登陆注册
5228800000040

第40章 II(24)

XII. Until it is proved to what removable condition attaching to the attendant the disease is owing, he is bound to stay away from his patients so soon as he finds himself singled out to be tracked by the disease. How long, and with what other precautions, I have suggested, without dictating, at the close of my Essay. If the physician does not at once act on any reasonable suspicion of his being the medium of transfer, the families where he is engaged, if they are allowed to know the facts, should decline his services for the time. His feelings on the occasion, however interesting to himself, should not be even named in this connection. A physician who talks about ceremony and gratitude, and services rendered, and the treatment he got, surely forgets himself; it is impossible that he should seriously think of these small matters where there is even a question whether he may not carry disease, and death, and bereavement into any one of "his families," as they are sometimes called.

I will now point out to the young student the mode in which he may relieve his mind of any confusion, or possibly, if very young, any doubt, which the perusal of Dr. Meigs's Sixth Letter may have raised in his mind.

The most prominent ideas of the Letter are, first, that the transmissible nature of puerperal fever appears improbable, and, secondly, that it would be very inconvenient to the writer.

Dr. Woodville, Physician to the Small-Pox and Inoculation Hospital in London, found it improbable, and exceedingly inconvenient to himself, that cow pox should prevent small-pox; but Dr. Jenner took the liberty to prove the fact, notwithstanding.

I will first call the young student's attention to the show of negative facts (exposure without subsequent disease), of which much seems to be thought. And I may at the same time refer him to Dr.

Hodge's Lecture, where he will find the same kind of facts and reasoning. Let him now take up Watson's Lectures, the good sense and spirit of which have made his book a universal favorite, and open to the chapter on Continued Fever. He will find a paragraph containing the following sentence: "A man might say, 'I was in the battle of Waterloo, and saw many men around me fall down and die, and it was said that they were struck down by musket-balls; but I know better than that, for I was there all the time, and so were many of my friends, and we were never hit by any musket-balls. Musket-balls, therefore, could not have been the cause of the deaths we witnessed.'

And if, like contagion, they were not palpable to the senses, such a person might go on to affirm that no proof existed of there being any such thing as musket-balls." Now let the student turn back to the chapter on Hydrophobia in the same volume. He will find that John Hunter knew a case in which, of twenty-one persons bitten, only one died of the disease. He will find that one dog at Charenton was bitten at different times by thirty different mad dogs, and outlived it all. Is there no such thing, then, as hydrophobia? Would one take no especial precautions if his wife, about to become a mother, had been bitten by a rabid animal, because so many escape? Or let him look at "Underwood on Diseases of Children,"[Philadelphia, 1842, p. 244, note.] and he will find the case of a young woman who was inoculated eight times in thirty days, at the same time attending several children with smallpox, and yet was not infected. But seven weeks afterwards she took the disease and died.

It would seem as if the force of this argument could hardly fail to be seen, if it were granted that every one of these series of cases were so reported as to prove that there could have been no transfer of disease. There is not one of them so reported, in the Lecture or the Letter, as to prove that the disease may not have been carried by the practitioner. I strongly suspect that it was so carried in some of these cases, but from the character of the very imperfect evidence the question can never be settled without further disclosures.

Although the Letter is, as I have implied, principally taken up with secondary and collateral questions, and might therefore be set aside as in the main irrelevant, I am willing, for the student's sake, to touch some of these questions briefly, as an illustration of its logical character.

The first thing to be done, as I thought when I wrote my Essay, was to throw out all discussions of the word contagion, and this I did effectually by the careful wording of my statement of the subject to be discussed. My object was not to settle the etymology or definition of a word, but to show that women had often died in childbed, poisoned in some way by their medical attendants. On the other point, I, at least, have no controversy with anybody, and I think the student will do well to avoid it in this connection. If I must define my position, however, as well as the term in question, I am contented with Worcester's definition; provided always this avowal do not open another side controversy on the merits of his Dictionary, which Dr. Meigs has not cited, as compared with Webster's, which he has.

I cannot see the propriety of insisting that all the laws of the eruptive fevers must necessarily hold true of this peculiar disease of puerperal women. If there were any such propriety, the laws of the eruptive fevers must at least be stated correctly. It is not true, for instance, as Dr. Meigs states, that contagion is "no respecter of persons;" that "it attacks all individuals alike." To give one example: Dr. Gregory, of the Small-Pox Hospital, who ought to know, says that persons pass through life apparently insensible to or unsusceptible of the small-pox virus, and that the same persons do not take the vaccine disease.

As to the short time of incubation, of which so much is made, we have no right to decide beforehand whether it shall be long or short, in the cases we are considering. A dissection wound may produce symptoms of poisoning in six hours; the bite of a rabid animal may take as many months.

同类推荐
  • 随相论解十六谛义

    随相论解十六谛义

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 愚谷集

    愚谷集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 非韩篇

    非韩篇

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 海东高僧传

    海东高僧传

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 情志门

    情志门

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 盗心记:别喊捉贼

    盗心记:别喊捉贼

    她是天下第一大盗,拥有倾城倾国的容貌,绝无仅有的武功,唯独缺的,不过是一个贴己之人,一个知心爱人。从第一次相遇到最后相识相知相爱,她不觉得自己有什么错。可是在得知一切之后,她宁愿人生若只如初见,“姽婳姽婳,我看你就是鬼话连篇。”那时候的他眉眼生花,多么好看呀!
  • 骑马出走的女人:劳伦斯短篇小说选集

    骑马出走的女人:劳伦斯短篇小说选集

    本书精选了英国著名作家D.H.劳伦斯的7部短篇小说,分别为《菊花的香味》《太阳》《马商的女儿》《美妇人》《你触摸了我》《普鲁士军官》《骑马出走的女人》。作者在生动地叙述中,通过坚持不懈地描述日常生活中无休止的心灵抗争,探索人的灵魂深处,揭露人性,反映社会现实,文风沉郁。本书收入的7部短篇小说都是现实主义的代表作,在广大读者中产生过较大影响。
  • 恶报

    恶报

    在上世纪二三十年代,天津卫是全中国最早开埠通商的水旱码头,商家云集,百业兴旺。当年,全国各地许多人闯天津卫,三教九流、五行八作什么人都有。甭管什么人,在天津卫没有两把刷子,三个板斧,就别想在这地界上混。因此,老天津人就常常开导年轻人:小子唉,别没事找事,别看街上那些敲牛胯骨、卖大粒丸、变戏法杂耍、摆摊儿算卦、拉洋车、背粪篓、捡破烂儿的,有一个算一个.
  • 灵异档案:阴阳师

    灵异档案:阴阳师

    诡秘档案,湘西赶尸,三王墓,召唤楚王之魂,捕捉千年妖怪,跨国猎杀变异妖魔……我走遍了华夏大地的每个角落,见识过形形色色的古怪之事。我将带你走进华夏大陆不为人知的一面,我将带你看见你无法想象过的神奇经历!
  • 逆天狂妃:王爷,来一战!

    逆天狂妃:王爷,来一战!

    她,是现代顶尖杀手,却遭人怨恨,最终含恨而死,一朝穿越,便要潇洒活一世。什么?废柴!遥身一变,极品丹药一抓一大把,各种神兽争相签订契约,各路美男争相求嫁。 但是却被冰山王爷宠成了小绵羊,这怎么行! “王爷,来一战!” “好,夫人莫非欲-求不满?没关系,为夫这就履行责任。” 【虽然前两本书可能玛丽苏,但是我保证,就算我们玛丽苏,也要苏的不一样!后面的小说绝对题材新颖!】
  • 御剑扫八荒

    御剑扫八荒

    神风大陆,是一个修真大陆,修真门派林立,孤儿南宫明被魔族追杀,为了逃命,闯入远古遗址,蜀山藏剑阁,获得神剑,横空出世,一步步走上霸主之路。
  • 草叶集选

    草叶集选

    《草叶集选》是自《草叶集》全集中精选出最精华的篇目,记录了美国“自由诗之父”惠特曼一生的思想和探索历程,也反映出整个时代和国家的面貌。从内容到形式,从思想到语言,《草叶集》最大的特点就是“自由”。它摒弃了传统的诗歌格律,开创了新的诗风,大力讴歌了自然的壮美,洋溢着时代激情,富有强烈的人道主义精神和神秘主义风格,是十九世纪美国的一部史诗。亨利·米勒、艾伦·金斯堡等后世艺术大师曾深受这部诗集的影响,电影《死亡诗社》也曾向其致敬。
  • 帝王律

    帝王律

    什么功勋卓著,护国忠良,在他们看来,永远都是功高盖主,威胁皇位之徒。飞鸟尽,良弓藏;狡兔死,走狗烹,我不甘做白白去死的走狗,我要成为这浩瀚历史的规则掌控者......
  • 带着小城回史前

    带着小城回史前

    林迹穿回到万年之前,他居住的小县城也成了他的随身物品。有小城在手,他的史前之旅应该像旅游一样,能四处猎杀史前猛兽,看史前最美的风景才对。无奈他穿越在一个小孩子身上,在洪荒之中连自保的能力都还没有。所以他要先在小部落里长大。过着颇为憋屈的生活,这样的日子什么时候是个头?他有如何从小部落里成长起来?本文非传统爽文,不喜勿喷。
  • 对不起,我爱你

    对不起,我爱你

    她有一个梦,直到死都放不下。从他救下她的那一刻起,她的人生就不是自己的,因他而活,因他而死。直到筋疲力尽,直到痛不欲生,再也没有力气去爱他。她说:“我愿来生,不再遇见你!”他说:“对不起,我爱你!”