"Master Thorillon，" exclaims Fréron to the commissary of police， "you shall be punished and held up to the people as an example； this infamous decision must be canceled." -- "Citizens，" writes Marat， "go in a body to the H？tel-de-Ville and do not allow one of the guards to enter the court-room. " -- On the day of the trial， and in the most condescending spirit， but two grenadiers are let in. Even these， however， are too many and shouts from the Jacobin crowd arise "Turn 'em out！ We rule here，" upon which the two grenadiers withdraw. On the other hand， says Fréron triumphantly， that there were in the court-room "sixty of the victors at the Bastille led by the brave Santerre， who intended to interfere in the trial." - They intervene， indeed， and first against the plaintiff. M. Etienne is attacked at the entrance of the court-room and nearly knocked down He is so maltreated that he is obliged to seek shelter in the guard-room. He is spit upon， and they "move to cut off his ears." His friends receive "hundreds of kicks，" while he runs away， and the case is postponed. -- It is called up again several times， so no the judges have to be restrained.
A certain Mandart in the audience， author of a pamphlet on "Popular Sovereignty，" springs to his feet and， addressing Bailly， mayor of Paris， and president of the tribunal， challenges the court. As usual Bailly yields， attempting to cover up his weakness with an honorable pretext： "Although a judge can be challenged only by the parties to a suit， the appeal of one citizen is sufficient for me and I leave the bench." The other judges， who are likewise insulted and menaced， yield also， and， through a sophism which admirably illustrates the times， they discover in the oppression to which the plaintiff is subject a legal device by which they can give a fair color to their denial of justice. M. Etienne having signified to them that neither he nor his counsel could attend in court， because their lives were in danger， the court decides that M. Etienne， "failing to appear in person， or by counsel， is non-suited." -- Victorious shouts at once proceed from the two journalists， while their articles on the case disseminated throughout France set a precedence contained in the .ruling. Any Jacobin may after this with impunity denounce， insult， and calumniate whomsoever he pleases， sheltered as he is from the action of courts， and held superior to the law.
Let us see， on the other hand， what liberty they allow their adversaries. A fortnight before this， Mallet du Pan， a writer of great ability， who， in the best periodical of the day， discusses questions week after week free of all personalities， the most independent， straight-forward， and honorable of men， the most eloquent and judicious advocate of public order and true liberty， is waited upon by a deputation from the Palais-Royal，[26] consisting of about a dozen well-dressed individuals， civil enough and not too ill-disposed， but quite satisfied that they have a right to interfere. The conversation which ensues shows to what extent the current political creed had turned peoples' heads.
"One of the party， addressing me， informed me that he and his associates were deputies of the Palais-Royal clubs， and that they had called to notify me that I would do well to change my principles and stop attacking the constitution， otherwise extreme violence would be brought to bear on me. I replied that I recognized no authority but the law and that of the courts； the law is your master and mine， and no respect is shown to the constitution by assailing the freedom of the press.""The constitution is the common will， resumed the spokesman. The law， is the authority of the strongest. You are subject to the strongest and you ought to submit. We notify you of the will of the nation and that is the law.'"Mallet du Pan stated to them that he was not in favor of the ancient régime， but that he did approve of royal authority.
"Oh！" exclaimed all together， " we should be sorry not to have a king.
We respect the King and maintain his authority. But you are forbidden to oppose the dominant opinion and the liberty which is decreed by the National Assembly."Mallet du Pan， apparently， knows more about this than they do， for he is a Swiss by birth， and has lived under a republic for twenty years.
But this does not concern them. They persist all the same， five or six talking at once， misconstruing the sense the words they use， and each contradicting the other in point of detail， but all agreeing to impose silence on him：
