For,as the books of the Old Testament are derived to us from no higher time than that of Esdras,who by the direction of God's spirit retrieved them when they were lost:those of the New Testament,of which the copies were not many,nor could easily be all in any one private man's hand,cannot be derived from a higher time than that wherein the governors of the Church collected,approved,and recommended them to us as the writings of those Apostles and disciples under whose names they go.The first enumeration of all the books,both of the Old and New Testament,is in the Canons of the Apostles,supposed to be collected by Clement the First (after St.Peter),Bishop of Rome.But because that is but supposed,and by many questioned,the Council of Laodicea is the first we know that recommended the Bible to the then Christian churches for the writings of the prophets and Apostles:and this Council was held in the 364th year after Christ.At which time,though ambition had so far prevailed on the great doctors of the Church as no more to esteem emperors,though Christian,for the shepherds of the people,but for sheep;and emperors not Christian,for wolves;and endeavoured to pass their doctrine,not for counsel and information,as preachers;but for laws,as absolute governors;and thought such frauds as tended to make the people the more obedient to Christian doctrine to be pious;yet I am persuaded they did not therefore falsify the Scriptures,though the copies of the books of the New Testament were in the hands only of the ecclesiastics;because if they had had an intention so to do,they would surely have made them more favorable to their power over Christian princes and civil sovereignty than they are.I see not therefore any reason to doubt but that the Old and New Testament,as we have them now,are the true registers of those things which were done and said by the prophets and Apostles.And so perhaps are some of those books which are called Apocrypha,if left out of the Canon,not for inconformity of doctrine with the rest,but only because they are not found in the Hebrew.For after the conquest of Asia by Alexander the Great,there were few learned Jews that were not perfect in the Greek tongue.For the seventy interpreters that converted the Bible into Greek were all of them Hebrews;and we have extant the works of Philo and Josephus,both Jews,written by them eloquently in Greek.But it is not the writer but the authority of the Church that maketh a book canonical.And although these books were written by diverse men,yet it is manifest the writers were all endued with one and the same spirit,in that they conspire to one and the same end,which is the setting forth of the rights of the kingdom of God,the Father,Son,and Holy Ghost.For the book of Genesis deriveth the genealogy of God's people from the creation of the world to the going into Egypt:the other four Books of Moses contain the election of God for their King,and the laws which he prescribed for their government:the Books of Joshua,Judges,Ruth,and Samuel,to the time of Saul,describe the acts of God's people till the time they cast off God's yoke,and called for a king,after the manner of their neighbour nations:the rest of the history of the Old Testament derives the succession of the line of David to the Captivity,of which line was to spring the restorer of the kingdom of God,even our blessed Saviour,God the Son,whose coming was foretold in the books of the prophets,after whom the Evangelists wrote his life and actions,and his claim to the kingdom,whilst he lived on earth:and lastly,the Acts and Epistles of the Apostles declare the coming of God,the Holy Ghost,and the authority He left with them and their successors,for the direction of the Jews and for the invitation of the Gentiles.In sum,the histories and the prophecies of the Old Testament and the gospels and epistles of the New Testament have had one and the same scope,to convert men to the obedience of God:1.in Moses and the priests;2.in the man Christ;and 3.in the Apostles and the successors to apostolical power.For these three at several times did represent the person of God:Moses,and his successors the high priests,and kings of Judah,in the Old Testament:Christ Himself,in the time he lived on earth:and the Apostles,and their successors,from the day of Pentecost (when the Holy Ghost descended on them)to this day.
It is a question much disputed between the diverse sects of Christian religion,from whence the Scriptures derive their authority;which question is also propounded sometimes in other terms,as,how we know them to be the word of God,or,why we believe them to be so;and the difficulty of resolving it ariseth chiefly from the improperness of the words wherein the question itself is couched.For it is believed on all hands that the first and original author of them is God;and consequently the question disputed is not that.Again,it is manifest that none can know they are God's word (though all true Christians believe it)but those to whom God Himself hath revealed it supernaturally;and therefore the question is not rightly moved,of our knowledge of it.Lastly,when the question is propounded of our belief;because some are moved to believe for one,and others for other reasons,there can be rendered no one general answer for them all.The question truly stated is:by what authority they are made law.
As far as they differ not from the laws of nature,there is no doubt but they are the law of God,and carry their authority with them,legible to all men that have the use of natural reason:but this is no other authority than that of all other moral doctrine consonant to reason;the dictates whereof are laws,not made,but eternal.
If they be made law by God Himself,they are of the nature of written law,which are laws to them only to whom God hath so sufficiently published them as no man can excuse himself by saying he knew not they were His.
