登陆注册
5199700000012

第12章

But [though sound and odour may travel,] with regard to Light the case is different. For Light has its raison d'etre in the being [not becoming] of something, but it is not a movement. And in general, even in qualitative change the case is different from what it is in local movement [both being different species of kinesis]. Local movements, of course, arrive first at a point midway before reaching their goal (and Sound, it is currently believed, is a movement of something locally moved), but we cannot go on to assert this [arrival at a point midway] like manner of things which undergo qualitative change. For this kind of change may conceivably take place in a thing all at once, without one half of it being changed before the other; e.g. it is conceivable that water should be frozen simultaneously in every part. But still, for all that, if the body which is heated or frozen is extensive, each part of it successively is affected by the part contiguous, while the part first changed in quality is so changed by the cause itself which originates the change, and thus the change throughout the whole need not take place coinstantaneously and all at once. Tasting would have been as smelling now is, if we lived in a liquid medium, and perceived [the sapid object] at a distance, before touching it.

Naturally, then, the parts of media between a sensory organ and its object are not all affected at once- except in the case of Light [illumination] for the reason above stated, and also in the case of seeing, for the same reason; for Light is an efficient cause of seeing.

Another question respecting sense-perception is as follows:

assuming, as is natural, that of two [simultaneous] sensory stimuli the stronger always tends to extrude the weaker [from consciousness], is it conceivable or not that one should be able to discern two objects coinstantaneously in the same individual time? The above assumption explains why persons do not perceive what is brought before their eyes, if they are at the time deep in thought, or in a fright, or listening to some loud noise. This assumption, then, must be made, and also the following: that it is easier to discern each object of sense when in its simple form than when an ingredient in a mixture; easier, for example, to discern wine when neat than when blended, and so also honey, and [in other provinces] a colour, or to discern the nete by itself alone, than [when sounded with the hypate] in the octave; the reason being that component elements tend to efface [the distinctive characteristics of] one another. Such is the effect [on one another] of all ingredients of which, when compounded, some one thing is formed.

If, then, the greater stimulus tends to expel the less, it necessarily follows that, when they concur, this greater should itself too be less distinctly perceptible than if it were alone, since the less by blending with it has removed some of its individuality, according to our assumption that simple objects are in all cases more distinctly perceptible.

Now, if the two stimuli are equal but heterogeneous, no perception of either will ensue; they will alike efface one another's characteristics. But in such a case the perception of either stimulus in its simple form is impossible. Hence either there will then be no sense-perception at all, or there will be a perception compounded of both and differing from either. The latter is what actually seems to result from ingredients blended together, whatever may be the compound in which they are so mixed.

Since, then, from some concurrent [sensory stimuli] a resultant object is produced, while from others no such resultant is produced, and of the latter sort are those things which belong to different sense provinces (for only those things are capable of mixture whose extremes are contraries, and no one compound can be formed from, e.g. White and Sharp, except indirectly, i.e. not as a concord is formed of Sharp and Grave); there follows logically the impossibility of discerning such concurrent stimuli coinstantaneously.

For we must suppose that the stimuli, when equal, tend alike to efface one another, since no one [form of stimulus] results from them; while, if they are unequal, the stronger alone is distinctly perceptible.

Again, the soul would be more likely to perceive coinstantaneously, with one and the same sensory act, two things in the same sensory province, such as the Grave and the Sharp in sound;for the sensory stimulation in this one province is more likely to be unitemporal than that involving two different provinces, as Sight and Hearing. But it is impossible to perceive two objects coinstantaneously in the same sensory act unless they have been mixed, [when, however, they are no longer two], for their amalgamation involves their becoming one, and the sensory act related to one object is itself one, and such act, when one, is, of course, coinstantaneous with itself. Hence, when things are mixed we of necessity perceive them coinstantaneously: for we perceive them by a perception actually one. For an object numerically one means that which is perceived by a perception actually one, whereas an object specifically one means that which is perceived by a sensory act potentially one [i.e. by an energeia of the same sensuous faculty]. If then the actualized perception is one, it will declare its data to be one object; they must, therefore, have been mixed. Accordingly, when they have not been mixed, the actualized perceptions which perceive them will be two; but [if so, their perception must be successive not coinstantaneous, for] in one and the same faculty the perception actualized at any single moment is necessarily one, only one stimulation or exertion of a single faculty being possible at a single instant, and in the case supposed here the faculty is one. It follows, therefore, that we cannot conceive the possibility of perceiving two distinct objects coinstantaneously with one and the same sense.

同类推荐
  • 明伦汇编官常典巡检部

    明伦汇编官常典巡检部

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 鸦片事略

    鸦片事略

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 大悲经

    大悲经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 送许侍御充云南哀册

    送许侍御充云南哀册

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 须摩提经

    须摩提经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 鲁迅最传世小说

    鲁迅最传世小说

    本书收录了鲁迅最有影响、最广为人知的小说,包括《祝福》《在酒楼上》《肥皂》《伤逝》等,表达了作者对生活在封建势力重压下的农民及知识分子的深刻洞察与表现,艺术手法圆熟,人物形象丰满,堪称中国现代小说经典。
  • 穿越之重新长大:迷你小皇妃

    穿越之重新长大:迷你小皇妃

    被暗恋男友的女同学推一把,她跌到山下臭水沟华丽丽的穿越了……太子失踪了,五岁她变成楚国的假大王,亲了蓝将军的脸,牵了小尚书的小手,搅得七皇子休妾休妻,全皇宫鸡飞狗跳……
  • 总制浙闽文檄

    总制浙闽文檄

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 万用英语表达宝典

    万用英语表达宝典

    无论是去英美国家旅游、工作、学习深造,还是感受英美文化的魅力,掌握最基本的英语口语都是第一需要。这里有英语万用会话黄金句,一定会碰上的近300个高频使用情境,及典型的生活口语!全面的编写内容+丰富的表达方式+易查的会话宝典,既可以满足英语初学者的入门需要,又可以满足那些具有一定基础、需要在较短时间内迅速提高口语水平的学习者的学习要求。让你一书在手,口语无忧。
  • 嫡妃不好惹

    嫡妃不好惹

    满怀欣喜赴约,没等到心上人,却等来一场精心安排的刺杀。银月国女扮男装的太子上官青染,伤心绝望之际,被心爱之人毫不留情的挥掌打落万丈深渊。再次睁眼,悲伤退去,眸底寒光乍现,让人望而生畏,她已非原来的她……纷争不断的皇宫,阴谋重重,负心男子虚情假意,无情利用,后宫嫔妃挑衅、嘲讽,设计陷害,无人知晓,她不是任人拿捏的软柿子,漫不经心的弹指一挥间,掀起阵阵血雨腥风:欠我债的人,我让你们拿命来抵,欠我情的人,我让你用一辈子的痛苦来还!本文女强+宫斗+宅斗,总之一个字‘斗’。斗斗更健康,越斗越销魂,外带斗倒所有敌人!推荐自己的文文:《重生之侯府嫡女》:《洛王妃》:《罂粟妃》:《狂妄邪妃》:《冷心弃妃》:推荐好友女强文:宁儿:《楚王妃》
  • 天机1

    天机1

    “由泰北清迈前往兰那王陵的途中,一个来自中国的旅行团辗转间误入歧途,迷失在一座群山围绕的现代城市。城内设施一应俱全,但却了无人迹,城内的时间,无情地定格在一年之前。本是一次幸福的旅行,未料等待旅行团的却是叵测的噩运。无法与外界联系,唯一的逃生道路被封死。在探寻出路的过程中,奇异事件接连发生——山魈报复,恶犬突袭;导游惨死天台,司机被炸成碎片……困境重重,危机四伏,远离人间的人们各怀心事。沉睡之城究竟埋藏着多少秘密?十九个原本命运各异的人,在这一坐标点相遇。是落入人为布设的陷阱,抑或是身遭不可违忤的天谴?对未知的恐惧攫取了每一个人的心。”
  • 公主太子妃

    公主太子妃

    ★她是公主,是太子妃,是皇后,是杀手联盟盟主,江湖武林盟主,也是天下第一魔宫宫主。她身份众多,淡定沉着,冷俊睿智!他是太子,是皇上,是富商,是杀手,也是天下第一堡的堡主。他冷漠孤傲,腹黑执着!当两个有着多重身份的人走到一起,他们的人生注定不再平静!★他们是平凡夫妻:“大将军的女儿缠着说要嫁给我当侧妃,你怎么看?”他站在门口,身子慵懒的靠着门沿,别有深意的看着自己的太子妃。“哦!”她仿佛在听一件事不关己的八卦一样,平静的脸上没有任何的表情。“你不生气?”“嗯,我为什么要生气?”“你的夫君要纳妾了,你都不吃醋吗?”他带着诧异,也带着愤怒,她怎可如此不在乎自己呢?她懒懒的站起身,脸上带着那一贯的柔和笑容,“夫君,晚膳时间到了,我们先用膳吧!”饭桌上,看着那一碟碟的菜,他的嘴张的可以塞下一个鸭蛋:醋溜白菜,糖醋鱼,糖醋排骨,醋溜丝瓜…“东宫的厨子该换了!”谁都知道,他从来都不吃酸的东西!她淡然的一笑,拿起筷子津津有味的夹起菜肴,意味深长的说道,“还是这醋好吃,那干醋吃起来太没有营养了!”啥?她这是在吃醋?★他们是江湖儿女:“你罗刹联盟为何要抢我暗夜联盟的生意?”他大摇大摆的走进她的地盘,一把搂住她的芊芊细腰,邪气的脸庞带着质问。她潸然一笑,轻轻的牵动嘴角,呵气如兰,“夫君,生意场上没有情面可讲,今日不是我抢,是你能力不行,客户择优选择了。”“这么说你能力很强了?”他的唇贴近她的脸,带着警告!“武林盟主的位置不是谁都能做的。”什么?她这是在向他宣战么?★他们是神秘宫主和堡主:“你水幽宫不是从来都只收女门徒的吗?那么那个男人是谁?”他气势汹汹的拽着她的手,眼中喷着火怒视着她身边的男人。她淡定的脸上带着惊愕,不动声色的反驳着,“你天下第一堡不也是只收男门徒的吗?那么那个女人是谁?”“她是你妹妹,我的小姨子。”“那她是不是女的?”“呃,是!”“这不就对了,你就能收女门徒,为什么我就不能收男门徒了呢?”她笑的温柔,笑的和煦,只是那抹笑意背后,却是毋庸置疑的坚决。他身子微微一颤,松开她的手,决然的说道,“那我现在去把她撵走!”“她不是你小姨子吗?”“娘子都没有了,要小姨子有屁用!”“哦!”她平静的脸上终于绽放出了一些温暖的神采,对着他的背影说道,“那个男的是我的亲弟弟,你的小舅子!”不是吧?她这是故意的吗?★
  • 七日一帝国盛宠

    七日一帝国盛宠

    “小东西,整整四年,我都无法忘记在你身体里的感觉,知道那是什么滋味么…”——英俊如魔的男人,将她狠狠压在教室最前方的讲台上,紧锁着她的魔魅双瞳中燃烧着邪恶的红莲狱火,让她颤抖地想起那段可耻的记忆。。。他是东晁帝国最年轻英勇的陆军元帅,被皇帝陛下赞美为:可与日月同辉的男人。他的一切,只能用“极致”来形容:极致完美的容貌、俊伟绝伦的身材、高贵优雅的气质、聪明绝顶的头脑,以及,对待敌时绝对的血腥噬骨,极致的残忍毒辣。他是自甘坠落于地狱,最美丽迷人的魔鬼。他性格孤僻,乖戾,高傲,不羁,光明的背后是沉重而挥之不去的阴暗。他一生战功彪炳,荣获帝国最多勋章,受天皇陛下亲自嘉奖,却被后人从史册上彻底抹去,甚至不承认他曾是这个民族最伟大的骄傲,而这一切仅仅因为他爱上了一个敌国的女子。——我的悠悠,我的生命早已献给伟大的皇帝陛下。但我愿意将我的灵魂永远留给你,留给我最爱的女人,生生世世与你同在。——我要去找他,他在等我!他用骨血筑成了他信仰的丰碑,他无愧于他的祖国;我欺骗了所有人包括我自己,成全家国大义。现在,我不能再欺骗他了,我爱他,我只想跟他在一起。。。。她是亚国南方小城里的一朵娇弱可爱的芙蓉花。芙蓉,又名拒霜,当百花凋零,唯它傲霜绽放。在这战火纷飞的乱世中,她仍然保有无限的生命热情,乐观积极,宛如拒霜花,所有的不幸和阴暗都不忍靠近她。。。。那一场樱花漫舞,融情的眼眸,注定两个来自不同世界的人,抵死纠缠的命运。也许只有风霜陡峭的绝壁天崖才能开出最美的花只有魔鬼的黑暗之心才能生出最纯粹的爱情——小东西,你喜欢我。——呸,你少不要脸了!。。。他给了她一切的极致:【极致宠溺】——她的一句模糊的呓语,让北平最寒冷的冬季,为粉樱飞舞芙蓉花覆盖;她的一个微笑,让他放弃了屠城的三光政策;她的一滴眼泪,让他虔诚地跪行千里为她祈福添寿【极致残酷】——为了争权夺利他杀了自己的兄弟姐妹,为了他们早夭的孩子他杀光了宅砥内所有伺候他们的仆役酿成举国震惊的惨案,为了将她囚禁在身边永不分离他杀掉她的万万同胞用鲜血染红了她热爱的故土【极致深爱】——他是公主殿下心怡的夫婿人选,却在大婚前一刻,跪在她面前恳请她的爱和求赎,对那唾手可得的帝王之位弃如敝帚【极至仇虐】
  • 淡墨舒香

    淡墨舒香

    颜墨作为颜家唯一的小女儿,在四岁那年意外成为了孤儿,于是乎,淡漠冷静的性子成功塑成。某次在某个好友手术时,夺了主刀医生的手术刀,从此麻烦不断……洛书辰作为医学界冉冉升起的一颗天才之星,在某次观望案例手术时发现一个小姑娘夺了主刀医生的手术刀,临危不乱的样子让他眼前一亮,从此开启了漫漫挖墙脚(追妻)之路。
  • 流年共生

    流年共生

    何为流年,谁伴你共生?最是那一见倾心,才有勇气直面生死。人生不就是寻觅这一人么?