登陆注册
4705700000005

第5章

SOCRATES: Very good; and is not this true, Crito, of other things which we need not separately enumerate? In questions of just and unjust, fair and foul, good and evil, which are the subjects of our present consultation, ought we to follow the opinion of the many and to fear them; or the opinion of the one man who has understanding? ought we not to fear and reverence him more than all the rest of the world: and if we desert him shall we not destroy and injure that principle in us which may be assumed to be improved by justice and deteriorated by injustice;--there is such a principle?

CRITO: Certainly there is, Socrates.

SOCRATES: Take a parallel instance:--if, acting under the advice of those who have no understanding, we destroy that which is improved by health and is deteriorated by disease, would life be worth having? And that which has been destroyed is--the body?

CRITO: Yes.

SOCRATES: Could we live, having an evil and corrupted body?

CRITO: Certainly not.

SOCRATES: And will life be worth having, if that higher part of man be destroyed, which is improved by justice and depraved by injustice? Do we suppose that principle, whatever it may be in man, which has to do with justice and injustice, to be inferior to the body?

CRITO: Certainly not.

SOCRATES: More honourable than the body?

CRITO: Far more.

SOCRATES: Then, my friend, we must not regard what the many say of us: but what he, the one man who has understanding of just and unjust, will say, and what the truth will say. And therefore you begin in error when you advise that we should regard the opinion of the many about just and unjust, good and evil, honorable and dishonorable.--'Well,' some one will say, 'but the many can kill us.'

CRITO: Yes, Socrates; that will clearly be the answer.

SOCRATES: And it is true; but still I find with surprise that the old argument is unshaken as ever. And I should like to know whether I may say the same of another proposition--that not life, but a good life, is to be chiefly valued?

CRITO: Yes, that also remains unshaken.

SOCRATES: And a good life is equivalent to a just and honorable one--that holds also?

CRITO: Yes, it does.

SOCRATES: From these premisses I proceed to argue the question whether I ought or ought not to try and escape without the consent of the Athenians: and if I am clearly right in escaping, then I will make the attempt; but if not, I will abstain. The other considerations which you mention, of money and loss of character and the duty of educating one's children, are, I fear, only the doctrines of the multitude, who would be as ready to restore people to life, if they were able, as they are to put them to death--and with as little reason. But now, since the argument has thus far prevailed, the only question which remains to be considered is, whether we shall do rightly either in escaping or in suffering others to aid in our escape and paying them in money and thanks, or whether in reality we shall not do rightly; and if the latter, then death or any other calamity which may ensue on my remaining here must not be allowed to enter into the calculation.

CRITO: I think that you are right, Socrates; how then shall we proceed?

SOCRATES: Let us consider the matter together, and do you either refute me if you can, and I will be convinced; or else cease, my dear friend, from repeating to me that I ought to escape against the wishes of the Athenians: for I highly value your attempts to persuade me to do so, but I may not be persuaded against my own better judgment. And now please to consider my first position, and try how you can best answer me.

CRITO: I will.

SOCRATES: Are we to say that we are never intentionally to do wrong, or that in one way we ought and in another way we ought not to do wrong, or is doing wrong always evil and dishonorable, as I was just now saying, and as has been already acknowledged by us? Are all our former admissions which were made within a few days to be thrown away? And have we, at our age, been earnestly discoursing with one another all our life long only to discover that we are no better than children? Or, in spite of the opinion of the many, and in spite of consequences whether better or worse, shall we insist on the truth of what was then said, that injustice is always an evil and dishonour to him who acts unjustly? Shall we say so or not?

CRITO: Yes.

SOCRATES: Then we must do no wrong?

CRITO: Certainly not.

SOCRATES: Nor when injured injure in return, as the many imagine; for we must injure no one at all? (E.g. compare Rep.)

CRITO: Clearly not.

SOCRATES: Again, Crito, may we do evil?

CRITO: Surely not, Socrates.

SOCRATES: And what of doing evil in return for evil, which is the morality of the many--is that just or not?

CRITO: Not just.

SOCRATES: For doing evil to another is the same as injuring him?

CRITO: Very true.

SOCRATES: Then we ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to any one, whatever evil we may have suffered from him. But I would have you consider, Crito, whether you really mean what you are saying. For this opinion has never been held, and never will be held, by any considerable number of persons; and those who are agreed and those who are not agreed upon this point have no common ground, and can only despise one another when they see how widely they differ. Tell me, then, whether you agree with and assent to my first principle, that neither injury nor retaliation nor warding off evil by evil is ever right. And shall that be the premiss of our argument? Or do you decline and dissent from this? For so I have ever thought, and continue to think; but, if you are of another opinion, let me hear what you have to say. If, however, you remain of the same mind as formerly, I will proceed to the next step.

CRITO: You may proceed, for I have not changed my mind.

SOCRATES: Then I will go on to the next point, which may be put in the form of a question:--Ought a man to do what he admits to be right, or ought he to betray the right?

CRITO: He ought to do what he thinks right.

同类推荐
  • 妇人大全良方

    妇人大全良方

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 农桑衣食撮要

    农桑衣食撮要

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 本草便读

    本草便读

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 礼忏文

    礼忏文

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 听歌二首

    听歌二首

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 格列佛游记(中小学生必读丛书)

    格列佛游记(中小学生必读丛书)

    英国杰出的讽刺作家斯威夫特的代表作,他以一个外科医生格列佛的口吻叙述了在航海时遇难、漂流到几个奇异国度的经历。
  • 田园谷香

    田园谷香

    重生农家小姑娘,家长里短是非多。家穷势薄遭人欺?不怕!有爹有娘有大哥哩!一家齐心好温暖,看咱带着家人奔小康。夫君?咳咳,伦家还木有想好挑哪个呢……**********************************感谢《锦医夜行》作者未眠君做的封面!
  • The Snare

    The Snare

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 太清经断谷法

    太清经断谷法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 万域灵神

    万域灵神

    一代霸主,惨遭背叛,被四十九个强者围攻,惨死万劫山,重活一次,他要再登巅峰;强势崛起,杀入乱星域,斩尽十万强者,悟生死杀道,冲击至高神位!
  • 俏皮军师之大学那点事

    俏皮军师之大学那点事

    她,是个活在二次元的腐女子。她,是个生在三次元的好闺蜜。她,人生只需要吃喝动漫便足以,而她,除了吃喝嫖赌骑射喷之外最重要的便是自家闺蜜的终身大事。大学那点事,一群人的胡搅盲缠一堆人的乐事趣事。哼哼,是谁说这二次元的腐女子就找不到三次元的真情感呢?看她这军师大人如果当这个俏皮红娘。
  • 倾世废凰:魔妃大人很妖娆

    倾世废凰:魔妃大人很妖娆

    一朝时空交错,21世纪杀手破空入府,俾睨天下。苍生万物,宛若蝼蚁,唯有她高悬其上,主宰一切。陋颜废柴如何?她自是上斗姨娘下斥庶妹,横眉冷对千夫指。刀尖舔血又如何?她也能左拥魔众右养暗兵,凭孤胆势不可挡。就算命贱如蒲草,她也誓要缠毁一个盛世王朝!
  • 与杀手为邻

    与杀手为邻

    《与杀手为邻》选自希区柯克短篇故事集,包括《与杀手为邻》《白痴的证词》《逍遥法外》等十余篇短篇小说,文字简洁平实,情节曲折跌宕,结局却出人意料,并且往往让读者有一种身临其境的感觉。小说具有较高的可读性,富于现代特点,符合当下阅读习惯及阅读趋向,颇受年青一代欢迎。
  • 文化产业比较案例

    文化产业比较案例

    本书是中国第一部文化产业比较案例图书,为“比较文化产业学”的举旗之作。在文化产业纵深发展的中国,对文化产业进行具体问题具体分析的案例比较,无论对文化产业实践还是文化产业学科建设都具有极其重要的意义。本书精心搜罗国内外多方面文化产业比较案例,并加以深入解析,既可作为文化产业学科教材或教辅资料,又是文化产业管理者、从业者、研究者和对文化产业感兴趣的普通读者不可多得的参考书。本书分国际视域、区域比较、文化传媒、文化体验四大部分,宏观与微观相结合,理论与实际相交融,对策思路与问题剖析相贯通,反面教训与正面启示相互验证,深入浅出,图文并茂,兼具较强的学理性与可读性。
  • 爱后余生

    爱后余生

    顾潇潇觉着,掌管人间姻缘的某位老神仙定是看自己十分的不爽。活了小半辈子,好容易心动一次,没成想,对方还是个身患“面瘫症晚期”的洋葱男!一路披荆斩棘,差点拼了小命,最终修成了正果,心满意足的抱得美男归,却发现原来自己只是充当了别人的替身……