登陆注册
5270400000094

第94章

There are certain hypotheses upon which it is at once difficult to bring, and easy to stand up to, an argument. Such (e.g.) are those things which stand first and those which stand last in the order of nature. For the former require definition, while the latter have to be arrived at through many steps if one wishes to secure a continuous proof from first principles, or else all discussion about them wears the air of mere sophistry: for to prove anything is impossible unless one begins with the appropriate principles, and connects inference with inference till the last are reached. Now to define first principles is just what answerers do not care to do, nor do they pay any attention if the questioner makes a definition: and yet until it is clear what it is that is proposed, it is not easy to discuss it. This sort of thing happens particularly in the case of the first principles: for while the other propositions are shown through these, these cannot be shown through anything else: we are obliged to understand every item of that sort by a definition. The inferences, too, that lie too close to the first principle are hard to treat in argument: for it is not possible to bring many arguments in regard to them, because of the small number of those steps, between the conclusion and the principle, whereby the succeeding propositions have to be shown. The hardest, however, of all definitions to treat in argument are those that employ terms about which, in the first place, it is uncertain whether they are used in one sense or several, and, further, whether they are used literally or metaphorically by the definer. For because of their obscurity, it is impossible to argue upon such terms; and because of the impossibility of saying whether this obscurity is due to their being used metaphorically, it is impossible to refute them.

In general, it is safe to suppose that, whenever any problem proves intractable, it either needs definition or else bears either several senses, or a metaphorical sense, or it is not far removed from the first principles; or else the reason is that we have yet to discover in the first place just this-in which of the aforesaid directions the source of our difficulty lies: when we have made this clear, then obviously our business must be either to define or to distinguish, or to supply the intermediate premisses: for it is through these that the final conclusions are shown.

It often happens that a difficulty is found in discussing or arguing a given position because the definition has not been correctly rendered: e.g. 'Has one thing one contrary or many?': here when the term 'contraries' has been properly defined, it is easy to bring people to see whether it is possible for the same thing to have several contraries or not: in the same way also with other terms requiring definition. It appears also in mathematics that the difficulty in using a figure is sometimes due to a defect in definition; e.g. in proving that the line which cuts the plane parallel to one side divides similarly both the line which it cuts and the area; whereas if the definition be given, the fact asserted becomes immediately clear: for the areas have the same fraction subtracted from them as have the sides: and this is the definition of 'the same ratio'. The most primary of the elementary principles are without exception very easy to show, if the definitions involved, e.g. the nature of a line or of a circle, be laid down; only the arguments that can be brought in regard to each of them are not many, because there are not many intermediate steps. If, on the other hand, the definition of the starting-points be not laid down, to show them is difficult and may even prove quite impossible. The case of the significance of verbal expressions is like that of these mathematical conceptions.

One may be sure then, whenever a position is hard to discuss, that one or other of the aforesaid things has happened to it. Whenever, on the other hand, it is a harder task to argue to the point claimed, i.e. the premiss, than to the resulting position, a doubt may arise whether such claims should be admitted or not: for if a man is going to refuse to admit it and claim that you shall argue to it as well, he will be giving the signal for a harder undertaking than was originally proposed: if, on the other hand, he grants it, he will be giving the original thesis credence on the strength of what is less credible than itself. If, then, it is essential not to enhance the difficulty of the problem, he had better grant it; if, on the other hand, it be essential to reason through premisses that are better assured, he had better refuse. In other words, in serious inquiry he ought not to grant it, unless he be more sure about it than about the conclusion; whereas in a dialectical exercise he may do so if he is merely satisfied of its truth. Clearly, then, the circumstances under which such admissions should be claimed are different for a mere questioner and for a serious teacher.

同类推荐
  • 孔子诗论

    孔子诗论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 瀛涯勝覽

    瀛涯勝覽

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 六十种曲双珠记

    六十种曲双珠记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 药师如来观行仪轨法

    药师如来观行仪轨法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 煮粥条议

    煮粥条议

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 好懂好用的教育心理学:解决学生学习的10个困惑

    好懂好用的教育心理学:解决学生学习的10个困惑

    赵希斌专著的《大夏书系:好懂好用的教育心理学(解决学生学习的10个困惑)》用教育心理学的知识解释了如何激发学习动力、提高学习成绩、养成良好的学习与行为习惯、优化师生和亲子关系等问题,探讨了使教育和学习更有效的方法与途径。《大夏书系:好懂好用的教育心理学(解决学生学习的10个困惑)》中呈现的大量真实的教育教学案例将成为桥梁,帮助我们将身边的教育教学现象和教育心理学知识紧密联系起来,促进我们对教育心理学知识的理解,提高我们的教育教学水平。
  • 心安是归处

    心安是归处

    她说,无论你在哪里,只要伸出手,就能握住我,她说,不要怕,我会带你冲出所有的黑暗,她说,就算上帝也不能拆散我们……然而最后,她说,我从未爱过你。她叫安心,一生只求心安,可颠沛流离多年,才发现她的心安处,原来一直在那里。
  • 奇妙故事

    奇妙故事

    世界奇妙故事的荟萃,有的让你捧腹大笑,有的让你泪流满面,更让你体味人生百态,快来到奇妙的故事世界吧。
  • 末日凉玖

    末日凉玖

    在近乎平庸的日子里沉沦的凉玖,某一天晚上却梦到自己即将死去,这是一场人类的末日,还是宇宙的灾难?
  • 胡子有脸

    胡子有脸

    香港文学经典,西西短篇作品集。本书共收录西西短篇小说十二篇。胡子有脸,是什么东西?胡子有脸,是一个人的外号。当胡子有脸还是一个小孩子的时候,最喜欢一天到晚问问题,而且,他的问题总是多得问不完。问问题当然不是一件坏事,事实上还是一件好事,不过,胡子有脸的问题,常常叫给问的人很难答得对,譬如他问:为什么抽屉有桌子?“你选择了我,我很高兴。”如果你真想表达一下你喜欢这书,你就抚抚右耳;不然,抚抚左耳好了。至于不知是好是坏,就抚抚鼻子吧。
  • 故事会(2016年6月下)

    故事会(2016年6月下)

    《故事会》是上海文艺出版社编辑出版的仅有114个页码、32开本的杂志,是中国最通俗的民间文学小本杂志。《故事会》创刊于1963年,是中国的老牌刊物之一。先后获得两届中国期刊的最高奖——国家期刊奖。1998年,它在世界综合类期刊中发行量排名第5。
  • 冬季营养食谱

    冬季营养食谱

    《家庭美食坊丛书》根据四季的特点、不同的家常菜式、南北方的不同饮食习惯,精选了一千多道家常菜。食物搭配具有较强的针对性,富含营养,又有保健功效,让你吃得美味,吃出健康。《家庭美食坊丛书》内容丰富,实用性强,通俗易懂,还有相关的营养知识,是家庭食物调养的有益参考书。
  • 大风思猛士:吴佩孚传

    大风思猛士:吴佩孚传

    《大风思猛士:吴佩孚传》记述了军阀吴佩孚光辉而又跌宕起伏的一生。起初,他只是一个落魄的秀才,后来竟成了直系统帅,成为北洋军阀操纵政局的首要人物。军阀混战时,他将段祺瑞赶下了台,把张作霖赶出了山海关。他还作为封面人物登上了美国的《时代》杂志,被誉为“中国最强者”。曾经,他也被视为最有希望统一中国的不二人选。他有“三不主义”——不住租界、不积私财、不举外债,对此一生不违;他坚持“不卖国”的主张,临终前仍告诫后人“不准当汉奸”;他还有“不纳妾”的美名,一位德国小姐爱上了他,他却在送来的情书上挥毫阅示——老妻尚在!
  • 拯救世界的英灵

    拯救世界的英灵

    “幻想”极为神秘的伟力。由其构建出无数的异世界。“幻想”的源头正是人类。异世界的存在必须由人类的“幻想”维持。但是,热情终归是有限度的,或许五十年,一百年,五百年。当再也没有人想起这个世界。它,就将走向灭亡于是乎,拯救世界的人出现了,以英灵之身,在地球意志的帮助下,不断地攻略(参与)异世界,让其完成从二次元到三次元的转变,从虚幻化作现实。
  • 八旗子弟

    八旗子弟

    作者作为满族正白旗觉尔察氏一族的后人,用纪实文学的手法叙述了其祖辈、父辈至自己一辈,从清王朝末期到本世纪,三代人在历史大潮中经历的家庭变迁、人生坎坷,折射出百余年来中国社会的深刻变革。