That a man in his study， often a feeble old person， should dispose of the lives and property of twenty or thirty million men， most of whom he has never seen； that he should order them to pay away a tenth or a fifth of their income and they should do it； that he should order them to go and slaughter or be slaughtered and that they should go； that they should thus continue for ten years， twenty years， through every kind of trial， defeat， misery and invasion， as with the French under Louis XIV， the English under Pitt， the Prussians under Frederick II.， without either sedition or internal disturbances， is certainly a marvelous thing. And， for a people to remain free it is essential that they should be ready to do this always. Neither this fidelity nor this concord is due to sober reflection (la raison raisonnante)； reason is too vacillating and too feeble to bring about such a universal and energetic result. Abandoned to itself and suddenly restored to a natural condition， the human flock is capable only of agitation， of mutual strife until pure force at length predominates， as in barbarous times， and until， amidst the dust and outcry， some military leader rises up who is， generally， a butcher. Historically considered it is better to continue so than to begin over again. Hence， especially when the majority is uncultivated， it is beneficial to have chiefs designated beforehand through the hereditary custom by which people follow them， and through the special education by which they are qualified. In this case the public has no need to seek for them to obtain them. They are already at hand， in each canton， visible， accepted beforehand； they are known by their names， their title， their fortune， their way of living； deference to their authority is established. They are almost always deserving of this authority； born and brought up to exercise it they find in tradition， in family example and in family pride， powerful ties that nourish public spirit in them； there is some probability of their comprehending the duties with which their prerogative endows them.
Such is the renovation， which the feudal régime admits of. The ancient chieftain can still guarantee his pre-eminence by his services， and remain popular without ceasing to be privileged. Once a captain in his district and a permanent gendarme， he is to become the resident and beneficent proprietor， the voluntary promoter of useful undertakings， obligatory guardian of the poor， the gratuitous administrator and judge of the canton， the unsalaried deputy of the king， that is to say， a leader and protector as previously， through a new system of patronage accommodated to new circumstances. Local magistrate and central representative， these are his two principal functions， and， if we extend our observation beyond France we find that he exercises either one or the other， or both together.
Notes：
[1]. See note 1 at the end of the volume[2]. One league (lieu) ca. 4 km. (SR.)[3]. Suger "Vie de Louis VI.，" chap. VIII. - Philippe I. became master of the Chateau de Montlhéry only by marrying one of his sons to the heiress of the fief. He thus addressed his successor： "My child， take good care to keep this tower of which the annoyances have made me grow old， and whose frauds and treasons have given me no peace nor rest'.
[4]. Léonce de Lavergne， "Les Assemblées Povinciales，" p. 19. -Consult the official statement of the provincial assemblies， and especially the chapters treating of the vingtièmes (an old tax of one-twentieth on incomes.-TR.)[5]. A report made by Treilhard in the name of the ecclesiastic committee， (Moniteur， 19th December， 1789)： The religious establishments for sale in Paris alone were valued at 150 millions.
Later (in the session of the 13th February， 1791)， Amelot estimates the property sold and to be sold， not including forests， at 3，700millions. M. de Bouillé estimates the revenue of the clergy at 180millions. (Mémoires， p.44). [French currency is so well known to readers in general it is not deemed necessary to reduce statements of this kind to the English or American standard， except in special cases.-TR.)[6] A report by Chasset on Tithes， April， 1790. Out of 123millions 23 go for the costs of collection： but， in estimating the revenue of an individual the sums he pays to his intendants， overseers and cashiers are not deducted. - Talleyrand (October l0， 1789)estimates the revenue of real property at 70 millions and its value at 2，100 millions. On examination however both capital and revenue are found considerably larger than at first supposed. (Reports of Treilbard and Chasset). Moreover， in his valuation， Talleyrand left out habitations and their enclosures as well as a reservation of one-fourth of the forests. Besides this there must be included in the revenue before 1789 the seigniorial rights enjoyed by the Church.
Finally， according to Arthur Young， the rents which the French proprietor received were not two and a half per cent. as nowadays but three and three quarters per cent - The necessity of doubling the figures to obtain a present money valuation is supported by innumerable facts， and among others the price of a day's labor， which at that time was nineteen sous. (Arthur Young). (Today， in 1999， in France the minimum legal daily wage is around 300 francs. 20 sous constituted a franc. So the sums referred to by Taine under the Revolution must be multiplied with at least 300 in order to compare them with 1990 values. To obtain dollars multiply with 50. SR.)[7]. National archives， among the papers of the ecclesiastical committee， box (portfolios) 10， 11， 13， 25. - Beugnot's Memoirs， I.
49， 79. - Delbos， "L'Eglise de France，" I. 399. - Duc de Lévis， "Souvenirs et Portraits，" p.156.
