登陆注册
5406800000364

第364章 MOORE'S LIFE OF LORD BYRON(10)

Cowper complains that"Manner is all in all, whate'er is writ, The substitute for genius, taste, and wit."He praised Pope; yet he regretted that Pope had"Made poetry a mere mechanic art, And every warbler had his tune by heart."Alfieri speaks with similar scorn of the tragedies of his predecessors."Mi cadevano dalle mani per la languidezza, trivialita e prolissita dei modi e dei verso, senza parlare poi della snervatezza dei pensieri.Or perche mai questa nostra divina lingua, si maschia anco, ed energica, e feroce, in bocca di Dante, dovra ella farsi casi sbiadata ed eunuca nel dialogo tragico?"To men thus sick of the languid manner of their contemporaries ruggedness seemed a venial fault, or rather a positive merit.

In their hatred of meretricious ornament, and of what Cowper calls "creamy smoothness," they erred on the opposite side.

Their style was too austere, their versification too harsh.

It is not easy, however, to overrate the service which they rendered to literature.The intrinsic value of their poems is considerable.But the example which they set of mutiny against an absurd system was invaluable.The part which they performed was rather that of Moses than that of Joshua.They opened the house of bondage; but they did not enter the promised land.

During the twenty years which followed the death of Cowper, the revolution in English poetry was fully consummated.None of the writers of this period, not even Sir Walter Scott, contributed so much to the consummation as Lord Byron.Yet Lord Byron contributed to it unwillingly, and with constant self-reproach and shame.All his tastes and inclinations led him to take part with the school of poetry which was going out against the school which was coming in.Of Pope himself he spoke with extravagant admiration.He did not venture directly to say that the little man of Twickenham was a greater poet than Shakspeare or Milton;but he hinted pretty clearly that he thought so.Of his contemporaries, scarcely any had so much of his admiration as Mr.

Gifford, who, considered as a poet, was merely Pope, without Pope's wit and fancy, and whose satires are decidedly inferior in vigour and poignancy to the very imperfect juvenile performance of Lord Byron himself.He now and then praised Mr.Wordsworth and Mr.Coleridge, but ungraciously and without cordiality.When he attacked them, he brought his whole soul to the work.Of the most elaborate of Mr.Wordsworth's poems he could find nothing to say, but that it was "clumsy, and frowsy, and his aversion." Peter Bell excited his spleen to such a degree that he evoked the shades of Pope and Dryden, and demanded of them whether it were possible that such trash could evade contempt? In his heart he thought his own Pilgrimage of Harold inferior to his Imitation of Horace's Art of Poetry, a feeble echo of Pope and Johnson.This insipid performance he repeatedly designed to publish, and was withheld only by the solicitations of his friends.He has distinctly declared his approbation of the unities, the most absurd laws by which genius was ever held in servitude.In one of his works, we think in his letter to Mr.Bowles, he compares the poetry of the eighteenth century to the Parthenon, and that of the nineteenth to a Turkish mosque, and boasts that, though he had assisted his contemporaries in building their grotesque and barbarous edifice, he had never joined them in defacing the remains of a chaster and more graceful architecture.In another letter he compares the change which had recently passed on English poetry to the decay of Latin poetry after the Augustan age.In the time of Pope, he tells his friend, it was all Horace with us.It is all Claudian now.

For the great old masters of the art he had no very enthusiastic veneration.In his letter to Mr.Bowles he uses expressions which clearly indicate that he preferred Pope's Iliad to the original.Mr.Moore confesses that his friend was no very fervent admirer of Shakspeare.Of all the poets of the first class Lord Byron seems to have admired Dante and Milton most.Yet in the fourth canto of Childe Harold, he places Tasso, a writer not merely inferior to them, but of quite a different order of mind, on at least a footing of equality with them.Mr.Hunt is, we suspect, quite correct in saying that Lord Byron could see little or no merit in Spenser.

But Byron the critic and Byron the poet were two very different men.The effects of the noble writer's theory may indeed often be traced in his practice.But his disposition led him to accommodate himself to the literary taste of the age in which he lived; and his talents would have enabled him to accommodate himself to the taste of any age.Though he said much of his contempt for mankind, and though he boasted that amidst the inconstancy of fortune and of fame he was all-sufficient to himself, his literary career indicated nothing of that lonely and unsocial pride which he affected.We cannot conceive him, like Milton or Wordsworth, defying the criticism of his contemporaries, retorting their scorn, and labouring on a poem in the full assurance that it would be unpopular, and in the full assurance that it would be immortal.He has said, by the mouth of one of his heroes, in speaking of political greatness, that "he must serve who fain would sway"; and this he assigns as a reason for not entering into political life.He did not consider that the sway which he had exercised in literature had been purchased by servitude, by the sacrifice of his own taste to the taste of the public.

He was the creature of his age; and whenever he had lived he would have been the creature of his age.Under Charles the First Byron would have been more quaint than Donne.Under Charles the Second the rants of Byron's rhyming plays would have pitted it, boxed it, and galleried it, with those of any Bayes or Bilboa.

Under George the First, the monotonous smoothness of Byron's versification and the terseness of his expression would have made Pope himself envious.

同类推荐
  • 武昌纪事

    武昌纪事

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 饮冰室评词

    饮冰室评词

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 奉天靖难记

    奉天靖难记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 出家授近圆羯磨仪轨附苾刍习学略法

    出家授近圆羯磨仪轨附苾刍习学略法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 穆庵文康禅师语录

    穆庵文康禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 心灵小语(少男少女文摘修订)

    心灵小语(少男少女文摘修订)

    《少男少女文摘丛书》汇集的是近年来写得最优美真切、生动感人的少男少女作品。这里有少男少女们初涉爱河的惊喜、迷惘、痛苦和走出“误区”挽手无怨的历程,有对五彩纷呈的世界特殊的感受和选择,有在升学压力之下压弯了腰的哀怨和对父辈们关于人生关于命运关于社会的认从与反叛。
  • 周易

    周易

    《周易》为儒家重要经典之一,又称《易经》,包括经和传两部分。本书将《周易》的六十四卦分别予以详细解读,每卦独立自成一体,各节皆有原文、译文、启示,每卦之后附有中外著名事例,以期深化理解,达到抛砖引玉之效。
  • 洞玄灵宝玉箓简文三元威仪自然真经

    洞玄灵宝玉箓简文三元威仪自然真经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 少室山房集

    少室山房集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 诺亚征途

    诺亚征途

    想要成为白银的话最起码也要到二十五岁左右,这还是天赋好的。可是,洛基今年只有十六岁啊!洛基以为御天岚不相信,释放出了自己的魔力,一股淡淡的白银色出现,这下御天岚想不相信都不行。
  • 夜雨寄北

    夜雨寄北

    心与文字的剑锋狭路相逢,黑暗的夜的光芒泄露,寻觅知音的言语,慰藉夜雨心中的荒凉。直抵心灵的句子,沉寂深邃的情感,令人产生共鸣的散文篇章。
  • 大风歌:风之涌

    大风歌:风之涌

    该诗丛诗歌作品以中国初民时期到西周后期的历史文化为观照对象,宏阔的人文架构是诗歌的精神脉络,散步在民间的信仰、宗教,以及政治、哲学与人学范畴的诸种题材,是本诗丛所涉及的广阔范围。
  • 文娱的战争

    文娱的战争

    在汉语的解释中,孤是王者,独是独一无二。南明朗于是说:我们都是在自己世界里称王的孤独先生。 …… 娱乐盛世,全民娱乐,四分天下,谁能称王道孤。南边的鬼才导演老当益壮,北边的全能巨星推土不疲,东边的变身女神孤芳自赏,西边的女装大佬还在剃着腿毛……在这艺术为辅的颜值时代,有一位长得好看的小(老)哥(系)哥(统)也来了。————————PS:本书又名《这场戏我没演过,但似乎经历过》、《花瓶少年的演技成长之再红你也红不过我们的南朋友》、《群抄争霸,全世界原创人民站起来了,拒绝文抄》…… 书友群203384119
  • 留守:守望的天空

    留守:守望的天空

    本书作者深各地乡村,全面采访众多的留守儿童及“留守群体”(如留守妇幼、老幼),采访当地政府、学校为留守儿童所做的大量细致扎实的工作,见证新形势下人们对生活的不屈探索,新一代少年儿童所展示的顽强生命活力,对生活的热爱与创造。全方位展现别样风采的“小鬼当家”。
  • 鼎立之地依旧为尊

    鼎立之地依旧为尊

    千古一帝秦始皇在历史的长河中坠落了,但是留下很多千古谜团,最大的莫过于秦始皇陵,皇陵表明了他要称霸鬼界的决心,虽然他通过一定手段成功转生了,但是称霸的野心却没有消失。