登陆注册
4811800000025

第25章 (7)

If such a privilege is given for the invention of a machine, which performs, by the labor of one man, a quantity of work that used to take the labor of four; as the possession of the exclusive privilege prevents any competition in doing the work, but what proceeds from the labor of the workmen, their wages, as long as the patent continues, must obviously form the measure of the patentee's charge; that is to secure employment, he has only to charge a little less than the wages of the labor which the machine supplants. But when the patent expires, other machines of the same nature are brought into competition; and then his charge must be regulated on the same principle as every other, according to the abundance of machines....

The profit of capital employed..., though it arises from supplanting labor, comes to be regulated, not by the value of the labor it supplants but, as in all other cases, by the competition among the proprietors of capital that presents itself for performing the duty, and the demand for it.

[Pp.119, 123, 124, 125, 134]

Finally, then, so long as the profit is greater than in other industries, capital will be thrown into the new industry until the rate of profit falls to the general level.

We have just seen that the example of the railway was scarcely suited to throw any light on his fiction of the person, Society. Nevertheless, M. Proudhon boldly resumes his discourse:

"With these points cleared up, nothing is easier than to explain how labor must leave a surplus for each producer."[I 77]

What now follows belongs to classical antiquity. It is a poetical narrative intended to refresh the reader after the fatigue which the rigor of the preceding mathematical demonstrations must have caused him. M. Proudhon gives the person, Society, the name of Prometheus, whose high deeds he glorifies in these terms:

First of all, Prometheus emerging from the bosom of nature awakens to life, in a delightful inertia, etc., etc. Prometheus sets to work, and on this first day, the first day of the second creation, Prometheus' product, that is, his wealth, his well-being, is equal to 10. On the second day, Prometheus divides his labor, and his product becomes equal to 100. On the third day and on each of the follow- ing days, Prometheus invents machines, discovers new util- ities in bodies, new forces in nature.... With every step of his industrial activity, there is an increase in the number of his products, which marks an enhancement of hap- piness for hiM. And since, after all, to consume is for him to produce, it is clear that every day's consumption, using up only the product of the day before, leaves a surplus product for the next day."[I 77-78]

This Prometheus of M. Proudhon's is a queer character, as weak in logic as in political economy. So long as Prometheus merely teaches us the division of labor, the application of machinery, the exploitation of natural forces and scientific power, multiplying the productive forces of men and giving a surplus compared with the produce of labor in isolation, this new Prometheus has the misfortune only of coming too late. But the moment Prometheus starts talking about production and consumption he becomes really ludicrous. To consume, for him, is to produce; he consumes the next day what he produced the day before, so that he is always one day in advance; this day in advance is his "surplus labor". But, if he consumes the next day what he has produced the day before, he must, on the first day, which had no day before, have done two days' work in order to be one day in advance later on. How did Prometheus earn this surplus on the first day, when there was neither division of labor, nor machinery, nor even any knowledge of physical forces other than fire? Thus the question, for all its being carried back "to the first day of the second creation", has not advanced a single step forward. This way of explaining things savors both of Greek and of Hebrew, it is at once mystical and allegorical. It gives M. Proudhon a prefect right to say:

"I have proved by theory and by facts the principle that all labor must have a surplus."The "facts" are the famous progressive calculation; the theory is the myth of Prometheus.

"But," continues M. Proudhon, "this principle, while being as certain as an arithmetical proposition, is as yet far from being realized by everyone.

Whereas, with the progress of collective industry, every day's individual labor produces a greater and greater product, and whereas therefore, by a necessary consequence, the worker with the same wage ought to become richer every day, there actually exist estates in society which profit and others which decay."[I 79-80]

In 1770 the population of the United Kingdom of Great Britain was 15 million, and the productive population was 3 million. The scientific power of production equalled a population of about 12 million individuals more. Therefore there were, altogether, 15 million of productive forces. Thus the productive power was to the population as 1 is to 1; and the scientific power was to the manual power as 4 is to 1.

In 1840 the population did not exceed 30 million: the productive population was 6 million. But the scientific power amounted to 650 million;that is, it was to the whole population as 21 is to 1, and to manual power as 108 is to 1.

In English society the working day thus acquired in 70 a surplus of 2,700 per cent productivity; that is, in 1840 it produced 27 times as much as in 1770. According to M. Proudhon, the following question should be raised: why was not the English worker of 1840 27 times as rich as the one of 1770? In raising such a question one would naturally be supposing that the English could have produced this wealth without the historical conditions in which it was produced, such as: private accumulation of capital, modern division of labor, automatic workshops, anarchical competition, the wage system -- in short, everything that is based upon class antagonisM.

同类推荐
  • 大方广佛华严经续入法界品

    大方广佛华严经续入法界品

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 楞严法玺印禅师语录

    楞严法玺印禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 证治准绳·幼科

    证治准绳·幼科

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 春暮思平泉杂咏二十

    春暮思平泉杂咏二十

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 韩愈集

    韩愈集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 唐先生的套路婚姻

    唐先生的套路婚姻

    苏子悦并不想和这个男人结婚,可是为什么他一步步把她套路进婚姻里了。
  • 奈非天闯漫威

    奈非天闯漫威

    奈非天横行漫威世界,德鲁伊模板,带一些其他职业技能,逐渐成为一个真正的奈非天,伪无敌流,开后宫但不会见女人就上……
  • 把快乐留给自己

    把快乐留给自己

    生活中的每个人,都或多或少缺少一些东西,没有一个人的生命是完整无缺的。但每个人的心灵深处,都希望自己天天快乐,日日开心,于是烦恼和愁苦便常常折磨着本已压力重重的心灵。其实,放下追求圆圆满满的幻想,面对充满挫折与考验的人生才是明智;在漫漫旅程中,把洒脱和快乐留给自己,过的踏实、满足才是真谛。本书收集了生活里许多人生小故事,使您在阅读中品味生活、心胸释然,不要忘记将快乐留给自己,在人生路上轻松前行。
  • 西游之暗黑世界

    西游之暗黑世界

    悟空:若这天容不下我,那我便捅破这天!我若成佛,则这世间无魔!我若成魔,便要杀尽那诸佛!
  • 你是第八个(希区柯克精选集)

    你是第八个(希区柯克精选集)

    《希区柯克精选集》中所选的故事,都深得希区柯克的精髓。书里的每一个小故事,其实都是每时每刻发生在我们身边的事情,但是通过希区柯克的别样演绎,它们又变得意味深长,引人入胜。正是这些东西,让你一口气读到最后,也让你体验到那种守得云开见月明的感觉,仿佛一下从黑暗中跃入到碧海蓝天之中,让你想放声尖叫。
  • 噬天剑尊

    噬天剑尊

    北冥有鱼,其名为鲲,鲲之大,不知几千里也,怒而啸,一念可吞天,一念能噬地,自成鸿蒙,万物皆能所容。一门《鲲神吞天诀》,一段失落的神明历史。一名含仇少年,一段辉煌剑尊之路。所有的所有,从这里开始!
  • 情剑魔刀生死决

    情剑魔刀生死决

    一场秋雨一场寒,十场秋雨穿上棉,江湖上又将引起一场以刀剑之争的生死劫,杨轩手握上古神器,脸色憔悴,看着站在他跟前的这个女人,他对她只有恨,一种彻骨的恨不得恨
  • 中外历史上著名思想家智慧、情操和人格魅力

    中外历史上著名思想家智慧、情操和人格魅力

    全书主要介绍中外著名思想家,例如孔子,老子,孟子。庄子,墨子、韩非子等等中国思想家的智慧、情操和人格魅力,还有外国思想家,例如苏格拉底,百拉图,亚里斯多德,卢梭,伏尔泰,孟德斯鸠,黑格尔等外国思想家的思想智慧,情操和人格等等。
  • 苦吟寒士贾岛传

    苦吟寒士贾岛传

    这是一部文学传记,而非学术性传记,但其中贾岛的生平大事都有所本,与贾岛有关的人物也多系真人。当然,作为历史人物传记,小说的情节不可能曲折离奇跌宕起伏,甚至许多方面还存在着推理性的叙述。我不敢说,书中的贾岛和中唐大诗人贾岛不差分毫,但他至少是我心目中的贾岛。我曾向一位前辈讨教,他说,“《三国演义》与《三国志》的区别,前者是小说,后者是史志。你既然是写小说,有些事就不要再去顾虑。”我听后为自己的胆大妄为感到安慰,也去了好多顾虑。
  • 琴说

    琴说

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。