Two questions are raised by Marx's work: First, Are his laws of historical development true? Second, Is Socialism desirable? The second of these questions is quite independent of the first.Marx professes to prove that Socialism must come, but scarcely concerns himself to argue that when it comes it will be a good thing.It may be, however, that if it comes, it will be a good thing, even though all Marx's arguments to provethat it must come should be at fault.In actual fact, time has shown many flaws in Marx's theories.The development of the world has been sufficiently like his prophecy to prove him a man of very unusual penetration, but has not been sufficiently like to make either political or economic history exactly such as he predicted that it would be.Nationalism, so far from diminishing, has increased, and has failed to be conquered by the cosmopolitan tendencies which Marx rightly discerned in finance.Although big businesses have grown bigger and have over a great area reached the stage of monopoly, yet the number of shareholders in such enterprises is so large that the actual number of individuals interested in the capitalist system has continually increased.Moreover, though large firms have grown larger, there has been a simultaneous increase in firms of medium size.Meanwhile the wage-earners, who were, according to Marx, to have remained at the bare level of subsistence at which they were in the England of the first half of the nineteenth century, have instead profited by the general increase of wealth, though in a lesser degree than the capitalists.The supposed iron law of wages has been proved untrue, so far as labor in civilized countries is concerned.If we wish now to find examples of capitalist cruelty analogous to those with which Marx's book is filled, we shall have to go for most of our material to the Tropics, or at any rate to regions where there are men of inferior races to exploit.Again: the skilled worker of the present day is an aristocrat in the world of labor.It is a question with him whether he shall ally himself with the unskilled worker against the capitalist, or with the capitalist against the unskilled worker.Very often he is himself a capitalist in a small way, and if he is not so individually, his trade union or his friendly society is pretty sure to be so.Hence the sharpness of the class war has not been maintained.There are gradations, intermediate ranks between rich and poor, instead of the clear-cut logical antithesis between the workers who have nothing and the capitalists who have all.Even in Germany, which became the home of orthodox Marxianism and developed a powerful Social-Democratic party, nominally accepting the doctrine of``Das Kapital'' as all but verbally inspired, even there the enormous increase of wealth in all classes in the years preceding the war ledSocialists to revise their beliefs and to adopt an evolutionary rather than a revolutionary attitude.Bernstein, a German Socialist who lived long in England, inaugurated the ``Revisionist'' movement which at last conquered the bulk of the party.His criticisms of Marxian orthodoxy are set forth in his ``Evolutionary Socialism.''[9] Bernstein's work, as is common in Broad Church writers, consists largely in showing that the Founders did not hold their doctrines so rigidly as their followers have done.There is much in the writings of Marx and Engels that cannot be fitted into the rigid orthodoxy which grew up among their disciples.Bernstein's main criticisms of these disciples, apart from such as we have already mentioned, consist in a defense of piecemeal action as against revolution.He protests against the attitude of undue hostility to Liberalism which is common among Socialists, and he blunts the edge of the Internationalism which undoubtedly is part of the teachings of Marx.The workers, he says, have a Fatherland as soon as they become citizens, and on this basis he defends that degree of nationalism which the war has since shown to be prevalent in the ranks of Socialists.He even goes so far as to maintain that European nations have a right to tropical territory owing to their higher civilization.Such doctrines diminish revolutionary ardor and tend to transform Socialists into a left wing of the Liberal Party.But the increasing prosperity of wage-earners before the war made these developments inevitable.Whether the war will have altered conditions in this respect, it is as yet impossible to know.Bernstein concludes with the wise remark that: ``We have to take working men as they are.And they are neither so universally paupers as was set out in the Communist Manifesto, nor so free from prejudices and weaknesses as their courtiers wish to make us believe.''
同类推荐
热门推荐
九天神凰
那一日,惨遭挚爱背叛,受尽折磨,她的真情,被狠狠践踏!然而,天不亡她,让她拥有了重生的机会!上古神诀在手,拼着一颗倔强不屈的心。她凤凰仙帝,一步一步,从弱小走向强大,要向所有亏欠她的人,一一讨债!有朝一日,浴火焚焰;凌驾云霄,凰舞九天!~~◇~~~~~◆◇~~【简介区】~~~~~~~◇◆~~~~◇~~他是名震九天仙域的逍遥仙帝,她是和他齐名甚至超过他的凤凰仙帝。可她为了他,却宁愿做他逍遥仙帝麾下的首席护法,一切胆敢惹怒他的存在,统统都将消灭。他们的结合,可谓九天仙域中最最令人羡慕的神仙眷侣。本以为,她可以幸福永久。然而有一天,他却突然借感情骗她,将她囚禁在那地狱般的炼妖魔塔,历经三味真火焚烧了长达千年之久。千年后,她含泪出来问他,为何这般…这般狠心的对我?却不料迎接她的,竟是他和另一个她,精心为她所设下的无情陷阱。他居然…那么决然地抢了她的稀世仙器,抽去她的挚爱情丝,剔除她历经万难才好不容易修炼而来的傲然仙骨……这一刻——她的真情,付诸东流;她的牺牲,无人可怜;她的恨意,滔天席卷;她的怒火,狂烧不灭…一朝重生,她幡然醒悟,原来自己欠缺的还是实力。“倘若可以凌驾于九天之上,那么,我就能够完全掌控自己的命运!谁也不可欺我!谁也不敢负我!”上一世,她太傻了。而这一世,她绝不会重蹈覆辙:“曾经失去的,统统都要拿回来,一分一毫都不可少!曾经欺我的害我的,通通都要被我踩在脚下,谁也不会例外!”~~◇~~~~~◆◇~~【男主区】~~~~~~~◇◆~~~~◇~~任缥缈:缥缈仙宫宫主,仙界之人称他为‘缥缈仙帝’。敢爱敢恨,为爱不惜一切痴情到底。哪怕,最终只换回一场空也无怨无悔。因为他爱,所以就爱。柳少卿:温柔无边,才华横溢,柔弱书生气质之下却也有着无比刚强和英勇。冷冰寒:潇洒冷酷,出尘飘逸,冷峻外表之下却也藏着无穷炙热与霸道。~~◇~~~~~◆◇~~【场景区】~~~~~~~◇◆~~~~◇~~任缥缈:“我爱你,不求回报。”东方凝雪:“呜,可是我就要抱!”柳少卿:“谁要是敢欺负她,必先从我尸体踏过!”东方凝雪:“不如,我们先踏过别人的尸体吧?”冷冰寒:“走自己的路,让……”东方凝雪:“让别人无路可走?”~~◇~~~~~◆◇~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~◇◆~~~~◇~~