登陆注册
4699300000022

第22章

A second consequence has regard to the treatment of the older philosophies. Such insight also prevents us from ascribing any blame to the philosophies when we miss determinations in them which were not yet present to their culture, and similarly it prevents our burdening them with deductions and assertions which were neither made nor thought of by them, though they might correctly enough allow themselves to be derived from the thought of such a philosophy. It is necessary to set to work on an historical basis, and to ascribe to Philosophy what is immediately given to us, and that alone. Errors crop up here in most histories of Philosophy, since we may see in them a number of metaphysical propositions ascribed to a philosopher and given out as an historical statement of the views which he has propounded, of which he neither thought nor knew a word, and of which there is not the slightest trace found in history. Thus in Brucker's great History of Philosophy (Pt. I. pp. 465-478 seq.) a list of thirty, forty, or a hundred theorems are quoted from Thales and others, no idea of which can be traced in history as having been present to these philosophers. There are also propositions in support of them and citations taken from discussions of a similar kind with which we may occupy ourselves long enough. Brucker's method is to endow the single theorem of an ancient philosopher with all the consequences and premises which must, according to the idea of the Wolffian Metaphysics, be the premises and conclusions of that theorem, and thus easily to produce a simple, naked fiction as if it were an actual historical fact.

Thus, according to Brucker, Thales said, Ex nihilo fit nihil, since he said that water was eternal.

Thus, too, he was to be counted amongst the philosophers who deny creation out of nothing; and of this, historically at least, Thales was ignorant. Professor Ritter, too, whose history of Ionic Philosophy is carefully written, and who on the whole is cautious not to introduce foreign matter, has very possibly ascribed to Thales more than is found in history. He says (pp. 12, 13), "Hence we must regard the view of nature which we find in Thales as dynamic in principle. He regarded the world as the all-embracing, living animal which has developed from a germ like every other animal, and this germ, like that of all other animals, is either damp or water. Thus the fundamental idea of Thales is that the world is a living whole which has developed from a germ and carries on its life as does an animal, by means of nourishment suitable to its nature" (cf. p. 16). This is quite a different account from that of Aristotle, and none of it is communicated by the ancients regarding Thales. The sequence of thought is evident, but historically it is not justified. We ought not by such deductions to make an ancient philosophy into something quite different from what it originally was.

We are too apt to mould the ancient philosophers into our own forms of thought, but this is just to constitute the progress of development; the difference in times, in culture and in philosophies, depends on whether certain reflections, certain thought determinations, and certain stages in the Notion have come to consciousness, whether a consciousness has been developed to a particular point or not. The history of Philosophy has simply to deal with this development and bringing forth of thought. The determinations involved certainly follow from a proposition, but whether they are put forth as yet or not is quite another thing, and the bringing forth of the inner content is the only matter of importance. We must therefore only make use of the words which are actually literal, for to use further thought determinations which do not yet belong to the consciousness of the philosopher in question, is to carry on development. Thus Aristotle states that Thales has defined the principle (archi) of every thing to be water. But Anaximander first made use of archi, and Thales thus did not possess this determination of thought at all; he recognized arch i as commencement in time, but not as the fundamental principle. Thales did not once introduce the determination of cause into his philosophy, and first cause is a further determination still. There are whole nations which have not this conception at all; indeed it involves a great step forward in development. And seeing that difference in culture on the whole depends on difference in the thought determinations which are manifested, this must be so still more with respect to philosophies.

Now, as in the logical system of thought each of its forms has its own place in which alone it suffices, and this form becomes, by means of ever-progressing development, reduced to a subordinate element, each philosophy is, in the third place, a particular stage in the development of the whole process and has its definite place where it finds its true value and significance. Its special character is really to be conceived of in accordance with this determination, and it is to be considered with respect to this position in order that full justice may be done to it. On this account nothing more must be demanded or expected from it than what it actually gives, and the satisfaction is not to be sought for in it, which can only be found in a fuller development of knowledge. We must not expect to find the questions of our consciousness and the interest of the present world responded to by the ancients; such questions presuppose a certain development in thought. Therefore every philosophy belongs to its own time and is restricted by its own limitations, just because it is the manifestation of a particular stage in development. The individual is the offspring of his people, of his world, whose constitution and attributes are alone manifested in his form; he may spread himself out as he will, he cannot escape out of his time any more than out of his skin, for he belongs to the one universal Mind which is his substance and his own existence.

同类推荐
  • 题侯仙亭

    题侯仙亭

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 江上遗闻

    江上遗闻

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 香宋杂记

    香宋杂记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 金匮翼

    金匮翼

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 对山医话

    对山医话

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 新手生存手册

    新手生存手册

    【有一群得到“生存手册”的人,他们前往过去,未来……其他世界,经历一次次诡异,恐怖,要艰难的活下去】【而在第六间“李铭”的带领下,一群人成功打破手册限制,变回普通人,成功逃离了手册】最终,一切看似恢复了正常。【但一年后,诡异在现实之中接连复苏】最终,在某位隐秘的建议下,李铭决定借助曾经手册遗留下来的力量,创造出一个怪诞的诅咒】【只有那些被诡异接触或者盯上的人,才会有机会撞见手册,那将是他们唯一可以存活的生路】【在多位曾经的队友、朋友……被诡异盯上后,李铭决定,主动加入这场灾难之中,并彻底解决它】ps:过去和现实的故事,将在小说中不停穿插。
  • 穿越之异世寻爱

    穿越之异世寻爱

    她是一名普通的胖子,一朝穿越,她成了文武双全的将军府大小姐。只是,老天,为什么还是胖子!谁说胖子没人爱的,她才不信,文采武功信手拈来,哼,看她如何在异世寻觅真爱,携手江湖!【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 更多的人死于心碎

    更多的人死于心碎

    长篇商战、言情小说,讲述了一段在残酷的商业竞争中的温情故事,他们是对立的身份,却是最好的搭档,尘埃落定恩怨终究会释然,只是感情的去向却再也没有后悔的机会。
  • 哏上哏

    哏上哏

    各种脑洞的小小说集锦,文章内容短小精炼,针砭时弊,颇有意味,正可谓“哏上哏”。
  • 大圣食用指南

    大圣食用指南

    说不清是为了什么,她身为仙判次次纵容,让他一抹红氅,一身桀骜,成为了真正的齐天大圣。他踏破凌霄,大闹天宫,为了那个叫狐狸的女子,一棒打在她的心头。她仍甘心散尽仙身救他,化为一尾平凡的银鲤。五指山下,她望着他冷冽的双眸:“孙悟空,满世界就一个狐狸,可她已经死了。”
  • 法华玄论

    法华玄论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 豪门独宠:总裁不要太过分

    豪门独宠:总裁不要太过分

    他是外人眼中优雅迷人的总裁大人,却在面对她的时候化身为一匹腹黑的饿狼。他精心布下甜蜜陷阱,设计与她结了婚,“我需要一个女人,而你是最好的选择。”面对霸道强势的他,她没有反抗的权利。他宠她宠到所有人嫉妒,给她所有却唯独除了爱情。当他的旧爱归来,她下决心想要离开的时候,他却将她压在身下,疯狂地占有索欢,捏着她的下巴狠戾地说:”季向暖,惹到我就别想轻易逃开!”
  • 见如元谧禅师语录

    见如元谧禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • Kaffe Fassett: Dreaming in Color
  • 诗地理考

    诗地理考

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。