登陆注册
5267600000053

第53章

The 'now' is the link of time, as has been said (for it connects past and future time), and it is a limit of time (for it is the beginning of the one and the end of the other). But this is not obvious as it is with the point, which is fixed. It divides potentially, and in so far as it is dividing the 'now' is always different, but in so far as it connects it is always the same, as it is with mathematical lines. For the intellect it is not always one and the same point, since it is other and other when one divides the line; but in so far as it is one, it is the same in every respect.

So the 'now' also is in one way a potential dividing of time, in another the termination of both parts, and their unity. And the dividing and the uniting are the same thing and in the same reference, but in essence they are not the same.

So one kind of 'now' is described in this way: another is when the time is near this kind of 'now'. 'He will come now' because he will come to-day; 'he has come now' because he came to-day. But the things in the Iliad have not happened 'now', nor is the flood 'now'-not that the time from now to them is not continuous, but because they are not near.

'At some time' means a time determined in relation to the first of the two types of 'now', e.g. 'at some time' Troy was taken, and 'at some time' there will be a flood; for it must be determined with reference to the 'now'. There will thus be a determinate time from this 'now' to that, and there was such in reference to the past event.

But if there be no time which is not 'sometime', every time will be determined.

Will time then fail? Surely not, if motion always exists. Is time then always different or does the same time recur? Clearly time is, in the same way as motion is. For if one and the same motion sometimes recurs, it will be one and the same time, and if not, not.

Since the 'now' is an end and a beginning of time, not of the same time however, but the end of that which is past and the beginning of that which is to come, it follows that, as the circle has its convexity and its concavity, in a sense, in the same thing, so time is always at a beginning and at an end. And for this reason it seems to be always different; for the 'now' is not the beginning and the end of the same thing; if it were, it would be at the same time and in the same respect two opposites. And time will not fail; for it is always at a beginning.

'Presently' or 'just' refers to the part of future time which is near the indivisible present 'now' ('When do you walk? 'Presently', because the time in which he is going to do so is near), and to the part of past time which is not far from the 'now' ('When do you walk?'

'I have just been walking'). But to say that Troy has just been taken-we do not say that, because it is too far from the 'now'.

'Lately', too, refers to the part of past time which is near the present 'now'. 'When did you go?' 'Lately', if the time is near the existing now. 'Long ago' refers to the distant past.

'Suddenly' refers to what has departed from its former condition in a time imperceptible because of its smallness; but it is the nature of all change to alter things from their former condition. In time all things come into being and pass away; for which reason some called it the wisest of all things, but the Pythagorean Paron called it the most stupid, because in it we also forget; and his was the truer view.

It is clear then that it must be in itself, as we said before, the condition of destruction rather than of coming into being (for change, in itself, makes things depart from their former condition), and only incidentally of coming into being, and of being. A sufficient evidence of this is that nothing comes into being without itself moving somehow and acting, but a thing can be destroyed even if it does not move at all. And this is what, as a rule, we chiefly mean by a thing's being destroyed by time. Still, time does not work even this change; even this sort of change takes place incidentally in time.

We have stated, then, that time exists and what it is, and in how many senses we speak of the 'now', and what 'at some time', 'lately', 'presently' or 'just', 'long ago', and 'suddenly' mean.

同类推荐
  • 金液还丹百问诀唐

    金液还丹百问诀唐

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Black Tulip

    The Black Tulip

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 香宋词

    香宋词

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 菊谱

    菊谱

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 舍利弗阿毗昙论

    舍利弗阿毗昙论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 时空世界维护者

    时空世界维护者

    飞凡作为一名时空世界维护者,忙于拯救各类文明世界。却意外拥有了成神的机遇。在其他神的帮助下。又一位强大的神诞生了
  • 超能天路

    超能天路

    暗能量!是22世纪由太阳超能风暴粒子带来的产物。所谓的“圣水”就是从其中而来。早在2090年,一场超强的太阳超能风暴粒子席卷地球,刹时间,昏天暗地,通信障碍,电压升降导致电线自燃,日地引力波动的地球,发生了超多超大型自然灾害。
  • 问心居

    问心居

    不要来打扰我,我只是想平静的生活下去。今天好好的干活吧,我只想陪着孩子,和家里人幸福快乐的生活,偏偏这个世界进化了
  • 重回九四

    重回九四

    乡村文,重生文,半现实文。九四年的村味,贫穷的自己,可怜的丫头,年迈的爷爷,生活的重担,这些都压在郭去身上,看主角如何在农村走出一条致富路来,这是很真实的致富经历。本书基本不装逼,不是爽文,只在虚幻之中求那么一点真实。 群号:236301568,加群时的答案:雨中雨夹雪
  • 少年愁(中国好小说)

    少年愁(中国好小说)

    本文主要写的是一群不知愁的少年在一起疯疯打打,情窦初开的他们相互之间虽然不是十分和谐,但随着时间的推移,慢慢地发生了变化。本文主人翁一直不合群,但最后考上了大学,成了最有出息的一个,也最终收获了爱情。
  • 最佳咸鱼翻身系统

    最佳咸鱼翻身系统

    蔺箫来自末世,濒临生命死亡,幸运被地府如愿系统选中,承担咸鱼翻身大任,为屈死,被冤枉,被害者雪耻复仇挽救生命。用任务的代价换取生命的价值,达到延长寿命长寿的目的。
  • 双刃Ⅱ之落日江南春

    双刃Ⅱ之落日江南春

    所谓“双刃”,自然是对双方而言,感情如果如双刃,那么在划伤别人的同时,就不免也会划伤自己,这就好像一个巴掌落下来,被打的人是痛的,而打人的人也是痛,手掌心火辣辣地灼痛,只是在伸手扬起巴掌的那一刻,无论是谁,可能还不曾意识到自己也会有如此的痛楚。
  • 爱脸红的男生

    爱脸红的男生

    谜一样的女生,用她迷倒众生的眼睛肆无忌惮且极度贪婪地看着一个帅气男生,男生娇羞地低下了头,女生得意洋洋,男生无地自容,爱情在彼此心里开出了花……
  • 朱元璋发迹史

    朱元璋发迹史

    中国历史不乏奇迹,朱元璋更是奇迹中的奇迹,从社会最底层的乞丐和尚,爬上天朝上国的皇帝宝座。中间的秘辛固然数不胜数,但这种成功足以激励后人。朱元璋的一生,可以说是拼搏的一生,也可以说是杀戮的一生。在他成功的路上,智慧伴随着血腥,谋略混杂着阴暗,理性之中夹杂着疯狂……如何解读朱元璋这个人,是现代人乐此不疲的话题。朱元璋身上有许多值得学习的地方,也有很多让人唾弃的地方。翻开姚尧编写的这本《朱元璋发迹史》,它将带你认识这位草根皇帝,并揭秘其发迹之路。
  • 剧领天下:中外电视剧产业发展报告(2012-2013)

    剧领天下:中外电视剧产业发展报告(2012-2013)

    本书是国内独有的全面解读全球电视剧产业最新现状与发展趋势的综合研究报告。本书由30多位传媒专家和业界精英倾情奉献,是一部集时效性、权威性、精准性、可读性于一体的行业著作;是一部发现规律、把握趋势、立足本土、放眼全球的中外电视剧产业发展的最新实物研究大全。