登陆注册
5406800000191

第191章 GLADSTONE ON CHURCH AND STATE(17)

But we must proceed in our examination of his theory.Having, as he conceives, proved that is the duty of every Government to profess some religion or other, right or wrong, and to establish that religion, he then comes to the question what religion a Government ought to prefer; and he decides this question in favour of the form of Christianity established in England.The Church of England is, according to him, the pure Catholic Church of Christ, which possesses the apostolical succession of ministers, and within whose pale is to be found that unity which is essential to truth.For her decisions he claims a degree of reverence far beyond what she has ever, in any of her formularies, claimed for herself; far beyond what the moderate school of Bossuet demands for the Pope; and scarcely short of what that school would ascribe to Pope and General Council together.To separate from her communion is schism.To reject her traditions or interpretations of Scripture is sinful presumption.

Mr.Gladstone pronounces the right of private judgment, as it is generally understood throughout Protestant Europe, to be a monstrous abuse.He declares himself favourable, indeed, to the exercise of private judgment, after a fashion of his own.We have, according to him, a right to judge all the doctrines of the Church of England to be sound, but not to judge any of them to be unsound.He has no objection, he assures us, to active inquiry into religious questions.On the contrary, he thinks such inquiry highly desirable, as long as it does not lead to diversity of opinion; which is much the same thing as if he were to recommend the use of fire that will not burn down houses, or of brandy that will not make men drunk.He conceives it to be perfectly possible for mankind to exercise their intellects vigorously and freely on theological subjects, and yet to come to exactly the same conclusions with each other and with the Church of England.And for this opinion he gives, as far as we have been able to discover, no reason whatever, except that everybody who vigorously and freely exercises his understanding on Euclid's Theorems assents to them."The activity of private judgment," he truly observes, "and the unity and strength of conviction in mathematics vary directly as each other." On this unquestionable fact he constructs a somewhat questionable argument.Everybody who freely inquires agrees, he says, with Euclid.But the Church is as much in the right as Euclid.Why, then, should not every free inquirer agree with the Church? We could put many similar questions.Either the affirmative or the negative of the proposition that King Charles wrote the Icon Basilike is as true as that two sides of a triangle are greater than the third side.

Why, then, do Dr.Wordsworth and Mr.Hallam agree in thinking two sides of a triangle greater than the third side, and yet differ about the genuineness of the Icon Basilike? The state of the exact sciences proves, says Mr.Gladstone, that, as respects religion, "the association of these two ideas, activity of inquiry, and variety of conclusion, is a fallacious one." We might just as well turn the argument the other way, and infer from the variety of religious opinions that there must necessarily be hostile mathematical sects, some affirming, and some denying, that the square of the hypothenuse is equal to the squares of the sides.But we do not think either the one analogy or the other of the smallest value.Our way of ascertaining the tendency of free inquiry is simply to open our eyes and look at the world in which we live; and there we see that free inquiry on mathematical subjects produces unity, and that free inquiry on moral subjects produces discrepancy.There would undoubtedly be less discrepancy if inquiries were more diligent and candid.But discrepancy there will be among the most diligent and candid, as long as the constitution of the human mind, and the nature of moral evidence, continue unchanged.That we have not freedom and unity together is a very sad thing; and so it is that we have not wings.But we are just as likely to see the one defect removed as the other.It is not only in religion that this discrepancy is found.It is the same with all matters which depend on moral evidence, with judicial questions, for example, and with political questions.All the judges will work a sum in the rule of three on the same principle, and bring out the same conclusion.But it does not follow that, however honest and laborious they may be, they will all be of one mind on the Douglas case.So it is vain to hope that there may be a free constitution under which every representative will be unanimously elected, and every law unanimously passed; and it would be ridiculous for a statesman to stand wondering and bemoaning himself because people who agree in thinking that two and two make four cannot agree about the new poor law, or the administration of Canada.

There are two intelligible and consistent courses which may be followed with respect to the exercise of private judgment; the course of the Romanist, who interdicts private judgment because of its inevitable inconveniences; and the course of the Protestant, who permits private judgment in spite of its inevitable inconveniences.Both are more reasonable than Mr.

Gladstone, who would have private judgment without its inevitable inconveniences.The Romanist produces repose by means of stupefaction.The Protestant encourages activity, though he knows that where there is much activity there will be some aberration.

Mr.Gladstone wishes for the unity of the fifteenth century with the active and searching spirit of the sixteenth.He might as well wish to be in two places at once.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 重生跌宕人生

    重生跌宕人生

    易欢自小缺一魂一魄,呆愣痴傻,每逢七月十五鬼门大开之时,便要入地府的奈何桥走上一糟,六岁之时,再一次魂魄离体,来到奈何桥旁,孟婆看她可怜,便将聚魂珠放入她识海之中,没想到她的一魂一魄早已经自行补齐其他两魂六魄,且被歹人所害,带着怨恨戾气正要转世轮回,途径奈何桥,却被聚魂珠吸引入女主体内,从此女主便拥有了双面人格…也开启了自己的跌宕人生!
  • 离星记

    离星记

    恒浩被同伴在背后暗算,但天赐良机,恒浩重生转世为陈家长子,就此还多了个傻白甜妹妹!实力强劲天赋惊人的他也成功的获得一群妹妹的芳心,但这完全不能阻挡他成为武界的“大哥大”!!
  • 弥见青山远

    弥见青山远

    因为一次举报事件,姐姐弥尔被继父孟元杀害,弥见从小背负沉重的枷锁,生活在仇恨与对姐姐的愧疚之中。为了让她忘记过去,母亲带着她搬离原来的小城,却在学校偶遇孟元的儿子孟青山,一个生长在黑暗中的孤冷少年。因为有一个犯罪的父亲,孟青山被寄养的外公家嫌弃,温暖的缺失让他亦正亦邪,弥见的出现更让他将一切的恨意都指向了她……然而,两人针锋相对中,当年的真相一步步揭开,感情也不受控制地悄然萌生,却永远得不到释怀……
  • 痛失

    痛失

    作品以一个乡土小县的权力争夺、人、事流变为结构故事的纽带,以人性的变异为叙事元点,来建构乡村权力场,编织一个宏大的政治权力寓言。作者凭勇气和正义感,写出了滋生腐败的政治、经济、文化土壤。这里的腐败分子不是道德有缺陷的人,也不是无能鼠辈。从任何意义上讲,他们都是精英。作品直击乡村官场的龌龊、用人机制的缺陷以及官本位主义的盛行。展示在你面前的是道德水准的“痛失”、“以民为本”的魂灵的“痛失”,以及良知的泯灭与救赎的无助,充满深沉的批判精神与悲剧意识。
  • 穿越之绝色雪后

    穿越之绝色雪后

    我,居然在试镜那天遭遇了两个劫财劫色的胆大匪徒。为了保住清白,情急之下,拿起一把水果刀狠狠的刺向了自己......可谁知道,这一刀竟然把自己给刺穿越了!天呐,这是怎么回事?谁能告诉我,我该怎么办?这一切的一切,究竟是天意如此,还是造化弄人?面对着一个个爱我、伤我的人,是留情此地,还是决然离去?情路漫漫,我又该何去何从......
  • 嫡女医妃:陛下莫弃疗

    嫡女医妃:陛下莫弃疗

    历史上最狗血的事情发生在了自己的身上,穿越!那也就算了,可是为毛是个妃子!“爱妃,可觉得哪里不舒服,朕再帮你揉揉?”腹黑帝王一双桃花眼正戏虐地看着她!偏爱受宠,成为宫里人的眼中钉,却不知,她最想就是拿着银针扎得他不赶上门!情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 一本书读懂德国史

    一本书读懂德国史

    统一与分裂,这个痛苦的命题对德国产生了怎样的影响?德国为何成为两次世界大战的策源地?二十一世纪的德国将何去何从?……波澜壮阔的历史场景几千年的历史风云。通过本书,你将会了解到:日耳曼人为什么如此好斗?“卡诺莎觐见”何以成为西方忍辱投降的代名词?德语的诞生与马丁·路德有怎样的关系?德国为何产生了如此多的哲学家?勃兰登堡门为何被称为德国的国门?“铁血宰相”俾斯麦有着怎样的人生经历?希特勒如何从艺术家变成战争狂人?……
  • 变身之女侠时代

    变身之女侠时代

    石青山穿越成了石青珊,不仅变为女子,更是成为了寡妇,武林第一的少侠丈夫才拜完堂就被武魔所杀。
  • 凤归江山暮

    凤归江山暮

    她,现代军人世家的千金,集各家所长,精兵法,擅谋略,长医毒,一次意外穿越到古代,以西楚公主的身份活下来,却失去了在现代的记忆。什么?满门被灭?流落敌国?失忆丧亲?遭受暗害?当心底的禁锢冲破阻碍,那个惊才绝艳的女子再次出现在人们的视野,彼时天下风云骤起,且看她如何皓腕平天下,素手定乾坤!
  • 凤凰玄女

    凤凰玄女

    “借来的,总是要还的。”那一战,注定了她和他的三世的情劫,那一战,注定了她和他们的宿怨。再相逢,一桩桩,一件件,爱、恨、情、仇的纠结。到底是一念执着,还是命运如此?