Undoubtedly the wrong they do, or which is done in their name, dissatisfies the kings and upsets them, but, at the bottom, their conscience is not disturbed. They may feel compassion for the people, but they do not feel guilty; they are its sovereigns and not its representatives. France, to them, is as a domain to its lord, and a lord is not deprived of honor in being prodigal and neglectful. He merely gambles away his own property, and nobody has a right to call him to account. Founded on feudal society, royalty is like an estate, an inheritance. It would be infidelity, almost treachery in a prince, in any event weak and base, should he allow any portion of the trust received by him intact from his ancestors for transmission to his children, to pass into the hands of his subjects. Not only according to medieval traditions is he proprietor-commandant of the French and of France, but again, according to the theory of the jurists, he is, like Caesar, the sole and perpetual representative of the nation, and, according to the theological doctrine, like David, the sacred and special delegate of God himself. It would be astonishing, if, with all these titles, he did not consider the public revenue as his personal revenue, and if, in many cases, he did not act accordingly. Our point of view, in this matter, is so essentially opposed to his, we can scarcely put ourselves in his place; but at that time his point of view was everybody's point of view. It seemed, then, as strange to meddle with the king's business as to meddle with that of a private person. Only at the end of the year 1788[37] the famous salon of the Palais-Royal "with boldness and unimaginable folly, asserts that in a true monarchy the revenues of the State should not be at the sovereign's disposition; that he should be granted merely a sum sufficient to defray the expenses of his establishment, of his donations, and for favors to his servants as well as for his pleasures, while the surplus should be deposited in the royal treasury to be devoted only to purposes sanctioned by the National Assembly. To reduce the sovereign to a civil list, to seize nine-tenths of his income, to forbid him cash on demand, what an outrage! The surprise would be no greater if at the present day it were proposed to divide the income of each millionaire into two portions, the smallest to go for the owner's support, and the largest to be placed in the hands of a government to be expended in works of public utility. An old farmer-general, an intellectual and unprejudiced man, gravely attempts to justify the purchase of Saint-Cloud by calling it "a ring for the queen's finger." The ring cost, indeed, 7,700,000 francs, but "the king of France then had an income of 447,000,000. What could be said of any private individual who, with 477,000 livres income, should, for once in his life, give his wife diamonds worth 7,000 or 8,000livres?"[38] People would say that the gift is moderate, and that the husband is reasonable.
同类推荐
热门推荐
跟无话可说的尴尬说再见
本书对谈话的每个环节都进行了详细分析,再辅以实例。你将学会如何应付任何类型的谈话,并且发现最终产生的良好效果。本书每个章节都是非常实用的步骤,而不仅仅是诸如,“保持目光接触,提问题“这样的泛泛而谈。别再犹豫了,现在就买一本回家吧,对了,从此以后,你什么时候都能有话可说了!非财务经理的7日财务之旅
本书根据新的《公司法》、《企业会计准则》和《企业所得税法》等相关财经规则的变化,针对参与财务事务的每一位企业管理者,包括企业中高层管理者、非财务部门经理和希望了解财务规则的商界人士,从零开始,以通俗易懂的语言、时尚轻松的叙述方式,介绍财务和会计的含义、财务报表的分析、资本运作、商业模式与税收安排等,循序渐进地为读者展开一幅财务管理的清晰画卷,带领读者进入一个轻松愉快的7天财务之旅。女人不懂理财,注定辛苦一辈子
没有理财智慧的女人,永远都无法成为真正的好命女。不懂理财的女人也许会赚钱,但却守不住钱;也许会守钱,但却不知道如何让钱升值;也许懂得如何让钱升值,但却不懂得如何给自己的未来提供一份保障;也许懂得给自己提供一份保障,但却不懂得如何通过钱财让自己持久美丽……我们不要做这样的女人,我们要做既有钱又聪明的女人!《女人不懂理财,注定辛苦一辈子》用丰富的案例和精彩的理论告诉大家:女人如何变有钱,如何快乐一辈子;如何用最小的投资换取最大的收益,用最低的成本打造最奢华的生活;做女人就要懂得理财,就要让自己活得更精彩,有财力的女人才能活出最好的自己。