登陆注册
4810700000016

第16章 Shakespear and the British Public

I have rejected Mr Harris's view that Shakespear died broken-hearted of "the pangs of love despised." I have given my reasons for believing that Shakespear died game, and indeed in a state of levity which would have been considered unbecoming in a bishop. But Mr Harris's evidence does prove that Shakespear had a grievance and a very serious one. He might have been jilted by ten dark ladies and been none the worse for it; but his treatment by the British Public was another matter. The idolatry which exasperated Ben Jonson was by no means a popular movement; and, like all such idolatries, it was excited by the magic of Shakespear's art rather than by his views.

He was launched on his career as a successful playwright by the Henry VI trilogy, a work of no originality, depth, or subtlety except the originality, depth, and subtlety of the feelings and fancies of the common people. But Shakespear was not satisfied with this. What is the use of being Shakespear if you are not allowed to express any notions but those of Autolycus? Shakespear did not see the world as Autolycus did: he saw it, if not exactly as Ibsen did (for it was not quite the same world), at least with much of Ibsen's power of penetrating its illusions and idolatries, and with all Swift's horror of its cruelty and uncleanliness.

Now it happens to some men with these powers that they are forced to impose their fullest exercise on the world because they cannot produce popular work. Take Wagner and Ibsen for instance! Their earlier works are no doubt much cheaper than their later ones; still, they were not popular when they were written. The alternative of doing popular work was never really open to them: had they stooped they would have picked up less than they snatched from above the people's heads. But Handel and Shakespear were not held to their best in this way. They could turn out anything they were asked for, and even heap up the measure. They reviled the British Public, and never forgave it for ignoring their best work and admiring their splendid commonplaces; but they produced the commonplaces all the same, and made them sound magnificent by mere brute faculty for their art. When Shakespear was forced to write popular plays to save his theatre from ruin, he did it mutinously, calling the plays "As _You_ Like It," and "Much Ado About Nothing." All the same, he did it so well that to this day these two genial vulgarities are the main Shakespearian stock-in-trade of our theatres. Later on Burbage's power and popularity as an actor enabled Shakespear to free himself from the tyranny of the box office, and to express himself more freely in plays consisting largely of monologue to be spoken by a great actor from whom the public would stand a good deal. The history of Shakespear's tragedies has thus been the history of a long line of famous actors, from Burbage and Betterton to Forbes Robertson; and the man of whom we are told that "when he would have said that Richard died, and cried A horse! A horse! he Burbage cried" was the father of nine generations ofShakespearian playgoers, all speaking of Garrick's Richard, and Kean's Othello, and Irving's Shylock, and Forbes Robertson's Hamlet without knowing or caring how much these had to do with Shakespear's Richard and Othello and so forth. And the plays which were written without great and predominant parts, such as Troilus and Cressida, All's Well That Ends Well, and Measure for Measure, have dropped on our stage as dead as the second part of Goethe's Faust or Ibsen's Emperor or Galilean.

Here, then, Shakespear had a real grievance; and though it is a sentimental exaggeration to describe him as a broken-hearted man in the face of the passages of reckless jollity and serenely happy poetry in his latest plays, yet the discovery that his most serious work could reach success only when carried on the back of a very fascinating actor who was enormously overcharging his part, and that the serious plays which did not contain parts big enough to hold the overcharge were left on the shelf, amply accounts for the evident fact that Shakespear did not end his life in a glow of enthusiastic satisfaction with mankind and with the theatre, which is all that Mr Harris can allege in support of his broken-heart theory. But even if Shakespear had had no failures, it was not possible for a man of his powers to observe the political and moral conduct of his contemporaries without perceiving that they were incapable of dealing with the problems raised by their own civilization, and that their attempts to carry out the codes of law and to practise the religions offered to them by great prophets and law-givers were and still are so foolish that we now call for The Superman, virtually a new species, to rescue the world from mismanagement. This is the real sorrow of great men; and in the face of it the notion that when a great man speaks bitterly or looks melancholy he must be troubled by a disappointment in love seems to me sentimental trifling.

If I have carried the reader with me thus far, he will find that trivial as this little play of mine is, its sketch of Shakespear is more complete than its levity suggests. Alas! its appeal for a National Theatre as a monument to Shakespear failed to touch the very stupid people who cannot see that a National Theatre is worth having for the sake of the National Soul. I had unfortunately represented Shakespear as treasuring and using (as I domyself) the jewels of unconsciously musical speech which common people utter and throw away every day; and this was taken as a disparagement of Shakespear's "originality." Why was I born with such contemporaries? Why is Shakespear made ridiculous by such a posterity?

_The Dark Lady of The Sonnets was first performed at the Haymarket Theatre, on the afternoon of Thursday, the 24th November 1910, by Mona Limerick as the Dark Lady, Suzanne Sheldon as Queen Elizabeth, Granville Barker as Shakespear, and Hugh Tabberer as the Warder.

同类推荐
  • The Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants

    The Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Captives

    The Captives

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 东南纪事

    东南纪事

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 麈史

    麈史

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 圣虚空藏菩萨陀罗尼经

    圣虚空藏菩萨陀罗尼经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 五界之魂魄天尊

    五界之魂魄天尊

    五界大陆,魔界入侵,魄界少年为了保护魄界,在修行之路勤奋修炼,最终成为魄界最强者。妖、冥两界又将如何,五界是否被入侵?一起让我们进入五界,感受不一样的玄幻,进入五界大陆探究真相!QQ交流群1927167
  • 易数钩深图

    易数钩深图

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 花枝招展(贰)

    花枝招展(贰)

    车子等在美容店的门口,何小眠唯一的能耐就是随时能找到免费的司机,这些男人或者没有一个看过她的小说,否则就不会用那么露骨的眼神盯着她的脖子往下看了。何小眠能让人看到的就是花枝招展,媚艳夺目,她似乎唯一需要的也就是男人对她身体的垂涎……
  • 纳兰词全鉴(珍藏版)

    纳兰词全鉴(珍藏版)

    《纳兰词》是清代著名词人纳兰性德所著的词作合集,内容涉及爱情、亲情、友情、边塞江南、咏物咏史及杂感等方面。词风清丽隽秀、幽婉顽艳,颇有南唐后主之风,在中国文学史上有着不可替代和忽略的地位与影响力。 《纳兰词全鉴(珍藏版)》参照权威版本,在每首词后附以注释和译文,以帮助读者更加深入地理解词意,从而走进纳兰性德那沉郁悲怆的情感世界,领略百年前《纳兰词》中的情深意切。
  • 波纹之声

    波纹之声

    谷村老师朝教室的窗边走去,把手伸进窗下的水槽里。不到三秒钟,她就用拇指和食指捏住了四处奔逃的五右卫门。就算失去了自由,这只小小的矶蟹还是挥动着它一双大钳,张牙舞爪。谷村老师一手高举着五右卫门,回到黑板前问坐在课堂里的学生:“注意了,现在向大家提一个问题,如果我把这蟹放在桌子上,它会朝哪个方向爬?”“横着爬!”“横着爬!”“横着爬!”孩子们众口一词地答道。“对,矶蟹习惯横着爬。让我们来验证一下。”说着,谷村老师把五右卫门放在了讲台上。
  • 等你到我的世界里来

    等你到我的世界里来

    【已完结】她是他养的小野猫,集万千宠爱于一身,可却被奸人所害,他的一句话,她就变成了一只无家可归的流浪猫。再见面,她摇身变成了暗夜修罗,身手敏捷。站在他面前,她说:“有人给我一个亿,取你性命。”他却道:“我给你全部身家,你回来。”她爽快应答:“好啊。”后来,她把所有想要暗害她丈夫的人,通通都打得满地找牙。再后来,她每天教他们的孩子练跆拳,搞得顾总每天下班回家,都要被当靶子给他们练习一翻,日子那叫一个苦啊。
  • 总裁有令之夫人别想逃

    总裁有令之夫人别想逃

    她普通,自卑,怯懦,毫无存在感;她俏丽,自信,冷漠,隐忍待发;“我们在一起了。”三个月前,暗恋了两年的学长和自己的好友如是在自己面前宣布。“重做!”文件被第三次甩在自己面前,工作屡遭坎坷。“怎么又穿成这样?真是上不了台面。”姐姐如此嘲讽她。“拿杯橙汁送到我房间来。”弟弟熟练地使唤她。父母的无视已经是家常便饭。这是穆雪云前二十三年的生活。一夜醉梦,无意中挤进了那条时空的罅隙,触碰到自己的命盘,当指针变了方向,命运的轨迹随之改变,自此以后,她的人生要重新来过!甩掉家庭的束缚,无视姐弟,智斗好友,工作上大放异彩,崭新的她要撑起一片属于她的世界!当外貌悄然发生改变,隐匿的气质显露,自信华丽归来,当所有人的眼中都烙印下了她的身影,她的眼中却只剩下了一人。“你怎么永远对我有说不完的谢谢?”程皓宇语气无奈,眼中却是满满的宠溺。淡淡的薄荷香盈满周身,穆雪云满意地吸吸鼻子,又往程皓宇怀里钻了钻:“因为喜欢你呀。”
  • 我真的长生不老

    我真的长生不老

    本文讲述了一个长生不老的人应该如何在社会主义核心价值观的指导下,在现代人类社会中正确积极生活的故事。希望能够对其他长生者,特异功能人士,修仙者,外星人,非人类生物参与国家建设稳定和谐生活的经验起到抛砖引玉的作用。作品QQ群:741825442满,783764489(满)907366463(空) 本书v群:870388766(满),723479938粉丝值10000
  • The Christmas Books

    The Christmas Books

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 联邦论:美国宪法评述

    联邦论:美国宪法评述

    众多支持和赞扬《联邦宪法》的文献中,有一本书脱颖而出,流传至今,成为代表作。这就是汉密尔顿策划并参与撰稿、麦迪逊和杰伊合作的《联邦论》。这本书的一个明显优点,是对联邦宪法基本观点的不厌其烦的反复弘扬。《联邦论》成为述评《美国宪法》的经典著作,声名与年俱增,在美国反复重印,累次畅销,至今不衰。华盛顿说:“危机消失、环境安定后,这本书将得到后世的瞩目。因为,这本书对自由的原理,对政治问题,提出了坦率精湛的讨论。凡有公民社会存在的地方,人们永远会对这些问题发生兴趣。”