登陆注册
4704900000052

第52章

SOCRATES: And naming is an art, and has artificers?

CRATYLUS: Yes.

SOCRATES: And who are they?

CRATYLUS: The legislators, of whom you spoke at first.

SOCRATES: And does this art grow up among men like other arts? Let me explain what I mean: of painters, some are better and some worse?

CRATYLUS: Yes.

SOCRATES: The better painters execute their works, I mean their figures, better, and the worse execute them worse; and of builders also, the better sort build fairer houses, and the worse build them worse.

CRATYLUS: True.

SOCRATES: And among legislators, there are some who do their work better and some worse?

CRATYLUS: No; there I do not agree with you.

SOCRATES: Then you do not think that some laws are better and others worse?

CRATYLUS: No, indeed.

SOCRATES: Or that one name is better than another?

CRATYLUS: Certainly not.

SOCRATES: Then all names are rightly imposed?

CRATYLUS: Yes, if they are names at all.

SOCRATES: Well, what do you say to the name of our friend Hermogenes, which was mentioned before:--assuming that he has nothing of the nature of Hermes in him, shall we say that this is a wrong name, or not his name at all?

CRATYLUS: I should reply that Hermogenes is not his name at all, but only appears to be his, and is really the name of somebody else, who has the nature which corresponds to it.

SOCRATES: And if a man were to call him Hermogenes, would he not be even speaking falsely? For there may be a doubt whether you can call him Hermogenes, if he is not.

CRATYLUS: What do you mean?

SOCRATES: Are you maintaining that falsehood is impossible? For if this is your meaning I should answer, that there have been plenty of liars in all ages.

CRATYLUS: Why, Socrates, how can a man say that which is not?--say something and yet say nothing? For is not falsehood saying the thing which is not?

SOCRATES: Your argument, friend, is too subtle for a man of my age. But I should like to know whether you are one of those philosophers who think that falsehood may be spoken but not said?

CRATYLUS: Neither spoken nor said.

SOCRATES: Nor uttered nor addressed? For example: If a person, saluting you in a foreign country, were to take your hand and say: 'Hail, Athenian stranger, Hermogenes, son of Smicrion'--these words, whether spoken, said, uttered, or addressed, would have no application to you but only to our friend Hermogenes, or perhaps to nobody at all?

CRATYLUS: In my opinion, Socrates, the speaker would only be talking nonsense.

SOCRATES: Well, but that will be quite enough for me, if you will tell me whether the nonsense would be true or false, or partly true and partly false:--which is all that I want to know.

CRATYLUS: I should say that he would be putting himself in motion to no purpose; and that his words would be an unmeaning sound like the noise of hammering at a brazen pot.

SOCRATES: But let us see, Cratylus, whether we cannot find a meeting-point, for you would admit that the name is not the same with the thing named?

CRATYLUS: I should.

SOCRATES: And would you further acknowledge that the name is an imitation of the thing?

CRATYLUS: Certainly.

SOCRATES: And you would say that pictures are also imitations of things, but in another way?

CRATYLUS: Yes.

SOCRATES: I believe you may be right, but I do not rightly understand you.

Please to say, then, whether both sorts of imitation (I mean both pictures or words) are not equally attributable and applicable to the things of which they are the imitation.

CRATYLUS: They are.

SOCRATES: First look at the matter thus: you may attribute the likeness of the man to the man, and of the woman to the woman; and so on?

CRATYLUS: Certainly.

SOCRATES: And conversely you may attribute the likeness of the man to the woman, and of the woman to the man?

CRATYLUS: Very true.

SOCRATES: And are both modes of assigning them right, or only the first?

CRATYLUS: Only the first.

SOCRATES: That is to say, the mode of assignment which attributes to each that which belongs to them and is like them?

CRATYLUS: That is my view.

SOCRATES: Now then, as I am desirous that we being friends should have a good understanding about the argument, let me state my view to you: the first mode of assignment, whether applied to figures or to names, I call right, and when applied to names only, true as well as right; and the other mode of giving and assigning the name which is unlike, I call wrong, and in the case of names, false as well as wrong.

CRATYLUS: That may be true, Socrates, in the case of pictures; they may be wrongly assigned; but not in the case of names--they must be always right.

SOCRATES: Why, what is the difference? May I not go to a man and say to him, 'This is your picture,' showing him his own likeness, or perhaps the likeness of a woman; and when I say 'show,' I mean bring before the sense of sight.

CRATYLUS: Certainly.

SOCRATES: And may I not go to him again, and say, 'This is your name'?--for the name, like the picture, is an imitation. May I not say to him--'This is your name'? and may I not then bring to his sense of hearing the imitation of himself, when I say, 'This is a man'; or of a female of the human species, when I say, 'This is a woman,' as the case may be? Is not all that quite possible?

CRATYLUS: I would fain agree with you, Socrates; and therefore I say, Granted.

SOCRATES: That is very good of you, if I am right, which need hardly be disputed at present. But if I can assign names as well as pictures to objects, the right assignment of them we may call truth, and the wrong assignment of them falsehood. Now if there be such a wrong assignment of names, there may also be a wrong or inappropriate assignment of verbs; and if of names and verbs then of the sentences, which are made up of them.

What do you say, Cratylus?

CRATYLUS: I agree; and think that what you say is very true.

SOCRATES: And further, primitive nouns may be compared to pictures, and in pictures you may either give all the appropriate colours and figures, or you may not give them all--some may be wanting; or there may be too many or too much of them--may there not?

CRATYLUS: Very true.

同类推荐
  • RUTH

    RUTH

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 大庄严经论

    大庄严经论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 绛雪园古方选注

    绛雪园古方选注

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 异辞录

    异辞录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 佛说辟除贼害咒经

    佛说辟除贼害咒经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 湘江之战(中国现代军事文学丛书)

    湘江之战(中国现代军事文学丛书)

    湘江战役红一方面军长征中,历经百战。但真正对全军生死攸关的当首推湘江之战。在中共的军史上,湘江战役是惨败。但是,毛泽东,周恩来作为红军的最高指挥官,为挽救整个中共和红军的命运功不可没,中共和红军从死亡线上走了出来。可以毫不夸张地讲,没有湘江边的这些勇士,就不会有毛泽东,共产党的天下。
  • 快穿之原来你是这样的宿主

    快穿之原来你是这样的宿主

    月老哪家强?“反派”红翎真“红娘”。————主神大人送关怀分界线————白羽:为什么最后一关是情劫?现任主神:弱水三千,只取一瓢饮,你这一瓢还是我掐指给算的,怎么样,够意思吧!白羽:......为什么叫“情劫”?(“劫”字咬着念)现任主神:呵呵~(意味深长)「历代主神惯例坑,我会告诉你?!」——————————————————2222:大猪蹄,看在宿主大大这么“在意”你的份上,人家…就大发慈悲地告诉你,加油,我知道你……可能……可以的!
  • 闪婚总裁宠甜妻

    闪婚总裁宠甜妻

    九年前因为一次赌约她招惹上了他,她以为这只是游戏,没想到自己越陷越深,可即便如此她还是抛弃了他九年后他无意间遇见了她用尽手段只为将她锁在自己的身边他说“乔伊伊我这五年来承受的痛苦,我会让你一一体会”她笑道“我奉陪到底。”
  • 绝色锋华:邪妃

    绝色锋华:邪妃

    她本是现代的半吊子挂鬼天师,因为抓错鬼搞乱了地府的人员流动,被丢去穿越。这是个以武为尊的世界,将门世家的废物三小姐惹是生非,不学无术,逃学爬墙摔死,再次醒来,她将彻底改变。什么惹是生非,都是被人陷害的。什么不学无术,纯粹是没有天赋。不过现在都不一样了,她要改变过去,做万人瞩目的天才。人不犯我,我不犯人,可惜这个世界上得罪她的人太多,那么就一一的讨回吧!她有个护短的爷爷,有个聪明的弟弟,有只自卑的魔兽,有个威武的心上人。
  • 玄天修仙录

    玄天修仙录

    在韩立飞升仙界无数万年之后,原本称霸小灵天的人族因为内战不断,而衰败下去,其他各异族却蠢蠢欲动。一个被逐出家族,身怀幻灵根的小修士,凭借自己的毅力跟智慧,在修仙界履历奇缘,从练气,筑基,一直到元婴期,最后凭借自己的神通,生生震慑住一干异族,重新确立了人族在此界的霸主地位,而通过韩立遗留在此界的空间通道,飞到到灵界之后。只是如今的灵界,在不负昔日的辉煌,主人公能否重镇灵界人族盛威,拭目以待。
  • 大自然神秘现象

    大自然神秘现象

    大海中为何会有一个被称为“魔鬼三角”的“平行世界”?叮咚泉水如何具有治病救人的灵气?终年冰雪覆盖的南极竟有暖水湖……动物的千年不死,植物的食人之谜,恐龙的突然灭绝,麦田圈的奇迹……大自然玄幻莫测,到处充满扑朔迷离的秘密。残缺的古垣,神秘的遗址:吴哥城、巴别塔、空中花园、玛雅文明……也许仍有失落的文明,在等待找寻。
  • 宠后欢喜记

    宠后欢喜记

    苏青青带着穿越神器穿越到南朝,嫁给同样穿越的皇帝刘逸之。皇后苏青青的日常:睡睡觉,喝喝茶,吃吃饭,逛逛御花园。皇帝刘逸之的日常:爱老婆,疼老婆,宠老婆,天天秀恩爱。
  • 律戒本疏

    律戒本疏

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 我其实是大佬

    我其实是大佬

    “叮!厨师等级提升,当前等级为2,奖励全属性+20!”“叮!炼金师等级提升,当前等级为5,奖励全属性+50.”“叮!......”当罗泽获得一个名为副职业系统的系统后,每次副职业升级都能得到全属性点的奖励,因此,他走上了成神之路......
  • 猎婚女才人

    猎婚女才人

    在这个真情越来越少的社会,真爱越来越难寻觅的时代;她辞去高薪工作,就是为了看到别人的成双成对,幸福美满;她作为觅爱猎婚公司的老板,七年来,确实成全千上万的单身男女,但是情缘似乎总是离她那么远。。。