登陆注册
5451600000002

第2章

I do not say that there is not a wider point of view from which the distinction between law and morals becomes of secondary or no importance, as all mathematical distinctions vanish in presence of the infinite.But I do say that that distinction is of the first importance for the object which we are here to consider--a right study and mastery of the law as a business with well understood limits, a body of dogma enclosed within definite lines.I have just shown the practical reason for saying so.If you want to know the law and nothing else, you must look at it as a bad man, who cares only for the material consequences which such knowledge enables him to predict, not as a good one, who finds his reasons for conduct, whether inside the law or outside of it, in the vaguer sanctions of conscience.The theoretical importance of the distinction is no less, if you would reason on your subject aright.

The law is full of phraseology drawn from morals, and by the mere force of language continually invites us to pass from one domain to the other without perceiving it, as we are sure to do unless we have the boundary constantly before our minds.The law talks about rights, and duties, and malice, and intent, and negligence, and so forth, and nothing is easier, or, I may say, more common in legal reasoning, than to take these words in their moral sense, at some state of the argument, and so to drop into fallacy.For instance, when we speak of the rights of man in a moral sense, we mean to mark the limits of interference with individual freedom which we think are prescribed by conscience, or by our ideal, however reached.Yet it is certain that many laws have been enforced in the past, and it is likely that some are enforced now, which are condemned by the most enlightened opinion of the time, or which at all events pass the limit of interference, as many consciences would draw it.Manifestly, therefore, nothing but confusion of thought can result from assuming that the rights of man in a moral sense are equally rights in the sense of the Constitution and the law.No doubt simple and extreme cases can be put of imaginable laws which the statute-making power would not dare to enact, even in the absence of written constitutional prohibitions, because the community would rise in rebellion and fight; and this gives some plausibility to the proposition that the law, if not a part of morality, is limited by it.But this limit of power is not coextensive with any system of morals.For the most part it falls far within the lines of any such system, and in some cases may extend beyond them, for reasons drawn from the habits of a particular people at a particular time.I once heard the late Professor Agassiz say that a German population would rise if you added two cents to the price of a glass of beer.A statute in such a case would be empty words, not because it was wrong, but because it could not be enforced.No one will deny that wrong statutes can be and are enforced, and we would not all agree as to which were the wrong ones.

The confusion with which I am dealing besets confessedly legal conceptions.Take the fundamental question, What constitutes the law?

You will find some text writers telling you that it is something different from what is decided by the courts of Massachusetts or England, that it is a system of reason, that it is a deduction from principles of ethics or admitted axioms or what not, which may or may not coincide with the decisions.But if we take the view of our friend the bad man we shall find that he does not care two straws for the axioms or deductions, but that he does want to know what the Massachusetts or English courts are likely to do in fact.I am much of this mind.The prophecies of what the courts will do in fact, and nothing more pretentious, are what I mean by the law.

Take again a notion which as popularly understood is the widest conception which the law contains--the notion of legal duty, to which already I have referred.We fill the word with all the content which we draw from morals.But what does it mean to a bad man? Mainly, and in the first place, a prophecy that if he does certain things he will be subjected to disagreeable consequences by way of imprisonment or compulsory payment of money.But from his point of view, what is the difference between being fined and taxed a certain sum for doing a certain thing? That his point of view is the test of legal principles is proven by the many discussions which have arisen in the courts on the very question whether a given statutory liability is a penalty or a tax.

On the answer to this question depends the decision whether conduct is legally wrong or right, and also whether a man is under compulsion or free.Leaving the criminal law on one side, what is the difference between the liability under the mill acts or statutes authorizing a taking by eminent domain and the liability for what we call a wrongful conversion of property where restoration is out of the question.In both cases the party taking another man's property has to pay its fair value as assessed by a jury, and no more.What significance is there in calling one taking right and another wrong from the point of view of the law? It does not matter, so far as the given consequence, the compulsory payment, is concerned, whether the act to which it is attached is described in terms of praise or in terms of blame, or whether the law purports to prohibit it or to allow it.If it matters at all, still speaking from the bad man's point of view, it must be because in one case and not in the other some further disadvantages, or at least some further consequences, are attached to the act by law.The only other disadvantages thus attached to it which I ever have been able to think of are to be found in two somewhat insignificant legal doctrines, both of which might be abolished without much disturbance.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 快穿之病态

    快穿之病态

    他的记忆是不全的,所以在他的人生,那个人便是他的一切。生而因你,死又何惧。
  • 黝木印

    黝木印

    我原本叫铜锣,爹娘取名时希望娃能一辈子响响亮亮,可是我六岁那年发了场高烧后就再也发不出声了。被卖到邝府做下人二十多年,他们都叫我哑锣,虽不能言语,但我心里比谁都敞亮。邝家田产众多,又经营药材,握着本省南来北往的物资运转,是当地数一数二的豪门大户。这些年外头闹战乱,光景不如原先好,但瘦死的骆驼比马大,邝家门庭排场一点都不逊脸面。
  • 无际商皇

    无际商皇

    成长类历史架空文,剧情逻辑清晰,涉及官场斗争、王朝战争、商业战争和种田发展等内容。
  • 洪荒之鲸祖

    洪荒之鲸祖

    孟锋穿越洪荒,成为了洪荒第一头鲸鱼。(沉默(??.??))
  • 送王建秘书往渭南庄

    送王建秘书往渭南庄

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 生命里的波纹:298个小故事,让你感悟一生

    生命里的波纹:298个小故事,让你感悟一生

    本书汇集了298个短小精干的让人感动的小故事,让您在意味深长的故事中去思考,去挖掘和探索,以“感动悟语”作为读后提示来进行点拨,使广大读者朋友在故事中受到启发、感动,进而能更加从容地应对生活中的各种问题,处理好各种社会关系,在生活这个迂回曲折的长廊中游刃有余,应对自如,不为风暴,一路前行,一路聆听心跳的语音。
  • 卿本佳人

    卿本佳人

    十三岁那年,继母的女儿害死弟弟栽赃给我,弟弟的灵堂上我被一家人摁在地上毒打……那年我成了沈家的养女,喜欢上了沈家独子沈修白,万万没想到之后发生了那么多事,逼着我一步一步走上了肮脏路,离我的爱情越来越远……--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 青少年知识博览2

    青少年知识博览2

    本书几乎囊括了自然天地与人类生活的方方面面,可谓名副其实的“百科全书”。它涉及的知识点较全:每一个知识面都包含若干知识点,知识点语言生动、内容严谨,又配以图片说明,足以让读者一目了然,可谓不折不扣的“百科全书”。本书每章都是一个特定的知识领域,章内再按各知识领域的内容特点分类一一展开细述,便于读者查找、阅读。
  • 日本的日常生活

    日本的日常生活

    总有人会因为一个人爱上一座城,为了拥抱一个人而不得不拥抱了所有人。不是日娱,单女主,女主是乃木坂成员,没有芝士的文笔,我只想能够片刻的拥有她。
  • 爱无助

    爱无助

    是—本从男人的视角来透视生活中女性的书,故而所写的人物皆为“男人的另一半”!