登陆注册
10452500000003

第3章 An Affection for Cathedrals

from Holiday magazine, December 1965

Among the virtues and vices that make up the British character, we have one vice, at least, that Americans ought to view with sympathy. For they appear to be the only people who share it with us. I mean our worship of the antique. I do not refer to beauty or even historical association. I refer to age, to a quantity of years. Provided a public man is old enough, we forgive him any folly. Provided a building is old enough, we discount ugliness, discomfort, dirt, and employ a special government department to shore it up. All the religious revolutions of the last five hundred years have affected only the top half of our minds, and left us with a little of the medieval attitude towards relics deep in our British unconscious. This is the most harmless thing left there; but still, it conditions our aesthetic attitudes.

For what is a work of art? Is it the form or the substance? 'Both,' we feel, when we think about it at all, 'but if we must choose, give us the substance.'

There was much outcry when our National Gallery began to clean the dirt of centuries off the old masters. We had got used to being able to catch no more than a glimpse of the original, and to viewing great art, as it were, on a dark and foggy night. Perhaps we felt the Master had said, 'It looks rather gaudy now—but wait for five hundred years till it's really dirty and then you'll be able to enjoy it properly.'

Stone that has mouldered out of shape is left just so. We do not believe that a reconstruction, a filling of the old form with new material, would result in anything genuine. We prefer a lump of the original stone, against which we lean a notice saying: 'Such a work of art as this is irreplaceable. Please do not touch.' On the other hand, one of the most beautiful churches in my part of the country, for which we have to thank an eccentric nobleman of the nineteenth century, is an accurate reproduction of an eleventh-century church in the south of France. Yet no one goes to see it; as if we ought to be moved, not by repeated performances of a symphony, but only by the first, with the composer conducting.

A ludicrous belief, you will agree; and yet I must admit, against all sense and reason, that I share it. The truth is, we have a primitive belief that virtue, force, power—what the anthropologist might call mana—lie in the original stones and nowhere else. Yet we must know these stones; they must be part of daily life so that we may have adjusted some sensor to the correct wavelength for reception, as you might adjust your eyes to a dim light.

Our old churches are full of this power. I do not refer to their specifically religious function or influence. There is a whole range of other feelings that have, so to speak, coagulated around them. These feelings are worth analysing and the analysis might help us to understand ourselves. I think particularly of the two English cathedrals I know well—Winchester and Salisbury. I can hold models of them each in my head, weighing them against each other. Let me give Winchester every advantage I can think of.

Winchester has had three cathedrals on the same site; and probably a pagan temple before that, since there is a sacred and pre-Christian well in the crypt. Even the present building, begun in the eleventh century, is the accretion of at least four hundred years of construction and four styles of architecture. The city was once England's capital; so the cathedral is stocked with the graves of kings, queens, cardinals and archbishops—a most distinguished crowd who contribute historical perspective. In a desire—which we British understand if no one else does—to share a roof with these top people, hundreds of commoners and minor nobilities have crowded in and got themselves buried in the less fashionable parts of the building. Here, the very stones speak to you in English or Latin or Greek. What they have to say varies from the pathetic to the mildly funny. What precisely is implied by the inscription to Davis Williams D.C.L.? All we are told of him is that

IN THIS CATHEDRAL

HIS POWERFUL AND MELODIOUS VOICE

WAS SINGULARLY IMPRESSIVE.

But I must confess that my favourite is a Royal Navy inscription, stiff-upperlipped, a masterpiece of understatement to

WILLIAM CARMICHAEL FORREST

1ST LIEUTENANT H.M.S. DOTEREL

WHO LOST HIS LIFE BY THE ACCIDENTAL

EXPLOSION OF THE SHIP'S MAGAZINE

AND CONSEQUENT FOUNDERING

OF THE SHIP.

To saunter and read these is a quiet pleasure. One does not need much scholarship to feel the pathos in the memorial of those children

IN ORIENTALI INDIA HEU! LONGE

A PARENTIBUS SEPULTARUM.

You may find your lips twitching at the quotation thought apt for Jane Austen, our demure satirist of English life:

'SHE OPENETH HER MOUTH WITH WISDOM;

AND IN HER TONGUE IS THE LAW OF KINDNESS.'

Doctor Johnson gave it as his opinion that in a lapidary inscription, no man is on oath, but one feels that Miss Austen might have been better accommodated with some other quotation from the Scriptures.

For a Winchester man, might mana reside in the statuary? Winchester is crowded with statues. Like the inscriptions, some of them are funny. Those marble parliamentarians, those gesticulating statesmen of the eighteenth century seem to have nothing to do with religion or death. Are they perhaps persons who stepped inside to shelter from sudden rain and had so gross an ignorance of the nature of the place that they harangued the high altar; and were struck so, justly, as an example to those who come after? Sometimes the dust of commoners has taken a revenge and lies on those aristocratic noses to make clowns or masks of them, so that a whole splendid monument seems to hold up nothing but the face of zany. Time has taken an even neater revenge on my favourite Winchester statue. He is a seventeenth-century nobleman, just about to set out on a stroll or enter some drawing room. You can see every hair of his wig, every thread of his lace, see even the pattern woven into his silk coat—see, still, the narcissistic smugness written in every line of his complacent face. Below him is the inscription which was to proclaim his lineage and his virtues. But here is the joke: you cannot read a word of it. Some statues carry modern, explanatory notices; but no one has cared to tamper with the anonymity of this alabaster gentleman. There is a gleeful conspiracy to keep him in the state to which the decay of monuments has called him.

Of course, not all Winchester statues are laughable. At the east end is a tiny bronze statue of William Walker, raised by public subscription. He was a diver; and at the beginning of this century when the building was in danger of collapsing into its own soggy foundations, he worked daily for six years, in slime and stinking darkness, until he had underpinned the walls and made the cathedral safe. Winchester thinks highly of him.

Then there is a figure in its own chantry—a small room or chapel where it was intended that mass should be said in perpetuity for the owner's soul. The whole thing looks like a gigantic four-poster; and the figure lies there in bed, apparently asleep. No expense has been spared. The figure is not only carved but enamelled and deceives the eye, as do the waxworks of Madame Tussaud. Even the cardinal's red hat is exact, though stone. To the thoughtful eye, this is not a Christian tomb at all. It resembles an Egyptian one, with a figure provided as an eternal home for the ka, the life spirit. Indeed, the apparent security of the figure is no more than a desperate attempt to cheat death, a last throw made by a man who had some considerable acquaintance with sin. This is the tomb of Henry Beaufort, a political churchman, chancellor of England, and so on, whose deathbed in 1447 was one of the most terrible recorded. He tried, in his delirium, to bribe death to pass him by. Shakespeare makes articulate what lies behind the calm figure and the cardinal's hat:

If thou be'st death, I'll give thee England's treasure,

Enough to purchase such another island,

If thou wilt let me live—

It is an eerie tomb; and not all its huddling as near as possible to the shrine of Saint Swithin can keep me comfortable if I stand in that part of the cathedral. If this is mana—and I do not think it is—I can do without it. Not the tomb of William Rufus, placed with kingly indifference to the convenience of others, on the centre line of the building so that processions have to divide around it; not those blue-and-gilt coffers with their loads of ecclesiastical and royal bones placed on the surround of the sanctuary; indeed not even Winchester City with its Round Table, its ancient school and holy well can give me what I get from more familiar stones in Salisbury.

I am not the only one who feels so. A few days ago I walked in Winchester Cathedral behind two people from Salisbury. The cathedrals are only twenty-five miles apart and Winchester is the richer. But these ladies from Salisbury did not find it so. Somewhere on the downland road that links the two cities, they had passed an invisible barrier and found themselves outside their own diocese. Winchester, they felt—Winchester, once England's capital—was provincial. What were cardinals and Kings to put against Poore, Longespee, Herbert and Hooker? The stones of Winchester were the wrong shape and the wrong sort. I had begun to eavesdrop in a spirit of kindly amusement, but I found myself to my astonishment agreeing with them. I had come, as I often do, to admire Winchester and be affectionate to it; and it took these ladies to bring me to my senses. I knew I had always felt as they did but had never had the self-awareness to admit it. Winchester is made of the wrong stone. It is the wrong shape. It stands on a slope, and it has no spire.

Driving home across the downs, I was now prepared for the invisible barrier, and heard a distinct 'Ping!' as I passed through it. The barrier was the exact point where Salisbury and Winchester influences were balanced. Like a space probe passing from moon's gravity to earth's gravity I was now hurrying faster and faster towards my own experiences of mana. I do not live in the close; but I was going home, and I was going home to the cathedral.

Fifteen miles away you can feel the cathedral begin to pull. It seems ageless as the landscape. You sense that the rivers run towards it, the valleys opening out, each to frame the spike of the spire. As for the roads, where else should they lead? Even today, though motor traffic is imposing a new pattern on the old one, you can see how the tracks make deeply for the spire and draw together at the ancient bridge just outside the close. It has been a long, steady work, this influencing of the landscape, this engraving and rubbing out, this adjusting and twitching of a whole country into place. And mana, however subtle, however indefinable, has at least one quality that aligns it with other forces: it varies inversely as the square of the distance. Fifteen miles away it begins to pull; but stand close to the walls and you feel you might click against them like a nail to a magnet.

A critic may bring up the sane, sad theory that you feel this way because the cathedral has become part of your life, and that mana is no more than familiarity. Of course there is something in this. Your mind becomes stocked with memories enough to fill the huge building itself. There are vistas you remember as a graded series of pictures, because you first walked there when you clung to your mother's hand. A particular Salisbury monument comes to my mind in three sizes; one when I looked up to it, one when I saw it at eye level, and one, alas, when I stand and look down. There have been the great occasions, celebrations of victory, when orchestras have played and massed choirs sung. There are grotesque memories too—one of a flooded cathedral with a punt moving solemnly up the nave. There are memories of inexpressible beauty: a floodlit cathedral, a magic cathedral under the full moon; a bone white spire against the smoke from burning Dunkirk, with the lightning conductors glittering like emeralds; a rose-coloured cathedral, yet washed from below with the reflected whiteness of a million open daisies. There are memories of the cathedral when it seemed no more impressive than a barn. It is a splendid instrument for meteorology to play on, and never looks the same two days running. Yet meteorology is not mana.

Does it lie in our statues? We have not so many as Winchester since we have never been so central to affairs. What statues we have are mostly imperfect. The left wing of religion is always knocking our cathedrals about and the right wing makes them over-elaborate. The left wing, the iconoclasts of the seventeenth century, have left their trade-mark in the painted glass—or rather in the absence of it. What enraged them was a face; and sometimes you can see a saint in a window with plain glass where his face used to be. This must have been tremendous fun of course—think of breaking things and being virtuous into the bargain! You can see their like any day of the week in a newsreel, turning over cars and breaking shop windows. One inconoclast was so famous he even got the nickname 'Blue Dicky' for his skill in smashing painted glass with a pike, going from window to window, and as the chronicler says, 'rattling down their glassy bones'.

But there has been another specialist at work in Salisbury. He is nameless and timeless, but you can identify him by his individual psychosis. He cannot see a stone projection without wanting to break it off. Why, in Athens, in the year 415 BC, he was up all night, bashing away at—but that is another story and too indelicate for an essay on cathedrals. In a church he has to be content with noses. It is no good when you walk round Salisbury cathedral and look at our maimed figures to think of a slow decay. Stone noses don't fall off, particularly when an effigy lies on its back and its nose points at the vaulting. Each of these breakages represents an episode, a moment of time. It was darkish, I believe, and the cathedral as nearly deserted as may be, when the little man stole out of the shadows with his hammer. Bash! Clitter clatter! and he is away over the downs, fingering the stung place on his cheek where a minute fragment of Bishop Poore hit him, but giggling and jerking with a possibly sexual excitement which dies down gradually so that he broods on the great days in Italy and Greece, and that wonderful young time he had in Egypt, when statues were statues and you had to use a sledgehammer. He left our cathedral with hardly a nose in the place.

Yet he did not injure the building as much as indifference has injured it. In the eighteenth century the fabric was wholly neglected. Anyone who took his religion seriously was dismissed as an 'enthusiast', as damning a label as 'communist' is today. Significantly enough, the cross on the top of our spire was replaced by a useful weather-cock in that century; a mechanism, perhaps, by which the venal and indifferent canons regulated their affairs. If you read the statutes of the cathedral you will find that, during the eighteenth century, not one addition was made. Round about 1760, however, the canons got people to build houses in the close, and gave them a 199-year lease for nothing but the condition that when the lease expired the houses should become cathedral property. Today, these leases are running out and the exquisite houses reverting to the chapter. It was a superbly long-sighted stroke of business that makes Wall Street look like a kindergarten. But these same canons so neglected the cathedral structure that during a storm of about the same date as the leases, the great west window bellied like a sail in the wind, then burst.

Even so, it is arguable that restoration has done more harm to Salisbury Cathedral than indifference. In the late eighteenth century there came a man called James Wyatt. He swept away monuments or altered their position. We had chantries—Beauchamp and Hungerford—clapped like earmuffs on each side of the Lady Chapel. He took them away and re-erected them, one in a public park where children have kicked it to bits, the other in the grounds of a laundry. He pushed the old choir screen into a side chapel. He tore down and threw away the acres of painted glass that the iconoclasts had not reached, and filled the windows with clear glass that lets the daylight in; as if inviting anyone who should pray in the cathedral to do so with eyes open, lest he should be led astray by some sense of awe and mystery, and the feeling that a church is a different sort of place from anywhere else. Wyatt opened vistas in the vast interior as though the building were a gentleman's estate. He was part of the Gothic revival, which was neither Gothic nor a revival but a misunderstanding of a church's function and a misreading of history. The only good thing he did was to reveal the bones of the building itself. Salisbury Cathedral is unique in England because it was built all in one style, like Blenheim or the Crystal Palace.

Round about the year 1200, Bishop Poore was standing on a hill overlooking the confluence of the local rivers, according to legend, when the mother of Jesus appeared to him, told him to shoot an arrow and build her a church where the arrow fell. The arrow flew more than a mile and fell in the middle of a swamp. There, with complete indifference to such things as health, foundations, access and general practicability, the cathedral was built. Eighty years later, with a technological gamble which makes space travel seem child's play, the builders erected the highest spire in the country on top of it, thousands of tons of lead and iron and wood and stone. Yet the whole building still stands. It leans. It totters. It bends. But it still stands; and Wyatt stripped the building to the point where we can see the members of that ancient engineering as clearly as they may be seen in a bridge; so that a model of the cathedral, however small, is a pretty, even an exquisite thing. I have heard rumour that there is in fact a weight-bearing stratum in the swamp; but if there is, and the thing does not float by some miracle, the builders could not have known about it. So it stands, a perpetual delight, a perpetual wonder, with the whole of our little body politic shrugged into shape about it.

Perhaps the wonder is not so visible inside. There, you may be more conscious of the bending pillars, of Wyatt's daylight emptiness in which the soaring stone is too naked, too austere. Yet a Gothic cathedral is never quite without the quirkish and personal. The noseless bishops and knights on their tomb slabs preserve a timeless dignity; but a hundred feet above them squint the faces in which the medieval stonecutter recorded his opinion of the boss. It was never a flattering opinion, but always full of life, always contemporary, with the mordant immediacy of a political cartoon. Tourists seldom examine these faces because they have not the time; and some of these cartoons are nearly inaccessible. But if you have the hardihood to use your binoculars, it is astonishing how the faces leap down. You are looking straight at the life of seven hundred years ago, the life of the tavern and street, the sweaty, brawling, cruelly good-humoured life that later congregated on the Left Bank or in Greenwich Village; and still later was to be debauched finally by television and mass sales into respectability. You can look straight at the work of artists who would never be knighted or win an international prize. In these carvings is the integrity of an art that did not know temptation.

The tourists walk through. Conducted parties group to listen. Sightseers wander. At moments when there is no other noise, you hear always the showering sound of heels on stone. This slow drift goes on all day. If one of the daily services is in progress, part of the building is cut off symbolically by ropes of red silk stretched between pillars. Far off, inside the rope, the choir sings, or you hear the echoing versicles said, not sung, to a congregation of three or four in a dim side chapel. When the major services are held, such visitors as do not wish to take part but are only there to see what the inside of a cathedral looks like, stand grouped under the west windows, with wary vergers to see they don't turn their backs on the high altar. At these times you may see such richness and ritual as the church has retained or renewed from medieval times: gold crosses, candles, a robed choir, priests in glittering copes, bishops and deans in mitres. There will be processions: but in general they will reach the altar by the shortest route. For though the ambulatory is still there, its stones worn by the feet of ancient pomp, the church has rid itself of all that; and there is a perpetual wing of the church that regards even the lighting of one candle as a step toward the fires of Smithfield. When your meditation has got as far as that, you may turn back to the thought of Bishop Poore and his shining faith, with relief. Yes. Let Winchester keep its mixed architecture, its King Alfred, King William Rufus and Saint Swithin. Even though we have only Saint Osmund, a junior saint of whom next to nothing is known, and whose canonization was so much in debate it took centuries of diplomacy at Rome to get him recognized, nevertheless our building is a miracle of faith.

Yet this may have nothing to do with mana. A few years ago, when shapeless stones from Salisbury spire were piled on the cloisters, their replacements already in position four hundred feet overhead, you could have seen me stand and regard them with a strange and slightly sheepish, even furtive respect. They were just stone, you might say, that was all. They were not art, they were not architecture. They were a formless substance but I could not take my eyes off them. Did I not say we British prefer the substance if we must choose? The historian of religion might mutter about the stones that they were 'relics by contact'. But contact with what? It was mana, indescribable, unaccountable, indefinable, impossible mana. I think somewhat wryly how I stood the other day in the nave of Salisbury Cathedral, near a local cleric. He watched, with a kind of benevolent suspicion, as I held my hand close to a pillar, then moved it forward and back, like a man trying to find out if he has switched on the bars of an electric fire; but suspicion seemed to be winning over benevolence—so I went away.

同类推荐
  • The Unusual Suspects (The Sisters Grimm #2)
  • Who Goes There?

    Who Goes There?

    A distant, remote scientific expedition taking place at the North Pole is invaded by a space alien who has reawakened after lying dormant for centuries after a crash landing. A cunning, intelligent alien who can shape-shift, thereby assuming the personality and form of anything and anyone it destroys. Soon, it is among the men of the expedition, killing each in turn and replacing them by assuming their shape, lulling the scientists one by one into inattention (and trust) and eventually, their destruction. The shape-shifting, transformed alien can pass every effort at detection, and the expedition seems doomed until the scientists discover the secret vulnerability of the alien and are able to destroy it.
  • Our Lady of the Flowers

    Our Lady of the Flowers

    Our Lady of the Flowers', which is often considered to be Genet's masterpiece, was written entirely in the solitude of a prison cell. the exceptional value of the work lies in its ambiguity.
  • A Dirge for Princes (A Throne for Sisters—Book Fou

    A Dirge for Princes (A Throne for Sisters—Book Fou

    "Morgan Rice's imagination is limitless. In another series that promises to be as entertaining as the previous ones, A THRONE OF SISTERS presents us with the tale of two sisters (Sophia and Kate), orphans, fighting to survive in a cruel and demanding world of an orphanage. An instant success. I can hardly wait to put my hands on the second and third books!"--Books and Movie Reviews (Roberto Mattos)From #1 Bestseller Morgan Rice comes an unforgettable new fantasy series.In A DIRGE FOR PRINCES (A Throne for Sisters—Book Four), Sophia, 17, battles for her life, trying to recover from the wound left by Lady D'Angelica. Will her sister Kate's new powers be enough to bring her back?The ship sails with the sisters to the distant and exotic lands of their uncle, their last hope and only know connection to their parents. Yet the journey is treacherous, and even if they find it, the sisters don't know if their reception will be warm or hostile.
  • 发现 (龙人日志系列#8)

    发现 (龙人日志系列#8)

    在《发现》(《龙人日志》#8)中,凯特琳和迦勒在公元三十三年的古代以色列醒来,并惊讶地发现他们身处在基督生活的时代。古代以色列是一个充满圣地、古犹太教堂和失落的遗址的地方。这里是当时世界上精神控制最严密的地方——而在公元三十三年,也就是耶稣受难的那一年,是精神控制最严密的一年。在以色列首都耶路撒冷的中心座落着所罗门的圣殿,在圣殿里安置着至圣所和神的约柜。而耶稣将最终走过这些街道,走向最后的十字架。在罗马士兵以及他们的总督——本丢·比拉多的严密统治下,耶路撒冷充满有各种宗教背景和信仰的人们。这座城市也有隐秘的一面,有着众多错综复杂的街道和迷宫般的巷道,通往不为人知的秘密和异教徒神庙。现在,凯特琳终于有了四把钥匙,但是,她仍然需要找到她的父亲。她的追寻将她带到拿撒勒、伽百侬,带到耶路撒冷,带她追随着耶稣行过的踪迹去寻找秘密和线索的神秘踪迹。追寻也同样将她带到古老的橄榄山上,带到艾登和他的家族那里,带着她找到更多她从未知道的更强大的秘密和圣物那里。每经过一处,她的父亲就只有一步之遥。但是时间紧迫——山姆,被转向黑暗的一面,也穿越到这个时代,而且和邪恶家族的领袖Rexius联手。他们急起直追要阻止凯特琳得到盾。Rexius将不惜一切代价毁灭凯特琳和迦勒——有山姆在旁相助,身后有一支新生的军队,他胜券在握。更糟糕的是,斯嘉丽和她的父母走散了,独自一人穿越到这个时代。她独自一人,和露丝流浪在耶路撒冷的大街上,她渐渐发现了自己的力量,并发现自己比以前处在更危险得多的境地中——特别是当她发现自己也持有一个秘密的时候。凯特琳找到她父亲了吗?她找到古老的龙人之盾了吗?她和女儿重聚了吗?她的亲弟弟是不是企图杀死她?她和迦勒之间的爱能不能在这最后一场时光穿越中经受住考验?《发现》是《龙人日志》系列的第八本书(之前有《转变》、《爱》、《背叛》、《命中注定》、《渴望》、《订婚》和《誓言》)。本书同时也可以作为一本独立的小说来读。《发现》共约有71,000字。《龙人日志》#9-#10现在也有售!同时,摩根莱斯第一畅销书系列、反乌托邦、后启示录惊悚小说《幸存者三部曲》现也已有售;摩根莱斯第一畅销玄幻系列《魔法师戒指》(含10部,未完待续)现也已有售——此系列第一部《寻找英雄》,可免费下载!
热门推荐
  • 给女白领看的升职加薪书

    给女白领看的升职加薪书

    《给女白领看的升职加薪书》讲述了也许你极具才华,可是却遇到了各种各样的问题;或者作为新人,你遇到了恶魔一样的boss,或许你非常喜欢这份工作,却不知道如何展现自己,以博得上司的青睐;或许你无法继续现在的工作,想要寻找适合自己发展的地方.那么你应该怎么做呢?《给女白领看的升职加薪书》将从各个角度,阐释白领女性走向职场成功之路将会遇到的种种问题,旨在用经验之谈,帮助你走向更灿烂的明天。
  • 素元传

    素元传

    不知道你有没有爱过一个人,后知后觉,知道要失去时才怅然若失。前世她是一棵小槐树,他是滋养生灵的露元君,今生,他是一朝太子,而她刚好成了他的太子妃。她说,嫁给你太危险了,不想嫁。他说会用一世来护她周全,而他确实做到了。他说,等他回来,再帮他把没绣完的那块帕子绣完,可当他回来时,却收到她已葬身火海的噩耗。苏子奕步履轻轻地走进殿内,只见一个身姿曼妙的女子背对着他,迈着一双光洁的腿脚往池边走去,一头柔顺的青丝几乎覆盖住了她的整个后背。苏子奕赶紧收回眼睛,准备往外走。他就知道,这一次又是苏姑姑搞得鬼,看来在君素元有了身孕之前,她们是不会消停的。苏子奕走得太急,一不小心踢翻了地上的篮子。“谁!”君素元转身竟然看到苏子奕,吓得花容失色,“啊——”苏子奕一个飞身过去,想要捂住她的嘴巴,谁知刚跑到君素元身边,君素元脚底一滑,整个僵硬的身体都要倒到水里去了。苏子奕赶紧伸手抱着君素元,两人双双落水,激起阵阵浪花。
  • 死囚分析师

    死囚分析师

    为死囚而开发的软件。突破所有坚墙厚盾的程序。只为寻找谎言的技术。人之将死,其言真的必善?呼救的头颅、流血的公厕、双头怪、白斩人肉……一桩桩血案背后,不为人知的隐情,一件件隐藏于心,黑暗至极的秘密。死囚,究竟隐瞒了什么?将带入地狱的秘密,又有多可怕?
  • 大说世界吞灵异世新世世升天

    大说世界吞灵异世新世世升天

    主要是描述一个叫风独行的人。有特别的看法。不属于小说。不要用看小说的方法去看。不是按照看小说的情况去打的,必须用本文特有看法,如果不用,后果自负。
  • 红颜怒之女帝传

    红颜怒之女帝传

    君曾言“迟暮枯骨皆做陪”!我亦倾心“凤冠霞帔为君着”!亲人逝,挚爱亡,屋漏又缝连夜雨,蛇蝎美人毁其容,!恨悲欢,叹离别,两行清泪,何日君再来!红颜殇,风波起,鲜衣怒马江湖路,娇羞身姿战苍穹!一朝风云裂变,凤鸣九天谁与争锋!
  • 谋妃入瓮,冷王强宠下堂妻

    谋妃入瓮,冷王强宠下堂妻

    临死前,她方雪梅才知道自己这一世活的多么荒唐。她本以为作为罪臣之女被流放是她此生唯一的归宿,可天不亡她路遇流寇中箭最终倒在了梅林,他将她救起护她周全,原以为这是上天垂怜,却不料,他居然是当今圣上的十二皇子,一场秘密协定,她看着他另娶她人,一杯毒酒了此残生。再醒来,竟然重生为当朝尚书嫡女,这一次她要改写一切,让害她的人付出应有的代价。家族要护,大仇要报,江山帝位,也要分一杯羹。这辈子,且看谁斗得过谁!她容颜清丽,绝世无双,心却如冬日最冷的寒冰。“方雪梅你听着,我只要你,若无你,这江山这权势我要有何用,你这一生一世都休想逃掉。”--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 夏有乔木:雅望天堂3

    夏有乔木:雅望天堂3

    十岁,单单母亲重病在床,父亲却带着私生子单依安堂而皇之地进入家门。单单出钱请人绑架单依安为母亲出气,却反被抢钱欺负,幸好被从学校逃课的唐小天所救。十四岁,单单在美国街头遇见满身仇恨的唐小天,原来此刻他青梅竹马的初恋舒雅望被人玷污。从此她开始了一场不可能的单恋:她十八岁表白被拒;二十四岁以为得到幸福,却亲眼看见刺骨的真相;二十六岁她因爱生恨,差点亲手将他最爱的女孩推下深渊……这是一个爱的疯狂,追的执着,恨的竭斯底里,毁的彻底的故事。
  • 家有一个兵

    家有一个兵

    大清早,九兰刚进茅房解裤带还未蹲下,低矮的土墙外发出一声凄厉的嚎叫:家有一个兵,我是光荣军属呢……是疯家公老木在嚎!九兰差点尿了裤子,胡乱系紧裤带飞奔出茅房就傻眼了,已疯十余年的家公独自住在老木屋里,近几日感冒卧床不起,昨晚还大病恹恹的,今早行动奔走怎么就如常人?况且,他怀里还抱着红木箱子。红木箱子可是小牛的命根子,谁也不能乱动,包括九兰。小牛用油布把箱子包裹起来塞进床底,自己也从未打开过,挂在扣皮上的那把锁已生了锈。九兰惊魂未定,她刚从房间出来进茅厕,老木轻飘飘的就来了,鬼神一样。
  • 中国古代文人传说

    中国古代文人传说

    读文人传说故事可以给我们以美的享受,许多故事本身就如诗如画,令我们读了如临其境,如闻其声;读文人传说故事还可以提升我们的生活品位,使我们的心灵得到美的陶冶。当然读文人传说故事最大的收益是可以使我们增长智慧,特别是那些文人墨客之间的唱和往还,文人墨客与官僚政客之间斗智斗勇,与风尘女子们的恩恩爱爱,与僧侣、道士之间的友谊与纠缠,这些传说故事从多角度、多侧面展现了当时那些时代的丰富生活画卷,从某种意义上来讲,它们比真实的历史更生动,也更全面,比真实历史更能使我们得到教益和收获,也是更能令我们感动的活教材。
  • 星际修仙时代

    星际修仙时代

    这是一个科技与修真共同发展的时代。在这么绚烂的世界里,苏醒的灵魂开始迎刃而上上——(备注:本文无男主,无CP)