登陆注册
4705400000085

第85章

George's Channel, than they begin to fill their bumpers to the glorious and immortal memory. They may truly boast that they look not at men, but at measures. So that evil be done, they care not who does it; the arbitrary Charles, or the liberal William, Ferdinand the Catholic, or Frederic the Protestant. On such occasions their deadliest opponents may reckon upon their candid construction. The bold assertions of these people have of late impressed a large portion of the public with an opinion that James the Second was expelled simply because he was a Catholic, and that the Revolution was essentially a Protestant Revolution.

But this certainly was not the case; nor can any person who has acquired more knowledge of the history of those times than is to be found in Goldsmith's Abridgement believe that, if James had held his own religious opinions without wishing to make proselytes, or if, wishing even to make proselytes, he had contented himself with exerting only his constitutional influence for that purpose, the Prince of Orange would ever have been invited over. Our ancestors, we suppose, knew their own meaning; and, if we may believe them, their hostility was primarily not to popery, but to tyranny. They did not drive out a tyrant because he was a Catholic; but they excluded Catholics from the crown, because they thought them likely to be tyrants. The ground on which they, in their famous resolution, declared the throne vacant, was this, "that James had broken the fundamental laws of the kingdom." Every man, therefore, who approves of the Revolution of 1688 must hold that the breach of fundamental laws on the part of the sovereign justifies resistance. The question, then, is this. Had Charles the First broken the fundamental laws of England?

No person can answer in the negative, unless he refuses credit, not merely to all the accusations brought against Charles by his opponents, but to the narratives of the warmest Royalists, and to the confessions of the King himself. If there be any truth in any historian of any party, who has related the events of that reign, the conduct of Charles, from his accession to the meeting of the Long Parliament, had been a continued course of oppression and treachery. Let those who applaud the Revolution and condemn the Rebellion, mention one act of James the Second to which a parallel is not to be found in the history of his father. Let them lay their fingers on a single article in the Declaration of Right, presented by the two Houses to William and Mary, which Charles is not acknowledged to have violated. He had, according to the testimony of his own friends, usurped the functions of the legislature, raised taxes without the consent of parliament, and quartered troops on the people in the most illegal and vexatious manner. Not a single session of parliament had passed without some unconstitutional attack on the freedom of debate; the right of petition was grossly violated; arbitrary judgments, exorbitant fines, and unwarranted imprisonments were grievances of daily occurrence. If these things do not justify resistance, the Revolution was treason; if they do, the Great Rebellion was laudable.

But it is said, why not adopt milder measures? Why, after the King had consented to so many reforms, and renounced so many oppressive prerogatives, did the Parliament continue to rise in their demands at the risk of provoking a civil war? The ship-money had been given up. The Star-Chamber had been abolished.

Provision had been made for the frequent convocation and secure deliberation of parliaments. Why not pursue an end confessedly good by peaceable and regular means? We recur again to the analogy of the Revolution. Why was James driven from the throne?

Why was he not retained upon conditions? He too had offered to call a free parliament and to submit to its decision all the matters in dispute. Yet we are in the habit of praising our forefathers, who preferred a revolution, a disputed succession, a dynasty of strangers, twenty years of foreign and intestine war, a standing army, and a national debt, to the rule, however restricted, of a tried and proved tyrant. The Long Parliament acted on the same principle, and is entitled to the same praise.

They could not trust the King. He had no doubt passed salutary laws; but what assurance was there that he would not break them?

He had renounced oppressive prerogatives but where was the security that he would not resume them? The nation had to deal with a man whom no tie could bind, a man who made and broke promises with equal facility, a man whose honour had been a hundred times pawned, and never redeemed.

Here, indeed, the Long Parliament stands on still stronger ground than the Convention of 1688. No action of James can be compared to the conduct of Charles with respect to the Petition of Right.

The Lords and Commons present him with a bill in which the constitutional limits of his power are marked out. He hesitates; he evades; at last he bargains to give his assent for five subsidies. The bill receives his solemn assent; the subsidies are voted; but no sooner is the tyrant relieved, than he returns at once to all the arbitrary measures which he had bound himself to abandon, and violates all the clauses of the very Act which he had been paid to pass.

For more than ten years the people had seen the rights which were theirs by a double claim, by immemorial inheritance and by recent purchase, infringed by the perfidious king who had recognised them. At length circumstances compelled Charles to summon another parliament: another chance was given to our fathers: were they to throw it away as they had thrown away the former? Were they again to be cozened by le Roi le veut? Were they again to advance their money on pledges which had been forfeited over and over again?

同类推荐
  • 太上赤文洞古经注

    太上赤文洞古经注

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 大随求即得大陀罗尼明王忏悔法

    大随求即得大陀罗尼明王忏悔法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 青崖集

    青崖集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 东茶记

    东茶记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 杂说

    杂说

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 花样美男之我是萝莉

    花样美男之我是萝莉

    我不过是在上课上看小说,就被老师请出了‘我的高中’啊,我这个悲催啊!从天而降的进校申请书,而且还是贵族学校?我也太好运了把,带着我的小说向这个所谓的最有钱最豪华的‘卡布奇诺’去看看。额,超级四美男?还要当他们的唯一女仆?妈咪咪啊,我怎么这么好运?!
  • 暗恋999次:男神宠上瘾

    暗恋999次:男神宠上瘾

    古人云:男追女,隔座山,女追男,隔层纱。这句话是哪个古人说的,请你出来,我想和你谈谈人生。白诺追许薄言那隔的哪是什么纱呀!那他么的是铁丝网,还是带电的那种!白诺追了许大神七年,再怎么贞洁烈女也该痒了。白诺:“男神,我要放弃你,别再互相伤害了!”许大神:“祸害我一个就够了,别去祸害别人了。“白诺:“…….“白诺:“许先生,我觉得我们有必要好好谈谈!“许大神:“除了谈恋爱,我们没什么好谈的。”白诺:“……“本文1v1,宠文,豪门,青梅竹马!请入坑!
  • 问花楼词话

    问花楼词话

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 爱杀了我们

    爱杀了我们

    眼前的男子面色和他身上的床单一样苍白,林染染随手拿起身边一颗苹果,缓慢地削起皮来。果皮一圈一圈垂下,就像这漫长等待的时光中,一点点下坠的心。“你打算什么时候醒来?”一个削好皮的苹果被摆放在男子的床头,林染染用小到只有自己能听到的声音说。一个人的喃喃自语,在这种幽静的环境下显得格外悲凉。“那你又准备等什么时候?”另一个人悄无声息地走进病房,还居然听清了林染染如梦呓的话,叹息着开口。林染染没有回头,而是依然看着病床上紧闭双眼的男子。她在等他,而他在等她。他们三个,都曾为爱死过一次。
  • 家有外星女友

    家有外星女友

    天上掉下个女友,却来自相距亿万光年的外星。穿越虫洞,宇宙文明画卷徐徐展开。跨越时空,少年肖锐踏上探索平行宇宙的浩瀚之旅。……书友群:647170951
  • 重生之奋斗人生

    重生之奋斗人生

    一不小心回到了2005年。这个年代房价不高,互联网不发达,城市建设落后。许阳带着十多年后的记忆回去,炒房炒股,写词卖歌。一不小心还当了非主流鼻祖。这是一段青春岁月,曾经的遗憾,就让这一世来弥补。一杯敬前世,一杯敬今生。
  • 女主修真手札

    女主修真手札

    她曾司掌轮回,高高在上,也曾幕天席地,不知归处。但命中注定,她必定为王!绛帻鸡人报晓筹,尚衣方进翠云裘。九天阊阖开宫殿,万国衣冠拜冕旒。日色才临仙掌动,香烟欲傍衮龙浮。朝罢须裁五色诏,佩声归到凤池头。
  • 我当神棍那些年

    我当神棍那些年

    神棍,是指耍弄玄虚手法假托鬼神的骗子。我没有耍弄玄虚,更没有假托鬼神,可还是被大多数不熟悉我的人叫我神棍,一切都因为我懂点道术......
  • 夫君未正名

    夫君未正名

    她喜欢独来独往,哪怕是娘亲也疏离于她,原以为,日子就这般淡如止水,哪料,姐姐身受毒害,无可奈何之际,她只好只身犯险潜往敌城,殊不知,途中巧遇并对自己施以援手之人,竟是那敌城之主。据传言,他临风玉树,文韬武略,却心狠手辣。--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 太上洞玄灵宝转神度命经

    太上洞玄灵宝转神度命经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。