"In the meantime,Montrose had been joined by the Irish under the command of Alexander Macdonald;these,on their march to join Montrose,had committed some excesses on lands belonging to Ardvoirlich,which lay in the line of their march from the west coast.Of this Ardvoirlich complained to Montrose,who,probably wishing as much as possible to conciliate his new allies,treated it in rather an evasive manner.Ardvoirlich,who was a man of violent passions,having failed to receive such satisfaction as he required,challenged Macdonald to single combat.Before they met,however,Montrose,on the information and by advice,as it is said,of Kilpont,laid them both under arrest.Montrose,seeing the evils of such a feud at such a critical time,effected a sort of reconciliation between them,and forced them to shake hands in his presence;when,it was said,that Ardvoirlich,who was a very powerful man,took such a hold of Macdonald's hand as to make the blood start from his fingers.Still,it would appear,Ardvoirlich was by no means reconciled.
"A few days after the battle of Tippermuir,when Montrose with his army was encamped at Collace,an entertainment was given by him to his officers,in honour of the victory he had obtained,and Kilpont and his comrade Ardvoirlich were of the party.After returning to their quarters,Ardvoirlich,who seemed still to brood over his quarrel with Macdonald,and being heated with drink,began to blame Lord Kilpont for the part he had taken in preventing his obtaining redress,and reflecting against Montrose for not allowing him what he considered proper reparation.
Kilpont of course defended the conduct of himself and his relative Montrose,till their argument came to high words;and finally,from the state they were both in,by an easy transition,to blows,when Ardvoirlich,with his dirk,struck Kilpont dead on the spot.He immediately fled,and under the cover of a thick mist escaped pursuit,leaving his eldest son Henry,who had been mortally wounded at Tippermuir,on his deathbed.
"His followers immediately withdrew from Montrose,and no course remained for him but to throw himself into the arms of the opposite faction,by whom he was well received.His name is frequently mentioned in Leslie's campaigns,and on more than one occasion he is mentioned as having afforded protection to several of his former friends through his interest with Leslie,when the King's cause became desperate.
"The foregoing account of this unfortunate transaction,I am well aware,differs materially from the account given by Wishart,who alleges that Stewart had laid a plot for the assassination of Montrose,and that he murdered Lord Kilpont in consequence of his refusal to participate in his design.Now,I may be allowed to remark,that besides Wishart having always been regarded as a partial historian,and very questionable authority on any subject connected with the motives or conduct of those who differed from him in opinion,that even had Stewart formed such a design,Kilpont,from his name and connexions,was likely to be the very last man of whom Stewart would choose to make a confidant and accomplice.On the other hand,the above account,though never,that I am aware,before hinted at,has been a constant tradition in the family;and,from the comparative recent date of the transaction,and the sources from which the tradition has been derived,I have no reason to doubt its perfect authenticity.It was most circumstantially detailed as above,given to my father,Mr.Stewart,now of Ardvoirlich,many years ago,by a man nearly connected with the family,who lived to the age of 100.This man was a great-grandson of James Stewart,by a natural son John,of whom many stories are still current in this country,under his appellation of JOHN DHU MHOR.This John was with his father at the time,and of course was a witness of the whole transaction;
he lived till a considerable time after the Revolution,and it was from him that my father's informant,who was a man before his grandfather,John dhu Mhor's death,received the information as above stated.
"I have many apologies to offer for trespassing so long on your patience;but I felt a natural desire,if possible,to correct what I conceive to be a groundless imputation on the memory of my ancestor,before it shall come to be considered as a matter of History.That he was a man of violent passions and singular temper,I do not pretend to deny,as many traditions still current in this country amply verify;but that he was capable of forming a design to assassinate Montrose,the whole tenor of his former conduct and principles contradict.That he was obliged to join the opposite party,was merely a matter of safety,while Kilpont had so many powerful friends and connexions able and ready to avenge his death.
"I have only to add,that you have my full permission to make what use of this communication you please,and either to reject it altogether,or allow it such credit as you think it deserves;
and I shall be ready at all times to furnish you with any further information on this subject which you may require,and which it may be in my power to afford.
"ARDVOIRLICH,15TH JANUARY,1830."
The publication of a statement so particular,and probably so correct,is a debt due to the memory of James Stewart;the victim,it would seem,of his own violent passions,but perhaps incapable of an act of premeditated treachery.
ABBOTSFORD,1ST AUGUST,1830.
