登陆注册
5270400000053

第53章

Next, for destructive purposes, see if the term of which he renders the property is used in more than one sense, and no distinction has been drawn as to which of them it is whose property he is stating: for then the property will not have been correctly rendered. The reasons why this is so are quite clear from what has been said above: for the same results are bound to follow. Thus (e.g.) seeing that 'the knowledge of this' signifies many things for it means (1) the possession of knowledge by it, (2) the use of its knowledge by it, (3) the existence of knowledge about it, (4) the use of knowledge about it-no property of the 'knowledge of this' could be rendered correctly unless he draw a distinction as to which of these it is whose property he is rendering. For constructive purposes, a man should see if the term of which he is rendering the property avoids bearing many senses and is one and simple: for then the property will have been correctly stated in this respect. Thus (e.g.) seeing that 'man' is used in a single sense, 'naturally civilized animal' would be correctly stated as a property of man.

Next, for destructive purposes, see whether the same term has been repeated in the property. For people often do this undetected in rendering 'properties' also, just as they do in their 'definitions' as well: but a property to which this has happened will not have been correctly stated: for the repetition of it confuses the hearer; thus inevitably the meaning becomes obscure, and further, such people are thought to babble. Repetition of the same term is likely to happen in two ways; one is, when a man repeatedly uses the same word, as would happen if any one were to render, as a property of fire, 'the body which is the most rarefied of bodies' (for he has repeated the word 'body'); the second is, if a man replaces words by their definitions, as would happen if any one were to render, as a property of earth, 'the substance which is by its nature most easily of all bodies borne downwards in space', and were then to substitute 'substances of such and such a kind' for the word 'bodies': for 'body' and 'a substance of such and such a kind' mean one and the same thing.

For he will have repeated the word 'substance', and accordingly neither of the properties would be correctly stated. For constructive purposes, on the other hand, see whether he avoids ever repeating the same term; for then the property will in this respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) seeing that he who has stated 'animal capable of acquiring knowledge' as a property of man has avoided repeating the same term several times, the property would in this respect have been correctly rendered of man.

Next, for destructive purposes, see whether he has rendered in the property any such term as is a universal attribute. For one which does not distinguish its subject from other things is useless, and it is the business of the language Of 'properties', as also of the language of definitions, to distinguish. In the case contemplated, therefore, the property will not have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of knowledge to be a 'conception incontrovertible by argument, because of its unity', has used in the property a term of that kind, viz. 'unity', which is a universal attribute; and therefore the property of knowledge could not have been correctly stated. For constructive purposes, on the other hand, see whether he has avoided all terms that are common to everything and used a term that distinguishes the subject from something: for then the property will in this respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as he who has said that it is a property of a 'living creature' to 'have a soul' has used no term that is common to everything, it would in this respect have been correctly stated to be a property of a 'living creature' to 'have a soul'.

Next, for destructive purposes see whether he renders more than one property of the same thing, without a definite proviso that he is stating more than one: for then the property will not have been correctly stated. For just as in the case of definitions too there should be no further addition beside the expression which shows the essence, so too in the case of properties nothing further should be rendered beside the expression that constitutes the property mentioned: for such an addition is made to no purpose. Thus (e.g.) a man who has said that it is a property of fire to be 'the most rarefied and lightest body' has rendered more than one property (for each term is a true predicate of fire alone); and so it could not be a correctly stated property of fire to be 'the most rarefied and lightest body'. On the other hand, for constructive purposes, see whether he has avoided rendering more than one property of the same thing, and has rendered one only: for then the property will in this respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man who has said that it is a property of a liquid to be a 'body adaptable to every shape' has rendered as its property a single character and not several, and so the property of 'liquid' would in this respect have been correctly stated.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 蒙古汉子(成吉思汗子孙秘传·第二季之一)

    蒙古汉子(成吉思汗子孙秘传·第二季之一)

    本书写的是成吉思汗的后代巴拉格特氏这支族人的故事。准噶尔叛乱,背负家族希望的巴特在战场上立下赫赫战功,满清正黄旗官员通智为贪巴特战功背后放冷箭。通智担心事情败露,把自己的女儿桐花嫁给巴特。桐花到了巴家后,巴家人处处受其欺辱。准噶尔二次叛乱,战场上,巴特遇到了自己当年的结拜兄弟,方知自己背后那支箭确是通智所为。凯旋归来的巴特进皇城状告通智,雍正皇帝怀疑巴特被策反,将巴特交通智处治,通智伪善地在包头收买人心,却对巴特落井下石。朝廷钦差刘统勋明察秋毫,救出巴特,通智被处死。准噶尔第三次叛乱,巴特再立战功。当乾隆皇帝要加封巴特为一品大员时,巴特婉言谢绝,告老还乡。
  • 准妈妈准爸爸必备私房书

    准妈妈准爸爸必备私房书

    针对准爸爸的无所适从,本书在每一章都特别立了一个栏目——“准爸爸须知”,这样可以让准爸爸在准妈妈不适或难受时能给以最及时的关心和呵护,陪准妈妈度过人生中最难忘、也是最难熬的一段幸福时光。
  • 不那么纯真的年代

    不那么纯真的年代

    这是一个轻松自然的的创业故事。重生归来的张十三,从办暑假班开始,踩着时代的节点,一步一步建立自己的商业集团。从小富即安到自我实现,让这个不那么纯真这个年代变得色彩斑斓。
  • 地狱天堂都有眼

    地狱天堂都有眼

    “七·一三”案件侦破半个月后的一天黄昏,顾小北只身悄悄出现在了D城火车站。他上身套了件藏青色T恤,脚蹬一双浅灰色夏季凉鞋,手里拎一只半新不旧的棕褐色旅行箱,怎么看,都不像是C城进出口贸易公司的高级白领。顾小北要的就是这种效果,他就是要把自己雪藏起来,藏进茫茫人海,让那个于老大无所适从,即使他有猎犬一般灵敏的鼻子,也休想嗅到半点关于他行踪的蛛丝马迹。他的休假是秘密进行的。除了公司老总没有人知道。即使老总也仅仅知道他在休假,并不知道目的地。当他来到吉祥旅馆时,撩人的夜色里已辨不清人的模样。
  • 戴明贤集(第六卷):九疑烟尘

    戴明贤集(第六卷):九疑烟尘

    本书收历史题材小说短篇六篇、中篇一部、长篇一部。讲述了吴汉槎、狄仁杰、秦桧、杜衍、欧阳修、米芾、龚自珍、军营歌伎严蕊、唐仲友、何腾蛟等的故事。作者有着独特的文化视角,认为过度使用小说创作的虚构权,会削弱阅读的信任感。因此本书稿中的大小故事情节,均有出处,其史料来源包括正史之外的野史、笔记等等。作者认为野史笔记中的记载,往往更接近真实,合乎情理。书稿诸多故事中只有一个虚构人物,即何腾蛟的随身护卫何七。本书保持着一种慢速、朴拙的手工感,写人、叙事、状物,针脚绵密细致,回味悠长。文学家擅长的场景和细节描写等,也使历史人物形象的塑造变得亲切感人,活生生立在纸上。
  • 完美基因风暴

    完美基因风暴

    末世之后,重启文明,地球进入无国界联邦时代。异兽之森、荒野都市、雨林禁区、极地深渊、禁忌之海共同构成的新世界,随处可见人类与变异生物抗争的痕迹。在这个异能部落、科者联盟、联邦军部三分天下的格局中,少年荆楚得远古完美基因传承,在逆境中崛起,开始搅动这个波诡云谲的时代,掀起一场热血激荡的基因风暴。当新世界的面纱被层层揭开,谁将引领人类踏上全新的变革征程?是他?还是她?
  • 这不是真的

    这不是真的

    夜已经很深了,我还在灯下看着校样。这是我的又一本新书。是的,我是一位作家。中年作家。是的,我已经四十一岁了。当然,有些报刊上有时仍然会称我为青年作家。叫青年作家似乎也没人有意见。只是我自己知道,事实上我已经毫无争议地跨入了中年,或者说是壮年?四十岁,是人生的一道坎。一个男人,只要一过了四十,看待世界的眼光以及对这个社会(包括了许许多多的事)的理解,就完全和过去不一样了。在别人眼里,作家也许会有点与众不同?不,事实上我们与别人在本质上根本没有任何的不同。所不同的只是我们谋生的方式和日常状态的差异。
  • 重生之逆流年代

    重生之逆流年代

    这是最好的年代,也是最坏的年代。大裤衩,人字拖,李世安一下子就回到了九十年代的夏天。VCD里正转动着盗版的碟片,满大街都是广东香港泛滥到内地的流行歌曲和港片,手里的冰激凌在融化…… 那如梦如烟的往事散发着芬芳,这九十年代出土的梦属于逆流年代。温馨提示:“告别一个时代,幸会一个时代”或许这句话是对过去曾经的记忆最好的诠释!
  • 涅磐重生:呆子,你走开

    涅磐重生:呆子,你走开

    【非复仇文】他,是被遗弃的皇子;她,是受尽宠爱的嫡女。当一片痴心错付,重生归来的她,是选择将错就错,还是,这个没有节操的某人?“音儿,男女授受不亲,你摸了人家的小手,人家就是你的人了,你可不要反悔了哦。”她一脸嫌弃地踢开这个如同大型犬一样的男子,“想做我的人,追上我再说。”新书《校草太嚣张:吃定绵羊小老师》已发,欢迎宝宝们围观。
  • 得依释序文缘起

    得依释序文缘起

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。