登陆注册
5273300000055

第55章 STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTA

The peculiar private condition and relations of the people of a State to one another could not properly be enquired into by any other State.That is a subject which each State regulates for itself;and it cannot enter into the question of the influence which such State ought to possess,in the common government of all the States.It is enough that the State brings into the common stock a certain amount of wealth,resulting from the industry of her people.Whether those people be men or women,bond or free,or bound to service for a limited time only,is the exclusive concern of the State itself,and is a matter with which the other States cannot intermeddle,without impertinence,injustice and oppression.So far,then,from limiting representation to three-fifths of the slaves,they ought all to be represented,for all contribute to the aggregate of the productive industry of the country.

And,even then,the rule would operate injuriously upon the slave-holding States;for,if the labor of a slave be as productive as that of a free man,(and in agriculture it is so),the cost of supporting him is much less.Therefore,of the same amount of food and clothing,raised by the two classes,a greater surplus will remain of that of the slave,and of course a greater amount subject to the demands of the public necessities.

The remarks of John Adams,delivered in convention,27are very forcible upon this point.According to Mr.Jefferson's report of them,he observed,"that the numbers of people are taken as an index of the wealth of the State,and not as subjects of taxation;that,as to this matter it was of no consequence by what name you called your people,whether by that of freemen or of slaves;that in some countries the laboring poor are called freemen,in others they are called slaves;but that the difference,as to the state,was imaginary only.What matters it whether a landlord,employing ten laborers on his farm,gives them annually as much money as will buy them the necessaries of life,or gives them those necessaries at short hand?The ten laborers add as much wealth to the State,increase its exports as much,in the one case as in the other.Certainly five hundred freemen produce no more profits,no greater surplus for the payment of taxes,than five hundred slaves.Therefore the State in which are the laborers called freemen should be taxed no more than that in which are the laborers called slaves.Suppose by an extraordinary operation of nature or of law,one-half the laborers of a State could,in the course of one night,be transformed into slaves,would the State be made poorer,or less able to pay taxes?That the condition of the laboring poor in most countries,that of the fishermen particularly of the northern States,is as abject as that of slaves.It is the number of laborers which produces the surplus for taxation,and numbers therefore,indiscriminately,are the fair index to wealth."

It is obvious that these remarks were made for very different purpose from that which I have in view.The subject then before the convention was the proper rule of taxation,and it was Mr.Adams's purpose to show that,as to that matter,slaves should be considered only as people,and,consequently,as an index of the amount of taxable wealth.The convention had not then determined that representatives and direct taxes should be regulated by the same ratio.When they did determine this,the remarks of Mr.Adams seem to me conclusive,to show that representation of all the slaves ought to have been allowed;nor do I see how those who held his opinions could possibly have voted otherwise.If slaves are people,as forming the measure of national wealth,and consequently of taxation,and if taxation and representation be placed upon the same principle,and regulated by the same ratio,then that slaves are people,in fixing the ratio of representation,is a logical sequitur which no one can possibly deny.

But it is objected that slaves are property,and for that reason,are not more entitled to representation than any other species of property.

But they are also people,and,upon analogous principles,are entitled to representation as people.It is in this character alone that the non-slaveholding States have a right to consider them,as has already been shown,and in this character alone is it just to consider them.We ought to presume that every slave occupies a place which,but for his presence,would be occupied by a free white man;and,if this were so,every one,and not three-fifths only,would be represented.But the States who hold no slaves have no right to complain that this is not the case in other States,so long as the labor of the slave contributes as much to the common stock of productive industry,as the labor of the white man.It is enough that a State possesses a certain number of people,of living,rational beings.We are not to enquire whether they be black or white,nor tawny,nor what are their peculiar relations among one another.If the slave of the South be property,of what nature is that property,and what kind of interest has the owner in it?He has a right to the profits of the slave's labor.And so,the master of an indented apprentice has a right to the profits of his labor.It is true,one holds the right for the life of the slave,and the other only for a time limited in the apprentice's indentures;but this is a difference only in the extent,and not in the nature of the interest.It is also true,that the owner of a slave has,in most States,a right to sell him;but this is only because the laws of the State authorize him to do so.And,in like manner,the indentures of an apprentice may be transferred if the laws of the State will allow it.In all these respects,therefore,the slave and the indentured apprentice stand upon precisely the same principle.To a certain extent,they are both property,and neither of them can be regarded as a free man;

同类推荐
  • 曹仁伯医案论

    曹仁伯医案论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 录鬼簿

    录鬼簿

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 元始天尊说玄微妙经

    元始天尊说玄微妙经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • Majorie Daw

    Majorie Daw

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 信及录

    信及录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 坏男人和坏女人

    坏男人和坏女人

    既不能相守但愿相知,既不能相知但愿想念,多年后不知是否能了解。
  • 废材修仙之兽兽不亲

    废材修仙之兽兽不亲

    讲述的是一对废材师妹与禽兽师兄的打怪日常。
  • 周穆王

    周穆王

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 我的御姐杀手老婆

    我的御姐杀手老婆

    【聚焦巅峰,免费新书】你觉得我帅吗?如果帅,请用八百字形容!什么?不帅?那请你用一万字形容我为什么不帅?他是纨绔二代,是混世魔王。但同时,他是魂组特工,是名震国际的——绝望之杀!……本书为《我的绝美御姐老婆》前传!
  • 绣像红灯记

    绣像红灯记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 好汉失联

    好汉失联

    为什么别人穿越秒天秒地秒空气,到了我嫖汉三这...,被系统欺负x1...任务即将完成...,系统修改任务x2...连特么猪都欺负我!!!啊啊~感觉好没尊严的说...
  • 评论与反思:发现保险法的精神

    评论与反思:发现保险法的精神

    20世纪90年代以来,保险法为规范中国保险业作出了突出贡献。由于理论研究的薄弱、实践中的保险法存在诸多瑕疵、评论现实中发生的疑难判例、反思中国保险法律制度的不足,发现保险法律制度的规律和精神,我们愿成为保险法研究的铺路石!
  • 留守在北大荒的知青

    留守在北大荒的知青

    “北大荒”,这是一个令无数知青心动的名字。从1968年到1976年,54万来自大城市的知青奔赴黑龙江,踏进衰草寒烟的北大荒。1976年大批知青返城时,一部分知青却留了下来。40年过去,昔日的姑娘小伙如今已是白发老人,人生最美好的年华都奉献给了这片原本陌生的土地。从黑龙江畔到红兴隆垦区,到处都留下他们的足迹。在哑丈夫与哈尔滨之间如何选择?曾经许下的婚姻誓言在回城的诱惑下能否信守?让孩子呆在身边还是回城读书?被人指为“封锁毛泽东思想”的孙绩威为什么没有返城?还有“不要前程要爱情”的周军岳,勇挑重担抚养精神病人的康金环,不能床前尽孝只能面对母亲坟墓的张玉林……
  • 桂花树

    桂花树

    菜头全身冒冷汗,扶着墙慢慢往家走。他不敢用手摸令他痛得想死的踝关节,轻轻一按,痛会转移到更多的地方,痛得更彻底。这次是踝关节痛,上次是膝关节,再上次是腰,反正哪儿都有可能痛。老医生没有给菜头下诊断,但年轻的医生断言这是缺少运动所致,像运动员的运动过量一个道理,失去了平衡,令到身体某些组织日积月累地发生了病变。医生的话听上去有几分道理,他开的药也有几分作用,但像止痛药,吃的时候没事,不吃又觉得痛。菜头这狼狈样正好被下班回家的赵天虹看到。隔老远赵天虹就情绪高涨地喊,菜头,你又遭报应了哪。
  • 信赖·互惠·共生:东亚地区交流的历史与现实

    信赖·互惠·共生:东亚地区交流的历史与现实

    本书以东亚地区交流的历史变迁与发展状况为中心,分别从“19世纪中期以前的东亚地区交流”、“近代西洋殖民主义的冲击和东亚各国的关系变化”、“冷战与冷战后的东亚地区交流”三个专题,汇聚了历史学、政治学、经济学、国际关系学等专业的中日学者跨学科的讨论成果。