登陆注册
5211100000064

第64章

I admit that I have not been enlightened by all that Bayle says about the Manichaeans and the Paulicians.That is controversy; I would have preferred pure philosophy.Why discuss our mysteries beside Zarathustra's? As soon as you dare to treat of our mysteries, which need only faith and no reasoning, you open precipices for yourself.

The trash in our scholastic theology has nothing to do with the trash in Zarathustra's reveries.

Why debate original sin with Zarathustra? There was never any question of it save in St.Augustine's time.Neither Zarathustra nor any legislator of antiquity had ever heard speak of it.

If you dispute with Zarathustra, put under lock and key the old and the new Testaments which he did not know, and which one must revere without desiring to explain them.

What then should I have said to Zarathustra? My reason cannot admit two gods who fight, that is good only in a poem where Minerva quarrels with Mars.My feeble reason is much more content with a single great Being, whose essence was to make, and who has made all that nature has permitted Him, than it is satisfied with two great Beings, one of whom spoils the works of the other.Your bad principle Ahriman, has not been able to upset a single one of the astrdnomical and physical laws of the good principle Ormuzd; everything progresses in the heavens with the greatest regularity.

Why should the wicked Ahriman have had power over this little globe of the world?

If I had been Ahriman, I should have attacked Ormuzd in his fine grand provinces of so many suns and stars.I should not have limited myself to making war on him in a little village.

There is much evil in this village: but whence have you the knowledge that this evil is not inevitable?

You are forced to admit an intelligence diffused over the universe;but (i) do you know, for instance, if this power reaches right to foreseeing the future ? You have asserted it a thousand times; but you have never been able either to prove it, or to understand it.You cannot know how any being whatever sees what is not.Well, the future is not; therefore no being can see it.You are reduced to saying that He foresees it; but foreseeing is conjecturing.This is the opinion of the Socinians.

Well, a God who, according to you, conjectures, can be mistaken.In your system He is really mistaken; for if He had foreseen tbat His enemy would poison all His works here below, He would not have produced them;He would not have prepared for Himself the shame of being continually vanquished.

(2) Do I not do Him much more honour by saying that He has made everything by the necessity of His nature, than you do Him by raising an enemy who disfigures, who soils, who destroys all His- works here below?

(3) It is not to have an unworthy idea of God to say that, having formed thousands of millions of worlds where death and evil do not dwell, it was necessary that evil and death should dwell in this world.

(4) It is not to disparage God to say that He could not form man without giving him self-esteem; that this selfesteem could not lead him without misguiding him almost always; that his passions are necessary, but that they are disastrous; that propagation cannot be executed without desire;that desire cannot animate man without quarrels; that these quarrels necessarily bring wars in their train, etc.

(5) When he sees part of the combinations of the animal, vegetable and mineral kingdoms, and this globe pierced everywhere like a sieve, from which escape in crowds so many exhalations, what philosopher will be bold enough, what scholastic foolish enough to see clearly that nature could stop the effects of volcanoes, the inelemencies of the atmosphere, the violence of the winds, the plagues, and all the destructive scourges?

(6) One must be very powerful, very strong, very industrious, to have formed lions which devour bulls, and to have produced men who invent arms to kill at one blow, not only bulls and lions, but even each other.One must be very powerful to have caused to be born spiders which spin webs to catch flies; but that is not to be omnipotent, infinitely powerful.

(7) If the great Being had been infinitely powerful, there is no reason why He should not have made sentient animals infinitely happy; He has not done so, therefore He was not able.

(8) All thb sects of the philosophers have stranded on the reef of moral and physical ill.It only remains to avow that God having acted for the best has not been able to act better.

(9) This necessity settles all the difficulties and finishes all the disputes.We have not the impudence to say--" All is good." We say--" All is the feast bad that is possible."(10) Why does a child often die in its mother's womb? Why is another who has had the misfortune to be born, reserved for torments as long as his life, terminated by a frightful death?

Why has the source of life been poisoned all over the world since the discovery of America? why since the seventh century of our era does smallpox carry off the eighth part of the human race? why since all time have bladders been subject to being stone quarries? why the plague, war, famine, the inquisition? Turn in every direction, you will find no other solution than that everything has been necessary.

I speak here to philosophers only and not to theologians.We know well that faith is the thread in the labyrinth.We know that the fall of Adam and Eve, original sin, the immense power given to the devil, the predilection accorded by the great Being to the Jewish people, and the baptism substituted for the amputation of the prepuce, are the answers which explain everything.

We have argued only against Zarathustra and not against the university of Conimbre or Coimbre, to which we submit in our articles.Philosophical Dictionary: Prayers PRAYERS WE do not know any religion without prayers, even the Jews had some, although there was not among them any public form, until the time when they sang canticles in their synagogues, which happened very late.

同类推荐
  • 魏忠贤小说斥奸书

    魏忠贤小说斥奸书

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 宝庆会稽续志

    宝庆会稽续志

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 三衣显正图

    三衣显正图

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 诫子拾遗

    诫子拾遗

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 善说

    善说

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 安若娉婷

    安若娉婷

    她,借太尉大小姐安娉婷之身意外重生。本以为从此开挂,走上人生巅峰。谁晓已被指婚当朝丞相二公子,市间相传,此人品行不端,身有残缺!再看生母早逝,父亲淡漠,兄妹排挤…她,该逆来顺受,或是奋起反抗?
  • 江湖迟暮

    江湖迟暮

    江湖庙堂,一念之间。一个满身疑团的少年,却一剑霜寒十四州,渐渐成为了名动天下的燕司马,前朝旧事,身世谜团,家国命运,江湖恩怨,他,该如何抉择?多年之后,他夜观天象,长叹一声。这个乱世,没有配角。这个江湖,没有主角。(这段时间很忙,停更一段时间,大家放心,我会写完的)
  • 解码大前研:箴言录

    解码大前研:箴言录

    本书不仅仅从经营管理、工作经验、思维方式谈大前研一那种从高处俯瞰社会的种种经验,还从社会理念、政治态度、民众情绪来谈论他的对当今社会上各种现象的观点,甚至还谈到他对待家庭与教育、休闲与享受的各方面的体验。
  • 凰储

    凰储

    余笙在准备跟自己生活不能自理的渣男老公离婚的时候莫名穿越到了一个陌生的时代,穿越成一个公主竟然还要为了温饱奔波劳碌,这可不是她要的人生啊,她想回到原来的世界却发现需要经历比西天取经还要漫长的过程……
  • 生生世世爱:玥色倾心

    生生世世爱:玥色倾心

    “你当真这般恨我?”皇甫歆,他带着无尽的忧伤问道。尉迟玥,她没有回答,却握紧了手中的刀子狠狠的刺去……血,一滴滴的散开,空气中的血腥味让她几近疯狂,飞奔而出,大喊着:“我不是你的王妃!”他愣住,未加阻拦,胸口的痛根本无法抵过内心阵阵的抽搐,仿佛那刀不是刺在胸口而是在心上生生剜了血肉一般……而她的心也再次被扯碎,刀刺中的不是他的胸口,而是自己的心。爱情,在种种误会还没有解除时已经去了地狱……
  • 蒙大拿牧场主

    蒙大拿牧场主

    打工仔得奇遇蒙大拿走起,长空之乡,我有一块地。
  • 大家评大家

    大家评大家

    新文化运动以后,现代文学领域涌现了一大批散文名家——鲁迅、周作人、林语堂、老舍、丰子恺、郁达夫、朱自清、徐志摩、沈从文、郭沫若、茅盾、曹聚仁、钱玄同、郑振铎、施蛰存、聂绀弩、邵洵美、林徽因、俞平伯……他们的文学成就,如一座座高峰令后人仰止。本套丛书汇集了这些名家的散文经典,从他们优美而富于深意的文字中,我们将体会大家的情怀,品读他们生活的那个民国时代。
  • 恶毒女配要洗白:毒女不好当

    恶毒女配要洗白:毒女不好当

    穿越了!竟然还穿到一本穿越文里跟穿越女主抢男主无脑+恶毒的女配。这玩笑开的有点大了!为了本人能够安度晚年,平平安安,一帆风顺。本人决定,防水防火防男主!PS.珍爱生命,远离男主!穿越女配VS穿越女主的较量!
  • 疡科纲要

    疡科纲要

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 魑魅情殇

    魑魅情殇

    是什么原因让她从来没有感受到爱?是什么原因让她总是心痛,而且一次比一次严重?徐翊彬,一个第一个爱上的人,却因为穿越,处在两个不同时空。夕夜月,一个能给她温暖的人,好不容易鼓足勇气去爱的人,却被迫分开。夕夜羽,为了她做了那么多的事,能否得到她的青睐?