登陆注册
5270400000021

第21章

Now one commonplace rule is to look and see if a man has ascribed as an accident what belongs in some other way. This mistake is most commonly made in regard to the genera of things, e.g. if one were to say that white happens (accidit) to be a colour-for being a colour does not happen by accident to white, but colour is its genus. The assertor may of course define it so in so many words, saying (e.g.) that 'Justice happens (accidit) to be a virtue'; but often even without such definition it is obvious that he has rendered the genus as an accident; e.g. suppose that one were to say that whiteness is coloured or that walking is in motion. For a predicate drawn from the genus is never ascribed to the species in an inflected form, but always the genera are predicated of their species literally; for the species take on both the name and the definition of their genera. A man therefore who says that white is 'coloured' has not rendered 'coloured' as its genus, seeing that he has used an inflected form, nor yet as its property or as its definition: for the definition and property of a thing belong to it and to nothing else, whereas many things besides white are coloured, e.g. a log, a stone, a man, and a horse. Clearly then he renders it as an accident.

Another rule is to examine all cases where a predicate has been either asserted or denied universally to belong to something. Look at them species by species, and not in their infinite multitude: for then the inquiry will proceed more directly and in fewer steps. You should look and begin with the most primary groups, and then proceed in order down to those that are not further divisible: e.g. if a man has said that the knowledge of opposites is the same, you should look and see whether it be so of relative opposites and of contraries and of terms signifying the privation or presence of certain states, and of contradictory terms. Then, if no clear result be reached so far in these cases, you should again divide these until you come to those that are not further divisible, and see (e.g.) whether it be so of just deeds and unjust, or of the double and the half, or of blindness and sight, or of being and not-being: for if in any case it be shown that the knowledge of them is not the same we shall have demolished the problem. Likewise, also, if the predicate belongs in no case. This rule is convertible for both destructive and constructive purposes: for if, when we have suggested a division, the predicate appears to hold in all or in a large number of cases, we may then claim that the other should actually assert it universally, or else bring a negative instance to show in what case it is not so: for if he does neither of these things, a refusal to assert it will make him look absurd.

Another rule is to make definitions both of an accident and of its subject, either of both separately or else of one of them, and then look and see if anything untrue has been assumed as true in the definitions. Thus (e.g.) to see if it is possible to wrong a god, ask what is 'to wrong'? For if it be 'to injure deliberately', clearly it is not possible for a god to be wronged: for it is impossible that God should be injured. Again, to see if the good man is jealous, ask who is the 'jealous' man and what is 'jealousy'. For if 'jealousy' is pain at the apparent success of some well-behaved person, clearly the good man is not jealous: for then he would be bad.

Again, to see if the indignant man is jealous, ask who each of them is: for then it will be obvious whether the statement is true or false; e.g. if he is 'jealous' who grieves at the successes of the good, and he is 'indignant' who grieves at the successes of the evil, then clearly the indignant man would not be jealous. A man should substitute definitions also for the terms contained in his definitions, and not stop until he comes to a familiar term: for often if the definition be rendered whole, the point at issue is not cleared up, whereas if for one of the terms used in the definition a definition be stated, it becomes obvious.

Moreover, a man should make the problem into a proposition for himself, and then bring a negative instance against it: for the negative instance will be a ground of attack upon the assertion.

This rule is very nearly the same as the rule to look into cases where a predicate has been attributed or denied universally: but it differs in the turn of the argument.

Moreover, you should define what kind of things should be called as most men call them, and what should not. For this is useful both for establishing and for overthrowing a view: e.g. you should say that we ought to use our terms to mean the same things as most people mean by them, but when we ask what kind of things are or are not of such and such a kind, we should not here go with the multitude: e.g. it is right to call 'healthy' whatever tends to produce health, as do most men: but in saying whether the object before us tends to produce health or not, we should adopt the language no longer of the multitude but of the doctor.

同类推荐
  • camellia girl

    camellia girl

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 太上瑶台益算宝籍延年忏

    太上瑶台益算宝籍延年忏

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 觞政

    觞政

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 秦中岁时记

    秦中岁时记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 续古尊宿语要

    续古尊宿语要

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 宗鉴录

    宗鉴录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 穿越独霸皇宠

    穿越独霸皇宠

    “在这里,所有的生物都是我们皇族的,当然也包括你——萧姗。”只是穿越而已,却就这样没有人权的被眼前这个自以为是,装冷酷扮阴沉的皇子殿下宣布了所有权,不反击就不是穿越人了,哼哼。她眯眼笑看他,“现在的皇帝可不是你,皇子殿下。”
  • 穿越之农商

    穿越之农商

    现代女穿越古代,偶遇失忆花美男,娶回家来当相公,偶得秘宝空间,关起门来闷声发大财,带领全村发财致富,夫妻领着孩子把家还。前有奇葩邻居,后有难缠婆婆,左有刁蛮公主,右有阴险小人。这些咱都不怕,看牧子语如何在古代,混得风生水起,智斗牛鬼蛇神!
  • 带着AI闯诸空

    带着AI闯诸空

    地球上,他用超凡的科技震撼着人们的心脏;宇宙中,他用庞大的星舰舰队和战力爆表的机甲征服着异族的星球。“耶!我们终于有了超过5km的星舰了!”…张辰默默的看着眼前每一艘至少超过50km的超级舰队。“唉,无敌真寂寞!”…无论是方舟舰,世界舰,还是行星要塞还是一掌湮灭星球的修炼者,都阻止不了我冲向那个地方…他本是一个平凡人,因一个外宇宙的智能生命从此有了无敌战力,用那瘦弱的身影给万族留下无尽的恐惧…当然,一切还得从科技开发地球开始…(萌新首发,也许有些bug不喜勿喷)
  • 名门挚爱:隐婚老公限时宠

    名门挚爱:隐婚老公限时宠

    “什么!我的户口因为婚姻关系被迁走了?可我没老公啊!”醉酒一夜,小白兔稀里糊涂的签了‘卖身契’。“你骗婚!我要告你!”“我有证据是你求婚的。”经鉴定,此婚姻真实有效,受法律保护。“你这么腹黑,肚子怎么就没烂掉呢?黑心汤圆!”事实证明,跟歹徒斗,英勇无比;跟总裁斗,奇傻无比!她说:欧阳连城,你信不信我告你!“我要离婚!!”“哼,你试试。”--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 星空探索之旅

    星空探索之旅

    一位宇宙中神奇的未知生物带着一名地球上的废宅正太以及人造舰娘们在宇宙中探险旅行以及收集各种萌物(娘)地轻松日常。
  • 绝世倾情:王妃太狂傲

    绝世倾情:王妃太狂傲

    【穿越幻情】一朝穿越的她,沾着为国捐躯的将军爹爹的光,荣登正妃位。<br/>新婚夜,她的夫君不屑的对她说:“记住,本王只给你这位子,其他的,想都别想!”<br/>她冷眼相待,这位子她也不想要。<br/>可是,终是逃脱不了他的纠缠,被他禁锢在床榻,夜夜被迫承欢。<br/>他说,你就是没心,本王也要你的身子陪在本王的身边!死都别想离开!<br/>然,又有谁知,她的心到底在哪儿……
  • 世纪的约会

    世纪的约会

    面对世界,每个人都有不同的生命感悟方式与生存审视态度。可以说,耿朝晖正是以诗歌作为载体,表达出自身主体意识对客观现实的心灵回答。读罢《世纪的约会》,掩卷沉思,感触颇深。凭心而论,近年来,受社会商业化无情冲击,缪斯堡垒坍塌,新诗队伍萎缩,像耿朝晖如此钟情于新诗的探索者越来越少。
  • 超级MOD符文大师

    超级MOD符文大师

    梦中:“不修改是不可能的,这辈子都不可能。”“穿越成了废材,又不能修炼,只能靠修改过活,才能维持生计”现实:“弟弟,你这金手指怎么要经验值才能用啊”“直接用金手指不就没意思了吗,加点限制。”“弟弟,这mod装上去怎么没用啊”“这个需要经验值才能实装。”“好吧,你这些mod有几个确实有点逆天,加点限制也好。”当某人选择无用之人开局,意外进入游戏世界后,“弟弟,哥如果能回来,保证不打死你”’早已过了十五六岁的他,只能走上调教主角团的不归路
  • 无际商皇

    无际商皇

    成长类历史架空文,剧情逻辑清晰,涉及官场斗争、王朝战争、商业战争和种田发展等内容。