登陆注册
4699800000086

第86章 WAS IT A PARTISAN PROSECUTION?(2)

It is conspicuous, too, that while the defense objected to but seven of the interrogatories submitted by the Prosecution, and five of them were permitted answer by the vote of the Senate;twenty-one of the proffers of testimony by the defense were objected to by the prosecution and but nine of them permitted answer: and that condition was aggravated by the fact that the numerical strength of the majority party in the Senate was sufficient to determine absolutely the disposition of every question, and they could therefore afford to be strictly fair to the accused, and by the further fact that the objections to testimony offered in behalf of the defense were as three to one of the objections to testimony offered in behalf of the prosecution.

These denials of testimony in behalf of the defense were unfortunate. That practice lowered the dignity of the occasion and of the proceeding, as they could but have given ground for criticism of partisan bias and a vindictive judgment in case of successful impeachment. Most, if not all these rejected interrogatories implied important information in possession of the witnesses which the Senate had a right to, and which the party offering had the right to have produced. Moreover, it was the right and the duty of the Senate to know what the witness was presumed to know, and then to judge, each Senator for himself, of the relevancy of the testimony.

As stated, the principal averment against the President, was his alleged violation of the Tenure-of-Office Act in the removal of Mr. Stanton from the office of Secretary of War, presented in various phases throughout the Articles of Impeachment.

In illustration of the treatment of testimony offered in the President's behalf by a majority of the Republican Senators, the record shows that on the eighth disputed interrogatory, the second put by the defense, General Sherman being on the witness stand:--Defense asked as to a certain conversation relating to that removal, had between the General and the President at an interview specified. The prosecution objected to the question being answered, and a vote of the Senate was demanded. The vote was--for receiving the testimony, 23; against receiving it, 28.

Of the latter number, twenty-seven, all Republicans, voted at the close of the trial to convict the President of violating the Tenure-of-Office Act, in the removal of Mr. Stanton, after refusing to hear testimony in his behalf on that charge.

The next interrogatory, No. 9, was "when the President asked the witness (Gen. Sherman,) to accept the War Office, was anything further said in reference to it?" This was objected to by the prosecution, and the vote thereon was 23 to 29. Twenty-eight of the twenty-nine gentlemen thus refusing answer to this question, afterwards voting to convict the President, after refusing to bear the testimony of a very important witness in his behalf, which his counsel proposed to produce and tried in vain to get before the Senate.

On the tenth interrogatory, by Defense, "whether the President had stated to the witness, (General Sherman), his object in asking him to accept the War Office," the vote was 7 to 44against receiving it, and thirty-one of the gentlemen voting not to hear this testimony, at the close of the hearing voted to convict Mr. Johnson of a high misdemeanor in office in the removal of Mr. Stanton, after refusing to hear his defense.

The next, No. 11, was as to the President's attempt to get a case before the Supreme Court for a judicial determination of Mr.

Stanton's right to retain the War Office against the President's wish. This testimony was refused by a vote of 25 to 27--every nay vote being cast by a Republican, every one of whom at the close of the trial, voting in effect to convict Mr. Johnson of a high misdemeanor in office in seeking resort to the courts to test the legality of an act of Congress passed for the practically sole purpose of restricting an executive function never before questioned.

The next interrogatory, No. 12, was whether the witness, (General Sherman, had formed an opinion whether the good of the service required a Secretary of War other than Mr. Stanton. It was well understood that General Sherman believed that for the good of the service Mr. Stanton ought to retire, and as the Chief Officer of the Army his opinion was certainly entitled to weight, and the President had a right to the benefit of his judgment. This interrogatory was objected to by the Prosecution, and was rejected by a vote of 18 to 35--thirty-one of the thirty-five being Republicans, who at the close of the trial voted to convict Mr. Johnson of a high misdemeanor in the removal of Mr. Stanton, after refusing him the benefit of the opinion of the Chief Officer of the Army on a question affecting the military service, and to which he was in all fairness clearly entitled.

No. 13, General Sherman was asked whether he had advised, the President to appoint a successor to Mr. Stanton. (It was well understood that he had.) Answer to this was refused, 18 to 32--thirty of the latter, all Republicans, voting at the close of the trial to convict Mr. Johnson, after refusing to hear this important testimony in his behalf. No. 16. The answer to the last interrogatory, ("if he did, state what his purpose was,") was received by a majority of one, 26 to 25--every nay vote being a Republican, and constituting a majority of the Republicans of the Senate.

同类推荐
  • 朱柏庐诗文选

    朱柏庐诗文选

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 佛说圣佛母小字般若波罗蜜多经

    佛说圣佛母小字般若波罗蜜多经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 萤窗异草

    萤窗异草

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 长歌行

    长歌行

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • A Woman-Hater

    A Woman-Hater

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 未来之另类母系社会

    未来之另类母系社会

    男女平等?喔,不不不,绝对平等不了!当人类的野心造成了人类自身的毁灭,当繁衍成为了人类自身最大的危机的时候,男与女的地位,完全翻了个,一个新型的母系社会不得不逐渐形成。异能、武能能否觉醒,完全是要看孕育他的母亲,女性的地位变得空前重要起来。元婴老祖莫名其妙地来到了这个另类母系社会,不得不为保护自己的未来子女,打起精神,斗智斗勇。
  • 创新得当论

    创新得当论

    作为人类实践的高级形式,从伦理学的角度分析,创新具有两重性:既可造福人类,亦可能对人类造成某些危害。准确预见创新的负面影响是困难的,但又是必须的。由此,从伦理学的角度探索创新之“得当”的应然尺度,研究有利于“创新得当”的文化氛围和制度安排,寻求培育创新主体之品格的有效途径,以抑制或减少“不当创新”,就成为摆在我们面前的一项现实且又无法回避的课题。
  • 冷情杀手相公

    冷情杀手相公

    苏蜜蜜没有想到自己会这么倒霉。好不容易熬完了高考,领到北大的入场券,兴高采烈地报名参加了时空旅行社的宋朝七日游。妈妈咪的,花了她妈妈奖励给她的十万人民币,就为了来到这个该死的宋朝玩七天。<P>那得了老年痴呆的导游,在带队去看了宋朝正在修建的王陵之后,竟然没有数人数就带队回去了。不想她一个花容月貌的美少女,走在队伍最后面,被滑下了山坡都不知道。<P>在苏蜜蜜第十九次诅咒那导游……
  • 最牛法医NO.1:休了冷魅王爷

    最牛法医NO.1:休了冷魅王爷

    某男:“本王是中媚骨了。”某女:“扯淡,第一次是媚骨,第二次,第N次,还有这次你哪中媚骨了?”某男笑笑:“长效媚骨啊,时不时发作一次。”成亲一年,打打闹闹也还算恩爱,谁知竟是一场‘错把丑女当貂蝉’的大乌龙。真相揭穿,日日冷落,他却不愿撇清关系,OK,休书她来写,从此老死不相往来。时隔多年,喜迎第六春,却遭前夫横阻。看着血泊中的新郎官,女人瞬间炸毛:“晋王,你他丫已经毁掉我五桩婚了。”“怀着本王的孩子,你还想嫁给谁?”阴霾视线定格在那略凸起的小腹上。某女微愣三秒,一把掀起自己的衣服:“是肉,肉,我自己的肉。”
  • 温室大棚蔬菜栽培与病虫害防治技术

    温室大棚蔬菜栽培与病虫害防治技术

    本书深入介绍了科学种植、生产加工等新工艺、新技术,切实帮助广大农民提升科学技术水平,引导农民朋友们脱贫致富,轻轻松松奔向致富之路。
  • 末日之役

    末日之役

    这个世界,是末日之后的世界,机器智能已经把这个世界统治,人类苟活在机械的圈养之中。是谜团,机械人究竟是被谁所制造?是死亡,人类的文明遭到了灭世的危机,人类将何去何从?是疑惑,十年前,百年前究竟发生了什么?所有的路交汇到2204年,在这个未来的时代,一个带有身世谜团的孩子,带来了新的世纪。他带来的新世纪,是毁灭,还是地球文明的再生?
  • 盛世宠婚:娇妻太凶猛

    盛世宠婚:娇妻太凶猛

    “顾简,结了婚我也只想这样叫你”苏念看着他的眼睛,认真的说。“那么,我叫你顾念好了”某男思考了一下。“为什么?”“因为今天开始你跟我姓了,顾太太。”心动,在夏日的午后,从此想要得到你,想要拥有你,何其感谢在我之前,还没有人牵起过你的手,交给我,冠以我的姓氏,不辜负你的动心。这是一个励志成长,小清新和商战权谋混杂的故事,男女主一对一,身心干净。
  • 消渴醉妃

    消渴醉妃

    新婚之夜,激情难续,血染婚床,新娘割断了新郎的动脉,新娘自杀……甄橡楠的姑姑,冷眼的扫过了侄子的遗像“他不会死的,我会利用千年的时间,让橡楠复活……”千年大宋,她是消渴罪妃,他是暴戾王爷“本王的婚事岂能变成丧事!不行也要带着气儿拜了堂!这不就是她想要的吗?”“贱人,别死了,我们之间还有很多事要做呢……”银发狂医,藐视威武王爷,谁破坏了千年复活计划,千年爱浮生,春华一场梦。几度轮回解情缘,爱恨两相生。
  • 国民女神她翻车了

    国民女神她翻车了

    “老公,抱~”荧幕上如高岭之花的神仙姐姐,在景谦大帝面前居然秒变小白兔,誓要抱紧绝色老公的大腿不撒手。前世她识人不清被渣男闺蜜所害,摔落江中。一朝重生,她狠虐仇人,手撕白莲花,却无意间招惹了一位帅裂苍穹的醋缸子。“老公,山无棱,天地合,人家只爱你一个!”“呵。”马屁无效。某女狗腿似的捏肩捶背:“宝贝儿,青梅竹马都是浮云,天长地久的只有你~”“哼。”顺毛失败。“唔,不如晚上给你暖被窝?”“……”好吧你赢了。爱情最美的样子,就是你爱我,而我也刚好爱你。(女主很苏很撩,男主宠妻无度,甜爽文)
  • 月涧禅师语录

    月涧禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。