登陆注册
4793600000356

第356章

And the war would not have been had there been no intrigues on the part of England, no Duke of Oldenburg, no resentment on the part of Alexander; nor had there been no autocracy in Russia, no French Revolution and consequent dictatorship and empire, nor all that led to the French Revolution, and so on further back: without any one of those causes, nothing could have happened. And so all those causes—myriads of causes—coincided to bring about what happened. And consequently nothing was exclusively the cause of the war, and the war was bound to happen, simply because it was bound to happen. Millions of men, repudiating their common-sense and their human feelings, were bound to move from west to east, and to slaughter their fellows, just as some centuries before hordes of men had moved from east to west to slaughter their fellows.

The acts of Napoleon and Alexander, on whose words it seemed to depend whether this should be done or not, were as little voluntary as the act of each soldier, forced to march out by the drawing of a lot or by conscription. This could not be otherwise, for in order that the will of Napoleon and Alexander (on whom the whole decision appeared to rest) should be effective, a combination of innumerable circumstances was essential, without any one of which the effect could not have followed. It was essential that the millions of men in whose hands the real power lay—the soldiers who fired guns and transported provisions and cannons—should consent to carry out the will of those feeble and isolated persons, and that they should have been brought to this acquiescence by an infinite number of varied and complicated causes.

We are forced to fall back upon fatalism in history to explain irrational events (that is those of which we cannot comprehend the reason). The more we try to explain those events in history rationally, the more irrational and incomprehensible they seem to us. Every man lives for himself, making use of his free-will for attainment of his own objects, and feels in his whole being that he can do or not do any action. But as soon as he does anything, that act, committed at a certain moment in time, becomes irrevocable and is the property of history, in which it has a significance, predestined and not subject to free choice.

There are two aspects to the life of every man: the personal life, which is free in proportion as its interests are abstract, and the elemental life of the swarm, in which a man must inevitably follow the laws laid down for him.

Consciously a man lives on his own account in freedom of will, but he serves as an unconscious instrument in bringing about the historical ends of humanity. An act he has once committed is irrevocable, and that act of his, coinciding in time with millions of acts of others, has an historical value. The higher a man’s place in the social scale, the more connections he has with others, and the more power he has over them, the more conspicuous is the inevitability and predestination of every act he commits. “The hearts of kings are in the hand of God.” The king is the slave of history.

History—that is the unconscious life of humanity in the swarm, in the community—makes every minute of the life of kings its own, as an instrument for attaining its ends.

Although in that year, 1812, Napoleon believed more than ever that to shed or not to shed the blood of his peoples depended entirely on his will (as Alexander said in his last letter to him), yet then, and more than at any time, he was in bondage to those laws which forced him, while to himself he seemed to be acting freely, to do what was bound to be his share in the common edifice of humanity, in history.

The people of the west moved to the east for men to kill one another. And by the law of the coincidence of causes, thousands of petty causes backed one another up and coincided with that event to bring about that movement and that war: resentment at the non-observance of the continental system, and the Duke of Oldenburg, and the massing of troops in Prussia—a measure undertaken, as Napoleon supposed, with the object of securing armed peace—and the French Emperor’s love of war, to which he had grown accustomed, in conjunction with the inclinations of his people, who were carried away by the grandiose scale of the preparations, and the expenditure on those preparations, and the necessity of recouping that expenditure. Then there was the intoxicating effect of the honours paid to the French Emperor in Dresden, and the negotiations too of the diplomatists, who were supposed by contemporaries to be guided by a genuine desire to secure peace, though they only inflamed the amour-propre of both sides; and millions upon millions of other causes, chiming in with the fated event and coincident with it.

When the apple is ripe and falls—why does it fall? Is it because it is drawn by gravitation to the earth, because its stalk is withered, because it is dried by the sun, because it grows heavier, because the wind shakes it, or because the boy standing under the tree wants to eat it?

Not one of those is the cause. All that simply makes up the conjunction of conditions under which every living, organic, elemental event takes place. And the botanist who says that the apple has fallen because the cells are decomposing, and so on, will be just as right as the boy standing under the tree who says the apple has fallen because he wanted to eat it and prayed for it to fall. The historian, who says that Napoleon went to Moscow because he wanted to, and was ruined because Alexander desired his ruin, will be just as right and as wrong as the man who says that the mountain of millions of tons, tottering and undermined, has been felled by the last stroke of the last workingman’s pick-axe. In historical events great men—so called—are but the labels that serve to give a name to an event, and like labels, they have the least possible connection with the event itself.

Every action of theirs, that seems to them an act of their own free-will, is in an historical sense not free at all, but in bondage to the whole course of previous history, and predestined from all eternity.

同类推荐
  • 修西闻见录

    修西闻见录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 自为墓志铭

    自为墓志铭

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 酉阳杂俎

    酉阳杂俎

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 西村诗集

    西村诗集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 茶疏

    茶疏

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 重生日本之阴阳师系统

    重生日本之阴阳师系统

    日常文。修士楚逸降临到异世岛国东京的一个故事。手游阴阳师的剧情得往后自己翻看,谢谢。PS:《路人女主》《食戟之灵》《甘辉游乐园》
  • 生活·哲理卷(读者精品)

    生活·哲理卷(读者精品)

    风靡全球的真情故事,感动一生的纯美阅读;润泽心灵的饕餮盛宴,惠泽精英的成功启示;突破困局的导航明灯,缔造成功的内在密码。最纯美动人的励志佳作,无可替代的生花妙笔,展现励志美文顶尖力量,最憾动心灵的饕餮盛宴,最荡气回肠的励志大餐,最酣畅淋漓的悦读。一则则故事,催人奋进,帮你梳理纷乱的思绪,找到人生幸福的密码;一篇篇美文,怡人性情,为心灵注入勇气和力量,带给你爱和希望。一部相伴一生的心灵圣经,一掬滋润心灵的智慧甘霖,在阅读中收获真知与感动,在品味中得到启迪到智慧。
  • 星河时代之帝尊

    星河时代之帝尊

    又名:都市之规则重组域外来客,秩序更矢,是改天换日人族化奴,还是逆天而上剑斩苍穹?全球一统,百族仍各自为战,敲骨噬髓,不知天变。豪门贵族,自私贪婪;联盟政客,玩弄权术;不知星河战纪?叶风云,经历地下世界十年血腥杀戮,荣耀回归,面对满目疮痍,一剑荡平,重组星河战纪新秩序。“我是地球人,我的地盘我做主,谁敢闹事,统统到南极上空堵臭氧空洞去!”
  • 花凤戏修罗

    花凤戏修罗

    原名<恶女硬上轿>不以风骚惊天下,就以淫荡动世人这是她放浪形骸的行事标准,也是她的至理明言谁让她生来就是尊贵的皇姑婆受尽万千宠爱,特权一堆宫内,调戏美貌妃子、待嫁公主、俊俏皇子人人闻而丧之宫外,浪荡青楼倚卧美人膝是众家美女姐妹都爱的风流俊俏公子苏十三少某一天路上偶遇一美男――惊艳当下扬州将之掳来做驸马哪知他人前温文尔雅,好欺负得很人后却是富可敌国拥有神秘势力的北方修罗推荐好友茶茶JOJO的(我们离婚吧)很好看哦,各位亲亲要去瞧一瞧才行.......嘿嘿
  • 武圣门

    武圣门

    大唐开国,以武立宗,武风盛行,太宗赐姓,各大世家在数百年间争雄江湖。直至唐宋,开国四大武者绝学现世,以致天下群雄纷争,酿就乱世……一位自幼身中剧毒的少年,在求助各派宗主无望之下,终以生命为赌注,跃下华山之顶。然而上天却没有遗弃这位无助的少年,机缘巧合,万毒自解,红颜相助,智武并存,阴阳互调,共悟魔经,由魔入道,终至大成。而就在他闯荡江湖,诛魔灭邪,功成名就,身拥数美之时,却发现人力无能抗天,“九五之命”原本天定,他竟会是……然而乱世有佳人,才能出英雄。一卷在手,自可笑看风起云涌,风花雪月。在宁静中天马行空,逍遥苍穹。
  • 我与良人共枕眠

    我与良人共枕眠

    穆青禾是良人,江蓠一直都这么觉得。可当这良人三年前背弃她之后,在她心里就成了全宇宙第一渣人。重逢后,男人声音低哑,“江蓠,你是不是忘了你连头发丝都是我的?”江蓠梗着脖子不以为然,“渣人,放开你的狗爪!”晕倒后,他在睡梦中呓语,“阿蓠,不要离开我,我不是面瘫。”江蓠终于动容,“我没觉得你面瘫,我喜欢你这种酷酷的样子……”
  • 殒天记

    殒天记

    传闻,一枚陨天丹可成就一名天道。上古时期,一枚陨天丹在机缘巧合之下诞生,引得无数强者争相抢夺,修真界顿时掀起一场腥风血雨,最后甚至连一些隐世不出的天道境大能也纷纷出手。可就在尘埃即将落定之际,陨天丹却忽然神秘消失,从此下落不明,任凭这些大能搜遍整个修真界,也无法找到任何的蛛丝马迹,仿佛此物从未出现过一般。许多年后,各方势力渐渐将此事淡忘,而陨天丹,最终也成为了一个虚无缥缈的传说……
  • The Life of Stephen A. Douglas

    The Life of Stephen A. Douglas

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • Caretaker

    Caretaker

    It was with this play that Harold Pinter had his first major success, and its production history since it was first performed in 1960 has established the work as a landmark in twentieth-century drama. The obsessive caretaker, Davies, whose papers are in Sidcup, is a classic comic creation, and his uneasy relationship with the enigmatic Aston and Mick established the author's individuality with an international audience.
  • 大文学与中国格调

    大文学与中国格调

    “中国文学的自觉”是本书特别关注并着力探讨的主要问题。大文学与中国格调作者试图通过对具体文本和具体现象的细致解读,建构“大文学”的价值图景和“中国文学”的主体性,揭示“中国格调”的魅力和价值,进而为当下的文学写作和文学阅读,寻求积极的“支援意识”。大文学与中国格调信从司马迁“不虚美,不隐恶”的写作伦理,不说空话,不说废话,不说假话,体现着作者一贯的坦率认真的批评态度和细读深究的批评风格,显示出一种在质疑中建构的积极的批评姿态。这些文章在报刊上发表后,曾引起较大的反响和读者的好评,多次被多家权威刊物转载,并屡次获奖。