登陆注册
5260800000006

第6章 3(1)

Again, privative terms inevitably form one branch of dichotomous division, as we see in the proposed dichotomies. But privative terms in their character of privatives admit of no subdivision. For there can be no specific forms of a negation, of Featherless for instance or of Footless, as there are of Feathered and of Footed. Yet a generic differentia must be subdivisible; for otherwise what is there that makes it generic rather than specific? There are to be found generic, that is specifically subdivisible, differentiae; Feathered for instance and Footed. For feathers are divisible into Barbed and Unbarbed, and feet into Manycleft, and Twocleft, like those of animals with bifid hoofs, and Uncleft or Undivided, like those of animals with solid hoofs. Now even with differentiae capable of this specific subdivision it is difficult enough so to make the classification, as that each animal shall be comprehended in some one subdivision and in not more than one; but far more difficult, nay impossible, is it to do this, if we start with a dichotomy into two contradictories.

(Suppose for instance we start with the two contradictories, Feathered and Unfeathered; we shall find that the ant, the glow-worm, and some other animals fall under both divisions.) For each differentia must be presented by some species. There must be some species, therefore, under the privative heading. Now specifically distinct animals cannot present in their essence a common undifferentiated element, but any apparently common element must really be differentiated. (Bird and Man for instance are both Two-footed, but their two-footedness is diverse and differentiated. So any two sanguineous groups must have some difference in their blood, if their blood is part of their essence.) From this it follows that a privative term, being insusceptible of differentiation, cannot be a generic differentia; for, if it were, there would be a common undifferentiated element in two different groups.

Again, if the species are ultimate indivisible groups, that is, are groups with indivisible differentiae, and if no differentia be common to several groups, the number of differentiae must be equal to the number of species. If a differentia though not divisible could yet be common to several groups, then it is plain that in virtue of that common differentia specifically distinct animals would fall into the same division. It is necessary then, if the differentiae, under which are ranged all the ultimate and indivisible groups, are specific characters, that none of them shall be common; for otherwise, as already said, specifically distinct animals will come into one and the same division. But this would violate one of the requisite conditions, which are as follows. No ultimate group must be included in more than a single division; different groups must not be included in the same division; and every group must be found in some division. It is plain then that we cannot get at the ultimate specific forms of the animal, or any other, kingdom by bifurcate division. If we could, the number of ultimate differentiae would equal the number of ultimate animal forms. For assume an order of beings whose prime differentiae are White and Black. Each of these branches will bifurcate, and their branches again, and so on till we reach the ultimate differentiae, whose number will be four or some other power of two, and will also be the number of the ultimate species comprehended in the order.

(A species is constituted by the combination differentia and matter.

For no part of an animal is purely material or purely immaterial; nor can a body, independently of its condition, constitute an animal or any of its parts, as has repeatedly been observed.)

Further, the differentiae must be elements of the essence, and not merely essential attributes. Thus if Figure is the term to be divided, it must not be divided into figures whose angles are equal to two right angles, and figures whose angles are together greater than two right angles. For it is only an attribute of a triangle and not part of its essence that its angles are equal to two right angles.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 末世全能战神

    末世全能战神

    当全世界的人一夜之间消失99%会发生什么?暴乱,政变,阴谋,残忍。虽然末世前只是一个普通平民,但不妨碍他俯视这个世界。晶矿,传承,觉醒,一切提升实力的方法他都要得到。末世全能战神当属陆风。
  • 雍正朱批奏折选辑

    雍正朱批奏折选辑

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 狗殇

    狗殇

    金戈,本名金礼山,一九六二年生,现供职于咸宁市广播电影电视局。出版中篇小说集《谁是赢家》。开始的时候,我不明白军宣队的王连长为啥要给我们连配上一条狗,而且指名道姓让连里最年轻、最出众的陈昭喂养。指导员老杜喊她时,她正弯腰撅臀挥锹往泥桶里铲泥,给我这个“赶鸭子上架”的泥瓦匠当小工。指导员老杜喊她时,她正弯腰撅臀挥锹往泥桶里铲泥,给我这个“赶鸭子上架”的泥瓦匠当小工。她“哎”了一声,扭过身子一拂盖了半边脸的刘海,喘了口气问:作啥?老杜抖了抖手中的黑团团说:小狗,连长说交给你来喂!
  • 成都姑娘(全集)

    成都姑娘(全集)

    本书为新都市情感长篇,分上下两部,讲述一对成都姑娘陶氏姐妹,他们之间的爱恨情仇。上部《雏菊逃亡》以九寨沟旅游为线索展开,在风景如画的山水间发生的故事。下部《亚白领的歌声》则以白领一组的生活工作为背景,讲述那些新结识朋友们的故事,作品表现的那些小人物悲欢离合的生活经历,就如同昨日发生在身边,亲切而发人深省。本书为第一届海峡两岸网络原创文学大赛入围作品。
  • 仙本无相

    仙本无相

    “没有人愿意当英雄......但这个世上总要有人去当英雄......”“只要这个世界还在,我就还活着......”
  • 法医笔记

    法医笔记

    我选择当一名法医,古时候称之为仵作,被视为不祥之人,在三教九流中属下九流行当。入行这些年,我经历过各种离奇的案件,我叫容彦!
  • 天原发微

    天原发微

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 谁偷走了你的自信与信任

    谁偷走了你的自信与信任

    围绕自信与信任谈起,逐个分析并找出致使人们丧失自信与失去信任的几乎所有因素。并提出了切实可行的应对之策,能够助你在最短的时间内找回你的自信和信任,让你在摆脱人生困境的同时,也能更好地发挥自身的潜力并构筑良好的外部关系。压力之下,自信易毁;竞争之中,信任易失。然而,现实所给予我们的更多的恰恰是压力与竞争,压力与竞争成了一种常态。正是这些无形的杀手在暗中不断地蚕食着我们的自信与信任,而我们的自信与信任又绝不会凭空产生,怎么办?我们要学会自己去拯救自己。
  • 安源的秘密

    安源的秘密

    安源不觉得自己,和孤儿院里的其他人有什么不同。直到他13岁被杜氏夫妇领养,他的人生发生了翻天覆地的变化。在外面的世界,他认识了此生所爱─叶知秋……
  • 西方世界中的社会主义思潮

    西方世界中的社会主义思潮

    社会主义、共产主义思想及其力量最先从西方资本主义社会诞生和发展起来,虽然其中历经波折起伏,特别是在苏东剧变之后更是进入低潮时期。但是经过共产党及其他社会主义力量数十年的反思、蛰伏与探索,又重新焕发了勃勃生机。作为世界社会主义力量的一部分,什么是西方社会主义?西方社会主义主要关注和探索哪些问题?西方国家共产党做出了什么样的理论创建和实践探索?有哪些类型的西方社会主义思潮和流派?西方社会主义及左翼力量做出了什么样的联合活动与斗争?西方社会主义的历史地位、意义及发展趋势如何?本书将就这些问题进行一一解答。