It is a very astonishing phenomenon for a society of men who have never made war to have invented a species of war made in the imaginary spaces, or in a globe distant from ours, or in what is called the "firmament,"the "empyrean." But it must be carefully observed that in this revolt of celestial beings against their Sovereign no blows were struck, no celestial blood flowed, no mountains hurled at the head, no angels cut in two, as in Milton's sublime and grotesque poem.
According to the "Shasta," it is only a formal disobedience to the orders of the Most High, a cabal which God punishes by relegating the rebellious angels to a vast place of shadows called "Ondera" during the period of an entire mononthour.A mononthour is four hundred and twenty-six millions of our years.But God deigned to pardon the guilty after five thousand years, and their ondera was only a purgatory.
He made "Mhurd" of them, men, and placed them in our globe on condition that they should not eat animals, and that they should not copulate with the males of their new species, under pain of returning to ondera.
Those are the principal articles of the Brahmins' faith, which have lasted without interruption from immemorial times right to our day: it seems strange to us that among them it should be as grave a sin to eat a chicken as to commit sodomy.
This is only a small part of the ancient cosmogony of the Brahmins.
Their rites, their pagodas, prove that among them everything was allegorical;they still represent virtue beneath the emblem of a woman who has ten arms, and who combats ten mortal sins represented by monsters.Our missionaries have not failed to take this image of virtue for that of the devil, and to assure us that the devil is worshipped in India.We have never been among these people but to enrich ourselves and to calumniate them.
Really we have forgotten a very essential thing in this little article on the Brahmins; it is that their sacred books are filled with contradictions.
But the people do not know of them, and the doctors have solutions ready, figurative meanings, allegories, symbols, express declarations of Birma, Brahma and Vitsnou, which should close the mouths of all who reason. Philosophical Dictionary: Character CHARACTER FROM the Greek word impression, engraving.
It is what nature has graved in us.
Can one change one's character? Yes, if one changes one's body.It is possible for a man born blunderer, unbending and violent, being stricken with apoplexy in his old age, to become a foolish, tearful child, timid and peaceable.His body is no longer the same.But as long as his nerves, his blood and his marrow are in the same state, his nature will not change any more than a wolf's and a marten's instinct.
The character is composed of our ideas and our feelings: well, it is substantiated that we give ourselves neither feelings nor ideas; therefore our character does not depend on us.
If it depended on us, there is nobody who would not be perfect.
We cannot give ourselves tastes, talents; why should we give ourselves qualities?
If one does not reflect, one thinks oneself master of everything; when one reflects thereon, one sees that one is master of nothing.
Should you wish to change a man's character completely, purge him with diluents every day until you have killed him.Charles XII., in his suppurative fever on the road to Bender, was no longer the same man.One prevailed upon him as upon a child.
If I have a crooked nose and two cat's eyes, I can hide them with a mask.Can I do more with the character which nature has given me?
A man born violent, hasty, presented himself before Francois I., King of France, to complain of an injustice; the prince's countenance, the respectful bearing of the courtiers, the very place where he is, make a powerful impression on this man; mechanically he lowers his eyes, his rough voice softens, he presents his petition humbly, one would believe him born as gentle as are (at that moment at least) the courtiers, amongst whom he is even disconcerted;but Francois I.understands physiognomy, he easily discovers in the lowered eyes, burning nevertheless with sombre fire, in the strained facial muscles, in the compressed lips, that this man is not so gentle as he is forced to appear.This man follows him to Pavia, is taken with him, led to the same prison in Madrid: Francois I.'s majesty no longer makes the same impression on him; he grows familiar with the object of his respect.One day when pulling off the king's boots, and pulling them off badly, the king, embittered by his misfortune, gets angry; my man sends the king about his business, and throws his boots out of the window.
Sixtus V.was born petulant, stubborn, haughty, impetuous, vindictive, arrogant; this character seemed softened during the trials of his novitiate.
He begins to enjoy a certain credit in his order; he flies into a passion with a guard, and batters him with his fist: he is inquisitor at Venice;he performs his duties with insolence: behold him cardinal, he is possessed dalla rabbia papale: this fury triumphs over his nature; he buries his person and his character in obscurity; he apes the humble and the dying man; he is elected Pope; this moment gives back to the spring, which politics have bent, all its long curbed elasticity; he is the haughtiest and most despotic of sovereigns.
Naturam expella furca, tamen usque recurret.
(Hor.L.I., ep.x.)
Drive away nature, it returns at the gallop.
(DESTOUCHES, Glorieux, Act 3, Sc.5.)
Religion, morality put a brake on a nature's strength; they cannot destroy it.The drunkard in a cloister, reduced to a half-setier of cider at each meal, will no longer get drunk, but he will always like wine.
