登陆注册
5237300000066

第66章 Lecture XVIII(4)

When one views the world with no definite theological bias one way or the other, one sees that order and disorder, as we now recognize them, are purely human inventions. We are interested in certain types of arrangement, useful, aesthetic, or moral--so interested that whenever we find them realized, the fact emphatically rivets our attention. The result is that we work over the contents of the world selectively. It is overflowing with disorderly arrangements from our point of view, but order is the only thing we care for and look at, and by choosing, one can always find some sort of orderly arrangement in the midst of any chaos. If I should throw down a thousand beans at random upon a table, I could doubtless, by eliminating a sufficient number of them, leave the rest in almost any geometrical pattern you might propose to me, and you might then say that that pattern was the thing prefigured beforehand, and that the other beans were mere irrelevance and packing material. Our dealings with Nature are just like this. She is a vast plenum in which our attention draws capricious lines in innumerable directions. We count and name whatever lies upon the special lines we trace, whilst the other things and the untraced lines are neither named nor counted. There are in reality infinitely more things "unadapted" to each other in this world than there are things "adapted"; infinitely more things with irregular relations than with regular relations between them. But we look for the regular kind of thing exclusively, and ingeniously discover and preserve it in our memory. It accumulates with other regular kinds, until the collection of them fills our encyclopaedias. Yet all the while between and around them lies an infinite anonymous chaos of objects that no one ever thought of together, of relations that never yet attracted our attention.

The facts of order from which the physico-theological argument starts are thus easily susceptible of interpretation as arbitrary human products. So long as this is the case, although of course no argument against God follows, it follows that the argument for him will fail to constitute a knockdown proof of his existence.

It will be convincing only to those who on other grounds believe in him already.

If philosophy can do so little to establish God's existence, how stands it with her efforts to define his attributes? It is worth while to look at the attempts of systematic theology in this direction.

Since God is First Cause, this science of sciences says, he differs from all his creatures in possessing existence a se.

From this "a-se-ity" on God's part, theology deduces by mere logic most of his other perfections. For instance, he must be both NECESSARY and ABSOLUTE, cannot not be, and cannot in any way be determined by anything else. This makes Him absolutely unlimited from without, and unlimited also from within; for limitation is non-being; and God is being itself. This unlimitedness makes God infinitely perfect. Moreover, God is ONE, and ONLY, for the infinitely perfect can admit no peer. He is SPIRITUAL, for were He composed of physical parts, some other power would have to combine them into the total, and his aseity would thus be contradicted. He is therefore both simple and non-physical in nature. He is SIMPLE METAPHYSICALLY also, that is to say, his nature and his existence cannot be distinct, as they are in finite substances which share their formal natures with one another, and are individual only in their material aspect. Since God is one and only, his essentia and his esse must be given at one stroke. This excludes from his being all those distinctions, so familiar in the world of finite things, between potentiality and actuality, substance and accidents, being and activity, existence and attributes. We can talk, it is true, of God's powers, acts, and attributes, but these discriminations are only "virtual," and made from the human point of view. In God all these points of view fall into an absolute identity of being.

This absence of all potentiality in God obliges Him to be IMMUTABLE. He is actuality, through and through. Were there anything potential about Him, He would either lose or gain by its actualization, and either loss or gain would contradict his perfection. He cannot, therefore, change. Furthermore, He is IMMENSE, BOUNDLESS; for could He be outlined in space, He would be composite, and this would contradict his indivisibility. He is therefore OMNIPRESENT, indivisibly there, at every point of space. He is similarly wholly present at every point of time--in other words ETERNAL. For if He began in time, He would need a prior cause, and that would contradict his aseity. If He ended it would contradict his necessity. If He went through any succession, it would contradict his immutability.

He has INTELLIGENCE and WILL and every other creature- perfection, for we have them, and effectus nequit superare causam. In Him, however, they are absolutely and eternally in act, and their OBJECT, since God can be bounded by naught that is external, can primarily be nothing else than God himself. He knows himself, then, in one eternal indivisible act, and wills himself with an infinite self-pleasure.[295] Since He must of logical necessity thus love and will himself, He cannot be called "free" ad intra, with the freedom of contrarieties that characterizes finite creatures. Ad extra, however, or with respect to his creation, God is free. He cannot NEED to create, being perfect in being and in happiness already. He WILLS to create, then, by an absolute freedom.

[295] For the scholastics the facultas appetendi embraces feeling, desire, and will.

同类推荐
  • 教坊记

    教坊记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 外道问圣大乘法无我义经

    外道问圣大乘法无我义经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 火[合牛]供养仪轨

    火[合牛]供养仪轨

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 东城杂记

    东城杂记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 东阳夜怪录

    东阳夜怪录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 跟着皇妃学美容:十大皇妃美人计

    跟着皇妃学美容:十大皇妃美人计

    人在妆点上标新立异,有人想尽方法保护青春容颜,正所谓“楚王好细腰,后宫多饿死”。中国的美容文化也得到长足的发展。各式各样的美容方法也别出新裁,从材料上看有贵重的麝香、珍珠、燕窝,也有简单易得的鸡蛋、黑豆、皂角;从制作方法上看有要煮沸的,有要发酵的,有要烹炒的;从使用方法上看有内服的、有外敷的、有涂抹的、有洗浴的。有的皇妃使用的美容方法是经过了历代的传承和验证,有的皇妃为了美貌却不惜甘冒风险,将水银、轻粉、密陀僧、草乌等带有毒性的物质抹在脸上。
  • 好家教胜过好学校

    好家教胜过好学校

    《好家教胜过好学校》站在当今家庭教育的前沿,针对家长们在教育孩子过程普遍存在的问题,总结出一套系统的解决方案,其中汇集了大量可供年轻父母借鉴的有益启示,吸纳了众多学者的优秀成果,是教育专家给年轻父母的最真诚、最有价值的忠告。
  • 执节

    执节

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 舍得

    舍得

    我们需要诗和远方,但并不是每个人都有那么好的运气和机遇可以获得。人世间的事情,总是没有绝对完美的,该舍弃的时候应该果断舍弃。每个人生来只有两只手,而时间万物何其众多,就算我们竭尽所能,能够抓到手里的又能有多少呢?很多东西就像握在手里的沙,往往抓得越紧,失去的也就越快。学会舍是一种大智慧,聪明的人,往往懂得舍得之道。舍不是损失,而是一种曲折前进的策略,是大步跃进的序曲,这样的舍比执着更为明智。不管我们是谁,扮演着怎样的角色,心中藏着什么样的欲望,都注定会失去一些东西,与其害怕失去而握紧双手,时刻处在禅精竭虑之中,反倒不如坦然地张开双手,平静地舍弃。
  • 猫咪生存手册

    猫咪生存手册

    白天是人,晚上是猫。平行空间,同一个背景下不同的转折点遭遇不同的人生。作为末世的移动储备粮,米乐表示,鸭梨巨大。
  • 时管的奇妙冒险

    时管的奇妙冒险

    简介写什么好呢?这是一个困扰很多人的问题。写作品里面的内容?不行,有水分没含量。随便写些骚话?不行,太骚怕被骚死。那么乱写?可以!我觉得可以!这是一个讲起源的故事,什么起源呢?一个强者的起源!作者在这先说,因为我们大中华的政策,这本小说一半已经爆炸……请谨慎观看。
  • 最前线:另一种篮球

    最前线:另一种篮球

    《NBA最前线》是一档由CCTV5与NBA联合打造的NBA专题节目,本书由节目组各位主持人所著,向你揭示NBA最炙手可热的明星、最火热的话题以及最不为人知的幕后故事。
  • 太清经断谷法

    太清经断谷法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 病友哈马阿蒂

    病友哈马阿蒂

    两个月前,王四屁股沟里莫名地长了一个红疙瘩,黄豆般大小,开始不痒不痛,只是觉得长在那里有点怪怪的。这样的事多了,不同的是,以前更多的时候是长在脸上,或者身上,那些可以堂而皇之亮出来而不觉得害羞的地方。公然长在脸上的,再早,说是青春痘,不青春后,就叫它痤疮。长在身上的,好发于手臂、胸前或肚皮上,星星点点的,有点红,有点痒,就不叫青春痘而叫它湿疹。用中医的说法,是内里湿热重了,发散出来的疹子。这些事,每个人都会有,随便弄点消炎的药搽搽,几天过后也就平复了。实在顽劣的,弄点鱼石脂敷上,就像如今给半生的水果施点催熟与膨大的药剂。
  • 丁甘仁医案

    丁甘仁医案

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。