登陆注册
5388700000065

第65章

Shall we then (proceeded Socrates) write the letter R on this side, and on that side the letter W; and then anything that appears to us to be the product of righteousness we will place to the R account, and anything which appears to be the product of wrong-doing and iniquity to the account of W?

The letter R (to stand for Right, Righteous, Upright, Just). The letter W (to stand for Wrong, Unrighteous, Unjust).

By all means do so (he answered), if you think that it assists matters.

Accordingly Socrates drew the letters, as he had suggested, and continued.

Soc. Lying exists among men, does it not? Euth. Certainly.

To which side of the account then shall we place it? (he asked). Euth. Clearly on the side of wrong and injustice.

Soc. Deceit too is not uncommon? Euth. By no means.

Soc. To which side shall we place deceit? Euth. Deceit clearly on the side of wrong.

Soc. Well, and chicanery or mischief of any sort?

Reading {to kakourgein} (= furari, Sturz); al. {kleptein}, Stob. Euth. That too.

Soc. And the enslavement of free-born men?

Or, "the kidnapping of men into slavery." {to andrapodizesthai} = the reduction of a free-born man to a state of slavery. Slavery itself ({douleia}) being regarded as the normal condition of a certain portion of the human race and not in itself immoral.

Euth. That too.

Soc. And we cannot allow any of these to lie on the R side of the account, to the side of right and justice, can we, Euthydemus?

It would be monstrous (he replied).

Soc. Very good. But supposing a man to be elected general, and he succeeds in enslaving an unjust, wicked, and hostile state, are we to say that he is doing wrong?

Euth. By no means.

Soc. Shall we not admit that he is doing what is right? Euth. Certainly.

Soc. Again, suppose he deceives the foe while at war with them? Euth. That would be all fair and right also.

Soc. Or steals and pillages their property? would he not be doing what is right?

Euth. Certainly; when you began I thought you were limiting the question to the case of friends.

Soc. So then everything which we set down on the side of Wrong will now have to be placed to the credit of Right?

Euth. Apparently.

Soc. Very well then, let us so place them; and please, let us make a new definition--that while it is right to do such things to a foe, it is wrong to do them to a friend, but in dealing with the latter it behoves us to be as straightforward as possible.

Or, "an absolutely straightforward course is necessary." I quite assent (replied Euthydemus).

So far so good (remarked Socrates); but if a general, seeing his troopsdemoralised, were to invent a tale to the effect that reinforcements were coming, and by means of this false statement should revive the courage of his men, to which of the two accounts shall we place that act of fraud?

Cf. "Hell." IV. iii. 10; "Cyrop." I. vi. 31. On the side of right, to my notion (he replied).

Soc. Or again, if a man chanced to have a son ill and in need of medicine, which the child refused to take, and supposing the father by an act of deceit to administer it under the guise of something nice to eat, and by service of that lie to restore the boy to health, to which account shall we set down this fraud?

Euth. In my judgment it too should be placed to the same account.

Soc. Well, supposing you have a friend in deplorably low spirits, and you are afraid he will make away with himself--accordingly you rob him of his knife or other such instrument: to which side ought we to set the theft?

Euth. That too must surely be placed to the score of right behaviour.

Soc. I understand you to say that a straightforward course is not in every case to be pursued even in dealing with friends?

Heaven forbid! (the youth exclaimed). If you will allow me, I rescind my former statement.

See above, I. ii. 44 ({anatithemai}).

Soc. Allow you! Of course you may--anything rather than make a false entry on our lists. . . . But there is just another point we ought not to leave uninvestigated. Let us take the case of deceiving a friend to his detriment: which is the more wrongful--to do so voluntarily or unintentionally?

Euth. Really, Socrates, I have ceased to believe in my own answers, for all my former admissions and conceptions seem to me other than I first supposed them. Still, if I may hazard one more opinion, the intentional deceiver, I should say, is worse than the involuntary.

Or, "all my original positions seem to me now other than I first conceived them"; or, "everything I first asserted seems now to be twisted topsy-turvy."Soc. And is it your opinion that there is a lore and science of Right andJustice just as there is of letters and grammar?

{mathesis kai episteme tou dikaiou}--a doctrine and a knowledge of the Just.

Euth. That is my opinion.

Soc. And which should you say was more a man of letters--he who intentionally misspells or misreads, or he who does so unconsciously?

Or, "more grammatical"; "the better grammarian."Euth. He who does so intentionally, I should say, because he can spell or read correctly whenever he chooses.

Soc. Then the voluntary misspeller may be a lettered person, but the involuntary offender is an illiterate?

Or, "In fact, he who sins against the lore of grammer intentionally may be a good grammarian and a man of letters, buthe who does so involuntarily is illiterate and a bad grammarian?"Euth. True, he must be. I do not see how to escape from that conclusion.

Soc. And which of the two knows what is right--he who intentionally lies and deceives, or he who lies and deceives unconsciously?

Or, Soc. And does he who lies and deceives with intent know what is right rather than he who does either or both unconsciously?

Euth. Clearly he does.

Euth. The intentional and conscious liar clearly.

Soc. Well then, your statement is this: on the one hand, the man who has the knowledge of letters is more lettered than he who has no such knowledge?

Or, Soc. It is a fair inference, is it not, that he who has the{episteme} of grammar is more grammatical than he who has no such{episteme}?

Euth. Yes.

同类推荐
  • 社学要略

    社学要略

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • Gobseck

    Gobseck

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 佛说八正道经

    佛说八正道经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 明伦汇编人事典十四岁部

    明伦汇编人事典十四岁部

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 古书隐楼藏书

    古书隐楼藏书

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 激励孩子成长的108个好故事

    激励孩子成长的108个好故事

    经历欢笑,经历泪水,才真正是一个完整的成长,因为有我们身边讲不完的故事,也因为有我们所熟识的人的陪伴,我们的成长才会那么丰富多彩,才会令我们心动着去等待下一站将要带来的转变。成长中的经历,永远是一本写不完的书,它的主语应该是人间的情感和所觉察到的人生之味,即生活所带来的痛苦、忧愁、快乐、思索与感悟。人生拥有成长,拥有智慧和感悟的成长,也将看到梦想的光芒,即在成长中能够触动心弦的那一抹青涩而诱人的颜色。追寻梦想和理想的脚步,其实也是成长。
  • 首席撩妻好手段

    首席撩妻好手段

    多次的不期而遇,是缘分还是一场预谋。顾峻泽不知道,但是他知道他对楚绪颜一见钟情了,那个女人像毒药一样一步一步的吞噬着他的心。她冷漠,他无赖。她耐人寻味,他形影相吊。原来冷漠如斯的楚绪颜是可以和一个不绅士甚至可以说是无赖的花心大萝卜擦出爱的火花。但是直到鉴定报告摆在面前他才恍然大悟,所谓的真情不过是一场利用罢了。“滚!”顾峻泽说得冷漠无情。但是当他看见她倒在血泊里的那一刻他才明白,原来他根本不在乎她爱不爱他,只要她在他身边就好。世界上最远的距离真的是生与死。他再也来不及对她说一声,对不起。--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 四世三生几回欢

    四世三生几回欢

    诛仙台上销魂柱边,她受贬谪,抽去根骨,失仙散神,落凡成妖。他说:“你为何如此执迷不悟!”她不可置信:“你...你竟不信我...”五百年后,九难山下。一念之差间,他收转世重生的她做了徒儿。师姐排挤,师兄捉弄,满门上下避之不及。更有同门师妹栽赃陷害。她委曲求全,小心侍奉,为的不过是他能信她,能说一句:“妖儿,我信你。”可是到了最后,妖凰出阵,天下大劫。不是她,明明不是她。错了,都错了,他竟还是这句话:“你为何如此执迷不悟...”
  • 中老年女性科学养生滋补食谱

    中老年女性科学养生滋补食谱

    中华传统医学和饮食文化皆有“养生之道,莫先于食”、药食同源的说法,这是炎黄子孙五千年来的智慧结晶。在历代宫廷养生中,“食养”的地位,堪称重中之重。饮食养生在我国历史悠久,自古就有“药食同源”和“药补不如食补”的说法。今天,简便有效的饮食养生越来越受到人们的青睐。当今世界,随着人们生活节奏的加快,高强度、高效率的生活现状,使众多忙于工作、精神压力大的人们越来越吃不消,因而前所未有地重视起自身保健了。化学药物的毒副作用,使人们“重返大自然”的心理越来越强,在这一背景下药膳食疗这一独特的中华文化宝库的奇葩,越来越显示出她深厚的底蕴和夺目的光彩。
  • 叠殇传奇

    叠殇传奇

    身怀绝世武功“乾坤雨花掌”的叠云阁大护法武翌,为救疾苦百姓不惜对抗朝廷,无奈朝廷设计铲除叠云阁。武翌不听长老劝阻,深陷美人计陷阱,武功被全废,失去大护法神功佑护的叠云阁惨遭灭顶之灾。一直活在悔恨中的子雲,为救武翌委曲求全嫁给王子,求得王子秘密救出天牢中的武翌,并托贴身丫鬟丫兰带武翌隐姓埋名、终身不弃。逃难中遇神医武翌神功恢复,恶帮闯入藏身之地丫兰遇害,复仇之火彻底爆发。武翌祭出了“叠山地狱名单”复仇之路鸡犬不留,当曾经爱过、恨过、伤过他的子雲倒在他面前告诉他真相的时候,潜藏集聚在心底的怨意、怒气、爱恨和情仇彻底崩溃、爆发,随着一声撕心裂肺地长吼应声倒下,再也没能起来……
  • 穿越也是技术活儿

    穿越也是技术活儿

    祁落一觉醒来,穿去了自己的前世,成了朝霞郡主,因为一块饼子,认识了绝美的少将军。不过,说好的是前世,为啥什么记忆也没有?金手指呢?!但凡能在古代风生水起的技能为何她都不会?幸好她会享受生活,用艺术生的创意头脑让自己在古代生活的充满了创意。而对待旁人冷淡至极的反差萌少将军也栽到了她手里,本以为是轻松惬意的生活。可却有莫名的危机,在慢慢的逼近……………轻松诙谐穿越文,无误会,不虐心,作者明显不是亲妈!
  • 咏怀

    咏怀

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 重生田园地主婆

    重生田园地主婆

    遭遇车祸,重生在农家。为毛身染重病,奄奄一息?老天爷也太不给力了吧!重病也就罢了,一群极品爷奶叔婶和包子爹妈竟然要将自己扔进土窑自生自灭!锦曦表示鸭梨山大……作为一位光荣的穿越者,锦曦要自救,要用自己的双手改造包子爹娘,种出一个富贵荣华出来,做一个坐拥万顷良田,坐看闲庭落花的田园地主婆!
  • 骑士的荣耀征途

    骑士的荣耀征途

    一部较为考究的历史向奇幻小说,算是圆我的一个骑士梦吧,设定来源于ck2、天国拯救、骑砍等中世纪题材游戏以及我本人还算可以的历史、兵击等知识,同好的话不妨支持一下。另外本书比较慢热,也是为了多描写一下其他同类型书中较少出现的中世纪的日常。加官进爵会有的,板甲冲阵会有的,只要你耐心看下去,精彩的内容都会有的。
  • 林下灵修传

    林下灵修传

    本书是对理想形态的憧憬,是写意人生所经所历的抽象画。各种欢乐和痛苦,成功与磨难,使我们渐渐长大,渐渐成熟,渐渐改变着对生活的认识,不再那么棱角分明,不再那么飞扬跋扈……青春,有因缘际会的相遇,也有宿命所决的迷茫;有田间花下的浪漫,也有刀光剑影的悲壮;有侦观世事的深沉,也有对酒当歌的张狂。但是,青春,无悔。那么那么多的邂逅,那么那么多的冒险,也有那么那么多的生死离别。往往曲终人散,弦断音绝之时才算收场。但青春留下的痕迹随着时间飞扬,随着记忆飘舞,直向远方。是荡气回肠的故事,解意着那一颗懵懂、稚嫩、沸腾的心。