It seems you do not know that, as Father Pintereau says, 'all our fathers teach, with one accord, that it is an error, and almost a heresy, to hold that contrition is necessary; or that attrition alone, induced by the sole motive, the fear of the pains of hell, which excludes a disposition to offend, is not sufficient with the sacrament?'" "What, father! do you mean to say that it is almost an article of faith that attrition, induced merely by fear of punishment, is sufficient with the sacrament? That idea, I think, is peculiar to your fathers; for those other doctors who hold that attrition is sufficient along with the sacrament, always take care to show that it must be accompanied with some love to God at least.It appears to me, moreover, that even your own authors did not always consider this doctrine of yours so certain.Your Father Suarez, for instance, speaks of it thus: 'Although it is a probable opinion that attrition is sufficient with the sacrament, yet it is not certain, and it may be false- non est certa, et potest esse falsa.And, if it is false, attrition is not sufficient to save a man;and he that dies knowingly in this state, wilfully exposes himself to the grave peril of eternal damnation.For this opinion is neither very ancient nor very common- nec valde antiqua, nec multum communis.' Sanchez was not more prepared to hold it as infallible when he said in his Summary that 'the sick man and his confessor, who content themselves at the hour of death with attrition and the sacrament, are both chargeable with mortal sin, on account of the great risk of damnation to which the penitent would be exposed, if the opinion that attrition is sufficient with the sacrament should not turn out to be true.Comitolus, too, says that 'we should not be too sure that attrition suffices with the sacrament.'" Here the worthy father interrupted me."What!" he cried, "you read our authors then, it seems? That is all very well; but it would be still better were you never to read them without the precaution of having one of us beside you.Do you not see, now, that, from having read them alone, you have concluded, in your simplicity, that these passages bear hard on those who have more lately supported our doctrine of attrition? Whereas it might be shown that nothing could set them off to greater advantage.Only think what a triumph it is for our fathers of the present day to have succeeded in disseminating their opinion in such short time, and to such an extent that, with the exception of theologians, nobody almost would ever suppose but that our modern views on this subject had been the uniform belief of the faithful in all ages! So that, in fact, when you have shown, from our fathers themselves, that, a few years ago, 'this opinion was not certain,' you have only succeeded in giving our modern authors the whole merit of its establishment! "Accordingly,"he continued, "our cordial friend Diana, to gratify us, no doubt, has recounted the various steps by which the opinion reached its present position.'In former days, the ancient schoolmen maintained that contrition was necessary as soon as one had committed a mortal sin; since then, however, it has been thought that it is not binding except on festival days; afterwards, only when some great calamity threatened the people; others, again, that it ought not to be long delayed at the approach of death.But our fathers, Hurtado and Vasquez, have ably refuted all these opinions and established that one is not bound to contrition unless he cannot be absolved in any other way, or at the point of death!' But, to continue the wonderful progress of this doctrine, I might add, what our fathers, Fagundez, Granados, and Escobar, have decided, 'that contrition is not necessary even at death;because,' say they, 'if attrition with the sacrament did not suffice at death, it would follow that attrition would not be sufficient with the sacrament.And the learned Hurtado, cited by Diana and Escobar, goes still further; for he asks: 'Is that sorrow for sin which flows solely from apprehension of its temporal consequences, such as having lost health or money, sufficient?
同类推荐
热门推荐
邪王慢慢宠:至尊甜妻要翻天
一次意外的穿越,洛浅陌成了西隐国郡王府废柴三小姐,爹不疼娘不爱,还被太子殿下退了亲成了笑柄。貌美柔善的二姐?阴狠毒辣的情敌?不可一世的太子殿下?洛浅陌表示,赶紧滚!别耽误老娘修炼!异界之上,强者为尊,这幅身躯下的灵魂,她就是神!只是那个权势滔天、修为逆天的皇叔,你靠我那么近干嘛?皇叔:小洛儿,咱们一起双修吧。王爷腹黑:夫人请接招
她是现代的医学天才,穿越成为暮云国丞相家不受宠的嫡女,筋脉细小不能习武?侮辱本小姐?那就揍的你满地开花!看着一步步走向自己的妖孽男,霸气十足的吼道“跪搓衣板去!”“夫人,为夫犯了何错?”某妖孽男真诚的问道。“犯了七出中的妒!你说该不该跪?”挑眉问道。“该,为夫这就去跪。”某妖孽男一脸坦然的回答道。【情节虚构,请勿模仿】重生之狂医冥后
穿越前,她是玄医世家家主,即将步入天纵领域的高手,却因为人祸家族覆灭,爱人永隔,穿越后,她是周楚国尊贵的长公主,才貌双绝,手握惊天财富和势力,却非要抽风倒贴敌国丞相为妻,洞房花烛夜,不堪旁人凌辱,血溅当场以求清名。尼玛,她堂堂天纵领域高手岂能有那么憋屈的一世?!没有关系!颠覆这世,穿越回去,于她不过是举手!且看——初来乍到的她,收拾了曾经欺辱她的小妾,救走了宝贝弟弟,顺带给那男人留下了永生难忘的记忆,至此深陷纠葛为她要死要活。从今往后,彪悍的人生不再需要理由,看她一代狂医,翻手为云,覆手为雨……至于男主么?我擦,你们没看文的名字么?某男主——老婆,乃这样直白我会不好意思的。————————————————————某天,某时,某地,一群人,面对着她的绝然纵身坠入山崖,悲痛欲绝,几近疯狂。而她,则借着机会脱胎换骨,涅磐重生,彻底抛却了一世纠葛,恩怨情仇。悬崖下,某男等候已久,纤手轻抬,将佳人拢如怀中,笑得得瑟。至此,携手天下,永不分离!————————————————他说,朕不管你是云缳还是玄墨,生生世世你都是朕的女人,你若是敢死,朕便让你族人陪葬!即便是生灵涂炭也再所不惜!她说,威胁人之前找个好理由,我的族人已经死得差不多了,还是你想玩穿越,去动我玄家人?既然如此,本家主不介意再次煅烧整个尧舜的精气!想要造孽随你便,小心死后下地狱!他说,你不是曾经爱本相爱得死去活来么,为何现在又这般绝情,是欲擒故纵还是你根本就换了一个人?!她说,你都说曾经了,何必再纠结下去?!麻烦继续抱着你的曾经还有那群对你死心塌地的蠢女人过一辈子,离我远点!———————————————“人生总是那么不完美,到哪里都摆脱不了渣男的环绕!”“亲爱的,那是为了衬托为夫的痴情专一卓尔不凡,有对比才能突出为夫的好!”“…”“麻烦有点骨气,你确认你是冥王?”“在自己女人面前要骨气干么?”“……”“那你不觉得我一灵医世家家主和你这冥王有冲突么?”“那不正好,你能让人活,我能让人死,如你觉得不妥,为夫也开医馆救人?”“……”求婚记——“为夫很好用,招之则来,挥之不去。连你跳崖都能接住你,死了都能让你活过来!亲爱的,考虑一下吧!”“可是我现在心情不爽,想看人跪搓衣板,特别是自己的男人来跪……”桥(中小学生必读丛书)
《桥》是萧红短篇小说中的代表作,她对此篇十分偏爱,在发表之前就以此名结集成小说、散文集《桥》。作品在意象选择、人物刻画和语言运用等艺术方面,做了很多新的尝试,使她的作品创作始由稚嫩走向成熟,为日后创作更具深度的长篇小说奠定了基础,而它所体现的悲剧性则代表了萧红的创作基调。