"There's something queer about these aeroplane accidents at Belmore Park," mused Kennedy, one evening, as his eye caught a big headline in the last edition of the Star, which I had brought uptown with me.
"Queer?" I echoed."Unfortunate, terrible, but hardly queer.Why, it is a common saying among the aeronauts that if they keep at it long enough they will all lose their lives.""Yes, I know that," rejoined Kennedy; "but, Walter, have you noticed that all these accidents have happened to Norton's new gyroscope machines?""Well, what of that" I replied."Isn't it just barely possible that Norton is on the wrong track in applying the gyroscope to an aeroplane? I can't say I know much about either the gyroscope or the aeroplane, but from what I hear the fellows at the office say it would seem to me that the gyroscope is a pretty good thing to keep off an aeroplane, not to put on it.""Why?" asked Kennedy blandly.
"Well, it seems to me, from what the experts say, that anything which tends to keep your machine in one position is just what you don't want in an aeroplane.What surprises them, they say, is that the thing seems to work so well up to a certain point--that the accidents don't happen sooner.Why, our man on the aviation field tells me that when that poor fellow Browne was killed he had all but succeeded in bringing his machine to a dead stop in the air.In other words, he would have won the Brooks Prize for perfect motionlessness in one place.And then Herrick, the day before, was going about seventy miles an hour when he collapsed.
They said it was heart failure.But to-night another expert says in the Star --here, I'll read it: 'The real cause was carbonic-acid-gas poisoning due to the pressure on the mouth from driving fast through the air, and the consequent inability to expel the poisoned air which had been breathed.Air once breathed is practically carbonic-acid-gas.When one is passing rapidly through the air this carbonic-acid-gas is pushed back into the lungs, and only a little can get away because of the rush of air pressure into the mouth.So it is rebreathed, and the result is gradual carbonic-acid-gas poisoning, which produces a kind of narcotic sleep.'""Then it wasn't the gyroscope in that case" said Kennedy with a rising inflection.
"No," I admitted reluctantly, "perhaps not."I could see that I had been rash in talking so long.Kennedy had only been sounding me to see what the newspapers thought of it.
His next remark was characteristic.
"Norton has asked me to look into the thing," he said quietly.
"If his invention is a failure, he is a ruined man.All his money is in it, he is suing a man for infringing on his patent, and he is liable for damages to the heirs, according to his agreement with Browne and Herrick.I have known Norton some time; in fact, he worked out his ideas at the university physical laboratory.Ihave flown in his machine, and it is the most marvellous biplane I ever saw.Walter, I want you to get a Belmore Park assignment from the Star and go out to the aviation meet with me tomorrow.
I'll take you on the field, around the machines--you can get enough local colour to do a dozen Star specials later on.I may add that devising a flying-machine capable of remaining stationary in the air means a revolution that will relegate all other machines to the scrap-heap.>From a military point of view it is the one thing necessary to make the aeroplane the superior in every respect to the dirigible."The regular contests did not begin until the afternoon, but Kennedy and I decided to make a day of it, and early the next morning we were speeding out to the park where the flights were being held.
We found Charles Norton, the inventor, anxiously at work with his mechanicians in the big temporary shed that had been accorded him, and was dignified with the name of hangar.
"I knew you would come, Professor," he exclaimed, running forward to meet us.
"Of course," echoed Kennedy."I'm too much interested in this invention of yours not to help you, Norton.You know what I've always thought of it--I've told you often that it is the most important advance since the original discovery by the Wrights that the aeroplane could be balanced by warping the planes.""I'm just fixing up my third machine," said Norton."If anything happens to it, I shall lose the prize, at least as far as this meet is concerned, for I don't believe I shall get my fourth and newest model from the makers in time.Anyhow, if I did I couldn't pay for it--I am ruined, if I don't win that twenty-five-thousand-dollar Brooks Prize.And, besides, a couple of army men are coming to inspect my aeroplane and report to the War Department on it.I'd have stood a good chance of selling it, I think, if my flights here had been like the trials you saw.
But, Kennedy," he added, and his face was drawn and tragic, "I'd drop the whole thing if I didn't know I was right.Two men dead--think of it.Why, even the newspapers are beginning to call me a cold, heartless, scientific crank, to keep on.But I'll show them--this afternoon I'm going to fly myself.I'm not afraid to go anywhere I send my men.I'll die before I'll admit I'm beaten."It was easy to see why Kennedy was fascinated by a man of Norton's type.Anyone would have been.It was not foolhardiness.
It was dogged determination, faith in himself and in his own ability to triumph over every obstacle.
We now slowly entered the shed where two men were working over Norton's biplane.One of the men was a Frenchman, Jaurette, who had worked with Farman, a silent, dark-browed, weatherbeaten fellow with a sort of sullen politeness.The other man was an American, Roy Sinclair, a tall, lithe, wiry chap with a seamed and furrowed face and a loose-jointed but very deft manner which marked him a born bird-man.Norton's third aviator, Humphreys, who was not to fly that day, much to his relief, was reading a paper in the back of the shed.
We were introduced to him, and be seemed to be a very companionable sort of fellow, though not given to talking.
