[33] "Archives Nationales，" D. XXIX. I. Letter of Briand-Delessart， August 1st (domiciliary visits to the Carmelites of Angoulême where it is pretended that Mme. de Polignac has just arrived. - Beugnot， I. 140. -- Arthur Young， July 20th， etc. -Buchez and Roux， IV. 166. Letter of Mamers， July 24th； of Mans， July 26th.
[34] Montjoie， ch. LXXII， p. 93 (according to acts of legal procedure). There was a soldier in the band who had served under M.
de Montesson and who wanted to avenge himself for the punishments he had undergone in the regiment.
[35] Mercure de France， August 20th (Letter from Vésoul， August 13th).
[36] M. de Memmay proved his innocence later on， and was rehabilitated by a public decision after two years' proceedings (session of June 4， 1791； Mercure of June 11th).
[37] Journal des Débats et Décrets， I. 258. (Letter of the municipality of Vésoul， July 22nd. -- Discourse of M. de Toulougeon， July 29th.)[38] De Rochambeau， "Mémoires，" I. 353. -- "Archives Nationales，"F7， 3253. (Letter of M. de Rochamheau， August 4th.) -- Chronicle of Schmutz (ibid. )， p. 284. "Archives Nationales，" D. XXIX. I.
(Letter of Mme. Ferrette， of Remiremont， August 9th.)[39] Sauzay， I. 180. (Letters of monks， July 22nd and 26th.)[40] "Archives Nationales，" D. XXIX. I. (Letter of M. de Bergeron， attorney to the présidial of Valence， August 28th， with the details of the verdict stated.) Official report of the militia of Lyons， sent to the president of the National Assembly， August 10th. (Expedition to Serrière， in Dauphiny， July 31st.)[41] Letter of the Count of Courtivron， deputy substitute (an eye-witness). -- "Archives Nationales，" D. XXIX. I. Letter of the municipal officers of Crémieu (Dauphiny)， November 3rd. Letter of the Vicomte de Carbonnière (Auvergne)， August 3rd. -- Arthur Young， July 30th (Dijon) says， apropos of a noble family which escaped almost naked from its burning chateau， " they were esteemed by the neighbors； their virtues ought to have commanded the love of the poor， for whose resentment there was no cause."[42] "Archives Nationales，" XXIX. I. (Letter of the commission of the States of Dauphiny， July 31st.)[43] "Désastres du Maconnais，" by Puthod de la Maison-Rouge (August， 1789). "Ravages du Maconnais." -- Arthur Young， July 27th. -Buchez and Roux， IV. 215， 214. -- Mercure de France， September 12， 1789. (Letter by a volunteer of Orleans.) "On the 15th of August， eighty-eight ruffians， calling themselves reapers， present themselves at Bascon， in Beauce， and， the next day， at a chateau in the neighborhood， where they demand within an hour the head of the son of the lord of the manor， M. Tassin， who can only redeem himself by a contribution of 1，600 livres and the pillaging of his cellars.
[44] Letter of the Count de Courtivron. - Arthur Young， July 31st.
- Buchez and Roux， II. 243. - Mercure de France， August 15， 1789(sitting of the 8th， discourse of a deputy from Dauphiné.) --Mermet， "Histoire de la Ville de Vienne，" 445 -- " Archives Nationales，" ibid. (Letter of the commission of the States of Dauphiny， July 31st.) -- "The list of burnt or devastated chateaux is immense." The committee already cites sixteen of them. --Puthod de la Maison-Rouge， ibid. ： "Were all devastated places to be mentioned， it would be necessary to cite the whole province "(Letter from Macon). "They have not the less destroyed most of the chateaux and bourgeois dwellings， either burning them and or else tearing them down."[45] Lally-Tollendal， "Second Letter to my Constituents，" 104.
[46] Doniol， "La Révolution et la Féodalité，" p.60 (a few days after the 4th of August). - "Archives Nationales，" H. 784. Letters of M. de Langeron， military commander at Besan？on， October 16th and 18th . -- Ibid. ， D. XXIX. I. Letter of the same， September 3rd.-- Arthur Young (in Provence， at the house of Baron de la Tour-d'Aignes). "The baron is an enormous sufferer by the Revolution； a great extent of country which belonged in absolute right to his ancestors， has been granted for quit-rents， ceus， and other feudal payments， so that there is no comparison between the lands retained and those thus granted by his family. . . . The solid payments which the Assembly have declared to be redeemable are every hour falling to nothing， without a shadow of recompense . . . The situation of the nobility in this country is pitiable； they are under apprehensions that nothing will be left them， but simply such houses as the mob allows to stand unburned； that the small farmers will retain their farms without paying the landlord his half of the produce； and that， in case of such a refusal， there is actually neither law nor authority in the country to prevent it. This chateau， splendid even in ruins， with the fortune and lives of the owners， is at the mercy of an armed rabble."
