登陆注册
4811200000030

第30章 II(4)

As for the strange secrecy about Dauger, here is an example. Saint- Mars, in January, 1687, was appointed to the fortress of the Isles Sainte-Marguerite, that sun themselves in the bay of Cannes. On January 20 he asks leave to go to see his little kingdom. He must leave Dauger, but has forbidden even his lieutenant to speak to that prisoner. This was an increase of precaution since 1682. He wishes to take the captive to the Isles, but how? A sedan chair covered over with oilcloth seems best. A litter might break down, litters often did, and some one might then see the passenger.

Now M. Funck-Brentano says, to minimize the importance of Dauger, "he was shut up like so much luggage in a chair hermetically closed with oilcloth, carried by eight Piedmontese relays of four."Luggage is not usually carried in hermetically sealed sedan chairs, but Saint-Mars has explained why, by surplus of precaution, he did not use a litter. The litter might break down and Dauger might be seen. A new prison was built specially, at the cost of 5,000 lires, for Dauger at Sainte- Marguerite, with large sunny rooms. On May 3, 1687, Saint-Mars had entered on his island realm, Dauger being nearly killed by twelve days' journey in a closed chair. He again excited the utmost curiosity. On January 8, 1688, Saint-Mars writes that his prisoner is believed by the world to be either a son of Oliver Cromwell, or the Duc de Beaufort,[1] who was never seen again, dead or alive, after a night battle in Crete, on June 25, 1669, just before Dauger was arrested. Saint-Mars sent in a note of the TOTAL of Dauger's expenses for the year 1687. He actually did not dare to send the ITEMS, he says, lest they, if the bill fell into the wrong hands, might reveal too much.

[1] Duc de Beaufort whom Athos releases from prison in Dumas's Vingt Ans Apres.

Meanwhile, an Italian news-letter, copied into a Leyden paper, of August 1687, declared that Mattioli had just been brought from Pignerol to Sainte-Marguerite. There was no mystery about Mattioli, the story of his capture was published in 1682, but the press, on one point, was in error; Mattioli was still at Pignerol. The known advent of the late Commandant of Pignerol, Saint-Mars, with a single concealed prisoner, at the island, naturally suggested the erroneous idea that the prisoner was Mattioli. The prisoner was really Dauger, the survivor of the two valets.

From 1688 to 1691 no letter about Dauger has been published. Apparently he was then the only prisoner on the island, except one Chezut, who was there before Dauger arrived, and gave up his chamber to Dauger while the new cells were being built. Between 1689 and 1693 six Protestant preachers were brought to the island, while Louvois, the Minister, died in 1691, and was succeeded by Barbezieux. On August 13, 1691, Barbezieux wrote to ask Saint-Mars about "the prisoner whom he had guarded for twenty years." The only such prisoner was Dauger, who entered Pignerol in August, 1669. Mattioli had been a prisoner only for twelve years, and lay in Pignerol, not in Sainte-Marguerite, where Saint- Mars now was. Saint-Mars replied: "I can assure you that NOBODY HAS SEEN HIM BUT MYSELF."By the beginning of March, 1694, Pignerol had been bombarded by the enemies of France; presently Louis XIV. had to cede it to Savoy. The prisoners there must be removed. Mattioli, in Pignerol, at the end of 1693, had been in trouble. He and his valet had tried to smuggle out letters written on the linings of their pockets. These were seized and burned. On March 20, 1694, Barbezieux wrote to Laprade, now commanding at Pignerol, that he must take his three prisoners, one by one, with all secrecy, to Sainte-Marguerite. Laprade alone must give them their food on the journey. The military officer of the escort was warned to ask no questions. Already (February 26, 1694) Barbezieux had informed Saint-Mars that these prisoners were coming. They are of more consequence, one of them at least, than the prisoners on the island, and must be put in the safest places." The "one" is doubtless Mattioli. In 1681 Louvois had thought Dauger and La Riviere more important than Mattioli, who, in March, 1694, came from Pignerol to Sainte- Marguerite. Now in April, 1694, a prisoner died at the island, a prisoner who, like Mattioli, HAD A VALET. We hear of no other prisoner on the island, except Mattioli who had a valet. A letter of Saint-Mars (January 6, 1696) proves that no prisoner THEN had a valet, for each prisoner collected his own dirty plates and dishes, piled them up, and handed them to the lieutenant.

M. Funck-Brentano argues that in this very letter (January 6, 1696)Saint-Mars speaks of "les valets de messieurs les prisonniers." But in THAT part of the letter Saint-Mars is not speaking of the actual state of things at Sainte-Marguerite, but is giving reminiscences of Fouquet and Lauzun, who, of course, at Piguerol, had valets, and had money, as he shows. Dauger had no money. M. Funck-Brentano next argues that early in 1694 one of the preacher prisoners, Melzac, died, and cites M. Jung ("La Verite sur le Masque de Fer," p. 91). This is odd, as M. Jung says that Melzac, or Malzac, "died in the end of 1692, or early in 1693." Why, then, does M. Funck-Brentano cite M. Jung for the death of the preacher early in 1694, when M. Jung (conjecturally) dates his decease at least a year earlier?[1] It is not a mere conjecture as, on March 3, 1693, Barbezieux begs Saint-Mars to mention his Protestant prisoners under nicknames. There are THREE, and Malzac is no longer one of them. Malzac, in 1692, suffered from a horrible disease, discreditable to one of the godly, and in October, 1692, had been allowed medical expenses. Whether they included a valet or not, Malzac seems to have been non- existent by March, 1693. Had he possessed a valet, and had he died in 1694, why should HIS valet have been "shut up in the vaulted prison"? This was the fate of the valet of the prisoner who died in April, 1694, and was probably Mattioli.

同类推荐
  • REGINALD

    REGINALD

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 云卧纪谭

    云卧纪谭

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 大威灯光仙人问疑经

    大威灯光仙人问疑经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 筠谷诗

    筠谷诗

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Golden Fleece

    The Golden Fleece

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 小小世界恰如你

    小小世界恰如你

    某天,你会不会无端的想起一个人,他(她)曾给你期许喜悦与鼓励,但从未出现在你的明天里……她有着别人羡慕不来的容貌,她是一个极其开朗又爱闯祸的小女生,她也有狡黠的一面,在小孩心性下她也有着一颗纯真善良的心。但被他伤害之后,一切都变了…且看他们两人怎样上演一次又一次的伤害戏码,最终两人又该如何呢…
  • 师父我罩你

    师父我罩你

    震惊!藏剑山庄的二庄主竟然收了五毒教教主那混世魔王小女儿为徒!这一件事传出去,顿时涌起了轩然大波...”“师父,徒儿要抱抱。”“好。”“师父,徒儿要去当兵!”师父啪的合上书,冷冷的看了她一眼,“敢去个试试?打断腿!”
  • 绝色猎妖师:鬼君霸爱狂宠

    绝色猎妖师:鬼君霸爱狂宠

    “你是谁?这里是什么地方?”冥夜殇轻揉突突作痛的太阳穴缓缓睁开双眼。对上冥夜殇纯净如初生婴儿的双眸,南宫羽轩微愣片刻,薄唇微勾温柔浅笑:“我是你夫君,这里是我们的家”。“夫君?家?”。“嗯”。“我又是谁?”冥夜殇再次抬手用力揉揉突隐隐作痛的太阳穴。“你是为夫唯一的宝贝!”南宫羽轩抿唇浅笑,在冥夜殇额前落下温柔一吻。(甜宠,一对一,男强女强)
  • 佛说超日明三昧经

    佛说超日明三昧经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 冷面骑士专宠俏丫头

    冷面骑士专宠俏丫头

    她,活泼温柔他,冷漠帅气他从始至终都对她情有独钟,从刚开始的暗自倾心,暗恋,到后来的真情告白,而她对他的爱慕却毫不知情,和别人拍拖起来面对她的决定,他选择祝福在孤男寡女共处一室,他竟然坐怀不乱,白白浪费一夜春宵在她遭遇困难时,毅然站出来给她排忧解难,共同进退她慢慢地被他的魅力所征服,放心地把自己交给了他好事多磨,她的情敌出现了经过一番的波折甚至离家出走最后,有情人终成眷属俩人终于走到一起
  • 訄书

    訄书

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 烛弥

    烛弥

    遇见邢烛以后温渝弥最大的兴趣就是撩邢烛。谁料邢烛却总是无动于衷,温渝弥时常怀疑是自己的人格魅力减弱了嘛?没想到原来是因为邢烛是个闷骚!
  • 嫡女当道,爷的至尊宠妃

    嫡女当道,爷的至尊宠妃

    慕千颜,拥有一双能看透人心的眼睛,医毒双绝,因为这双眼,她被家族利用,也因为这双眼,她最后被灭口穿越到古代,新的重生,她还是因为这眼,备受关注……“怎么,想利用我,不惜把自己送到我床上来了?”她冷哼。“不,本王想利用谁,从来都只是勾勾手,自然大批的人等着被本王利用差遣。”某王爷狂放不羁道“那你这是?”“本王看上你了,主动来求暖床!”--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • GONE IS GONE

    GONE IS GONE

    In this delightful story we meet Fritzl,a farmer who lives with his wife Liesi,their baby kinndli,and Spitz,their m.wkkk.net works hard in the fields every m.wkkk.net works hard all day,too,but Fritzl somehow feels that he works harder.
  • 如果这样,会怎样

    如果这样,会怎样

    为什么许多我们曾经认为天经地义的事情,在这个大变革的时代,变得那么脆弱?在规则混乱和失序的时代,如何让我们的大脑跟上未来的趋势?你听说过一种心理叫“旁观他人之痛苦”吗?比如我们总是很轻松地认为AV女优赚钱容易,很轻率地对医生歇斯底里,很轻佻地把记者称作“妓者”,试问依据是什么?你以为你以为的就是你以为的吗?这些只是本书所要讲述内容的冰山一角。许骥认为真理是常识,常识却不一定是真理。绝大多数的常识都是感觉。所谓文明社会,是在常识的基础上,大家进一步建立起共识。许骥开腔不走火,用温和、客观、中立的态度告诉我们:世界不是我们表面看见的那样!每一个敢于和别人不一样的人,都有一颗强悍的大脑!