登陆注册
5198000000026

第26章

In estimating what is good or evil in itself, as distinguished from what can be so called only relatively, the following points are to be considered.Either a rational principle is already conceived, as of itself the determining principle of the will, without regard to possible objects of desire (and therefore by the more legislative form of the maxim), and in that case that principle is a practical a priori law, and pure reason is supposed to be practical of itself.The law in that case determines the will directly; the action conformed to it is good in itself; a will whose maxim always conforms to this law is good absolutely in every respect and is the supreme condition of all good.Or the maxim of the will is consequent on a determining principle of desire which presupposes an object of pleasure or pain, something therefore that pleases or displeases, and the maxim of reason that we should pursue the former and avoid the latter determines our actions as good relatively to our inclination, that is, good indirectly, i.e., relatively to a different end to which they are means), and in that case these maxims can never be called laws, but may be called rational practical precepts.The end itself, the pleasure that we seek, is in the latter case not a good but a welfare;not a concept of reason, but an empirical concept of an object of sensation; but the use of the means thereto, that is, the action, is nevertheless called good (because rational deliberation is required for it), not however, good absolutely, but only relatively to our sensuous nature, with regard to its feelings of pleasure and displeasure; but the will whose maxim is affected thereby is not a pure will; this is directed only to that in which pure reason by itself can be practical.

This is the proper place to explain the paradox of method in a critique of practical reason, namely, that the concept of good and evil must not be determined before the moral law (of which it seems as if it must be the foundation), but only after it and by means of it.

In fact, even if we did not know that the principle of morality is a pure a priori law determining the will, yet, that we may not assume principles quite gratuitously, we must, at least at first, leave it undecided, whether the will has merely empirical principles of determination, or whether it has not also pure a priori principles;for it is contrary to all rules of philosophical method to assume as decided that which is the very point in question.Supposing that we wished to begin with the concept of good, in order to deduce from it the laws of the will, then this concept of an object (as a good) would at the same time assign to us this object as the sole determining principle of the will.Now, since this concept had not any practical a priori law for its standard, the criterion of good or evil could not be placed in anything but the agreement of the object with our feeling of pleasure or pain; and the use of reason could only consist in determining in the first place this pleasure or pain in connexion with all the sensations of my existence, and in the second place the means of securing to myself the object of the pleasure.Now, as experience alone can decide what conforms to the feeling of pleasure, and by hypothesis the practical law is to be based on this as a condition, it follows that the possibility of a priori practical laws would be at once excluded, because it was imagined to be necessary first of all to find an object the concept of which, as a good, should constitute the universal though empirical principle of determination of the will.But what it was necessary to inquire first of all was whether there is not an a priori determining principle of the will (and this could never be found anywhere but in a pure practical law, in so far as this law prescribes to maxims merely their form without regard to an object).Since, however, we laid the foundation of all practical law in an object determined by our conceptions of good and evil, whereas without a previous law that object could not be conceived by empirical concepts, we have deprived ourselves beforehand of the possibility of even conceiving a pure practical law.On the other hand, if we had first investigated the latter analytically, we should have found that it is not the concept of good as an object that determines the moral law and makes it possible, but that, on the contrary, it is the moral law that first determines the concept of good and makes it possible, so far as it deserves the name of good absolutely.

同类推荐
  • 处世悬镜

    处世悬镜

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • A Belated Guest

    A Belated Guest

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 重修台郡各建筑图说

    重修台郡各建筑图说

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 梅溪词

    梅溪词

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 達海叢書·批注

    達海叢書·批注

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 恋爱玛奇朵

    恋爱玛奇朵

    古灵精怪的黎妃雪在父亲的安排下,以一个新的身份转入当地的贵族学校——枫林学园。然而鬼点子层出不穷的她不甘现状,乔装成一个其貌不扬的丑小鸭进入枫林学园。岂料在进入枫林学园的第一天,因误闯禁地,在那片残阳如火的枫林中,她遇见了两个命中注定的少年……故事的背后,冥冥中,究竟是谁的安排?谁的算计?
  • 上清六甲祈祷秘法

    上清六甲祈祷秘法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 伪异能觉醒

    伪异能觉醒

    一块诡异的槐木牌,将一个普通青年带入怪异的武侠世界,当他摸爬滚打重返地球已是八百年后。曾经引以为傲的武学在新派异能面前是如此不堪一击,这一次且看他如何觉醒异能再次纵横天下!(新人新书求各位大大推荐票支持!)
  • 花椒刺

    花椒刺

    温新阶,土家族,出版有散文集《小雨中的回忆》、《红磨坊》、《他乡故乡》、《昨日的风铃》、《乡村影像》,小说集《黑巷》、《唐朝女子》。散文《豆芽菜》在日本获奖,散文集《他乡故乡》获全国第七届少数民族文学“骏马奖”,散文集《乡村影像》获湖北省第七届“屈原文学奖”。系中国作家协会会员,湖北宜昌市作家协会副主席。王欣雅正在市中心医院忙得满头大汗,刚把尤汉勇送进手术室,孔书记的电话来了。“小王,在干啥?”王欣雅想了想,“感冒了,在医院输液。”
  • 诱你入局:左少情非得已

    诱你入局:左少情非得已

    左林肖宠我惯我容忍我,以保卫者的姿态强势闯入我的生活。我以为我们之间存在爱情,直到发现,他接近我竟是源于一场交易。剥开真相的外衣,方知所谓的甜蜜是穿肠毒药。这场猎心游戏,我,不玩了!
  • 快穿之男神攻略手册

    快穿之男神攻略手册

    蜜月被丈夫闺蜜联手害死!或许是怨念太深,在秦欢欢死亡的最后一秒,脑海中突然:“哔——男神攻略系统正式启动,请宿主坐稳扶好。”于是乎,秦欢欢就这样开始了穿越到不同位面攻略男主之路。竹马总裁/多情校草/粗汉将军/弱鸡书生/断背王爷/魔鬼皇上/冷酷吸血鬼/末世僵尸王/网游大神/原始首领……只有想不到,没有做不到,你,准备好了吗?
  • 大探险家的故事(古今中外英雄伟人故事系列)

    大探险家的故事(古今中外英雄伟人故事系列)

    探险是人类对世界的许多重大发现的必由之路,是人类探索自然的一种天性。许多大探险家不仅对人类做出了伟大贡献,他们的精神对后人,尤其是对青少年更具巨大的激励作用。
  • 隐婚歌神是妻奴

    隐婚歌神是妻奴

    都说身高不是距离,年龄不是问题,当158的小矮子遇上187的大长腿,当19岁的萌妹子遇上31岁的糙大叔,意料之外的爱情也会在悄然间生根发芽。初见。他是歌坛神话,她不过是他众多迷妹中的一员,他却主动伸出了手,说,“我们如此有缘,就作个伴吧。”那时候的他还不知道,这伴,一作就是一辈子。而父不疼,母不爱,兄厌弟嫌的她,生平第一次知道,原来作伴这个词,是这样的温暖。恋爱前。他对她温柔体贴,而她深陷其中,使出百般手段,只为了能够站在他的身边。面对她的告白,他说,“我只是把你当做侄女。”结婚前。她厚颜无耻,誓将推到男神为己任,而他却冷静自持,千般推阻。面对她的套路,他说,“我怕你未来会后悔。”结婚后。大龄男青年在再一次被老婆踹下了床之后,终于领悟到一个人生道理。flag千万不要乱立!他万般求情,只求能和她同床共枕,而她却熟视无睹,转身就睡。面对她的冷淡,他却不再多说,而是用实际行动向她证明,他究竟老不老!第二天,她扶着腰,一个用力又将他踹下了床。她说:“未来一个月你别想要回卧室睡觉!”她是陈姝轻,人前的普通大学生,人后的神秘制作人。他是程书卿,公认的抒情皇太子,有着近乎完美的嗓音。类似的名字,类似的兴趣,也让两颗渴望的心逐渐靠近。无关乎年龄地位,有的不过是两个相似的灵魂在互相吸引。他曾被她视为光芒,但在后来,她成为了他的太阳。男女双洁,甜宠暖文,欢迎入坑。
  • Pollyanna

    Pollyanna

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 繁华录

    繁华录

    她,聪敏慧黠。睿智的头脑里那五千年的文化积淀,使她在初唐那个繁华盛世里取得一番傲人的成就。从商贾之女到大唐郡主,她头上笼罩着无数耀眼的光环。 然而,就在她集万千荣宠于一身之时,命运之神却给了她重重磨难。 于是,聪明绝顶的她与命运展开一场惊心动魄的较量。 作者群:108911050 读者群:108911250 欢迎各位加入!