登陆注册
5270400000052

第52章

First, see whether the property has or has not been rendered correctly. Of a rendering being incorrect or correct, one test is to see whether the terms in which the property is stated are not or are more intelligible-for destructive purposes, whether they are not so, and for constructive purposes, whether they are so. Of the terms not being more intelligible, one test is to see whether the property which he renders is altogether more unintelligible than the subject whose property he has stated: for, if so, the property will not have been stated correctly. For the object of getting a property constituted is to be intelligible: the terms therefore in which it is rendered should be more intelligible: for in that case it will be possible to conceive it more adequately, e.g. any one who has stated that it is a property of 'fire' to 'bear a very close resemblance to the soul', uses the term 'soul', which is less intelligible than 'fire'-for we know better what fire is than what soul is-, and therefore a 'very close resemblance to the soul' could not be correctly stated to be a property of fire. Another test is to see whether the attribution of A (property) to B (subject) fails to be more intelligible. For not only should the property be more intelligible than its subject, but also it should be something whose attribution to the particular subject is a more intelligible attribution. For he who does not know whether it is an attribute of the particular subject at all, will not know either whether it belongs to it alone, so that whichever of these results happens, its character as a property becomes obscure.

Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of fire to be 'the primary element wherein the soul is naturally found', has introduced a subject which is less intelligible than 'fire', viz. whether the soul is found in it, and whether it is found there primarily; and therefore to be 'the primary element in which the soul is naturally found' could not be correctly stated to be a property of 'fire'. On the other hand, for constructive purposes, see whether the terms in which the property is stated are more intelligible, and if they are more intelligible in each of the aforesaid ways. For then the property will have been correctly stated in this respect: for of constructive arguments, showing the correctness of a rendering, some will show the correctness merely in this respect, while others will show it without qualification. Thus (e.g.) a man who has said that the 'possession of sensation' is a property of 'animal' has both used more intelligible terms and has rendered the property more intelligible in each of the aforesaid senses; so that to 'possess sensation' would in this respect have been correctly rendered as a property of 'animal'.

Next, for destructive purposes, see whether any of the terms rendered in the property is used in more than one sense, or whether the whole expression too signifies more than one thing. For then the property will not have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) seeing that to 'being natural sentient' signifies more than one thing, viz.

(1) to possess sensation, (2) to use one's sensation, being naturally sentient' could not be a correct statement of a property of 'animal'. The reason why the term you use, or the whole expression signifying the property, should not bear more than one meaning is this, that an expression bearing more than one meaning makes the object described obscure, because the man who is about to attempt an argument is in doubt which of the various senses the expression bears: and this will not do, for the object of rendering the property is that he may understand. Moreover, in addition to this, it is inevitable that those who render a property after this fashion should be somehow refuted whenever any one addresses his syllogism to that one of the term's several meanings which does not agree. For constructive purposes, on the other hand, see whether both all the terms and also the expression as a whole avoid bearing more than one sense: for then the property will have been correctly stated in this respect. Thus (e.g.) seeing that 'body' does not bear several meanings, nor quickest to move upwards in space', nor yet the whole expression made by putting them together, it would be correct in this respect to say that it is a property of fire to be the 'body quickest to move upwards in space'.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 甜宠星婚,早安,戏精先生

    甜宠星婚,早安,戏精先生

    “我们的协议是隐婚一年之后离婚,你为什么还要缠着我?”清澈的眼眸看着眼前近乎完美的男人。粉丝面前,他是温柔暖男形象的超级明星,但人后他却是高冷腹黑的“戏精”。“丫头,你签协议的时候没有看字吗?协议满期后没有书面解约,本协议将自动延续至无期!”男人嘴角微微上扬,眼眸中满是狡黠之意。“当初签的时候,没有这一条!你是什么时候加上去的?”“现在!”大手一推,男人直接将她按在了墙上……
  • 隐婚掠爱:冷面总裁的小骗子

    隐婚掠爱:冷面总裁的小骗子

    几年前她带着一百万逃离他的身边,几年后她带着孩子兜兜转转又重新回来,而一场早有预谋的隐婚让两个本该形同陌路的人重新走在了一起。他以为自己对待这个满口谎话的小骗子会足够铁石心肠,但是在看到她狡诈灵动的眼眸时那些狠心的话全都说不出口了,更何况她身边还带着一只软软糯糯的包子。当一切误会被解开,他才知道自己对她的伤害,刻骨铭心,鲜血淋漓,幸好,还为时不晚。“你放开我。”女人嘴里说些拒绝的话身体却柔软地如同一汪泉水瘫软在了男人怀中。“小骗子,这时候还不说实话。”男人暧昧地吻上了她的唇角说:“正好惩罚你,咱们再来做一只二宝吧。”幸好时光不晚,你还在我身边。--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 影响你一生的习惯全集

    影响你一生的习惯全集

    习惯每时每刻都在左右着我们的行为,影响着我们的人生。它能够影响个人的卫生、形象,也能影响人的身体健康、行为处世、杜交、口才、婚姻、爱情等。好习惯让你品尝命运的成果,坏习惯使你饱尝命运的苦果。本书在向读者阐释习惯对人的一生所产生的重大影响的同时,还精心为读者提供了一些培养好习惯、摒弃坏习惯的行而有效之方,以期使读者通过阅读来改变命运、成就人生。
  • 空院残月

    空院残月

    《空院残月》是“中国作家档案书系”之一种,收录了当代中国著名作家韩少功发表于各时期的中短篇作品。分为2000年后新作,处女作,成名作、代表作,影响或争议最大之作,文坛友人撰写的印象记,与作家、批评家的对话录,以及作家自己的小传、影集、手迹、著作目录等14个部分。
  • 不败战尊

    不败战尊

    诸天万界,唯我不败!大千世界,生灵以天源炼出体内诸天,成就天地主宰!天源青皮葫芦,蕴含紫气青莲,出现在一个少年丹田,铸造诸天万界至高天地!
  • 黑暗纪元

    黑暗纪元

    黑云笼罩全球,太阳永远消失,深渊的恶魔窥伺人间,人类进入了最黑暗的纪元。当我醒来,永夜之下,便是我的天下。
  • 汪曾祺经典

    汪曾祺经典

    本书从汪曾祺先生创作的大量小说、散文中精选而成,最早的写于四十年代,大部分写于后半生,风格从华丽归于朴实,技巧臻于至境。本书选编原则紧紧围绕教育部新编语文教材,帮助中学生扩大阅读、精深阅读,提高文学修养。本书由特级教师精选目录,精心出版。
  • 火爆天王

    火爆天王

    狱中走出来的妖孽少年,却成了美女组合中的一员,从此开启了新的生活……
  • 帝少万安夫人重生了

    帝少万安夫人重生了

    一生平平淡淡的安玖玖竟、然、重、生、了?!玖玖表示“我也很蒙逼,难道是自己人品大爆发了吗?”事实证明并没有,只是以彗星撞地球的几率让玖玖继承了某仙人的空间而已。原本玖玖以为自己会种田发家致富,不想这空间的功能牛逼哄哄,玖玖本想凭着自己的努力走上人生巅峰,不想捡了一个牛掰的师傅不够,又撩了一位腹黑少爷。这是一个女孩子成长为女王的过程。夺得各种奖项,之后宠宠宠超级宠的故事。(1v1,盛世甜宠,女强,男更强的故事,女主可能会心软,但绝不白莲,绝不白莲,绝不白莲。)
  • 温澜,你的潮生

    温澜,你的潮生

    遇见你温澜潮生.[挑战史上最简洁简介,有趣的灵魂终将在这里相遇]