登陆注册
5381100000115

第115章

Accordingly we always see the legislator stopping, in his fiscal laws, before the subversive consequences of the progressive tax, and consecrating the necessity, the immutability of the proportional tax.For equality in well- being cannot result from the violation of capital: the antinomy must be methodically solved, under penalty, for society, of falling back into chaos.Eternal justice does not accommodate itself to all the whims of men: like a woman, whom one may outrage, but whom one does not marry without a solemn alienation of one's self, it demands on our part, with the abandonment of our egoism, the recognition of all its rights, which are those of science.

The tax, whose final purpose, as we have shown, is the reward of the non- producers, but whose original idea was a restoration of the laborer, -- the tax, under the system of monopoly, reduces itself therefore to a pure and simple protest, a sort of extra-judicial act, the whole effect of which is to aggravate the situation of the wage-worker by disturbing the monopolist in his possession.As for the idea of changing the proportional tax into a progressive tax, or, to speak more accurately, of reversing the order in which the tax progresses, that is a blunder the entire responsibility for which belongs to the economists.

But henceforth menace hovers over privilege.With the power of modifying the proportionality of the tax, government has under its hand an expeditious and sure means of dispossessing the holders of capital when it will; and it is a frightful thing to see everywhere that great institution, the basis of society, the object of so many controversies, of so many laws, of so many cajoleries, and of so many crimes, PROPERTY, suspended at the end of a thread over the yawning mouth of the proletariat.

3.-- Disastrous and inevitable consequences of the tax.(Provisions, sumptuary laws, rural and industrial police, patents, trade-marks, etc.)

M.Chevalier addressed to himself, in July, 1843, on the subject of the tax, the following questions:

(1) Is it asked of all or by preference of a part of the nation? (2)

Does the tax resemble a levy on polls, or is it exactly proportioned to the fortunes of the tax-payers? (3) Is agriculture more or less burdened than manufactures or commerce? (4) Is real estate more or less spared than personal property? (5) Is he who produces more favored than he who consumes?

(6) Have our taxation laws the character of sumptuary laws?

To these various questions M.Chevalier makes the reply which I am about to quote, and which sums up all of the most philosophical considerations upon the subject which I have met:

(a) The tax affects the universality, applies to the mass, takes the nation as a whole; nevertheless, as the poor are the most numerous, it taxes them willingly, certain of collecting more.(b) By the nature of things the tax sometimes takes the form of a levy on polls, as in the case of the salt tax.(c, d, e) The treasury addresses itself to labor as well as to consumption, because in France everybody labors, to real more than to personal property, and to agriculture more than to manufactures.(f)

By the same reasoning, our laws partake little of the character of sumptuary laws.

What, professor! is that all that science has taught you? The tax applies to the mass, you say; it takes the nation as a whole.Alas! we know it only too well; but it is this which is iniquitous, and which we ask you to explain.The government, when engaged in the assessment and distribution of the tax, could not have believed, did not believe, that all fortunes were equal; consequently it could not have wished, did not wish, the sums paid to be equal.Why, then, is the practice of the government always the opposite of its theory? Your opinion, if you please, on this difficult matter? Explain; justify or condemn the exchequer; take whatever course you will, provided you take some course and say something.Remember that your readers are men, and that they cannot excuse in a doctor, speaking ex cathedra, such propositions as this: as the poor are the most numerous, it taxes them willingly, certain of collecting more.No, Monsieur: numbers do not regulate the tax; the tax knows perfectly well that millions of poor added to millions of poor do not make one voter.You render the treasury odious by making it absurd, and I maintain that it is neither the one nor the other.The poor man pays more than the rich because Providence, to whom misery is odious like vice, has so ordered things that the miserable must always be the most ground down.The iniquity of the tax is the celestial scourge which drives us towards equality.God! if a professor of political economy, who was formerly an apostle, could but understand this revelation!

By the nature of things, says M.Chevalier, the tax sometimes takes the form of a levy on polls.Well, in what case is it just that the tax should take the form of a levy on polls? Is it always, or never? What is the principle of the tax? What is its object? Speak, answer.

And what instruction, pray, can we derive from the remark, scarcely worthy of quotation, that the treasury addresses itself to labor as well as to consumption, to real more than to personal property, to agriculture more than to manufactures? Of what consequence to science is this interminable recital of crude facts, if your analysis never extracts a single idea from them?

同类推荐
  • Henry VIII

    Henry VIII

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 东林本末

    东林本末

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 长沙方歌括

    长沙方歌括

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 修真十书黄庭内景玉经注卷

    修真十书黄庭内景玉经注卷

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 未生怨经

    未生怨经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 高调宠爱

    高调宠爱

    姜棠上过两次微博头条:名模姜棠嫁入顾氏豪门姜棠产女,亲子鉴定不匹配。声名狼藉,沈擎第三次凑过来追她。姜棠:你到底喜欢我什么啊?沈擎:哪都喜欢。他从她出道那年就开始追,追,追,这次大的跑不了,小的也得抢回家!
  • 玫染秋雨听华年

    玫染秋雨听华年

    你好,我是年华。我的名字?上天给的缘分吧,大概是为了让我和陆听风相遇。年华深处草听风嘛。你好,我是陆听风。关于名字?那要问我的父母了。你好,我是海闻雨。名字?还不是家长们自作多情地定娃娃亲,连名字都起得这么对称。害我浪费了那么多年的精力呢。你好,我秋玫。我的故事,和名字一样,很简单。只是,后来出了差错。不过,有最要好的他们陪伴,我很幸运。你好,我年溪。猜我和年华的关系。当然,她是我姐。我的故事?那就要问我姐。你好,我秋染。我和秋玫?当然是敌人啦。我和她,哼,还有很多故事呢。「敢不敢点进来,看看我们的青春故事?」
  • 非凡修真

    非凡修真

    现代社会,修真已没落。一个修真少年正迷茫于修真的前景与方向,但是一个意外把他送到了异世界。修真是光明大道还是无尽坦途,尽在掌控之中……
  • 普贤金刚萨埵瑜伽念诵仪

    普贤金刚萨埵瑜伽念诵仪

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 许你晚风凉

    许你晚风凉

    盲人男孩许和风与游泳队的自卑少女齐小夏,是两座彼此陪伴的小孤岛,见证对方全部青涩美好的岁月。他们原本平静的高中岁月因为古惑仔少年孙江宁的蓄意介入而掀起千层浪,先是和风假装眼盲十年的秘密被一朝戳穿,再是小夏放弃泳池梦想,奋不顾身地紧追和风漂洋过海到东京,开始日夜辛苦地打工留学。短短两三年,三个人的生活都面目全非,在一环接一环的欺骗与裂痕之后,和风再一次鼓起勇气找回小夏,给她北海道的漫天大雪,给她轮船上的烛火之夜,谁知就在小夏陷入徘徊时,年轻的和风也遭遇了前所未有的困境,家族破产,暴食症,孙江宁的干扰与威胁……
  • 生生世世不相忘

    生生世世不相忘

    沐仙城传说中修仙的胜地,可却在一天之间被灭门,余一子沐安。后遇仙子漓沫,她在帮他找仇人的路上,遇到了许多奇奇怪怪事。
  • 诸天武道从武当开始

    诸天武道从武当开始

    这是一个现代职业道士,穿越古代武当山下,一个农家小子,本来只是想,凭着肚子里对道经的熟悉,上山当个道士,好过地里刨食,谁知听到自己的道号是自己记忆中的那个名字后,他就知道他这一生,不能只读道经了。然后,他便开始了传奇的第二世,第三世,第四世……(本书无限流)书友群:551845914,可以来聊聊天
  • 另一个人:变形者札记

    另一个人:变形者札记

    世界已经在谎言中变得老残,只等着最后那慈悲的一刀。本书是《船夫日记》的续篇,写于1991到1995年,是凯尔泰斯日记体哲思文集的第二部。凯尔泰斯延续了《船夫日记》中对尼采、卡夫卡、维特根斯坦、加缪、贝克特、伯恩哈德等人广阔的阅读和对话。然而,相比《船夫日记》,本书与作者当时的生活经验联系更为紧密,在五年的记录中,可以看到作者游历欧陆各国。在这些游历的记录中,将日常生活中的吉光片羽,与对生命、人性、民族、自由、伤痛等不间断的思考,与自己的文学创作观念结合起来。看似散落的碎片,而加以艺术的表达。虽然其中有鲜明的国家和民族意识的痕迹,但作者对人在大的历史命运中艰难选择的反思,至今仍有启发意义。
  • 蒋勋说红楼梦(第三辑)

    蒋勋说红楼梦(第三辑)

    这是蒋勋在长达半个世纪的时间里,数十次阅读《红楼梦》后的心血之作。无关红学,不涉及考证,作者从青春与美的角度出发,带领读者逐字逐句细读小说本身,梳理《红楼梦》中的人物与情感,探寻书中表达的繁华的幻灭、逝去的哀伤,讲述青春的孤独、寂寞与彷徨。这是一个生命对其余生命的叩问与聆听。跟蒋勋读《红楼梦》,仿佛是在阅读自己的一生。蒋勋说:我是把《红楼梦》当“佛经”来读的,因为处处都是慈悲,也处处都是觉悟。
  • 末世圣冰姬

    末世圣冰姬

    这是一个少女的时代!十年前的生化实验创造了【九神】于此同时在遥远的南方也建立了与之对抗的组织——圣雷纳斯学院。来自世界各地的觉醒出“属性”的少女聚集在此共同抵御丧尸的进攻,保卫整个世界!十年前叶天灵和自己的兄长一起来到学院接受最苛刻的训练可是在一次战争中兄长却离奇失踪,叶天灵则在寻找和战斗中渐渐看清了整个世界。(简介不是全部,点进来看正文吧!只有这样才能知道这是一本关于百合还是后宫的书!)