登陆注册
4711300000021

第21章

(3.ii.7) Here motives arise, to diminish the quantity of corn, and increase the quantity ofcloth; because the men who have been producing corn, and purchasing cloth, can obtain more cloth, bytransferring their means of production from the one to the other. As soon, again, as no morecloth can be obtained by applying the same amount of means to the production of cloth, than byapplying them to corn, and exchanging it for cloth, all motive to alter the quantity of the one ascompared with that of the other is at an end. Nothing is to be gained by producing corn ratherthan cloth, or cloth rather than corn. The cost of production on both sides is equal.

(3.ii.8) It thus appears that the relative value of commodities, or in other words, the quantityof one which exchanges for a given quantity of another, depends upon demand and supply, in thefirst instance; but upon cost of production, ultimately; and hence, in accurate language, uponcost of production, entirely. An increase or diminution of demand or supply, may temporarilyincrease or diminish, beyond the point of productive cost, the quantity of one commodity whichexchanges for a given quantity of another; but the law of competition, wherever it is notobstructed, tends invariably to bring it to that point, and to keep it there.

(3.ii.9) Cost of production, then, regulates the exchangeable value of commodities. But costof production is itself involved in some obscurity.

(3.ii.10) Two instruments are commonly combined in production; Labour and Capital.

(3.ii.11) It follows, either that cost of production consists in labour and capital combined; orthat one of these may be resolved into the other. If one of them can be resolved into the other, itfollows that cost of production does not consist in both combined.

(3.ii.12) The opinion, which is suggested by first appearances, undoubtedly is, that cost ofproduction consists in capital alone. The capitalist pays the wages of his labourer, buys the rawmaterial, and expects that what he has expended shall be returned to him, in the price, with theordinary profits upon the whole of the capital employed. From this view of the subject, it wouldappear, that cost of production consists exclusively in the portion of capital expended, togetherwith the profits upon the whole of the capital employed in effecting the production.

(3.ii.13) It is easy, however, to see, that in the term capital, thus understood, an ambiguity,and hence a fallacy, is involved. When we say that capital and labour, the two instruments ofproduction, belong to two classes of persons; we mean that the labourers have contributed somuch to the production, and the capitalists so much; and that the commodity, when produced,belongs in certain proportions to both. It may so happen, however, that one of these parties haspurchased the share of the other, before the production is completed. In that case, the whole ofthe commodity belongs to the party who has purchased the share of the other. In point of fact, itdoes happen, that the capitalist, as often as he employs labourers, by the payment of wages,purchases the share of the labourers. When the labourers receive wages for their labour, withoutwaiting to be paid by a share of the commodity produced, it is evident that they sell their title tothat share. The capitalist is then the owner, not of the capital only, but of the labour also. If whatis paid as wages is included, as it commonly is, in the term capital, it is absurd to talk of labourseparately from capital. The word capital, as thus employed, includes labour and capital both. Tosay, therefore, that the exchangeable value of commodities is determined by capital, understoodin this sense, is to say that it is determined by labour and capital combined. This, however, isreturning to the point from which we set out. It is nugatory to include labour in the definition ofthe word capital, and then to say that, capital without labour, determines exchangeable value. Ifcapital is understood in a sense which does not include the purchase money of labour, and hencethe labour itself, it is obvious that capital does not regulate the exchangeable value ofcommodities.

(3.ii.14) If labour were the sole instrument of production, and capital not required, theproduce of one day's labour in one commodity would exchange against the produce of one day's labour inanother commodity. In the rude state of society, if the hunter and the fisherman desired to varytheir food, the one by a portion of game, the other by a portion of fish, the average quantitywhich they took in a day would form the standard of exchange. If it did not, one of the twowould be placed in a more unfavourable situation than his neighbour, with perfect power, whichhe would of course employ, to pass from the one situation to the other.

(3.ii.15) In estimating equal quantities of labour, an allowance would, of course, be includedfor different degrees of hardness and skill. If the products of each of two days' labour of equalhardness and skill exchanged for one another, the product of a day's labour, which was eitherharder, or required a greater degree of skill, would exchange for something more.

(3.ii.16) All capital consists really in commodities. The capital of the farmer is not themoney which he may be worth, because that he cannot apply to production. His capital consists in hisimplements and stock.

(3.ii.17) As all capital consists in commodities, it follows, of course, that the first capitalmust have been the result of pure labour. The first commodities could not be made by anycommodities existing before them.

同类推荐
  • The Hated Son

    The Hated Son

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 太上灵宝玉匮明真斋忏方仪

    太上灵宝玉匮明真斋忏方仪

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Golden Slipper

    The Golden Slipper

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Governess

    The Governess

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 宋中太乙宫碑铭

    宋中太乙宫碑铭

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 悦读MOOK(第十一卷)

    悦读MOOK(第十一卷)

    本书将带你走进茫茫书海,我们将请一些学者和专家帮你指津,请一些书界人士为你剖析书坛风云,使你从中获得大量的图书信息,还能饱览各类书籍的精彩片段,一册在手,尽情享受读书的乐趣。
  • 丹凤街

    丹凤街

    张恨水先生在中国现代文学史上有着重要的地位。他一生写小说100多部,其作品有着极其深远的影响。80年代来,他的作品经久不衰。几年来他的很多作品被搬上屏幕,再度展现了其深厚的文化魅力和艺术感染力,在众多的读者和观众中有相当的地位。
  • 至尊狂妃:鬼医五小姐

    至尊狂妃:鬼医五小姐

    她是穿越而来的杀手至尊,手握上古神兵,独步天下,他是韬光养晦的腹黑妖孽,生杀予夺,染血九州。一次意外,她生死人肉白骨,鬼手无形救了那个奸诈如狐的腹黑王爷,从此纠缠不断。当草包对上废物,痞女遇上流氓,是针锋相对,还是携手杀伐,颠覆天下…
  • 云画扇·红泪未央

    云画扇·红泪未央

    她,原该是大兴国尊贵荣宠的七公主,一出生竟成了天降灾星!她,原本应该是他连宸祁的皇后,可是姐姐却代替她穿上了嫁衣!命运虽不可抗,当有机会逆转时,却因一个无心的掩饰将她引上了不归路。她笑着流泪,笑着看他含笑饮鸠,才知道,原来恨并不是爱的背面,而是延续……【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 赵氏经络综合锻炼方法

    赵氏经络综合锻炼方法

    天地万事万物都离不开“道”。老子在《道德经》第一章讲述了道的玄妙。“道可道,非常道。名可名,非常名。无名,万物之始也;有名,万物之母也。故恒无欲也,以观其妙;恒有欲也,以观其所徼。两者同出,异名同谓。玄之又玄,众妙法门”。释义:“道”如果可以用语言来表述,那它就是常“道”(“道”是可以用语言来表述的,它并非一般的“道”);“名”如果可以用文辞去命名,那它就是常“名”(“名”也是可以说明的,它并非普通的“名”)。“无”可以用来表述天地混沌未开之际的状况;而“有”,则是宇宙万物产生之本原的命名。因此,要常从“无”中去观察领悟“道”的奥妙;要常从“有”中去观察体会“道”的端倪。
  • The Emerald City of Oz

    The Emerald City of Oz

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 光绪年间的命案

    光绪年间的命案

    光绪二十六年冬天,青莲嫁到彤县埠头镇上。新郎周举是个秀才,生性儒雅、好学上进,只可惜自幼体弱多病。周家是书香门第,家资虽不十分丰厚倒还算富足。公婆为人厚道人缘极好,青莲满心欢喜不用言表。来年秋天,青莲生下儿子一发。周家三代单传,合家人虽视如珍宝却从不溺爱。一发咿呀学语时,周举便教他学规矩知道理,四岁即会背三字经。两年后青莲生下二发,一家子更是欢天喜地。二发四岁那年,周举突发恶疾一命呜呼,年迈父母因悲伤过度相继去世。几经折腾,周家的产业耗去大半。埠头镇上几个好吃懒做的泼皮,见周家只剩妇孺,便趁火打劫。
  • 我的兄弟姐妹(上)

    我的兄弟姐妹(上)

    “人在痛苦的时候会想起要好的朋友,他们都是我的兄弟姐妹。”“我们正赶上了一个伟大的不可逆转的时代,这让我们的生活超出几代人的想像。”这是一幅描述遥远的西部地区众生百态的浮世绘长卷。小说故事虽然发生在一个边陲小城,一个多民族聚居地,但无不反映着变化中的大时代对人生和生命以及价值观的刻骨铭心的改变。
  • 在外卖小哥面前刷脸100次

    在外卖小哥面前刷脸100次

    [新文《和写文大神交换了身体怎么办》连载中~]身为吃货的楼幼羽立志让自己光顾的每家店都完美的记住自己,然后……再也不去哒!很好,鸡排饭的小哥知道她只吃麦香味的,手抓饼的外卖大婶知道她是住六楼的昨天刚点了9块钱手抓饼的妹子,就连蛋包饭大叔也知道常点外送服务的她手机尾号是5849了!然后有一天,楼幼羽光顾了一家店,吃了十多次,叫了五次外卖,这位小哥居然还是不知道她要吃什么!呵呵呵,你将失去本宝宝_(:зゝ∠)_家常菜新来的中文渣渣小哥最近很苦恼,有个姑娘一直来店里点菜,每次都十分幽怨的看着他。昨天他送了一道下饭菜,前天抹了三块钱零头,今天送外卖还送了她一瓶绿茶。他已经算是年度最佳小哥了![皱眉]
  • 如意娘

    如意娘

    她是乱世之中李代桃僵的皇家养女萧如意,凭着一颗七窍玲珑心平安无虞地长大。与表哥徐仪订下婚约,二人青梅竹马,心意相通。直到逆贼李斛攻进皇宫,如意才得知自己竟然是李斛之女。她不甘认贼作父,在二皇子萧怀朔的援救下浴血破围。其后二人并肩御敌,力挽狂澜于既倒。逆贼平定,太子遇害,萧怀朔回宫继承大统。战场上的生死不离,使萧怀朔早已对如意弥足深陷。而君子如玉又情深意重的徐仪,乱世中几度离合依然初心不改。如意是选择辅佐天子,母仪天下,还是与青梅竹马长相厮守?