登陆注册
5406800000158

第158章 SOUTHEY'S COLLOQUIES(8)

Southey thinks a fearful evil.But is there no mitigating circumstance? Each of the ten neighbours of our fundholder has fifty pounds a year more than formerly.Each of them will, as it seems to our feeble understandings, employ more industry and feed more mouths than formerly.The sum is exactly the same.It is in different hands.But on what grounds does Mr.Southey call upon us to believe that it is in the hands of men who will spend it less liberally or less judiciously? He seems to think that nobody but a fundholder can employ the poor; that, if a tax is remitted, those who formerly used to pay it proceed immediately to dig holes in the earth, and to bury the sum which the Government had been accustomed to take; that no money can set industry in motion till such money has been taken by the tax-gatherer out of one man's pocket and put into another man's pocket.We really wish that Mr.Southey would try to prove this principle, which is indeed the foundation of his whole theory of finance: for we think it right to hint to him that our hard-hearted and unimaginative generation will expect some more satisfactory reason than the only one with which he has yet favoured it, namely, a similitude touching evaporation and dew.

Both the theory and the illustration, indeed, are old friends of ours.In every season of distress which we can remember, Mr.

Southey has been proclaiming that it is not from economy, but from increased taxation, that the country must expect relief; and he still, we find, places the undoubting faith of a political Diafoirus, in his"Resaignare, repurgare, et reclysterizare.""A people," he tells us, "may be too rich, but a government cannot be so.""A state," says he, "cannot have more wealth at its command than may be employed for the general good, a liberal expenditure in national works being one of the surest means of promoting national prosperity; and the benefit being still more obvious, of an expenditure directed to the purposes of national improvement.

But a people may be too rich."

We fully admit that a state cannot have at its command more wealth than may be employed for the general good.But neither can individuals, or bodies of individuals, have at their command more wealth than may be employed for the general good.If there be no limit to the sum which may be usefully laid out in public works and national improvement, then wealth, whether in the hands of private men or of the Government, may always, if the possessors choose to spend it usefully, be usefully spent.The only ground, therefore, on which Mr.Southey can possibly maintain that a government cannot be too rich, but that a people may be too rich, must be this, that governments are more likely to spend their money on good objects than private individuals.

But what is useful expenditure? "A liberal expenditure in national works," says Mr.Southey, "is one of the surest means for promoting national prosperity." What does he mean by national prosperity? Does he mean the wealth of the State? If so, his reasoning runs thus: The more wealth a state has the better; for the more wealth a state has the more wealth it will have.This is surely something like that fallacy, which is ungallantly termed a lady's reason.If by national prosperity he means the wealth of the people, of how gross a contradiction is Mr.Southey guilty.Apeople, he tells us, may be too rich: a government cannot: for a government can employ its riches in making the people richer.The wealth of the people is to be taken from them, because they have too much, and laid out in works, which will yield them more.

We are really at a loss to determine whether Mr.Southey's reason for recommending large taxation is that it will make the people rich, or that it will make them poor.But we are sure that, if his object is to make them rich, he takes the wrong course.There are two or three principles respecting public works, which, as an experience of vast extent proves, may be trusted in almost every case.

It scarcely ever happens that any private man or body of men will invest property in a canal, a tunnel, or a bridge, but from an expectation that the outlay will be profitable to them.No work of this sort can be profitable to private speculators, unless the public be willing to pay for the use of it.The public will not pay of their own accord for what yields no profit or convenience to them.There is thus a direct and obvious connection between the motive which induces individuals to undertake such a work, and the utility of the work.

Can we find any such connection in the case of a public work executed by a government? If it is useful, are the individuals who rule the country richer? If it is useless, are they poorer? Apublic man may be solicitous for his credit.But is not he likely to gain more credit by an useless display of ostentatious architecture in a great town than by the best road or the best canal in some remote province? The fame of public works is a much less certain test of their utility than the amount of toll collected at them.In a corrupt age, there will be direct embezzlement.In the purest age, there will be abundance of jobbing.Never were the statesmen of any country more sensitive to public opinion, and more spotless in pecuniary transactions, than those who have of late governed England.Yet we have only to look at the buildings recently erected in London for a proof of our rule.In a bad age, the fate of the public is to be robbed outright.In a good age, it is merely to have the dearest and the worst of everything.

Buildings for State purposes the State must erect.And here we think that, in general, the State ought to stop.We firmly believe that five hundred thousand pounds subscribed by individuals for rail-roads or canals would produce more advantage to the public than five millions voted by Parliament for the same purpose.There are certain old saws about the master's eye and about everybody's business, in which we place very great faith.

同类推荐
  • 六即义

    六即义

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 宿东岩寺晓起

    宿东岩寺晓起

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 云杜故事

    云杜故事

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • SILAS MARNER

    SILAS MARNER

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 广阳杂记

    广阳杂记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 三生劫之九妖

    三生劫之九妖

    一念成悦,处处繁花处处锦;一念成执,寸寸相思寸寸灰。他远远便望见了她站在大雪中,撑着油纸伞,眉黛青山。雪色里,他朝她伸出手,他眼里仿佛还有未曾融化的积雪,落了满眼的温柔与眷恋。她朝他缓步走来,一步一步,好像走了一生一世,每一步都落在他的眼里,走进他心里。他望着她身后的满朝文武百官,声色俱厉:“谁阻我爱你,我便杀谁,直到尸横遍野,血染天下,万里江山再也无人反对为佳。”她笑靥如花:“若叛我,碧落黄泉,不得超生;若忠我,黄土白骨,生死相随。君,可还愿以江山为聘,娶我为妻?”他回:“死生契阔,与子成说。执子之手,与子偕老。”
  • 徒弟都是债(四)

    徒弟都是债(四)

    桃林下摆好了桌椅和茶水,我过去时,正好看到一袭青袍的伟岸背影,他正负着手看眼前灼灼芳华。蜀山那尾小景鲤很恭敬地伴在一边,竹笛别在腰间,见我从树林里出来,忙又恭敬地喊了一声:“师叔祖。”背对着我的飘涯子这才转过身,一双沉淀如深潭的眸子望了过来,面容如昔,略显沧桑,不过衬着一身的掌门气势,还是颇有威严的。我让自己笑了一笑:“师兄。”
  • 系乐府十二首 陇上

    系乐府十二首 陇上

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 太极图说

    太极图说

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 王爷你给妞听好了

    王爷你给妞听好了

    据说穿越好,吃好玩好嫁得好。妞穿了,也嫁了……爷,给妞听好:琴棋书画,妞不会;三从四德,妞不懂;妞现在喜欢你不代表以后也喜欢,你给妞好好的,别以为妞好欺负,爱答不理的;爷,给妞听好:妞嫁了你,你就是妞的男人,你敢围着别的女人转,别怪妞往死里跟你闹;爷,给妞听好:妞的心不大,闯进来再也不要跑出去,或者,跑出去永远不要再回来;爷,给妞听好:妞只爱你一次,你若把妞丢了别说对不起,妞不会站在原地等你。
  • 穿越系统之辉煌人生

    穿越系统之辉煌人生

    此书主要讲述嚣张,腹黑且正义的女主叶芊芊,遇到电梯故障穿越到修仙界,签订蠢萌神兽妖妖零,激活赏善罚恶系统,顺便救了一个大魔头驰韵,从此踏上了维护世界和平,惩罚一切罪恶之路!“嘚,你们这群欺男霸女的坏蛋,赶快洗干净脖子等死吧!”叶芊芊皱了皱眉,一个爆栗敲在了妖妖零的脑袋上:“妖妖零,你怎么说话的?先让他们将钱财交出来,再洗脖子!我们这是在劫富济贫!”驰韵趁机凑到叶芊芊面前,抛了个媚眼,幽幽道:“我早就洗干净脖子了,连身子也洗干净了,你什么时候来临幸我呀~~”文风轻松,适合闲暇时刻,打发时间
  • 大广方入如来智德不思议经

    大广方入如来智德不思议经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 云南看云集

    云南看云集

    这是“沈从文散文新编”书系之一,收入沈从文抗战时在大后方云南所写的《昆明冬景》《云南看云集》《新废邮存底》《新废邮存底续编》四种小册子。除了《昆明冬景》《云南看云》几篇散文外。很多是书信体,内容却是发表自己对文学和人事的看法。
  • 胡适四十自述

    胡适四十自述

    《胡适四十自述》是胡适唯一亲笔撰写的自传,在中国现代传记文学中独树一帜。在本书中,胡适从母亲的订婚开始,讲述了自己童年、少年与青年时代的人生经历。九年的家乡教育,从拜神到无神,以及他接受新式教育,考取官费留美,到“逼上梁山”的文学革命,皆是胡适难以忘记的人生历程,也是造就胡适成为当时中国学术、思想、舆论领袖的成因。同时,本书也是胡适与自己心灵的一次对谈。本书讲的不仅是胡适40岁以前的人生经历与思想建树,更反映了他当时所处社会的风貌。
  • 竹西花事小录

    竹西花事小录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。