登陆注册
4811800000019

第19章 (1)

APPLICATION OF THE

LAW OF THE PROPORTIONALITY OF VALUE

A) Money "Gold and silver were the first commodities to have their value constituted."[I 69]

T hus, gold and silver are the first applications of "value constituted" ... by M. Proudhon. And as M. Proudhon constitutes the value of products determining it by th e comparative amount of labor embodied in them, the only thing he had to do was to prove that variations in the value of gold and silver are always explained by variations in the labor time taken to produce them. M. Proudhon has no intention of doing so. He speaks of gold and silver not as commodities, but as money.

His only logic, if logic it be, consists in juggling with the capacity of gold and silver to be used as money for the benefit of all the commodities which have the property of being evaluated by labor time.

Decidedly there is more naivete than malice in this jugglery.

A useful product, once it has been evaluated by the labor time needed to produce it, is always acceptable in exchange; witness, cries M. Proudhon, gold and silver, which exist in my desired conditions of "exchangeability"!

Gold and silver, then, are value which has reached a state of constitution:

they are the incorporation of M. Proudhon's idea. He could not have been happier in his choice of an example. Gold and silver, apart from their capacity of being commodities, evaluated like other commodities, in labor time, have also the capacity of being the universal agents of exchange, of being money. By now considering gold and silver as an application of "value constituted" by labor time, nothing is easier than to prove that all commodities whose value is constituted by labor time will always be exchangeable, will be money.

A very simple question occurs to M. Proudhon. Why have gold and silver the privilege of typifying "constituted value"?

"The special function which usage has devolved upon the precious metal, that of serving as a medium for trade, is purely conventional, and any other commodity could, less conveniently perhaps, but just as reliably, fulfil this function. Economists recognize this, and cite more than one example. What then is the reason for this universal preference for metals as money? And what is the explanation of this specialization of the function of money -- which has no analogy in political economy?... Is it possible to reconstruct the series from which money seems to have broken away, and hence to trace it back to its true principle?"[I 68-69]

Straight away, by formulating the question in these terms, M. Proudhon has presupposed the existence of money . The first question he should have asked himself was, why, in exchanges as they are actually constituted, it has been necessary to individualize exchangeable value, so to speak, by the creation of a special agent of exchange. Money is not a thing, it is a social relation. Why is the money relation a production relation like any other economic relation, such as the division of labor, etc.? If M.

Proudhon had properly taken account of this relation, he would not have seen in money an exception, an element detached from a series unknown or needing reconstruction.

He would have realized, on the contrary, that this relation is a link, and, as such, closely connected with a whole chain of other economic relations; that this relation corresponds to a definite mode of production neither more nor less than does individual exchange. What does he do? He starts off by detaching money from the actual mode of production as a whole, and then makes it the first member of an imaginary series, of a series to be reconstructed.

Once the necessity for a specific agency of exchange, that is, for money, has been recognized, all that remains to be explained is why this particular function has developed upon gold and silver rather than upon any commodity. This is a secondary question, which is explained not by the chain of production relations, but by the specific qualities inherent in gold and silver as substances. If all this has made economists for once "go outside the domains of their own science, to dabble in physics, mechanics, history and so on", as M. Proudhon reproaches them with doing, they have merely done what they were compelled to do. The question was no longer within the domain of political economy.

"What no economist," says M. Proudhon, "has either seen or understood is the economic reason which has determined, in favor of the precious metals, the favor they enjoy."[I 69]

This economic reason which nobody -- with good ground indeed -- has seen of understood, M. Proudhon has seen, understood and bequeathed to posterity.

"What nobody else has noticed is that, of all commodities, gold and silver were the first to have their value attain constitution. In the patriarchal period, gold and silver were still bartered and exchanged in ingots but even then they showed a visible tendency to become dominant and received a marked degree of preference. Little by little the sovereigns took possession of them and affixed their seal to them: and of this sovereign consecration was born money, that is, the commodity par excellence. which, notwithstanding all the shocks of commerce, retains a definite proportional value and makes itself accepted for all payments....

"The distinguishing character of gold and silver is due, I repeat, to the fact that, thanks to their metallic properties, to the difficulties of their production, and above all to the intervention of state authority, they early won stability and authenticity as commodities."To say that, of all commodities, gold and silver were the first to have their value constituted, is to say, after all that has gone before, that gold and silver were the first to attain the status of money. This is M.

Proudhon's great revelation, this is the truth that none had discovered before him.

同类推荐
  • 金箓大斋宿启仪

    金箓大斋宿启仪

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 大唐保大乙巳岁续贞元释教录

    大唐保大乙巳岁续贞元释教录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 和乐天感鹤

    和乐天感鹤

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 南海宝象林慧弓诇禅师语录

    南海宝象林慧弓诇禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 新竹县制度考

    新竹县制度考

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 阴阳剪纸师

    阴阳剪纸师

    我爷爷是剪纸的手艺人,当然这不是普通的手艺,里边的道道多得数不清,本来我对此嗤之以鼻,可是自打小时候我用童子尿破了死人的剪纸冥婚被索命后,我才发现,自己已经进入了这个漩涡之中无法自拔……
  • 金刚三昧经论

    金刚三昧经论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 提高说话水平的11种方法

    提高说话水平的11种方法

    古人云:“听君一席话,胜读十年书。”与有学识、会说话的人交谈,能使人增长知识、开阔眼界。如此益智、怡悦之事,何乐不为?说话是有效沟通的手段之一,把话说好、说到位,从政者能平步青云,经商者则能财源滚滚,即便身在职场也能左右逢源。古有“烁金之言”、“一言九鼎”一说,今有“一言定升迁”、“一句值千金”之谓,可见,把话说好的作用不可小觑。
  • 网游之骷髅也疯狂

    网游之骷髅也疯狂

    人家挖矿我挖坟,人家用金疮药我吃坟头草,人家用魔法药我点香烛,人家打坐回复我住棺材,人家用魔法攻击我扔烧纸,﹉﹉且看一只骷髅如何玩转网游,搅乱风云终成魔!书友群:49509036.欢迎大家来探讨剧情!
  • 问题解构与战略选择:中国广电产业发展研究

    问题解构与战略选择:中国广电产业发展研究

    本书是教育部人文社会科学研究项目“我国广播电视资源状况和配置实用效率研究”成果,详尽分析了我国广播影视产业在国民经济和文化产业中的地位、产业现状与结构、发展趋势,并对我国广播影视产业管理模式进行了深入探讨。本书从产业理论、行业实践、国家发展战略等角度,对我国广播影视产业进行了深刻剖析。本书既适用于高校传媒专业师生,也可为广播影视行业从业人员提供指导。
  • 重生之奇女修仙

    重生之奇女修仙

    一朝重生,眼底的懦弱化为坚毅,恨意在胸腔中蔓延。重生而来的她,这一世将走向不同的生活,命运的齿轮开始轮转,她将背负的是职责,她到底该如何掌握命运?
  • 我心如初

    我心如初

    一段年少时的爱恋,牵出一生的纠缠。大学时代的林珊阳光灿烂,意外邂逅了大三学长徐睿。开朗直率的她和才气出众的徐睿在青青校园的背景下,产生了一系列的爱情纠葛。然而,不善表达的他终于使她在一次伤心之下远走他乡……
  • 暗系宠婚,白少,轻点撩

    暗系宠婚,白少,轻点撩

    白墨染眯着妖冶的眸子,眸底的神色黑暗稠丽,带着偏执的疯狂。“不要再把我丢了,好吗?”男人低头蹭了蹭女孩的脸,清冷矜贵的脸上带着落寂,像是跌落在地狱里的魔。黎笙小手附上男人精致如玉的脸,勾唇笑了笑,带着妖冶惑人的意味。“不会的,毕竟……还要宠着你的。”前世因意外去世,再次醒来,黎笙一下子就穿到了两年后。醒来后的第一件事,她家宝宝呢?有些懵的接受了自己成了一个刚十八岁的少女,黎笙就开启了寻夫之路。可是谁能告诉她,这个动不动就要黑化把她关小黑屋的货是谁?黎笙裹紧自己的小被子,表示不想接受这个现实。男人轻轻的在黎笙耳边呵了一口气。“笙笙说过的,要宠着我,不能反悔的。”
  • 圣伊皇家校草帮

    圣伊皇家校草帮

    圣伊,神秘的皇家贵族学院。这里有四大校草。一个恶魔、一个温柔、一个花心、另一个则冷如冰山。而她,叶梓晴,叶家的千金小姐,调皮搞怪,却在转去圣伊的第一天就惹到四大校草之首,并亲眼目睹他和别的女生接吻。正当她想要逃跑,却被他一把拉住,说要让她赔偿被打断的吻!
  • 美国与反共主义:论美国对社会主义国家的意识形态外交

    美国与反共主义:论美国对社会主义国家的意识形态外交

    本书从美国特有的民族文化背景谈起,探索美国人为何对共产主义意识形态和社会主义国家采取如此敌对的态度,美国政治文化为何同马克思主义格格不入。本书还纵论美国在冷战期间和冷战结束之后的反共主义如何表现在其对社会主义国家的外交政策之中,指出美国在国家利益受到严重威胁时,意识形态的诉求会让于实际利益的考虑;在国力强盛的状态下,在对手的意识形态诉求也十分强烈的情况下,则在外交中强化意识形态色彩。