登陆注册
5217300000148

第148章 Chapter VI(12)

According to Kant there are three Ideas of the pure Reason --the Soul,the World,and God.Nobody really doubts the existence of the world;but doubts as to the existence of the soul or of God are possible and have been met by professedly demonstrative arguments.The 'dogmatists'whom Kant criticised had,as they thought,proved the existence of a monad,an 'indiscerptible'unit called the soul;and of a Supreme Being,or 'Ens Realissimum,'who is taken to be in some sense absolute and simple.Kant holds these arguments to be essentially a misapplication of logical method.It is the function of the reason to unify our knowledge.The ideal would be reached if all knowledge could be regarded as a system of deductions from a single principle.This,in reasoning about the soul,produces a 'paralogism.'All our thoughts and faculties are bound together into a unity which is consistent with multiplicity.We interpret this unjustifiably as implying the existence of an absolutely simple unit.We hypostatise the unity and regard it as a thing when,in truth,it represents a complex system of reciprocal relations.The arguments upon the supposed proofs of the existence of a supreme Being,though they are expanded and considered in many different forms,reach a similar conclusion.

We are perfectly right in unifying as much as possible our whole knowledge of the world,but though we may continue the process indefinitely,we can never logically arrive at the knowledge of a single Being existing independently as the foundation of all other being.In this sense,Kant calls the idea 'regulative.'It corresponds to the legitimate process of thought;we must unify,but no reasoning can reveal an entity lying beyond all experience.We are thus led to 'irresistible illusions,'from which,however,we can escape,though only 'by the severest and most subtle criticism.'Kant compares this to the illusion produced by a mirror,which makes objects really in front appear to be behind it,or to the apparent increase of the moon's size when near the horizon.Still,it is impossible,as he emphatically says,that reason should be itself undeserving of confidence.It is only from its misuse in an inappropriate sphere,or,in other words,from its attempt to transcend experience,that the fallacy arises.(81)It is needless to ask how this argument can be reconciled with the theism which Kant accepts.Hamilton's criticism of Cousin is essentially a statement of the converse argument.

Schelling and Cousin had taken up Kant's challenge,not by inferring the simple being from the complex of experiences,but by professing to show how multiplicity might be evolved out of absolute simplicity.This feat,as Hamilton held,and as Mill of course held with him,could only be accomplished by a palpable juggle.Clearly you cannot count,if you are restricted to the use of an absolute 'one.'The germ from which an organic system is developed cannot be itself absolutely simple.Knowledge can only be made out of rules;and a simple 'is'gives no rule.

Hamilton tries to express the principle implied in such instances in the proper pomp of metaphysical language.Cousin starts by admitting that knowledge supposes 'plurality,'that is,an object and a subject.Now,says Hamilton,(82)the 'absolute'must be identified with the subject or with the object,or with the 'indifferency of both'(whatever that may be).On the first or second hypothesis,the absolute is not,as it ought to be,a unit,for it is one of a pair;on the other hypothesis,you suppose that consciousness does not imply plurality.A man,let us say in humbler language,if he thinks,must think about something.If so,we start from a man and a something.But suppose him to think about himself.Then there must be something to say about himself;and he will have nothing to say if he is absolutely simple.That seems to be true enough.Every proposition asserts a relation of some kind,and a proposition cannot be got at all if no relation be given.This,therefore,is one meaning of the 'relativity'of thought.'To think is the condition';that is,you cannot affirm or deny unless you deny or affirm something.If you try then to get to the absolute by stripping off all relations,you really get to zero.We think only by the attribution of certain qualities,and the negation of these qualities and of this attribution is so far a negation of thinking at all.Kant's arguments duly carried out prove 'the unconditioned,'says Hamilton,to be a mere 'fasciculus of negations.'(83)Clearly,we reply,if the unconditioned is reached by unsaying all that we have said.A plain person is,indeed,chiefly astonished that such arguments should be required.Schelling's system,says Hamilton himself,is only fit for 'Laputa on the Empire,'(84)but Schelling at least invented a supernatural faculty to perceive an 'incogitable'hypothesis.

Cousin's hypothesis,which tried to omit this faculty,is worse,for it is self-contradictory.(85)The spectacle of three of the most distinguished men in Germany,France,and England joining in this game,and even of Hamilton winning a 'European reputation'by declaring that we cannot believe two contradictory propositions at once,or make something out of nothing,is not edifying to a believer in philosophy.

V.ANTINOMIES

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 文殊师利问经

    文殊师利问经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 画情为牢,溺爱天价前妻

    画情为牢,溺爱天价前妻

    三年前的新婚之夜她错手伤了他心尖上的人本该进监狱的她被丈夫送进精神病院三年间她亲眼见证了他如何让她家破人亡整整三年她失去自由,生不如死*三年后重获自由时,他紧紧的抱着她“我们回家。”她在他怀中淡笑无意识的问:“我已家破人亡,请问江先生,我的家在哪里?”他沉默带着倾世温柔的笑从此以后她见到光明但依然没有自由他扣留了她所有的证件,将她囚在身边*不复当年的绝情,他宠她如骨三年的狼狈换来了三年后风光无限的总裁夫人的位置她不知教训的沉沦在他的温柔里无法自拔直到自己亲眼看着他送她上手术台时,方才醒悟原来一切宠爱都是为了他的心上人*“都是为了她吗?”被打了麻醉的她意识恍惚拉住他的衣服“嗯,如果有下辈子,我拿命换你。”他不复温柔,一双眼睛清冷她的手缓缓的松开,张了张嘴再也说出话来她为他的心上人搭上了命却被人散布成想与奸夫私奔,途中车祸身亡*又过几年,她出现在他的世界,很巧合,也很蓄意挽着儒雅清贵的男人向他介绍那是她丈夫她笑靥如花时刺伤了他的眼无人夜色将她抵在墙上疯狂的吻她“江总,我可是结了婚的女人,自重。”她的声音婉转娇媚“跟他离婚。”“凭什么?”“我爱你。”“但我爱他。”*她为当年的生不如死,家破人亡步步为营的算计,折磨直到她癫狂的将他刺伤真相才破壳而出,而那人在怀中气息减弱……
  • Death at La Fenice

    Death at La Fenice

    Death at La Fenice is the first novel in Donna Leon's internationally best-selling Commissario Guido Brunetti series. During intermission at the famed La Fenice opera house in Venice, a notoriously difficult conductor is poisoned, and suspects abound. Brunetti, a native Venetian, sets out to unravel the mystery behind the high-profile murder. To do so, he he calls on his knowledge of Venice, its culture, and its dirty politics. Revenge, corruption, and even Italian cuisine play a role. The novel that started it all, Death at La Fenice is an entrancing mystery, rich in wkkk.net detective writers create so vivid, inclusive and convincing a narrative as Donna Leon, the expatriate American with the Venetian heart… . One of the most exquisite and subtle detective series ever. —The Washington Post
  • 致我们正值的青春年华(珍藏一生的经典散文)

    致我们正值的青春年华(珍藏一生的经典散文)

    本书包括缤纷的花墙,泥土的芬芳,真情流露,温馨家园,感悟真情,读懂父亲的真诚,真情如歌,父爱如山,活着就是幸福等。
  • 世界最具故事性的中篇小说(5)

    世界最具故事性的中篇小说(5)

    我的课外第一本书——震撼心灵阅读之旅经典文库,《阅读文库》编委会编。通过各种形式的故事和语言,讲述我们在成长中需要的知识。
  • The Well at the World's End

    The Well at the World's End

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 纯男恋上俏熟女

    纯男恋上俏熟女

    对于这部作品,我只想让看过的人能感受到那份纯真。这是讲述一个发生在高四的恋爱故事,男主人单纯愚笨,女主人公漂亮可爱又成熟,欲知结果如何,请您关注《纯男恋上俏熟女》,对您的支持我感激万分。
  • 大般涅槃经论

    大般涅槃经论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Lesson of the Master

    The Lesson of the Master

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 梦里花落知多少(提高学生学习能力的故事全集)

    梦里花落知多少(提高学生学习能力的故事全集)

    站在生命的起跑线上,开始一场人生的马拉松赛跑,为什么起点相同,结局却迥然不同?秘诀就在于学习。学习能够点石成金、削璞为玉。提高学习能力,会让你从平庸中脱颖而出,踏上人生闪光大道,奔赴心中远大前程。