登陆注册
10432900000001

第1章

Philogagging

To the memory of our philosophical grandfather

GROUCHO MARX,

who summed up our basic ideology when he said,

"These are my principles; if you don't like them, I have others."

An Introduction

DIMITRI: If Atlas holds up the world, what holds up Atlas?

TASSO: Atlas stands on the back of a turtle.

DIMITRI: But what does the turtle stand on?

TASSO: Another turtle.

DIMITRI: And what does that turtle stand on?

TASSO: My dear Dimitri, it's turtles all the way down!

This bit of ancient Greek dialogue perfectly illustrates the philosophical notion of infinite regress, a concept that comes up when we ask if there is a First Cause-of life, of the universe, of time and space, and most significantly, of a Creator. Something must have created the Creator, so the causal buck-or turtle-cannot stop with him. Or with the Creator behind him. Or the one behind him. It's Creators all the way down-or up, if that seems like the right direction for chasing down Creators.

If you find that infinite regress is getting you nowhere fast, you might consider the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo-creation out of nothing-or, as John Lennon put it in a slightly different context, "Before Elvis, there was nothing."

But let's lend an ear to old Tasso again. As well as being illuminating, his rejoinder-"It's turtles all the way down!"-definitely has the ring of a punch line. Ba-da-bing!

That's no surprise to us. The construction and payoff of jokes and the construction and payoff of philosophical concepts are made out of the same stuff. They tease the mind in similar ways. That's because philosophy and jokes proceed from the same impulse: to confound our sense of the way things are, to flip our worlds upside down, and to ferret out hidden, often uncomfortable, truths about life. What the philosopher calls an insight, the gagster calls a zinger.

For example, consider the following classic joke. On the surface, it just sounds deliciously goofy, but on closer inspection it speaks to the very heart of British empiricist philosophy-the question of what sort of information about the world we can depend on.

Morty comes home to find his wife and his best friend, Lou, naked together in bed. Just as Morty is about to open his mouth, Lou jumps out of the bed and says, "Before you say anything, old pal, what are you going to believe, me or your eyes?"

By challenging the primacy of sensory experience, Lou raises the question of what sort of data is certain and why. Is one way of gathering facts about the world-say, seeing-more dependable than others-say, a leap of faith that accepts Lou's description of reality?

Here's another example of a philogag, this one a riff on the Argument from Analogy, which says that if two outcomes are similar, they must have a similar cause:

A ninety-year-old man went to the doctor and said, "Doctor, my eighteen-year-old wife is expecting a baby."

The doctor said, "Let me tell you a story. A man went hunting, but instead of a gun, he picked up an umbrella by mistake. When a bear suddenly charged at the man, he picked up the umbrella, shot the bear, and killed it."

The man said, "Impossible. Someone else must have shot that bear."

The doctor said, "My point exactly!"

You couldn't ask for a better illustration of the Argument from Analogy, a philosophical ploy currently (and erroneously) being used in the argument for Intelligent Design (i.e., if there's an eyeball, there must be an Eyeball-Designer-in-the-Sky.)

We could go on and on-and in fact we will, from Agnosticism to Zen, from Hermeneutics to Eternity. We will show how philosophical concepts can be illuminated by jokes and how many jokes are loaded with fascinating philosophical content. Wait a second, are those two notions the same? Can we get back to you on that?

STUDENTS wandering into a philosophy class are usually hoping to gain some perspective on, say, the meaning of it all, but then some rumpled guy in mismatched tweeds ambles up to the podium and starts lecturing on the meaning of "meaning."

First things first, he says. Before we answer any question, big or small, we need to understand what the question itself signifies. Listening reluctantly, we soon discover that what this guy has to say is wicked interesting.

That's just the way philosophy-and philosophers-are. Questions beget questions, and those questions beget another whole generation of questions. It's questions all the way down.

We may start with basic ones like, "What is the meaning of it all?" and, "Does God exist?" and, "How can I be true to myself?" and, "Am I in the wrong classroom?" but very quickly we discover we need to ask other questions in order to answer our original questions. This process has given rise to an array of philosophical disciplines, each delving into particular Big Questions by asking and attempting to answer the questions that underlie them. Any questions?

So it follows that, "What is the meaning of it all?" is dealt with in the discipline known as Metaphysics, and "Does God exist?" in the one called, Philosophy of Religion. "How can I be true to myself?" falls to the school of Existentialism; "Am I in the wrong classroom?" to the new sector of philosophy called Meta-philosophy, which poses the question, "What is philosophy?" And on it goes, with each sphere of philosophy undertaking different kinds of questions and concepts.

We've arranged this book not chronologically, but by those questions we had in mind when we wandered into that first philosophy classroom-and the philosophical disciplines that tackle them. What's so neat is that a whole bunch of jokes just happen to occupy the identical conceptual territory as these disciplines. (Pure chance? Or is there an Intelligent Designer after all?) And there is a big reason why this is all so neat: When the two of us wandered out of that classroom, we were so baffled and bewildered, we were convinced we'd never get our minds around this heady stuff. That's when a graduate student sauntered up to us and told us the joke about Morty coming home to find his best friend, Lou, in bed with his wife.

"Now that's philosophy!" he said.

We call it philogagging.

THOMAS CATHCART

DANIEL KLEIN

August, 2006

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 将军追妻:傻丫头要当家

    将军追妻:傻丫头要当家

    某将军:做我丫鬟,月钱10两。顾雨两眼发光:好的!某天,府中大大小小的事务摆在眼前……顾雨欲哭无泪地看着在那悠闲自在在那看书的某位将军大人。顾雨:将军大人,我会洗衣做饭,但上得了厨房,下不了厅堂,而且我是丫鬟,不是管家!某将军:迟早也要管的,现在正好给你练练手。顾雨:……丫鬟什么时候能当管事的?我咋不知?某将军一脸无奈:傻丫头。。。作品前期有些惨不忍睹,后期会多多改善!最后一句!!!不喜勿喷!!!
  • 同桌高乐高(同桌好好玩)

    同桌高乐高(同桌好好玩)

    《同桌好好玩》从同桌到邻桌,从校园到家庭和社会,形成环环相扣的教育链条。主要人物有“福尔摩斯”巴奇,调皮鬼周大齐,爽歪歪李晓果,见义勇为的侯洋,学习好的小美女纪阳,等等。别小瞧这些爱玩的孩子,他们的本事可不小,他们在玩侦探中竟能让一个快破裂的家庭获得重生,他们通过卖花给贫困的小伙伴温暖;他们在集体的力量中让顽劣的小混混尝尝拳头,也让他们自己从恶作剧中醒悟。
  • 异术奇谭

    异术奇谭

    口味平淡、内容清淡、纯属扯淡。幻想一下世界的另一个方向。
  • 人渣

    人渣

    张天宝突然死了。张天宝是连同自行车从几十米高的公路上摔下悬崖而死的。那天是9月20日早晨。星期三,天下着毛毛秋雨。发现张天宝尸首的人是一位卖菜老头。那天卖菜老头跟往日一样起了个大早。当他挑着菜篮匆忙来到离N市只有10公里的庙咀转弯处一条乡村公路上的时候,他内急忍不住,放下菜篮到公路边撒尿。当他射下悬崖去的时候,他惊恐万状地望见了血肉模糊的一具尸首。死者被摔得脑浆迸出,断肢缺腿,鞋飞裤破。卖菜老头惊叫了一声“妈呀!”,尿湿了一裤裆。
  • 死者的眼睛

    死者的眼睛

    时隐时现的黑衣女人,病床下的诡异信息,停尸间里的凶险秘密……癌症病房纪医生的妻子董雪突然毫无征兆地失踪了,其后病房里也开始出现怪事:时隐时现的白脸女人,半夜传出的哭声,23床病人一个接一个地死去,神秘失踪的笔记本,枕头上的死飞蛾……恐怖的气氛笼罩着病房,医生、护士、病人、守太平间的老人、警察等都被卷入其中!在这错综复杂的迷局里,生死未卜的境遇中,一连串骇人听闻的事件发生了。董雪究竟是否还活着?纪医生家里到底隐藏着什么秘密?谜底,竟是那样惨烈……
  • 斗罗大陆之成长的历练

    斗罗大陆之成长的历练

    曾经在大陆上一个传奇人物的后代。灵冰斗罗霍雨浩的后代在斗罗大陆上又一翻传奇故事。精彩绝伦。
  • 我和自己抢男人

    我和自己抢男人

    婚礼上接到一个陌生女人的电话,她奔了出去,一辆汽车疾驰而来……当她再次醒来后,竟然回到了大学时期,和四年前的自己做了同学。“从此以后,白若泠就是我莫洵的女人!”一个霸道的男生当着所有同学面宣布。“你为什么总要和我抢,上次是莫洵,这次是古顾临风……”最好的朋友,也是以前的自己从此后再也不拿白若泠当朋友看待。白若泠满肚子的委屈,她这么做是有原因的啊!
  • 漫行欧洲

    漫行欧洲

    从意国的雪山到法国的城堡群,一路跋涉的大美山水,一路掀起的波澜逸事,一路目睹的新旧碰撞,无不动人心魄。透过他的车窗,我们看到了南德啤酒馆的蒂罗尔颤音歌手,看到了凯瑟琳皇后微笑而摄人的面容,看到了身着宽大灯笼马裤的佐阿夫兵,看到了露德苍白憔悴的朝圣者队伍,还有阿维尼翁那段老桥,人们在上面跳着圆圈舞,不醉不休。而旅途中的点滴思考才是真正贯穿这本书的核心。此书可谓是最初的自驾游记,而又因处在那个特殊的战前黄昏,拥有其独特的历史价值。
  • 蔬菜物语

    蔬菜物语

    《蔬菜物语》是一本种菜生活随笔,分为冬春篇和夏秋篇。作者将自己种菜的心得体会细细道来,在他眼里,每一棵菜都善解人意,菜园子里暗藏着生活的大智慧。一箪食,一瓢饮,就这样,把日子过得热气腾腾。在这片“万物有灵”的土地上,在所谓田园牧歌式的生活中,劳作带来的踏实感让人心安。
  • 命案目睹记

    命案目睹记

    有那么几秒钟,两列火车平行行驶在一起。在这恐怖的瞬间,伊丽莎白确信自己见证了一场谋杀。还能是什么呢?一个男子残忍地箍紧了一个女人的喉咙。而伊丽莎白只能透过车厢窗口徒劳地望着——女人的身体瘫软了。而火车,也开远了。