登陆注册
5370400000040

第40章 Preamble On The Peculiarities Of All Metaphysical

But I say, that the law of nature remains, whether the rational being is the cause of the effects in the sensuous world from reason, that is, through freedom, or whether it does not determine them on grounds of reason. For, if the former is the case, the action is performed according to maxims, the effect of which as appearance is always conformable to constant laws; if the latter is the case, and the action not performed on principles of reason, it is subjected to the empirical laws of the sensibility, and in both cases the effects are connected according to constant laws; more than this we do not require or know concerning natural necessity. But in the former case reason is the cause of these laws of nature, and therefore free; in the latter the effects follow according to mere natural laws of sensibility, because reason does not influence it; but reason itself is not determined on that account by the sensibility, and is therefore free in this case too. Freedom is therefore no hindrance to natural law in appearance, neither does this law abrogate the freedom of the practical use of reason, which is connected with things in themselves, as determining grounds. Thus practical freedom, viz., the freedom in which reason possesses causality according to objectively determining grounds, is rescued and yet natural necessity is not in the least curtailed with regard to the very same effects, as appearances. The same remarks will serve to explain what we had to say concerning transcendental freedom and its compatibility with natural necessity (in the same subject, but not taken in the same reference). For, as to this, every beginning of the action of a being from objective causes regarded as determining grounds, is always a first start, though the same action is in the series of appearances only a subordinate start, which must be preceded by a state of the cause, which determines it, and is itself determined in the same manner by another immediately preceding. Thus we are able, in rational beings, or in beings generally, so far as their causality is determined in them as things in themselves, to imagine a faculty of beginning from itself a series of states, without falling into contradiction with the laws of nature. For the relation of the action to objective grounds of reason is not a time-relation; in this case that which determines the causality does not precede in time the action, because such determining grounds represent not a reference to objects of sense, e.g., to causes in the appearances, but to determining causes, as things in themselves, which do not rank under conditions of time. And in this way the action, with regard to the causality of reason, can be considered as a first start in respect to the series of appearances, and yet also as a merely subordinate beginning. We may therefore without contradiction consider it in the former aspect as free, but in the latter (in so far as it is merely appearance) as subject to natural necessity. As to the fourth Antinomy, it is solved in the same way as the conflict of reason with itself in the third. For, provided the cause in the appearance is distinguished from the cause of the appearance (so far as it can be thought as a thing in itself), both propositions are perfectly reconcilable: the one, that there is nowhere in the sensuous world a cause (according to similar laws of causality), whose existence is absolutely necessary; the other, that this world is nevertheless connected with a Necessary Being as its cause (but of another kind and according to another law). The incompatibility of these propositions entirely rests upon the mistake of extending what is valid merely of appearances to things in themselves, and in general confusing both in one concept. Sect. 54. This then is the proposition and this the solution of the whole antinomy, in which reason finds itself involved in the application of its principles to the sensible world. The former alone (the mere proposition) would be a considerable service in the cause of our knowledge of human reason, even though the solution might fail to fully satisfy the reader, who has here to combat a natural illusion, which has been but recently exposed to him, and which he had hitherto always regarded as genuine. For one result at least is unavoidable. As it is quite impossible to prevent this conflict of reason with itself-so long as the objects of the sensible world are taken for things in themselves, and not for mere appearances, which they are in fact-the reader is thereby compelled to examine over again the deduction of all our a priori cognition and the proof which I have given of my deduction in order to come to a decision on the question. This is all I require at present; for when in this occupation he shall have thought himself deep enough into the nature of pure reason, those concepts by which alone the solution of the conflict of reason is possible, will become sufficiently familiar to him. Without this preparation I cannot expect an unreserved assent even from the most attentive reader. III. The Theological Idea. 34 Sect. 55. The third transcendental Idea, which affords matter for the most important, but, if pursued only speculatively, transcendent and thereby dialectical use of reason, is the ideal of pure reason. Reason in this case does not, as with the psychological and the cosmological Ideas, begin from experience, and err by exaggerating its grounds, in striving to attain, if possible, the absolute completeness of their series. It rather totally breaks with experience, and from mere concepts of what constitutes the absolute completeness of a thing in general, consequently by means of the idea of a most perfect primal Being, it proceeds to determine the possibility and therefore the actuality of all other things. And so the mere presupposition of a Being, who is conceived not in the series of experience, yet for the purposes of experience-for the sake of comprehending its connection, order, and unity -i.e., the idea [the notion of it], is more easily distinguished from the concept of the understanding here, than in the former cases. Hence we can easily expose the dialectical illusion which arises from our making the subjective conditions of our thinking objective conditions of objects themselves, and an hypothesis necessary for the satisfaction of our reason, a dogma. As the observations of the Critique on the pretensions of transcendental theology are intelligible, clear, and decisive, I have nothing more to add on the subject. General Remark on the Transcendental Ideas. Sect. 56. The objects, which are given us by experience, are in many respects incomprehensible, and many questions, to which the law of nature leads us, when carried beyond a certain point (though quite conformably to the laws of nature), admit of no answer; as for example the question: why substances attract one another? But if we entirely quit nature, or in pursuing its combinations, exceed all possible experience, and so enter the realm of mere ideas, we cannot then say that the object is incomprehensible, and that the nature of things proposes to us insoluble problems. For we are not then concerned with nature or in general with given objects, but with concepts, which have their origin merely in our reason, and with mere creations of thought; and all the problems that arise from our notions of them must be solved, because of course reason can and must give a full account of its own procedure. 35 As the psychological, cosmological, and theological Ideas are nothing but pure concepts of reason, which cannot be given in any experience, the questions which reason asks us about them are put to us not by the objects, but by mere maxims of our reason for the sake of its own satisfaction. They must all be capable of satisfactory answers, which is done by showing that they are principles which bring our use of the understanding into thorough agreement, completeness, and synthetical unity, and that they so far hold good of experience only, but of experience as a whole. Although an absolute whole of experience is impossible, the idea of a whole of cognition according to principles must impart to our knowledge a peculiar kind of unity, that of a system, without which it is nothing but piecework, and cannot be used for proving the existence of a highest purpose (which can only be the general system of all purposes), I do not here refer only to the practical, but also to the highest purpose of the speculative use of reason. The transcendental Ideas therefore express the peculiar application of reason as a principle of systematic unity in the use of the understanding.

同类推荐
  • 大方等大集经

    大方等大集经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 净土往生传

    净土往生传

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • A Passion in the Desert

    A Passion in the Desert

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 左文襄公奏牍

    左文襄公奏牍

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 小品方

    小品方

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 你想去的远方,现在就起航:励志系列(套装共9册)

    你想去的远方,现在就起航:励志系列(套装共9册)

    人生最大的敌人不是失败,而是甘于平淡、安于现状的心。时光不会辜负每一个努力的人,念念不忘,必有回响。将来的你,一定会感谢现在拼命的自己!你想去的远方,现在就起航;趁年轻,拼一拼;用最好的姿态,拥抱世界的精彩;向前走,不回头:去和这个功利的世界谈谈;人生不言败;活成自己喜欢的样子;愿所有的坚持终不被辜负;让你的努力,配得上你的梦想;世界不曾亏欠每一个努力的人。
  • 天倪阁词

    天倪阁词

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 中观学概论

    中观学概论

    《唯识学概论》内容简介:《中观学概论》和《唯识学概论》两书的作者弘学居士,本名李英武,重庆南岸人氏。外祖母、母亲都是虔诚的佛教徒。弘学是我汉藏教理院同班同学正果法师的忠实弟子。1993年他写了《佛学概论》,我专门为他写了序,并希望他能“写出中、高两级佛学院校学生阅读的佛学书籍,并作为各级佛学院校的教材或参考资料”。
  • 汉唐盛世的历史解读:汉唐盛世学术研讨会论文集(中国人民大学汉唐研究丛书)

    汉唐盛世的历史解读:汉唐盛世学术研讨会论文集(中国人民大学汉唐研究丛书)

    本书为中国人民大学历史学院暨汉唐史研究中心主办的汉唐盛世学术研讨会的论文结集。全书从中国古代历史演进的角度,全面探讨了汉唐时代历史的魅力、汉唐盛世的历史内涵,以及汉唐时期的社会、经济、政治、法律、制度、文化等方面的问题。其的最大特点是,打破朝代断限的研究传统,探索新的研究方式,在回归原典的同时,注重新史料的整理和解读。
  • 情深不负:腹黑总裁别太坏

    情深不负:腹黑总裁别太坏

    唐艺以为,嫁给宋昱杰就等于嫁给了爱情。结果,他却把她推进婚姻的地狱!怀孕一个月。他强行逼她打掉肚子里的孩子。“唐艺,你休想用你的肚子生下我的孩子!”“宋昱杰,我求你,放过我们的孩子,他是无辜的。”“不可能!在我这里,你只能得到一块牌坊,永远也别想用孩子来拴住我!”漆黑的夜里,她被冷酷无情的他甩在了地上,撞到了肚子,她那可怜的还没成型的孩子,就那么孤零零的流掉了……她的孩子因他而死,美好的爱情,最终变成了仇恨!原以为这个女人会一辈子屈服于他。终有一天,她提着离婚协议书,高傲的站在他的面前。“宋昱杰,我们离婚吧!我已经签好字了,该到你了。”
  • 顶级专宠:厉少,好好学习

    顶级专宠:厉少,好好学习

    初次见面,他鄙视她:“长得跟个矮冬瓜一样。”她:“……”再矮也有一米五八呢!从一开始的怼到后来的宠,他看她的眼神多了几分别样的情绪……“冬瓜,我喜欢你。”“好好学习。”“冬瓜,我们谈恋爱吧。”“好好学习!”“冬瓜,我要出国留学了!”“嗯……好好学习……”直到他离开,她仍然只说了句“好好学习”,可他走后,她发现她的心好像也被带走了……茫茫人海,曾经对她百般呵护的那个少年还会不会回来?
  • 萌宠异闻录

    萌宠异闻录

    【此坑暂弃,勿入】十七年前,刚满二十的天才少女凌颖已是研究生毕业,还是京都大学建校以来的最美校花。没人能想到的是,人们口中善良可爱的她,竟是一家狗肉店的幕后老板。机缘巧合下,凌颖得到了四只不同品种的狗,智商各占排行榜前四。让她感到惊讶的是,它们居然是同年同月同日生,还与自己是同一天生日。或许就是这个原因,她决定留下这四个毛孩子。凌颖为了它们,将狗肉店改成了川味火锅店,狗子们也帮她征服了心目中的“白马王子”。后来周公告诉她,她只能陪其中一只走到老,她不信。几年后,其中三条狗因各种原因去世,她终于信了,但她不后悔。她说:“那是它们以这种方式,让我给它们赎罪来了……”
  • 1分钟读懂顾客心理

    1分钟读懂顾客心理

    顾客的心理有多种,其中包括“求实惠”和“求便宜”的心理,对抱有这种心理的顾客,一般可以用价格和产品的质量来说服,重点指出自己产品的“物美价廉”,那么他们就很容易被打动。抓住顾客的“面子”心理,给顾客“面子”不要吝惜你的赞美之词,这点对任何顾客都适用。另外顾客的求“效率”心理,求“舒适”心理,求“安全”心理,求“方便”心理等,在读懂消费者心理的旅途中,本书将为您一一展现!让您1分钟之内读懂顾客心理,打开顾客的钱袋!
  • 格列佛游记

    格列佛游记

    本书游记是对十八世纪前半期英国社会毫不留情的全面批判;尤其是对统治者的腐败、无能、无聊、毒辣、荒淫、贪婪、傲慢等作了酣畅淋漓的揭露和无情的批判。这种批判的声音在慧驷国游记中甚至达到了尖锐和偏激的程度,斯威夫特将矛头直接指向罪孽深重、愚蠢肮脏、毫无理性的整个人类。由马匹组成的慧驷国是他理想中的乌托邦,格列佛遭到智慧而理性的慧驷的流放,满怀惆怅地回到生养他而又让他厌恶的故土,只好愤怒而又无可奈何地与一帮“野胡”共度余生。
  • 一曲尘世半生缘

    一曲尘世半生缘

    第一世,她是妖族大祭司,而他是以除妖为己任的道士,她为了他,甘愿付出生命。第二世,她是一国公主,而他是江湖游侠,他为了她,甘愿守着青灯古佛度过一生。然而这终究是幻梦一场。冥河彼岸,千年花开,千年花落。花叶永不相见。终究是有缘无分……冥冥之中,一只无形的手掌控着这一切,他们,又该何去何从……