登陆注册
4699800000052

第52章 IMPEACHMENT REPORTED TO THE SENATE.(11)

And in answer to the eleventh article, this respondent denies that on the 18th day of August, in the year 1866, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, he did, by public speech or otherwise, declare or affirm, in substance or at all, that the thirty-ninth Congress of the United States was not a Congress of the United States authorized by the constitution to exercise legislative power under the same, or that he did then and there declare or affirm that the said thirty-ninth Congress was a Congress of only part of the States in any sense or meaning other than that ten States of the Union were denied representation therein; or that he made any or either of the declarations or affrmations in this behalf, in the said article alleged, as denying or intending to deny that the legislation of said thirty-ninth Congress was valid or obligatory upon this respondent, except so far as this respondent saw fit to approve the same; and as to the allegation in said article, that be did thereby intend or mean to be understood that the said Congress had not power to propose amendments to the Constitution, this respondent says that in said address he said nothing in reference to the subject of amendments of the Constitution. nor was the question of the competency of the said Congress to propose such amendments, without the participation of said excluded States. at the time of said address in any way mentioned or considered or referred to by this respondent. nor in what he did say had he any intent regarding the same, and he denies the allegation so made to the contrary thereof. But this respondent, in further answer to, and in respect of, the said allegations of the said eleventh article hereinbefore traversed and denied, claims and insists upon his personal and official right of freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, and his duty in his political relations as President of the United States to the people of the United States in the exercise of such freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, in the same manner, form and effect as he has in this behalf stated the same in his answer to the said tenth article, and with the same effect as if he here repeated the same; and he further claims and insists, as in said answer to said tenth article he has claimed and insisted, that he is not subject to question, inquisition, impeachment, or inculpation, in any form or manner, of or concerning such rights of freedom of opinion or freedom of speech or his alleged exercise thereof.

And this respondent further denies that on the 21st day of February, in the year 1868, or at any other time, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, in pursuance of any such declaration as is in that behalf in said eleventh article alleged, or otherwise, he did unlawfully, and in disregard of the requirement of the Constitution that he should take care that the laws should be faithfully executed, attempt to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act regulating the tenure of certain civil offices," passed March 2, 1867, by unlawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means by which he should prevent Edwin M. Stanton from forthwith resuming the functions of Secretary for the Department of War, or by lawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1868, and for other purposes,"approved March 2, 1867, or to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States," passed March 2, 1867.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that he has, in his answer to the first article, set forth in detail the acts, steps, and proccedings done and taken by this respondent to and toward or in the matter of the suspension or removal of the said Edwin M. Stanton in or from the office of Secretary for the Department of War, with the times, modes, circumstances, intents, views, purposes, and opinions of official obligation and duty under and with which such acts, steps, and proceedings were done and taken; and he makes answer to this eleventh article of the matters in his answer to the first article, pertaining to the suspension or removal of said Edwin M.

Stanton, to the same intent and effect as if they were here repeated and set forth.

And this deponent, further answering the said eleventh article, denies that by means or reason of anything in said article alleged, this respondent, as President of the United States, did, on the 21st day of February, 1868, or at any other day or time.

commit, or that he was guilty of, a high misdemeanor in office.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that the same and the matters therein contained do not charge or allege the commission of any act whatever by this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, nor the omission by this respondent of any act of official obligation or duty in his office of President of the United States; nor does the said article nor the matters therein contained name designate, describe, or define any act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance, or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance or means, whereby this respondent can know or understand what act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance, or means are imputed to or charged against this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, or intended so to be, or whereby this respondent can more fully or definitely make answer unto the said article than he hereby does.

And this respondent, in submitting to this honorable court this his answer to the articles of impeachment exhibited against him, respectfully reserves leave to amend and add to the same from time to time, as may become necessary or proper, and when and as such necessity and propriety shall appear.

Andrew Johnson Henry Stanbery, B. R. Curtis, Thomas A. R. Nelson, William M.

Evarts. W. S. Groesbeck. Of Counsel.

同类推荐
  • 修西闻见录

    修西闻见录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • Agamemnon

    Agamemnon

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 六十种曲目录

    六十种曲目录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 证道歌

    证道歌

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 續夷堅志

    續夷堅志

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 再造唐朝:郭子仪

    再造唐朝:郭子仪

    公元697年,一个可爱健壮的男婴诞生在华州郑县郭家老宅里,谁也没想到,四十年后,风雨飘摇的大唐帝国要靠他力挽狂澜!他就是唐朝著名的军事家、政治家郭子仪。
  • 重生:青葱岁月

    重生:青葱岁月

    如果能够回到那段青葱岁月,你会干什么?是好好放肆一回,不再辜负曾经逝去的青春,还是努力学习,好好的做一个学霸千金?重活一世,原本受尽欺辱,性格懦弱的季小北决定不再顺从,不再随波逐流。既然来了,那么便好好的疯狂一回吧!江別月,顾凉薄,前世你们所带给我的痛苦,今生我必然加倍还来。不管别人,这是季小北内心最真实的想法。这一世,她不再懦弱,不再受人欺压了!
  • 血凤刀

    血凤刀

    这是一部新武侠风格的作品。故事以主人公史子砚为父报仇为主线,重现那个门派纷争,恩怨纠缠,动人心魄的时代。期间既有热血的战斗,也有阴险的算计,更有青年男女暧昧的情仇。
  • 傲娇的谢先生

    傲娇的谢先生

    时温从来不知道有一个人喜欢她喜欢到那样疯狂的地步。可是她宁愿不知道啊。“你发现了我最大的秘密,时温,你说我是把你吞入腹中还是融入血液中。”时温抵着他的胸膛,讪讪地笑了笑:“谢总,你认错人了吧,我不叫时温,我叫温时。”谢晔附在耳边,嘴角缓缓勾起,声音低沉蛊惑,“是么,既然如此,温小姐,有关你侵犯了我太太的肖像权的事,请你陪我去警局走一趟。”时温震惊地瞪着他,“凭什么,长得像有错吗?”谢晔勾起她的一缕头发,在手指上环绕着,漫不经心道:“本来是没错,但是……偷了我的心,就是有错了。我这人护短,如果温小姐当着记者的面承认你是我太太,我就不追究温小姐的过错。”时温:“………”
  • 千佛杀

    千佛杀

    奚朝元康三年四月,安阳巡抚梁恒突然暴毙而亡,死因不明。皇帝擢安阳辖下通州府府尹徐远松接任巡抚一职。徐远松接任不足一月,也暴毙而亡。死因,也不明。皇帝决定起复已退休的老臣白鹤。白鹤说自己年迈无力,恐有违皇帝的重托,不能履任;但推荐自己十九岁的小孙子白小舟替他去当巡抚。
  • 神器快穿:仙尊,契约吧!

    神器快穿:仙尊,契约吧!

    一个是仙界仙尊,一个是末世少女,当机缘巧合,让他们相遇,穿梭于不同的时空位面之中,会经历些什么呢?这是一对绑定人生的主人公穿梭位面,成长修炼的故事;这也是两个人从相伴到相知相恋的故事
  • 十七史蒙求

    十七史蒙求

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 灰姑娘的千亿保镖

    灰姑娘的千亿保镖

    千亿继承人冷语豪,不好好在家吃香喝辣,却屁颠屁颠地做连饭都吃不起的周芸熙贴身保镖?是阴谋诡计还是闲得蛋疼?感谢阅文书评团提供书评支持!!
  • 归来之专揍纨绔

    归来之专揍纨绔

    纨绔放言,不允许有他这么牛气的人存在。然后,好像就没有然后了……
  • 战神再生之兵不血刃

    战神再生之兵不血刃

    本文为《龙焱》、《全职特工》、《最强雇佣兵》姊妹篇与相关故事的延伸,致敬所有为民族复兴默默奉献的无名英雄。读书交流群:244577168,有问题来群里讨论。