登陆注册
4707200000193

第193章

The second volume of Lyell's "Principles of Geology" was published in January, 1832, and Darwin's copy (like that of the other two volumes, in a sadly dilapidated condition from constant use) has in it the inscription, "Charles Darwin, Monte Video. Nov. 1832." As everyone knows, Darwin in dedicating the second edition of his Journal of the Voyage to Lyell declared, "the chief part of whatever scientific merit this journal and the other works of the author may possess, has been derived from studying the well-known and admirable "Principles of Geology".

In the first chapter of this second volume of the "Principles", Lyell insists on the importance of the species question to the geologist, but goes on to point out the difficulty of accepting the only serious attempt at a transmutation theory which had up to that time appeared--that of Lamarck. In subsequent chapters he discusses the questions of the modification and variability of species, of hybridity, and of the geographical distribution of plants and animals. He then gives vivid pictures of the struggle for existence, ever going on between various species, and of the causes which lead to their extinction--not by overwhelming catastrophes, but by the silent and almost unobserved action of natural causes. This leads him to consider theories with regard to the introduction of new species, and, rejecting the fanciful notions of "centres or foci of creation," he argues strongly in favour of the view, as most reconcileable with observed facts, that "each species may have had its origin in a single pair, or individual, where an individual was sufficient, and species may have been created in succession at such times and in such places as to enable them to multiply and endure for an appointed period, and occupy an appointed space on the globe." ("Principles of Geology", Vol. II. (1st edition 1832), page 124. We now know, as has been so well pointed out by Huxley, that Lyell, as early as 1827, was prepared to accept the doctrine of the transmutation of species. In that year he wrote to Mantell, "What changes species may really undergo! How impossible will it be to distinguish and lay down a line, beyond which some of the so-called extinct species may have never passed into recent ones" (Lyell's "Life and Letters" Vol. I. page 168). To Sir John Herschel in 1836, he wrote, "In regard to the origination of new species, I am very glad to find that you think it probable that it may be carried on through the intervention of intermediate causes. I left this rather to be inferred, not thinking it worth while to offend a certain class of persons by embodying in words what would only be a speculation" (Ibid. page 467). He expressed the same views to Whewell in 1837 (Ibid. Vol. II. page 5.), and to Sedgwick (Ibid. Vol.

II. page 36) to whom he says, of "the theory, that the creation of new species is going on at the present day"--"I really entertain it," but "Ihave studiously avoided laying the doctrine down dogmatically as capable of proof" (see Huxley in "L.L." II. pages 190-195.))After pointing out how impossible it would be for a naturalist to prove that a newly DISCOVERED species was really newly CREATED (Mr F. Darwin has pointed out that his father (like Lyell) often used the term "Creation" in speaking of the origin of new species ("L.L." II. chapter 1.)), Lyell argued that no satisfactory evidence OF THE WAY in which these new forms were created, had as yet been discovered, but that he entertained the hope of a possible solution of the problem being found in the study of the geological record.

It is not difficult, in reading these chapters of Lyell's great work, to realise what an effect they would have on the mind of Darwin, as new facts were collected and fresh observations concerning extinct and recent forms were made in his travels. We are not surprised to find him writing home, "I am become a zealous disciple of Mr Lyell's views, as known in his admirable book. Geologising in South America, I am tempted to carry parts to a greater extent even than he does." ("L.L." I. page 263.)Lyell's anticipation that the study of the geological record might afford a clue to the discovery of how new species originate was remarkably fulfilled, within a few months, by Darwin's discovery of fossil bones in the red Pampean mud.

It is very true that, as Huxley remarked, Darwin's knowledge of comparative anatomy must have been, at that time, slight; but that he recognised the remarkable resemblances between the extinct and existing mammals of South America is proved beyond all question by a passage in his letter to Henslow, written November 24th, 1832: "I have been very lucky with fossil bones; I have fragments of at least six distinct animals...I found a large surface of osseous polygonal plates...Immediately I saw them I thought they must belong to an enormous armadillo, living species of which genus are so abundant here," and he goes on to say that he has "the lower jaw of some large animal which, from the molar teeth, I should think belonged to the Edentata." ("M.L." I. pages 11, 12. See "Extracts of Letters addressed to Prof. Henslow by C. Darwin" (1835), page 7.)Having found this important clue, Darwin followed it up with characteristic perseverance. In his quest for more fossil bones he was indefatigable. Mr Francis Darwin tells us, "I have often heard him speak of the despair with which he had to break off the projecting extremity of a huge, partly excavated bone, when the boat waiting for him would wait no longer."("L.L." I. page 276 (footnote).) Writing to Haeckel in 1864, Darwin says:

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • The Sexual Outlaw

    The Sexual Outlaw

    In this angry, eloquent outcry against the oppression of homosexuals, the author of the classic City of Night gives "an explosive non-fiction account, with commentaries, of three days and nights in the sexual underground" of Los Angeles in the 1970s--the "battlefield" of the sexual outlaw. Using the language and techniqus of the film, Rechy deftly intercuts the despairing, joyful, and defiant confessions of a male hustler with the "chorus" of his own subversive reflections on sexual identity and sexual politics, and with stark documentary reports our society directs against homosexuals--"the only minority against whose existence there are laws."
  • 盛世倾城狂妃

    盛世倾城狂妃

    嗷呜!一不小心居然穿越到古代!上有帝皇后妃,下有姨娘嫡姐,她从坐立难安,到大杀四方。哼哼哼,谁说女子不如男,她就要好好活着,潇潇洒洒,笑看四海八方!纳尼?皇帝他居然妄想纳她为妃?不好意思,她才不要
  • 魔道回忆录

    魔道回忆录

    莫枯相当于一张白纸,自己给自己身上点墨,最终变成水墨画——最简易的火柴人,参上。
  • 脚下的远方

    脚下的远方

    人生得追求境界。境界取决于理想,理想之光照耀着痛苦之肥养育的美丽。没有理想之光和痛苦之肥,便不可能有美丽,有的顶多是漂亮。漂亮在不太高的境界之中就常常可以找到。最美的永远在理想之中。如果不说理想,人类也就没有美也没有希望了。应该是,生活过就是爱过,生活着就是爱着。爱是一种特别重要的素质、特别重要的能力、也是特别重要的境界。才华不光在于高智商和绝顶聪明,而包括真诚的爱的能力。散文写作也如此,那怕是走马看花,匆行远方,用脚写下的游记类作品,也缺不得爱心。
  • 随身空间之良田农女

    随身空间之良田农女

    一朝重生到农家,挨饿受冻未脱贫。鸡飞狗跳麻雀闹,鸡毛蒜皮是非多。啥?娶俺当扶贫?我呸,俺人穷志不短,拖家带口奔小康!田园魔方空间大,土肥水清好种田,田中自有黄金屋,田中自有男如玉。咔咔咔,转转转,金田银地一锅兜,看我农家小萝莉,变废柴田为金银地!翻手田,覆手地,金银财帛滚滚,美男排排我选!论家的小日子红红火火滴旺起来啦!来,排排队,选个男银陪种田!富的冒油滴不要,苦的掉渣滴不要,帅到人妖滴不要,土到嗝屁滴也不要!小剧场一:“相公?快来嘛!”女人躺在床上,媚眼如丝。“嘘——”“干啥?”“我听听娘走了没。”小剧场二:“宝宝,快喝奶!”“宝宝,不许吐奶!”“宝宝,你又尿地图了!”“臭小子,霸占了你爹地盘,还这么嚣张!”“啪——啪——”“哇——”“混蛋,你干嘛打我儿子?!”“他欺负我女人!”“你欺负我儿子!”飞起一脚,猛踹过去。“哎呦——疼,女人,你敢打我!我打你儿子!”“打我儿子,就打你!!!”某女强悍叉腰。小宝宝满脸黑线——瞧这极品的一家子!!!
  • 肥娘种田好发家

    肥娘种田好发家

    一口燕窝把她呛成了一个吃啥啥都香的大肥婆。这里有瞎眼的婆婆,瘸腿的公公,身子病弱的小娃娃,还有个生不见人死不见尸的男人,她真想再喝口燕窝把自己呛死回去。怎奈全家的生计都在她一人身上,极品乡邻虎视眈眈,阴险妯娌泼辣嚣张,不彪不悍日子怎个过?
  • 所多玛的咒语

    所多玛的咒语

    期刊著名作家水湄伊人的最新力作《所多玛的咒语》,以严谨苛刻的态度,倾尽心血,打造精品,集惊悚、悬疑、魔幻为一身。经典唯美,飘浮诡异,悬疑惊悚及古埃及文化的深度魅力,对每个人的内心都有着永远的古老的诱惑。母亲的离奇死亡,诱发了女孩叶苇对于自己前世今身之谜的探究欲望。殊不料,命案一再发生,一桩比一桩诡秘,死者竟全是处女座的男性。古老的咒语在灵验中…
  • 唯有陪伴,能抵御岁月漫长

    唯有陪伴,能抵御岁月漫长

    这不是一个轰轰烈烈的爱情故事,亦不是一段风起云涌的青春往事。但它却能让我们从中寻到自己的过往,青春已逝,而少年尚未迟暮。故事讲述了陆敬安、林轩、周思雨、萧然、高仁、刘莉、周思雪、刘琳等一帮生活在北京的年轻人,从校园到社会,从稚嫩到成熟,从单纯到功利的蜕变过程。以陆敬安的爱情经历、转变和抉择为主线,引出一系列人物身上背负的有关青春的秘密,同时展现了在成长蜕变的过程中,亲情、友情与爱情对他们原本的世界观与价值观的冲击。
  • 暗香

    暗香

    这是一部长篇小说,讲述了四十年代出生的铁路技术高级工程师周桂欣的一生。小说从他考上江南理工大学讲起,以他与失散多年的初恋情人夏丹的重逢作为结尾,讲到了他与孙教授的师生情、与夏丹的恋情、与家人的亲情,以及与童养媳即后来的妻子张翠翠的情感纠葛。
  • 麻辣田园妻

    麻辣田园妻

    田园辣妻,挣钱买个老公。当穿越成为促销产品,她购买了最便宜的“种田穿越”套餐,带着一包辣椒种子,风风火火的杀去田园。家徒四壁,三餐不继,都是套路设定;极品亲戚,蓄意谋害,这都是关卡BOSS,左手杀人刀,右手炒菜勺,再想想在这里挣得银子,还可以按比例兑换成人民币,她有什么理由不奋起致富?金银满屋?当然,俘虏某人的胃虽然是蓄意图谋,可擒获他的心呢?那就是一场摧残与反摧残后的意外了……“媳妇,你挣这么多钱为了啥?”“为了把你买回去!”--情节虚构,请勿模仿