The relation between these several deposits on the shores of the Pacific, is not nearly so clear as in the case of the tertiary formations on the Atlantic.Judging from the form and height of the land (evidence which Ifeel sure is here much more trustworthy than it can ever be in such broken continents as that of Europe), from the identity of mineralogical composition, from the presence of fragments of lignite and of silicified wood, and from the intercalated layers of imperfect coal, I must believe that the coast-formations from Central Chiloe to Concepcion, a distance of 400 miles, are of the same age: from nearly similar reasons, I suspect that the beds of Mocha, Huafo, and Ypun, belong also to the same period.The commonest shell in Mocha and Huafo is the same species of Turritella; and Ibelieve the same Cytheraea is found on the islands of Huafo, Chiloe, and Ypun; but with these trifling exceptions, the few organic remains found at these places are distinct.The numerous shells from Navidad, with the exception of two, namely, the Sigaretus and Turritella found at Ypun, are likewise distinct from those found in any other part of this coast.
Coquimbo has Cardium auca in common with Concepcion, and Fusus Cleryanus with Huafo; I may add, that Coquimbo has Venus petitiana, and a gigantic oyster (said by M.d'Orbigny also to be found a little south of Concepcion)in common with Payta, though this latter place is situated twenty-two degrees northward of latitude 27 degrees, to which point the Coquimbo formation extends.
>From these facts, and from the generic resemblance of the fossils from the different localities, I cannot avoid the suspicion that they all belong to nearly the same epoch, which epoch, as we shall immediately see, must be a very ancient tertiary one.But as the Baculite, especially considering its apparent identity with the Cretaceous Pondicherry species, and the presence of an Ammonite, and the resemblance of the Nautilus to two upper greensand species, together afford very strong evidence that the formation of Concepcion is a Secondary one; I will, in my remarks on the fossils from the other localities, put on one side those from Concepcion and from Eastern Chiloe, which, whatever their age may be, appear to me to belong to one group.I must, however, again call attention to the fact that the Cardium auca is found both at Concepcion and in the undoubtedly tertiary strata of Coquimbo: nor should the possibility be overlooked, that as Trigonia, though known in the northern hemisphere only as a Secondary genus, has living representatives in the Australian seas, so a Baculite, Ammonite, and Trigonia may have survived in this remote part of the southern ocean to a somewhat later period than to the north of the equator.
Before passing in review the fossils from the other localities, there are two points, with respect to the formations between Concepcion and Chiloe, which deserve some notice.First, that though the strata are generally horizontal, they have been upheaved in Chiloe in a set of parallel anticlinal and uniclinal lines ranging north and south,--in the district near P.Rumena by eight or nine far-extended, most symmetrical, uniclinal lines ranging nearly east and west,--and in the neighbourhood of Concepcion by less regular single lines, directed both N.E.and S.W., and N.W.and S.E.This fact is of some interest, as showing that within a period which cannot be considered as very ancient in relation to the history of the continent, the strata between the Cordillera and the Pacific have been broken up in the same variously directed manner as have the old plutonic and metamorphic rocks in this same district.The second point is, that the sandstone between Concepcion and Southern Chiloe is everywhere lignitiferous, and includes much silicified wood; whereas the formations in Northern Chile do not include beds of lignite or coal, and in place of the fragments of silicified wood there are silicified bones.Now, at the present day, from Cape Horn to near Concepcion, the land is entirely concealed by forests, which thin out at Concepcion, and in Central and Northern Chile entirely disappear.This coincidence in the distribution of the fossil wood and the living forests may be quite accidental; but Iincline to take a different view of it; for, as the difference in climate, on which the presence of forests depends, is here obviously in chief part due to the form of the land, and as the Cordillera undoubtedly existed when the lignitiferous beds were accumulating, I conceive it is not improbable that the climate, during the lignitiferous period, varied on different parts of the coast in a somewhat similar manner as it now does.Looking to an earlier epoch, when the strata of the Cordillera were depositing, there were islands which even in the latitude of Northern Chile, where now all is irreclaimably desert, supported large coniferous forests.
TABLE 4.
Column 1.Genera, with living and tertiary species on the west coast of South America.(M.d'Orbigny states that the genus Natica is not found on the coast of Chile; but Mr.Cuming found it at Valparaiso.Scalaria was found at Valparaiso; Arca, at Iquique, in latitude 20, by Mr.Cuming; Arca, also, was found by Captain King, at Juan Fernandez, in latitude 33 degrees 30'S.)Column 2.Latitudes, in which found fossil on the coasts of Chile and Peru.
(In degrees and minutes.)
Column 3.Southernmost latitude, in which found living on the west coast of South America.(In degrees and minutes.)Bulla : 30 to 43 30 : 12 near Lima.
Cassis : 34 : 1 37.
Pyrula : 34 (and 36 30 at Concepcion) : 5 Payta.
Fusus : 30 and 43 30 : 23 Mexillones; reappears at the St.of Magellan.
Pleurotoma : 34 to 43 30 : 2 18 St.Elena.
Terebra : 34 : 5 Payta.
Sigaretus : 34 to 44 30 : 12 Lima.
Anomia : 30 : 7 48.
Perna : 30 : 1 23 Xixappa.
Cardium : 30 to 34 (and 36 30 at Concepcion) : 5 Payta.
Artemis : 30 : 5 Payta.
