登陆注册
5237100000215

第215章 VOLUME IV(2)

I wish to say at the beginning that I will hand to the reporters that portion of Judge Trumbull's Alton speech which was devoted to this matter, and also that portion of Judge Douglas's speech made at Jacksonville in answer to it. I shall thereby furnish the readers of this debate with the complete discussion between Trumbull and Douglas. I cannot now read them, for the reason that it would take half of my first hour to do so. I can only make some comments upon them. Trumbull's charge is in the following words:

"Now, the charge is, that there was a plot entered into to have a constitution formed for Kansas, and put in force, without giving the people an opportunity to vote upon it, and that Mr. Douglas was in the plot."

I will state, without quoting further, for all will have an opportunity of reading it hereafter, that Judge Trumbull brings forward what he regards as sufficient evidence to substantiate this charge.

It will be perceived Judge Trumbull shows that Senator Bigler, upon the floor of the Senate, had declared there had been a conference among the senators, in which conference it was determined to have an enabling act passed for the people of Kansas to form a constitution under, and in this conference it was agreed among them that it was best not to have a provision for submitting the constitution to a vote of the people after it should be formed. He then brings forward to show, and showing, as he deemed, that Judge Douglas reported the bill back to the Senate with that clause stricken out. He then shows that there was a new clause inserted into the bill, which would in its nature prevent a reference of the constitution back for a vote of the people,--if, indeed, upon a mere silence in the law, it could be assumed that they had the right to vote upon it. These are the general statements that he has made.

I propose to examine the points in Judge Douglas's speech in which he attempts to answer that speech of Judge Trumbull's. When you come to examine Judge Douglas's speech, you will find that the first point he makes is:

"Suppose it were true that there was such a change in the bill, and that I struck it out,--is that a proof of a plot to force a constitution upon them against their will?"

His striking out such a provision, if there was such a one in the bill, he argues, does not establish the proof that it was stricken out for the purpose of robbing the people of that right. I would say, in the first place, that that would be a most manifest reason for it. It is true, as Judge Douglas states, that many Territorial bills have passed without having such a provision in them. I believe it is true, though I am not certain, that in some instances constitutions framed under such bills have been submitted to a vote of the people with the law silent upon the subject; but it does not appear that they once had their enabling acts framed with an express provision for submitting the constitution to be framed to a vote of the people, then that they were stricken out when Congress did not mean to alter the effect of the law. That there have been bills which never had the provision in, I do not question; but when was that provision taken out of one that it was in? More especially does the evidence tend to prove the proposition that Trumbull advanced, when we remember that the provision was stricken out of the bill almost simultaneously with the time that Bigler says there was a conference among certain senators, and in which it was agreed that a bill should be passed leaving that out. Judge Douglas, in answering Trumbull, omits to attend to the testimony of Bigler, that there was a meeting in which it was agreed they should so frame the bill that there should be no submission of the constitution to a vote of the people. The Judge does not notice this part of it. If you take this as one piece of evidence, and then ascertain that simultaneously Judge Douglas struck out a provision that did require it to be submitted, and put the two together, I think it will make a pretty fair show of proof that Judge Douglas did, as Trumbull says, enter into a plot to put in force a constitution for Kansas, without giving the people any opportunity of voting upon it.

But I must hurry on. The next proposition that Judge Douglas puts is this:

"But upon examination it turns out that the Toombs bill never did contain a clause requiring the constitution to be submitted."

This is a mere question of fact, and can be determined by evidence.

I only want to ask this question: Why did not Judge Douglas say that these words were not stricken out of the Toomb's bill, or this bill from which it is alleged the provision was stricken out,--a bill which goes by the name of Toomb's, because he originally brought it forward? I ask why, if the Judge wanted to make a direct issue with Trumbull, did he not take the exact proposition Trumbull made in his speech, and say it was not stricken out? Trumbull has given the exact words that he says were in the Toomb's bill, and he alleges that when the bill came back, they were stricken out. Judge Douglas does not say that the words which Trumbull says were stricken out were not so stricken out, but he says there was no provision in the Toomb's bill to submit the constitution to a vote of the people. We see at once that he is merely making an issue upon the meaning of the words. He has not undertaken to say that Trumbull tells a lie about these words being stricken out, but he is really, when pushed up to it, only taking an issue upon the meaning of the words. Now, then, if there be any issue upon the meaning of the words, or if there be upon the question of fact as to whether these words were stricken out, I have before me what I suppose to be a genuine copy of the Toomb's bill, in which it can be shown that the words Trumbull says were in it were, in fact, originally there. If there be any dispute upon the fact, I have got the documents here to show they were there.

同类推荐
  • 秦观词选

    秦观词选

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 韵语阳秋

    韵语阳秋

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 救荒活民书

    救荒活民书

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • O PIONEERS!

    O PIONEERS!

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 安广县乡土志

    安广县乡土志

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 绝色天才小老公

    绝色天才小老公

    想她陆敏,有个抛夫弃子的母亲,一个酗酒成瘾的父亲,家境清贫,功课差劲,脾气火爆,我行我素,标准的男人婆一个,从来没想到自己会和世人眼中的优质乖宝宝扯上关系。功课好,相貌好,气质好,家世好,老少通吃的柔弱美少年,怎么瞧都和她陆敏是两个世界的人。可是他却死皮赖脸地搬进她的家要和她“同居”,还说以后她的功课他负责了。都怪自己当初多管闲事救了他,更怪自己面对他那双无辜的如小鹿一般的大眼睛时常常忍不住心软。这下,麻烦惹上身了,她能不能甩掉他啊?什么?虽然他年龄比她小,可他却是天才。呜呜,以她那平凡的智商,要和他斗,不知有没有胜算?×××××××××××××××感谢薛紫夜为本文做的封面!××××××××××××××推荐米虫其他文:《花痴憨凤戏江湖》《重生古代钓美男》《姬无心》推荐一组其他作者文:浅水的鱼:《墨心夜奴》
  • 重生之后妈难当

    重生之后妈难当

    被人撞飞的那一瞬间,乔景瑶重生在另外一个同名同姓的女人身上,成为了别人的妻子,还当上了别人的后妈。继子憎恨自己的父亲同时也憎恨后妈,为了能够调查出原本的自己究竟被谁所杀,她不得不当起后妈,接替这个乔景瑶乱七八糟的感情生活。
  • 大明小皇帝

    大明小皇帝

    主角穿越明朝,发现自已居然变成一个熬了三十几年,却只当了三十天皇上的悲催人物!做为一个现代人,信奉的理念是人定胜天!怎能甘当一世炮灰?且看主角在风雨飘摇的明末,死磕皇上爹;智斗郑贵妃;挽留申时行;什么红丸什么梃击什么妖书,明朝三大案疑云重重,我自全身而退。救不世之功臣,灭万世之祸首,一切只为逆天改命!
  • 指武

    指武

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 漫威世界里的生化危机

    漫威世界里的生化危机

    依琳在穿越到DNF的世界之后,又穿越到了漫威的世界里。在这里,无限战争刚刚结束,不过跟剧情中不一样的是,灭霸他并没有成功的消减宇宙中的一半生命,反而是将无限宝石给打爆了。而好不容易在地狱厨房里安居的依琳,突然发现,这个地球好危险啊!先是发现吸血鬼的存在,然后是鼠祸、蝗灾、狂暴巨兽、鲨卷风等等危机,最后,这个世界居然还爆发了丧尸危机!依琳;嘤嘤嘤,地球好危险,我想回阿拉德大陆!其他人众;最危险的是你好吧!
  • 外门弟子不好当

    外门弟子不好当

    身为归一宗最基层的外门弟子,蓁蓁表示:工作时间长,待遇福利差,社会地位低。早上给消极怠工的师尊诵读经文,上午替鹤发童颜的掌门打扫洞府,中午帮心机深沉的师伯饲养灵兽,下午为勤奋上进的师妹种植草药,晚上……某人咆哮:还不滚回来给师兄铺床!--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 中国通史:双色典藏版

    中国通史:双色典藏版

    《中国通史》全名《自修适用白话本国史》,由吕思勉先生在历年教学讲稿和史学研究的基础上完善而成。全书约55万字,详细地记叙了上起远古时代,下至民国十一年(1922年)华盛顿会议期间的中国历史,是一部完全意义上的中国通史。全书由绪论和五编构成,每一编内又分若干章,并按中国历史社会的变迁化分为:上古、中古、近古、近世、最近世、现代六个不同的时期。本书是吕思勉的史学成名之作,也是中国历史上第一部白话中国通史。它规模宏大,视野开阔,史识丰富,笔调流畅,1923年9月由商务印书馆出版后,曾长期作为大学教材和青年“自修适用”读物,出版后数十年内不断重印再版,是民国时期发行量最大的一部中国通史。
  • 地持义记卷第四

    地持义记卷第四

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 空谷足音:扬州八怪书法(文化之美)

    空谷足音:扬州八怪书法(文化之美)

    中国古老而传统的笔墨艺术,它们用最简单的线条创造了流转飞动的世界,用最原始的色彩绘出了神采飞扬的灵魂。扬州八怪在艺术上表现出强烈的个性,他们的书法笔情纵逸,随意挥洒,苍劲绝伦,更多地表现出对传统书法的背离与反叛。
  • 服务细节全书

    服务细节全书

    一位餐饮业巨擘这样总结他的成功之道:在其连锁店中提供给顾客的,永远是17厘米厚的汉堡与4℃的可乐。这两个数据是经过反复的研究、调查、试验得来的。是的,连锁店当然也可以提供20厘米厚的汉堡和7℃的可乐,但那一定不是最佳口感——这就是专业精神的服务与普通服务的区别。本书倡导完美的服务精神,即要实现从要服务、会服务到服务好的蜕变;强调服务精神的建立、服务精神的落实和服务精神的完善与升级。只要从生活和工作中的点滴人手,使领导者和员工都更为明确服务精神的实质,并将服务精神灌输到思想中,落实到实处。你将会发现——服务就是力量!