登陆注册
4811800000038

第38章 (3)

"In society, the incessant appearance of machinery is the antithesis, the inverse formula of the division of labor: it is the protest of the industrial genius against fractional and homical labor. What, actually, is a machine? A way of uniting different portions of labor which had been separated by the division of labor. Every machine can be defined as a summary of several operations.... Thus, through the machine there will be a restoration of the worker.... machinery, which in political economy places itself in contradiction to the division of labor, represents synthesis, which in the human mind is opposed to analysis.... Division merely separated the different parts of labor, letting each one devote himself to the speciality which most suited him; the workshop groups the workers according to the relation of each part to the whole.... It introduces the principle of authority in labor.... But this is not all; the machine or the workshop, after degrading the worker by giving him a master, completes his abasement by making him sink from the rank of artisan to that of common laborer.... The period we are going through ar the moment, that of machinery, is distinguished by a special characteristic, the wage worker. The wage worker is subsequent to the division of labor and to exchange."[I 135, 136, 161]

Just a simple remark to M. Proudhon. The separation of the different parts of labor, leaving to each one the opportunity of devoting himself to the speciality best suited to him -- a separation which M. Proudhon dates from the beginning of the world -- exists only in modern industry under the rule of competition.

M. Proudhon goes on to give us a most "interesting genealogy", to show how the workshop arose from the division of labor and the wage worker from the workshop.

He supposes a man who "noticed that by dividing up production into its different parts and having each one performed by a separate worker", the forces of production would be multiplied.

This man, "grasping the thread of this idea, tells himself that, by forming a permanent group of workers selected for the special purpose he sets himself, he will obtain a more sustained production, etc." [I 161]

This man makes a proposal to other men, to make them grasp his idea and the thread of his idea.

This man, at the beginning of industry, deals on terms of equality with his companions who later becomes his workmen.

"One realizes, in fact, that this original equality had rapidly to disappear in view of the advantageous position of the master and the dependence of the wage-earner." [I 163]

That is another example of M. Proudhon's historical and descriptive method.

Let us now examine, from the historical and economic point of view, whether the workshop of the machine really introduced the principle of authority in society subsequently to the division of labor; whether it rehabilitated the worker on the one hand, while submitting him to authority on the other; whether the machine is the recomposition of divided labor, the synthesis of labor as opposed to its analysis.

Society as a whole has this in common with the interior of a workshop, that it too has its division of labor. If one took as a model the division of labor in a modern workshop, in order to apply it to a whole society, the society best organized for the production of wealth would undoubtedly be that which had a single chief employer, distributing tasks to different members of the community according to a previously fixed rule. But this is by no means the case. While inside the modern workshop the division of labor is meticulously regulated by the authority of the employer, modern society has no other rule, no other authority for the distribution of labor than free competition.

Under the patriarchal system, under the caste system, under the feudal and corporative system, there was division of labor in the whole of society according to fixed rules. Were these rules established by a legislator? No. Originally born of the conditions of material production, they were raised to the status of laws only much later. In this way, these different forms of the division of labor became so many bases of social organization. As for the division in the workshop, it was very little developed in all these forms of society.

It can even be laid down as a general rule that the less authority presides over the division of labor inside society, the more the division of labor develops inside the workshop, and the more it is subjected there to the authority of a single person. Thus authority in the workshop and authority in society, in relation to the division of labor, are in inverse ratio to each other.

The question now is what kind of workshop it is in which the occupations are very much separated, where each worker's task is reduced to a very simple operation, and where the authority, capital, groups and directs the work. How was this workshop brought into existence? In order to answer this question, we shall have to examine how manufacturing industry, properly so-called, has developed. I am speaking here of that industry which is not yet industry, with its machinery, but which is already no longer the industry of the artisans of the Middle Ages, nor domestic industry. We shall not go into great detail: we shall merely give a few main points to show that history is not to be made with formulas.

One of the most indispensable conditions for the formation of manufacturing industry was the accumulation of capital, facilitated by the discovery of America and the import of its precious metals.

It is sufficiently proved that the increase in the means of exchange resulted in the depreciation of wages and land rents, on the one hand, and the growth of industrial profits on the other. In other words: to the extent that the propertied class and the working class, the feudal lords and the people, sank, to that extent the capitalist class, the bourgeoisie, rose.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 青少年百科·下

    青少年百科·下

    《青少年百科》是我社最近推出系列长卷之一,是促进青少年健康成长的必不可少的百科全书,是一部提高青少年综合素质、增强青少年全面修养的良师益友。
  • 东西晋演义

    东西晋演义

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 血渊古城

    血渊古城

    新来的老师戴着面具,手拿武士刀,他是谁啊?在云联里都敢与怜爱为敌,与无尽恶意一起喝酒,还有他那神秘的能力,敢自立为绝对中立,还有他的那段记忆,让所有人扑朔迷离
  • 土豪总裁不好惹

    土豪总裁不好惹

    他冷漠无情,唯独对她温柔深情,给她一切,并高调宣布:“她是我冷少的女人!”他对她百依百顺,她交付身心,却突然发现……她打算离开,却被告知怀孕……重遇,他紧追不放,她瞟他一眼:“先生,你哪位?”他邪魅一笑:“老婆,该回家洗洗睡了!”被折叠、拉伸、翻转N遍后,她哀叹:“土豪总裁不好惹……”误会解除,她才知,他是她的天涯海角,此生都逃不过他的心。
  • 致身录

    致身录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 你是我时光里的甜蜜

    你是我时光里的甜蜜

    “做我的女人,这些东西都归你所有。”她满脸不屑的看着摆在眼前的豪车别墅,珠宝华服,冷笑挑衅,“抱歉,我只跟随强者。”下一秒,他送出去的金卡在空中划出一道优美的弧线,准确无误的掉入垃圾桶。他是呼风唤雨,无所不能的商界神话,竟被她不屑一顾!该死的女人,敢惹恼了她,后果她承担不起!既然她不肯乖乖就范,那他就只好一不做,二不休,直接将人扛回家!“混蛋,你做梦去吧,我死也不会嫁给你!”她气急败坏的瞪着他。某人邪魅一笑,载着她的银色劳斯莱斯直奔教堂,“我最擅长把不可能的事情变成现实。”
  • 幽默口才

    幽默口才

    人们学会讲话和思考的基本法则就是把不同的事物概念和语言区别开来,而幽默似乎要把人们的日常语言和思维搞乱了才成。如果你不能忍受你日常语言和理性思维的规范服从于幽默的谈吐和思维的规范,那你就可能把自己关在幽默的大门之外。
  • 魔纹之怒

    魔纹之怒

    叶沉通过灵魂投射器,转生至神秘的中央世界。他的灵魂被灵魂投射器加强,获得了过目不忘的记忆力。机缘巧合之下他更是得到奇点爆炸后,伴随中央世界诞生的魔纹以及神秘短刀。随后他聚纹力、锻纹兵、创刀法,从一个弱小的少年成长为一名纵横天地的高手。从此以后,中央世界又多出一个被人永恒传唱的名字!
  • 我为伊人狂

    我为伊人狂

    以大型百货商场为背景,讲述男主从学生时代的纯洁初恋,到进入职场的勾心斗角,十几年间经历了感情的跌宕起伏,事业的峰回路转……
  • 人大常用语汇释义

    人大常用语汇释义

    全书精选与人民代表大会制度、人大议事履职和常委会机关日常管理密切相关的百余个常用词条,内容涵盖人大理论研究和实际工作的各个领域。本书按其内在逻辑关系分为政治学与法学基础理论、人大制度与人大建设知识、人大机关工作与人大业务知识三大部分,各个部分词条的选择注重包容性、相关性,尽量涵盖较多的知识点和信息量,便于读者系统学习和掌握相关概念与知识。词条的解释立足人大依法履职实践,结合相关理论研究成果,着重阐明其基本含义、核心内容和相关知识,同时回答人大工作中的疑惑,语言通俗易懂,内容具体实在。