登陆注册
4699800000074

第74章 A CONFERENCE HELD AND THE FIRST VOTE TAKEN.(1)

A few days prior to the day set for taking the vote on the several Articles of Impeachment, and after the conclusion of testimony, it was proposed that there be a private session for conference of the Senate on a day named, May 11th, to give Senators an opportunity to declare themselves on the pending impeachment.

Neither the precise object or the utility of a conference were then apparent, but the result was somewhat of a surprise to those who had, up to that time, been undoubtingly confident of the President's conviction. Comparatively few Senators had previously declared their position. Very few, if any of the Republican Senators had indicated a disposition to vote against any of the articles, but the silence of a number of them, and their refusal to commit themselves even to their associates, was a source of uneasiness in Senatorial Impeachment circles. Hence, possibly, the suggestion of a "conference."It was taken for granted that every Democratic Senator would vote against the impeachment. But the idea was not to be entertained that the "no" votes would extend beyond the Democratic coterie of twelve. There were, however, anxious misgivings as to that. There was too much silence--too much of saying nothing when so little that might be said would go so far to relieve an oppressive anxiety.

So a session for "conference" was ordered and held, much to the surprise of gentlemen whose silence had become somewhat oppressive, and was becoming equally painful to those who wanted a conference." It savored of an attempt to "poll the Senate" in advance of judgment. It was resolved at the session of May 7th, to hold a session for deliberation on the following Monday, May 11th. The most surprising development of that session was the weakness of the bill of indictment at the very point where it was apparently strongest--the first Article. Two conspicuous and influential Senators--Messrs. Sherman of Ohio, and Howe of Wisconsin--declared, and gave convincing reasons therefor, that they would not vote for the impeachment of Mr. Johnson on that Article.

In his remarks on this occasion, after giving a history of the enactment of the Tenure-of-Office law, the first section of which specifically excepts from its operation such members of Mr.

Johnson's Cabinet as had been appointed by Mr. Lincoln and still remaining, though not recommissioned by Mr. Johnson, Mr. Sherman said:

I can only say as one of the Senate conferees, under the solemn obligations that now rest upon us in construing this Act, that Idid not understand it to include members of the Cabinet not appointed by the President, and that it was with extreme reluctance and only to secure the passage of the bill that, in the face of the votes of the Senate I agreed to the report LIMITING AT ALL the power of the President to remove heads of Departments. * * * I stated explicitly that the Act as reported did not protect from removal the members of the Cabinet appointed by Mr. Lincoln, that President Johnson might remove them at his pleasure; and I named the Secretary of war as one that might be removed. * * * I could not conceive a case where the Senate would require the President to perform his great executive office upon the advice and through heads of Departments personally obnoxious to him, and whom he had not appointed, and, therefore, no such case was provided for. * * * Can I pronounce the President guilty of crime, and by that vote aid to remove him from his high office for doing what I declared and still believe he had a legal right to do. God forbid: * * * What the President did do in the removal of Mr. Stanton he did under a power which you repeatedly refused to take from the office of the President--a power that has been held by that officer since the formation of the Government. and is now limited only by the words of an Act, the literal construction of which does not include Mr. Stanton. * * * It follows, that as Mr. Stanton is not protected by the Tenure-of-Civil-Office Act, his removal rests upon the Act of 1789, and he according to the terms of that Act and of the commission held by him, and in compliance with the numerous precedents cited in this cause, was lawfully removed by the President, and his removal not being contrary to the provisions of the Act of March 2nd 1867, the 1st, 4th, 5th, and 6th Articles, based upon his removal, must fail.

On this point, Mr. Howe said:

If Mr. Stanton had been appointed during the present Presidential term. I should have no doubt he was within the security of the law. But I cannot find that, either in fact or in legal intendment, he was appointed during the present Presidential term. It is urged that he was appointed by Mr. Lincoln, and such is the fact. It is said that Mr. Lincoln's term is not yet expired. Such I believe to be the fact. But the language of the proviso is, that a Secretary shall hold not during the term of MAN by whom he is appointed, but during the TERM of the PRESIDENTby whom he may be appointed. Mr. Stanton was appointed by the President in 1862. The term of that President was limited by the Constitution. It expired on the 4th of March, 1865. That the same incumbent was re-elected for the next term is conceded, but I do not comprehend how that fact extended the former term.

Entertaining these views, and because the first Article of the Impeachment charges the order of removal as a violation of the Tenure-of-Office Act, I am constrained to hold the President not guilty upon that Article.

同类推荐
  • SILAS MARNER

    SILAS MARNER

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 海印昭如禅师语录

    海印昭如禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 游四明山刘樊二真人

    游四明山刘樊二真人

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 上清金阙帝君五斗三一图诀

    上清金阙帝君五斗三一图诀

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 雅言

    雅言

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 徒弟都是债(四)

    徒弟都是债(四)

    桃林下摆好了桌椅和茶水,我过去时,正好看到一袭青袍的伟岸背影,他正负着手看眼前灼灼芳华。蜀山那尾小景鲤很恭敬地伴在一边,竹笛别在腰间,见我从树林里出来,忙又恭敬地喊了一声:“师叔祖。”背对着我的飘涯子这才转过身,一双沉淀如深潭的眸子望了过来,面容如昔,略显沧桑,不过衬着一身的掌门气势,还是颇有威严的。我让自己笑了一笑:“师兄。”
  • 蚁族:北京生存日记

    蚁族:北京生存日记

    来京刚满一年的北漂青年车厘子,励志告别“火柴盒公寓”。她打算整租一套三室一厅,做二房东,并为此押上了全部积蓄。就在找房成功,交付订金的第二天,车厘子丢了工作。一手租房子,一手找工作,车厘子的“滑铁卢七月”就这样开始。在这个过程当中,车厘子遇见了挣扎浮沉在北京的各色人等……林林总总,众生百态,共同组成了一个漂泊者眼中的北京。
  • 九玄神祖

    九玄神祖

    叮!【恭喜宿主绑定系统!】叮!【恭喜宿主完成任务获得新手礼包!】叮!【多余的雷劫需要宿主来抗,请不要逃避!】什么鬼?居然要宿主抗雷劫!!!
  • 岁岁常欢

    岁岁常欢

    威风凛凛的卫将军竟然怕狗?卫忧算是看出来了,小美人儿只对两件事儿感兴趣:刺绣和养狗。小美人儿看都不看自己一眼,这可如何是好!!青铜雄狮灯台旁,卫忧侧首看了一眼缩在角落里吐着大红舌头的肥狗。僵硬地垂首,剑眉微蹙,瞅了一眼骨节分明的长指间的小小绣花针,满目纠结,痛苦地闭上眼睛,想着对自己温柔冷淡的美人儿,咬咬牙,猛地睁眼,认命地在鸳鸯绣绷上戳了起来。身边的侍卫实在看不下去了,抬手擦擦额边的冷汗,低声献策:“爷,不如请个绣娘?”某人闻言,冷冷地瞪了他一眼:“本将军在你眼中如此不堪?”笑话!请绣娘?!让他将军的脸面往哪搁?!!终于,大功告成的卫将军欢欢喜喜地策马前往云绣坊。寂静的绣室中,绿衣女子微低螓首,玉指翩飞。一条大白狗枕着女子的绣鞋好梦,卫忧僵在原地,对上女子如水般的眸光,轻扯嘴角,硬着头皮道:“云欢姑娘,在下夜以继日绣得一幅鸳鸯图,可否指点一二?”看着男人展开那幅说是“小鸡啄米图”都勉强的“鸳鸯戏水图”,云欢:“……”男人仔细打量云欢的神色,见状不对赶忙岔开话题:“不愧是姑娘的狗,跟姑娘一般可爱…”云欢:“……”
  • 农村微型金融机构风险生成机理及控制路径研究

    农村微型金融机构风险生成机理及控制路径研究

    农村微型金融机构风险生成机理及控制路径研究农村微型金融机构风险生成机理及控制路径研究
  • 医手遮天,蛮妃太嚣张

    医手遮天,蛮妃太嚣张

    凌如烟幽幽醒来,只觉全身力气都被抽空。周身不能动弹,就连手指头动都费力,更别说睁开眼帘。她不在睡觉吗?怎么会这样,难怪遇到鬼了不成?朦胧的意识跟着渐渐变的明朗,对了,她跟师傅从科研所回来,又累又渴,就把研制不久的药液当水喝了。全身无力,难道是那药的作用?不对,那药明明是兴奋的?怎么会这样?“老大,这丫头这样也成?”粗野猥琐的声音传来,有只……
  • 索拉拉的飞天扫帚

    索拉拉的飞天扫帚

    女巫的故事太多太多了,但这本关于女巫的童话故事却能让你笑,让你哭,让你感动,让你温暖,让你沉思……偷梦小妖,开心魔法,看夕阳的斑纹贝……必将在你的记忆中画下重重的一笔!长雀斑的女巫、会魔法的姐姐、骑扫帚的索拉拉……
  • 微风暖余生

    微风暖余生

    我想余生和你一起,享受着微风拂面的暖。“沈子宸我不喜欢你了,所以你也不要喜欢我了。”苏清冲沈子宸喊到。…………这一场呼啸而过的岁月里,谁辜负了谁?
  • 争取做优秀的自己

    争取做优秀的自己

    耐心是等待时机成熟的一种成事之道,反之,人在不耐烦时,往往易变得固执己见,粗鲁无礼,而使别人感觉难以相处,更难成大事。当一个人失去耐心的时候,也失去了明智的头脑去分析事物。所以,做任何事,都要抱有一份耐心,先打好基础,筹划好资本,然后再着手行动。
  • 爱妃不要逃

    爱妃不要逃

    古画、血玉镯、姻缘果,冥冥之中的天意,前世今生未了的情缘……一幅古画,莫名其妙地将她带到一个陌生的时代,神秘老人的告戒,谁,才是与她订下今生的血玉镯主人?三个同样优秀的男子,她,该如何抉择?东望国烈王爷南宫烈,一个盛传好男色的王爷碰上了她,那个小小的姻缘果,真的可以给他带来一段良缘?南临国溯王爷云溯,误打误撞抓了她,也抓来了他一生的麻烦。失散多年的哥哥独孤继,爱上了一个不该爱的人,真的是他的不幸吗?当一切真相大白“她”会做出怎样的选择?前世之缘,能否再续?