233.] Now we did not think that it was in human dullness to miss the meaning of the lines so completely.Sir William distributes twenty-three hours among various employments.One hour is thus left for devotion.The reader expects that the verse will end with "and one to heaven." The whole point of the lines consist in the unexpected substitution of "all" for "one." The conceit is wretched enough, but it is perfectly intelligible, and never, we will venture to say, perplexed man, woman, or child before.
Poor Tom Davies, after failing in business, tried to live by his pen.Johnson called him "an author generated by the corruption of a bookseller." This is a very obvious, and even a commonplace allusion to the famous dogma of the old physiologists.Dryden made a similar allusion to that dogma before Johnson was born.
Mr.Croker, however, is unable to understand what the doctor meant."The expression," he says, "seems not quite clear." And he proceeds to talk about the generation of insects, about bursting into gaudier life, and Heaven knows what.[Vol.iv.323.]
There is a still stranger instance of the editor's talent for finding out difficulty in what is perfectly plain."No man," said Johnson, "can now be made a bishop for his learning and piety.""From this too just observation," says Boswell, "there are some eminent exceptions." Mr.Croker is puzzled by Boswell's very natural and simple language."That a general observation should be pronounced too just, by the very person who admits that it is not universally just, is not a little odd." [2 iii.228.]
A very large proportion of the two thousand five hundred notes which the editor boasts of having added to those of Boswell and Malone consists of the flattest and poorest reflections, reflections such as the least intelligent reader is quite competent to make for himself, and such as no intelligent reader would think it worth while to utter aloud.They remind us of nothing so much as of those profound and interesting annotations which are pencilled by sempstresses and apothecaries' boys on the dog-eared margins of novels borrowed from circulating libraries;" How beautiful!" "Cursed prosy!" "I don't like Sir Reginald Malcolm at all." "I think Pelham is a sad dandy." Mr.Croker is perpetually stopping us in our progress through the most delightful narrative in the language, to observe that really Dr.
Johnson was very rude, that he talked more for victory than for truth, that his taste for port wine with capillaire in it was very odd, that Boswell was impertinent, that it was foolish in Mrs.Thrale to marry the music-master; and so forth.
We cannot speak more favourably of the manner in which the notes are written than of the matter of which they consist.We find in every page words used in wrong senses, and constructions which violate the plainest rules of grammar.We have the vulgarism of "mutual friend," for "common friend." We have "fallacy" used as synonymous with "falsehood." We have many such inextricable labyrinths of pronouns as that which follows: "Lord Erskine was fond of this anecdote; he told it to the editor the first time that he had the honour of being in his company." Lastly, we have a plentiful supply of sentences resembling those which we subjoin."Markland, who, with Jortin and Thirlby, Johnson calls three contemporaries of great eminence." [iv.377.] "Warburton himself did not feel, as Mr.Boswell was disposed to think he did, kindly or gratefully of Johnson." [iv.415.] "It was him that Horace Walpole called a man who never made a bad figure but as an author." [ii.461.] One or two of these solecisms should perhaps be attributed to the printer, who has certainly done his best to fill both the text and the notes with all sorts ofblunders.In truth, he and the editor have between them made the book so bad, that we do not well see how it could have been worse.
When we turn from the commentary of Mr.Croker to the work of our old friend Boswell, we find it not only worse printed than in any other edition with which we are acquainted, but mangled in the most wanton manner.Much that Boswell inserted in his narrative is, without the shadow of a reason, degraded to the appendix.The editor has also taken upon himself to alter or omit passages which he considers as indecorous.This prudery is quite unintelligible to us.There is nothing immoral in Boswell's book, nothing which tends to inflame the passions.He sometimes uses plain words.But if this be a taint which requires expurgation, it would be desirable to begin by expurgating the morning and evening lessons.The delicate office which Mr.Croker has undertaken he has performed in the most capricious manner.One strong, old-fashioned, English word, familiar to all who read their Bibles, is changed for a sober synonym in some passages, and suffered to stand unaltered in others.In one place a faint allusion made by Johnson to an indelicate subject, an allusion so faint that, till Mr.Croker's note pointed it out to us, we had never noticed it, and of which we are quite sure that the meaning would never be discovered by any of those for whose sake books are expurgated, is altogether omitted.In another place, a coarse and stupid jest of Dr.Taylor on the same subject, expressed in the broadest language, almost the only passage, as far as we remember, in all Boswell's book, which we should have been inclined to leave out, is suffered to remain.
We complain, however, much more of the additions than of the omissions.We have half of Mrs.Thrale's book, scraps of Mr.
